19 Feb 2021

Perseverance rover begins three-year mission on Mars

Bryan Dyne


NASA’s latest and most complex robotic explorer yet safely touched down on the surface of Mars in Jezero Crater on Thursday, 20:55 UTC (3:55 p.m. Eastern). Perseverance landed after a seven-month journey of 472 million kilometers from Earth to Mars. As its many instruments become active, it will undertake the most advanced astrobiological study ever conducted of the red planet.

Perseverance is a direct upgrade of its immediate predecessor, Curiosity. Much of the overall framework was built with excess hardware incorporated into a similar but more advanced and robust design. Alongside the seven primary instruments to study Mars, the rover brought along a small helicopter, which will attempt the first powered flight on another world, and will leave behind sealed samples of Martian rocks and soil as the first step for future attempts to return samples of Mars to Earth.

Artists’s conception of Perseverance collecting soil samples. (Credit: NASA)

The successful landing evoked widespread public enthusiasm. Hundreds of thousands watched the live feed of the NASA control center as the spacecraft approached Mars at more than 19,200 kilometers per hour and, seven minutes later, safely touched down on the surface. In those critical moments, the vessel slammed into Mars’ atmosphere, successfully deployed a supersonic parachute to slow down, mapped and calculated its exact landing point, activated its rocket pack, and safely lowered the rover from a hovering skycrane onto the rocky landscape of the fourth planet from the Sun.

Landing on Mars is made all the more difficult because the entire sequence must be automated, and, despite many recent successes, nothing can be taken for granted. At its current distance from Earth, radio signals take 22 minutes to go to Mars and back, meaning that the entire entry, descent and landing sequence, starting about an hour before touchdown, must be automated. To do this, Perseverance required about 500,000 lines of code to direct hundreds of precise maneuvers that had to be planned in advance, an effort by hundreds of scientists and engineers working on the project over several years.

Invaluable roles were also played by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) and MAVEN spacecraft, which acted as relays between the rover and Earth during the descent, as direct communication to Earth was blocked by Mars itself during the final parts of the landing. Telemetry was received by the Deep Space Network, which has powerful radar dishes in the United States, Spain and Australia.

All indications are that the entire sequence was executed flawlessly. Moments after it landed, the rover transmitted two images of the surface of Mars, the first of thousands to come. The scenes of jubilation at Mission Control echoed the celebrations around the globe at the start of a new stage of discovery on an alien world. At a cost of a mere $2.7 billion over seven years, less than what the Pentagon spends in ten days, the safe landing of the Perseverance rover is a rare and welcome moment of triumph for modern science and humanity as a whole amidst the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

Perseverance was launched on July 30, 2020, and is the third mission to reach Mars in the past nine days. It follows the Hope and Tianwen-1 orbiters, operated by the United Arab Emirates and China, respectively, which both successfully entered Martian orbit last week. All three missions took advantage of the “launch window” between Earth and Mars that occurs about every two years, which minimizes the time and rocket fuel needed to cross between the planets.

Like its predecessors—including Sojourner, Spirit, Opportunity and the still operational Curiosity—Perseverance was developed, built and landed on Mars to increase scientific knowledge about the planet itself, as well as the general evolution of all the bodies in the Solar System, including Earth. It is in particular designed to deepen the search for signs of any past life on or slightly below the Martian surface.

First two images from Perseverance from the surface of Mars, confirming the rover landed safely and is operational. (Credit: NASA)

In many ways, Perseverance’s mission can be summed up in a single question: Did life evolve on Mars?

Jezero Crater was selected as the rover’s landing site because satellite observations suggest that answers to that question are quite likely to be contained within the crater’s many interesting features. Imagery of the region from MRO reveals that the crater has both an inflow and an outflow channel, meaning that it was likely a lake in the distant past. It has a delta, which on Earth are places where microbial life thrives, and a very diverse mineral content.

The crater was actually one of the possible landing sites for Curiosity in 2012. It was rejected then because it was deemed too dangerous for a landing. Perseverance, however, was developed using the many lessons learned from the previous rover’s landing eight-and-a-half years ago, and came equipped with a powerful new mapping tool that was able to determine the rover’s location far more precisely even as it was attempting to land. In doing so, it was able to avoid hazards such as cliff faces, boulders and sand dunes to land in a very treacherous but scientifically interesting location on Mars.

There are additionally and, for the first time on a Mars probe, two microphones to record sounds. These were turned on before the spacecraft entered the atmosphere, and are expected to return audio of the entire landing sequence. It is expected that, combined with the images taken during landing, we will soon be able to watch a video of and listen to a Mars landing from the perspective of the rover itself.

In the coming days and weeks, the full instrument suite of Perseverance will come online, which was built and will be operated by thousands of people in the United States and around the world, including researchers in Norway, Spain and France. The many cameras and sensors will be used to study Martian geology, as well as the temperature, wind speed, pressure, humidity and aerosol content of Mars’ atmosphere. Others instruments will measure radiation at the planet’s surface and use ground-penetrating radar to potentially detect any underground sources of water.

Perseverance also has a two-meter long Mastcam-Z, similar to but larger than the Mastcam on Curiosity, which will be the main camera used to image the landscape of Mars, both to help guide the rover as it drives around and to share the vistas of Mars with humanity back on Earth.

The rover will also debut the Ingenuity helicopter in the coming weeks and months. The solar-powered drone is slated to undertake five short flights over the course of thirty days and act as a testbed to learn how hard it is to achieve flight in the Martian atmosphere. If all goes well, Ingenuity during that time will also act as a scout for Perseverance, taking aerial pictures to spot hazards hidden from the rover’s vantage point on the surface.

One of the more forward-thinking aspects of the mission is that Perseverance is equipped with ultra-clean sample containers, which it will use to store material from the surface and certain rocks it drills into to preserve for a future sample-return mission. The samples will be left at various places along its journey, and will hopefully be collected when sample-return missions begin their slated operations in the early 2030s. If successful, these will allow for a much more detailed analysis of the Martian surface using the much more powerful tools available on Earth.

Of course, especially when science is ultimately subservient to the profit motive, no such guarantees can truly be made. The successful landing of Perseverance is a testament to the power of science and international cooperation at a time when national borders are being ever more closed off, bigger and more destructive wars are being prepared, and during a deadly pandemic which has so far claimed more than 2.4 million lives worldwide. The same rational planning used to touch down a robot on the surface of Mars must be applied to society as a whole, and the ruthless domination by capitalism ended.

US life expectancy drops to lowest level since 2006

Kate Randall


Close to half a million Americans have died in the COVID-19 pandemic and the global death toll stands at nearly 2.5 million. The immense suffering continues unabated as cases climb, reaching more than 110 million worldwide and new and potentially more virulent mutations of the virus circulate.

The US population has had the greatest drop in life expectancy since the 1940s, according to a new study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), while another study has shown that a staggering 20 million years of human life have been lost to the pandemic.

Workers wearing personal protective equipment bury bodies in a trench on Hart Island, April 9, 2020 (Photo: AP Photo/John Minchillo)

These brutal realities are not simply the result of the lethal virus, but the consequence of a deliberate policy of capitalist governments the world over that have allowed the virus to spread and have even welcomed and promoted its deadly wrath. Those killed include both the young and old, and are disproportionately working class and poor.

If the health and progress of a society is judged by life expectancy, then the US is indeed in the throes of societal decay. The new study from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) shows that in the first half of 2020, life expectancy at birth for the total US population was 77.8 years, declining by an entire year from 78.8 years in 2019. This is the largest drop in life expectancy since World War II, when it fell by 3 years.

The NCHS cautions that, as dramatic as this drop is, its findings are provisional and based on death certificates that may later be revised up to six months after the end of the data year. The study also does not take into account deaths that occurred in the second half of 2020, when the pandemic took a firm hold in the US South and West.

US life expectancy at birth in the first half of 2020 for the total population stood at its lowest level since 2006 (77.8 years) and for males (75.1 years). For females, it was at the lowest level since 2007 (80.5 years). Life expectancy for the non-Hispanic black population in the first half of 2020 (72 years) was at its lowest level since 2001.

Undoubtedly contributing to the decline in US life expectancy are so-called deaths of despair, from overdoses, substance abuse-related health problems, and suicides. The CDC found that the twelve-month period ending last June saw a 20 percent jump and includes the highest number of fatal overdoses ever recorded in the US in a single year, 81,003.

These addiction-related fatalities must be seen as a subset of deaths related to the pandemic, which has isolated those in recovery as substance abuse has largely fallen off the radar. Addiction treatment programs have been cut at a time when they are needed more than ever, due to the isolation and financial insecurity fueled by the pandemic.

Another study, from Nature ’s “Scientific Reports,” analyzed data from more than 1.2 million people from 81 countries who have died from COVID-19 so far. The authors, from Pampeu Fabra University in Barcelona, Spain and the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock, Germany, calculated “years of life lost” (YLL), or the difference between a person’s age at death and his or her life expectancy, using data on life expectancy in these countries.

The authors’ research found that a staggering 20.5 million years of life have been lost to COVID-19 globally. As the deaths in the 81 countries number 1,279,866—and current official global deaths stand at nearly 2.5 million—the years of life lost are undoubtedly far higher.

This study contradicts the claims put forward by authorities that the pandemic is taking the lives of older individuals who, even without infection by the virus, would have had few life years remaining. Deaths of the elderly have been viewed by the ruling class, both before the pandemic and now, as something to be welcomed, as their continued life and medical care are a drain on the health care system at a time in their lives when they are no longer churning out profits for the financial oligarchy.

According to the “Scientific Reports” study, three-quarters of YLL result from deaths of those below age 75, and almost a third from deaths of those below age 55. In other words, while older people are suffering a disproportionate number of deaths, those below the age of 55 are being robbed of a large percentage of their adult years by the virus.

The study’s authors also acknowledge that their study does not take into account the burden of disability falling upon those who contract the virus and survive, but whose quality of life is impacted by a wide range of debilitating disabilities—both physical and mental—the wide-ranging extent of which is still being investigated.

Taken together, the “Scientific Reports” and NCHS studies reveal the extent of the suffering inflicted on the world’s population, both in deaths and years lost, by the policies of the world’s ruling elites in the pandemic. In the US, the policy of the Biden administration differs little in fundamentals from that of his predecessor Trump.

The response to the pandemic in the United States and countries throughout Europe has been dictated by the mantra of “herd immunity” and the slogan “the cure cannot be worse than the disease,” i.e., that saving human lives cannot get in the way of the accumulation of private profit.

The driving force for the reopening of schools is that they must be reopened so that parents can get back on the job in unsafe factories and workplaces where the virus will continue to spread and infect. But scientific study after study has proven that schools, which lack the most basic safety protections for students and teachers, are a key driver of spread.

In reality, herd immunity means herding students, teachers and other workers into unsafe factories where infections will fester and the death toll will mount in the interest of maintaining the profits of the financial aristocracy. According to this logic, human life must be subordinated at all costs to the wealth of the financial elite.

Earlier this month, the journal formerly known as the British Medical Journal (now the BMJ) published an editorial aptly accusing governments around the world of “social murder” in their response to the pandemic. The BMJ accurately characterized this as a deliberate effort to handicap governments’ responses to the pandemic by promoting the deadly “herd immunity” policy.

As the virus continued to spread and kill millions around the globe, those lockdowns that had been imposed were lifted and the population was encouraged to travel, go to restaurants and attend sporting events. In the US, this included earlier this month the super-spreader Super Bowl in Florida, a hotbed of the pandemic. This has now culminated in the US in the homicidal drive to reopen schools. The pro-capitalist trade unions have been the enforcers of this back-to-school, back-to-work campaign.

The working class must counter this capitalist program of misery and death with a socialist program that places the social interests of the vast majority of the population at its center, harnessing the advances of science and medicine for the good of humankind.

NATO summit stresses anti-China strategy as wars in Middle East, Afghanistan continue

Bill Van Auken


The two-day NATO defense ministers meeting that concluded Thursday was marked by the attempt of the Biden administration and its defense secretary, retired General Lloyd Austin, to adopt a new “tone and approach, a desire to work with our allies and partners,” as a senior Pentagon official put it.

Whatever the claims that “America is back” after the four years of Donald Trump, the US used the meeting, held via a secure videoconference because of the pandemic, to press for the same essential policies: continued imperialist operations in the Middle East and a strategic shift toward the preparations for “great power” confrontation with China and Russia.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg speaks during a media conference, after a meeting of NATO defense ministers in video format, at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Thursday, Feb. 18, 2021. (AP Photo/Virginia Mayo, Pool)

This was combined with a continuation of Washington’s insistence that the European powers devote a greater share of their budgets—two percent of GDP—to military spending, including buying American-made hardware, a demand that has remained consistent from Obama to Trump to Biden.

The most pressing immediate issue confronting NATO, a May 1 withdrawal deadline for 10,000 NATO and allied troops occupying Afghanistan, was left unresolved, waiting for a decision to be made in Washington.

The deadline is part of the peace agreement signed last year in Qatar between the US and the Taliban, which was supposed to trade the withdrawal of US and other foreign troops for the Taliban’s commitment to denying the use of Afghan soil to Al Qaeda or any other forces seeking to attack the US and its allies. In the year since the negotiation of the accord, not a single US soldier has been killed in the country.

Now, the Pentagon is claiming that the level of “violence” in the country makes it impossible to move forward. The US-backed security forces of the puppet regime in Kabul are facing a debacle, giving up bases and checkpoints to the Taliban, which is encircling major regional capitals. The insurgent movement’s traditional spring offensive is still to come.

While European forces account for the majority of the foreign troops still in Afghanistan—officially, the US has only 2,500 soldiers deployed in the country—the occupation is wholly dependent upon US airpower, supply lines and logistical support.

If Washington was moving toward a May 1 withdrawal, orders would already have been given to begin shutting down the extensive US military infrastructure that has been built up over the course of the two-decades-long war and shipping back the massive amount of military hardware sent into the impoverished country. There is every indication that the longest war in American history is to continue.

Meanwhile, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg announced a major escalation of the alliance’s military presence in Iraq, with the current contingent of 500 “trainers” being increased to 4,000. The US, whose own troop deployment is reported as numbering 2,500, threatened this week to carry out unspecified retaliation against a rocket attack on a US base in Erbil that killed a contractor and wounded several others, including an American soldier. The strike was claimed by a little-known group.

While NATO claims that the increase in its presence in Iraq is motivated by a concern over the resurgence of the ISIS Sunni Islamist militia, the main focus of US-led operations in the country, as throughout the region, is militarily countering the influence of Iran.

Even as it remains mired in the decades-old wars in the Middle East and Afghanistan, the Biden administration has ordered a Pentagon “global posture” review with the aim of re-directing US firepower against China and Russia. Biden has already put a hold on Trump’s order to withdraw US troops from Germany and sent B-1 bombers into Norway.

On the eve of the ministers conference, a top Pentagon official spelled out a belligerent US policy toward Russia, declaring it “a threat to all NATO allies, including the United States.” He charged Moscow with “using military force to achieve their goals,” a prerogative Washington regards exclusively as its own, and “undermining the rules-based international order” established by US imperialism.

NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg stated after the first day of the videoconference that he intended to recommend that the alliance’s “Strategic Concept” drafted in 2010 be reworked principally to confront Russia and China.

Arguing that the alliance’s security environment had “fundamentally changed,” Stoltenberg stated, “[F]or instance, in the current strategic concept we are not addressing the shifting balance of power and the security consequences of the rise of China. ... Back in 2010, we were working for establishing what we thought to be a strategic partnership with Russia. Since then we’ve seen Russia being responsible for aggressive actions against neighbors, the illegal annexation of Crimea, and the things have fundamentally changed.”

For his part, Defense Secretary Austin told the NATO ministers that he “welcomed recognition by NATO allies that China’s growing influence and international policies present challenges to trans-Atlantic security and looks forward to working together to address these challenges,” according to the Pentagon.

To this end, Washington and the US corporate media have mounted an unrelenting propaganda campaign to demonize China as responsible for everything from the coronavirus pandemic to “genocide” against its Muslim population. This campaign has as one of its critical aims diverting mounting popular anger over social inequality and the catastrophic handling of the pandemic outward toward a new enemy.

NATO’s unity based on such an agenda is hardly assured. Conflicts and strains within the nearly 75-year alliance were no doubt exacerbated by the crudely transactional character of Trump’s “America First” policy and the ex-president’s open contempt for NATO. However, they pre-date Trump, and their roots are far more profound. A change in “tone” will hardly serve to overcome them.

When the trans-Atlantic military alliance was forged in 1949, US imperialism exercised dominance over the capitalist world. The alliance was directed against the Soviet Union in the 40-year Cold War between the two nuclear-armed powers. To offset the decline of its global economic hegemony and in particular, since the dissolution of the USSR, US imperialism has increasingly resorted to the use of military force, leading to three decades of uninterrupted wars.

Western European powers, in particular Germany and France, have repeatedly expressed opposition to being turned into pawns in Washington’s conflicts with Beijing and Moscow. At the end of last year, the European Union concluded a major trade and investment pact with China over US objections, and last week it was revealed that China has overtaken the US as the EU’s leading trade partner.

Meanwhile, the German government has maintained its support for the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which is to deliver more Russian gas directly to Germany, circumventing Ukraine, despite US threats and sanctions.

The deepening of the world capitalist crisis, which has been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, is inflaming conflicts, not only between the US and Russia and China, but also within NATO, whose member states twice engaged in world wars against each other in the 20th century.

A report issued this month by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) entitled, “The United States, China, and Taiwan: A Strategy to Prevent War,” warns that Washington cannot count on the support of its erstwhile NATO allies in a war with China. “In matters ranging from technology issues to criticism of China’s handling of Hong Kong, U.S. allies have sometimes been hesitant to support Washington when American rhetoric and actions are deemed too provocative or come with high economic costs,” the CFR states. “France and Germany refused to support the United States in the 2003 Gulf conflict. In a U.S.-China war, even Japan might not join the battle, given its domestic politics and constitutional constraints, and the United States could well fight alone, shattering its alliance system.”

The report makes a chilling warning as to the consequence of such a conflict. “Millions of Americans could die in the first war in human history between two nuclear weapons states. A 2015 RAND Corporation study of the effects of U.S.-China combat determined that estimating military losses would be ‘exceedingly difficult.’ World War II, however, was the last time the United States lost a major warship, and one sunk vessel could turn into the deadliest U.S. military event since the Vietnam War.”

18 Feb 2021

Lawfare Threatens to Derail the Presidential Election in Ecuador

William Camacaro & Frederick B. Mills


On February 7, the progressive presidential candidate for the Union of Hope Alliance (UNES) party, Andrés Arauz, won first place in Ecuador’s presidential election; this is uncontested. Arauz garnered 32.71% of the vote; right-wing former banker Guillermo Lasso 19.74%; and the “Indigenous” candidate, Yaku Pérez  19.38%. Since Arauz’s margin of victory was less than the required 40% plus at least ten points more than the closest competitor, a runoff is scheduled for April 11th. With the UN calling for transparency and Pérez contesting the outcome, Ecuador’s National Electoral Council (CNE) has agreed to conduct a partial recount to verify the second place contender.

This election will have enormous consequences for Ecuador as well as the entire region. After four years of President Lenin Moreno’s neoliberal turn, which reversed the economic and social gains of former President Rafael Correa’s Citizens’ Revolution, the majority of Ecuadorians have opted for a change of course. An Arauz victory would once again prioritize social investment over IMF imposed austerity and resume Ecuador’s leadership in the movement towards regional integration. If the ultra right in Ecuador and Colombia have their way, however, Arauz will not make it to the run-off election.

Just a week prior to the first round, with Arauz ahead in most polls, Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno, who is a fierce opponent of the UNES candidate, met with the notoriously interventionist Secretary General of the OAS, Luis Almagro, in Washington. This meeting raised suspicions that efforts were underway to prevent a return of the Citizens’ Revolution in Ecuador.  On February 12th,  the Attorney General of Colombia, Francisco Barbosa arrived in Quito to meet with his Ecuadorian counterpart, Diana Salazar, armed with a dossier that allegedly shows the campaign of Arauz had received funding from the National Liberation Army (ELN) guerillas in Colombia. Although no independent corroboration of such charges have been presented to back these allegations, the echo chamber of right wing fake news is already urging election authorities in Ecuador to disqualify UNES in a bid to prevent Arauz from participating in the second round of the presidential election.

In his Facebook page, Arauz categorically denied this accusation: “I have no link with the ELN. This big lie has just one purpose, to prevent the Arauz-Rabascall ticket from participating in the second round.”

Prominent voices of the Americas have denounced these charges as fabrications designed to sabotage democratic procedures in Ecuador. Nobel Peace Prize Winner (1980), Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, tweeted: “They will not be able to fool the Ecuadorian people with judicial and media operations from the well known Lawfare manual. Democracy will prevail. Ecuador has suffered a great deal and needs a return to common sense. Our support for candidate Arauz.”

Former Colombian President Ernesto Samper, in response to an article published in the ultra-right wing Colombian magazine, Semana, alleging that Arauz had links to the ELN, wrote: “The people of Ecuador should be on the alert that the enemies of progressivism in our countries are intent on stopping by any means the transformations for which Latin America clamours.” In the face of criticism of the unsubstantiated charges made against Arauz in the article, the Director of Semana, Victoria Avila, remarked in an interview “I want to make it very clear. I do not want to say that this information is absolutely certain.”

The Puebla Group, which brings together several former presidents of the region, including the Brazilian Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva, issued a statement in which it “categorically rejects the attempt to link Andrés Arauz with the National Liberation Army.”

Former President of Bolivia, Evo Morales, who himself was forced into exile by an OAS backed coup in November 2019, tweets: “We sound an alert about a plan by the right and the US in Ecuador to try to prevent the triumph of Arauz in the second round, using the Attorney General of Colombia, right-wing parties and the OAS. We have the obligation to defend democracy and our regional integration. Be alert!”

The outcome of the presidential election in Ecuador will no doubt have a significant impact on the politics of the entire region. As Correa points out, these elections provide an opportunity “to recover UNASUR”. If elected, Arauz has promised to champion the revival of UNASUR and return this South American nation to ALBA. There is also a growing consensus in South America in support of these regional integration and cooperation mechanisms. With the election of the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS) candidate, Luis Arce, for President of Bolivia last October, an Arauz victory in Ecuador would fortify UNASUR at a most critical time. In the face of the ongoing COVID 19 pandemic, the benefits of multilateralism have become obvious in efforts throughout the Americas to obtain urgently needed medical supplies and vaccines from a variety of countries. Given the return of progressive governance in Argentina, Mexico, and Bolivia within the last three years, a victory in Ecuador could signal a new pink tide.

United Nations COP26 Youth4Climate Travel Bursary 2021

Application Deadline: 28th February 2021

About the Award: Young people from all over the world can now apply until the 28th of February to take part in the COP26 event dedicated to the young voices. You can find more information on how to apply on the dedicated website of the United Nations Secretary-General’s Envoy on Youth

In recent years, young people have been a strong voice in the battle for the fight against global warming and for environmental sustainability. In the context of the events leading to the COP26 in Glasgow (UK), the Italian government (who will bear the travel and stay costs) and the other partners – the UK government, the Office of the UN Secretary-General Envoy for Youth, YOUNGO – wanted to give young people prominence and visibility.

The invitation to participate is addressed at all the young leaders (aged 15 to 29) active in climate change and sustainable development. They will have the opportunity to be in Milan from September 28 to September 30 2021 and discuss with young colleagues from all over the world the policies and steps that will be necessary to ensure a sustainable future. On the last day, they will present a Final Declaration to the Ministers who will be in Milan for the UNFCCC PreCOP26 taking place in the following days.

Type: Conference

Eligibility: All the young leaders (aged 15 to 29) active in climate change and sustainable development.

Eligible Countries: Any

To be Taken at (Country): Italy, UK

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: The Italian government will bear the travel and stay costs

Duration of Award: Milan – 28-30 September 2021 – “Youth4Climate: Driving Ambition”

How to Apply: Application form:
https://un.submittable.com/submit/162028/youth4climate-driving-ambition

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Bayer Foundation Women Empowerment Award 2021

Application Deadline: 28th February 2021

About the Award: By supporting female entrepreneurs with groundbreaking ideas, Bayer Foundation specifically recognizes and celebrates their role as game changers driving sustainability and social impact through entrepreneurial innovation.

Type: Entrepreneurship

Eligibility:

  • Female entrepreneurs leading innovative social enterprises with a focus on Sub-Saharan
  • Africa Enterprises that already have their first customer and less than 1 million EUR revenue per year
  • Partners that can generate large scale social impact, sharing the vision: Health for all, Hunger for none.

Eligible Countries: Sub-saharan countries

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: Through the Women Empowerment Award, Bayer Foundation offers a partnership which goes far beyond a one-off cash prize. The award includes 25,000 EUR in cash plus an in-kind contribution that equals 25,000 EUR in the form of a 24-week growth accelerator. During this period, the winners will receive tailored support and training for scaling, including active investor feedback. In addition, they will be able to will tap into an extensive network of Bayer experts, who will offer coaching both in health and nutrition as well as sustainable agriculture related focus areas. Last but not least, all winners will become part of Bayer Foundation’s exceptional global alumni and partner network, which offers the opportunity to raise capital and exchange knowledge about experience gained.

How to Apply: Apply here

Key documents to be uploaded:

  1. A pitch deck including an executive summary describing your vision, your team structure, governance, business model and potential for scaling.
  2. A report of the main challenges you are trying to solve in the next 12 months.
  3. An overview of your organization’s finances in 2020

Visit Award Webpage for Details

DSI-NRF Master’s, Doctoral & Post-doctoral Fellowships 2021

Application Deadline: 26th February 2021

About the Award: Each year the DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development awards bursaries to high-performing Master’s and Doctoral students and Post-doctoral fellows who wish to do research that falls into one of the CoE’s four thematic or cross-cutting areas:

Type: Master’s, Doctoral & Post-doctoral

Eligibility:

  • That Master’s students must fulfil the requirements for their degree within two years and have at least one co-authored paper in a peer-reviewed journal accepted for publication;
  • That Doctoral students must fulfil the requirements for their degrees within three years and have at least two first-authored papers accepted for publication or published;
  • That Post-Doctoral Fellows must have at least two first- or co-authored papers accepted for publication, in press or published in each year of the three-year fellowship.

Eligible Countries: Any

To be Taken at (Country): South Africa

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value & Duration of Award:

  • Master’s students are funded for two years at R70 000 a year
  • Doctoral students are funded for three years at R100 000 a year
  • Post-Doctoral Fellows are funded for three years at R200 000 a year

How to Apply: Applications may be made by students directly or by supervisors on behalf of students. The grant and bursary rules can be found here.

Download the form HERE and submit with the required documentation to coe.human@wits.ac.za by no later than Friday 26 February 2021.

PLEASE USE THE EMAIL SUBJECT LINE: BURSARY APPLICATION 2022

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Women Techsters Fellowship Program 2021

Application Deadline: 27th February 2021

About the Award: The Women Techsters Initiative is set out to achieve the following:

  1. To empower African women to establish start-ups or technology-enabled businesses to build an entrepreneurial mindset in them.
  2. To support women to become digitally enabled, social champions, and owners of businesses
  3. To bridge the digital divide between men and women in the technology space while contributing to economic growth
  4. To ultimately improve the socio-economy of the African continent by providing skills that will elevate women from poverty The Fellowship Program is an opportunity for women to upskill and build the capacity needed to access decent work opportunities.

Type: Training

Eligibility: This year, we will admit girls and women between the ages of 16 to 40 years into the fellowship program. Only women in Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, and Egypt should apply.

Eligible Countries: Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, and Egypt

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: The learning paths for this training are: 1. Software Development 2. Product Design (UI/UX) 3. Cybersecurity 4. Product Management 5. Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Engineering Fellows will be required to take part in the training to qualify for the internship.

Duration of Award: The Fellowship will commence on Monday, 8th March 2021 and will run for a year. The first 3 months will be for the technical training, followed by a 2-week soft skill training, and a six-month internship program.

How to Apply: Kindly proceed to fill the form if you can commit to the training schedule.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

KAS Media Africa Management Short Course Scholarship 2021

Application Deadline: 15th March 2021

About the Award: KAS Media Africa and Wits Journalism invite African journalists and editors with management ambitions to apply for a Media Management short course accredited by the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Type: Short Course

Eligibility:

  • Senior journalists working in newsrooms across sub-Saharan Africa who are interested in taking on management responsibilities.
  • They should have
  • 3-5 years of newsroom experience; and/or
  • A first degree in any field; and
  • Evidence of ability to manage the course, including writing skills; and

Selection Process: The selection process will seek to balance the class in terms of race, gender and country of origin.

Eligible Countries: African countries

To be Taken at (Country): Online

Value of Award: An allowance to cover data costs could be provided to ensure participants are able to participate virtually in all sessions.

How to Apply: To apply, complete the Wits short course application form and submit with your CV and a motivation of around 700 words, outlining your current situation, plans and how you hope to benefit from the course.

Send you applications to: researcherone.johannesburg@kas.de

Visit Award Webpage for Details

British Ecological Society (BES) Grants 2021

Application Deadline: 19th March 2021 at 17:00 (BST).

Offered Annually? Twice in a Year

Eligible Countries: African countries

About the Award: This grant provides support for ecologists in Africa to carry out innovative ecological research. We recognise that ecologists in Africa face unique challenges in carrying out research; our grant is designed support you to develop your skills, experience and knowledge base as well as making connections with ecologists in the developed world. We support excellent ecological science in Africa by funding services and equipment.

Type: Grants

Eligibility: Applicants should:

  • be a scientist and a citizen of a country in Africa or its associated islands, that is a ‘low-income economy’ or ‘lower-middle-income economy’ according to the World Bank categorisation
  • have at least an MSc or equivalent degree
  • be working for a university or research institution in Africa (including field centres, NGOs, museums etc.) that provides basic research facilities
  • carry out the research in a country in Africa or its associated islands

Selection Criteria: 

  • The application will be judged by a panel of reviewers on the basis of your personal qualifications, the scientific excellence, novelty and feasibility of the proposal, and the academic and non-academic impact of the planned research.
  • You should demonstrate that you have made connections with ecologists in a developed country that can provide advice during the proposed project. If international travel is part of the application, you should demonstrate close links with those they propose to visit.
  • Funding is available for any area of ecological science excluding research focused solely on agriculture, forestry and bioprospecting. Please note that neither purely descriptive work nor studies that might be considered incremental will be funded.
  • The proposed project could be part of an existing programme but the application should be for a clearly defined piece of research. Researchers must also show how their research will have a wider impact beyond academia.

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: 

  • The maximum value of a grant is £8,000 for research.
  • An additional sum up to £2,000 may be requested to fund travel to help you develop connections with other ecologists outside your usual peer group.
  • Travel funds are available to spend time working with ecologists in developed countries where facilities and experience will help you on return to your own institution.
  • Successful applicants also receive two years of free BES membership and free online access to our journals.

Duration/Timeline of Program: The proposed work must be completed within 18 months.

Apply Online

Visit the Program Webpage for Details

Important Notes: Applicants are only able to submit one grant application per round, across all grant schemes.

ICGEB Arturo Falaschi Fellowship 2021/2022

 Application Deadlines: 

  • Closing date for applications for PhDs: 31st March 2021
  • Closing dates for applications for Postdocs: 31st March and 30th September 2021

Eligible Countries: Developing Countries. See List below.

To be taken at: Trieste, New Delhi or Cape Town.

About the Award: Fellowships include participation in a competitive research programme, access to state-of-the-art facilities, participation in ICGEB Meetings, Seminars and Journal Clubs. A competitive stipend, travel provision plus full coverage of tuition fees and health insurance. Additional benefits for postdocs.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: 

  • Applicants must be nationals of an ICGEB Member State and may not apply for fellowships to be undertaken in their country of origin, unless they have been working abroad for, at least, the last 3 years and at the time of application.
  • Degree requirements: applicants should hold a recent PhD in Life Sciences or have at least 3 years research experience.
  • Preference is given to candidates below the age of 35.

Selection Criteria: The ICGEB Fellowships Selection Committee will evaluate complete and endorsed applications received by the closing date. The main criteria for selection include scientific excellence of the project, the qualities of the candidate’s CV and potential benefit for the home country.

Selection: All submitted applications will be transmitted to the respective ICGEB Liaison Officer in the country of which you are a national for endorsement. Endorsement is a fundamental requirement for the Fellowship to be awarded

Number of Awardees: Not specified

Value of Fellowship: The Fellowships consist of a very competitive package including stipend, health insurance and additional benefits. The most successful fellows will also be eligible, upon completion, to apply for ICGEB Early Career Research Grants to support their own research programmes as young PIs upon return to an ICGEB Member State.

Duration of Fellowship: 2 years with the possibility of a 1-year extension.

Eligible Countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ivory Coast, Croatia, Cuba, Ecuador, Egypt, Eritrea, FYR Macedonia, Hungary, India, Iran, Iraq, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Libya, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mexico, Montenegro, Morocco, Namibia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Venezuela and Vietnam

How to Apply: To apply,Applicants should contact the ICGEB Group Leader/PI of their choice with a motivation letter, to determine availability of laboratory space and to define the research project proposal that will form an integral part of the application.

Visit Fellowship Webpage for details

Important Notes: ICGEB makes no financial provision, nor can it provide administrative support for family members of participants in the programme.

Mass protests in Haiti against president’s authoritarian power grab

Richard Dufour


Tens of thousands of people protested Sunday in Port-au-Prince and other Haitian cities against President Jovenel Moïse, who has taken steps over the past two weeks to consolidate a presidential dictatorship. Protesters chanted “down with the dictatorship,” while the police responded with tear gas and rubber bullets.

A protester holds up a copy of the Haitian constitution during a protest to demand the resignation of Haiti's president Jovenel Moise in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, Wednesday, Feb. 10, 2021. ( AP Photo/Dieu Nalio Chery)

With the full backing of Washington and imperialist-led institutions like the United Nations and Organization of American States (OAS), Moïse is violating Haiti’s constitution by remaining in power after his five-year term expired on February 7.

He is preparing to hold a referendum in April to establish a more powerful presidency on the grounds the country is currently ungovernable. Proposed changes include: abolishing the post of a prime minister accountable to the legislature; replacing the current bicameral parliament with a unicameral one; and eliminating the prohibition in the constitution on a president serving two consecutive terms. This last measure was introduced as a democratic safeguard following the downfall of the Duvalier dictatorship.

Sunday’s protests denounced the United States and other foreign powers for backing Moïse. The protest’s route included stops in front of the OAS office in Pétion-Ville on the hills of Port-au-Prince and the United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti (also known by its French-language acronym BINUH) in nearby Juvenat.

Three journalists were injured in the clashes, and a protester was burned alive by suspected members of an armed gang believed to have ties to Moïse.

The president has allowed the police and armed gangs to go on a rampage against popular protests in recent weeks. Two local journalists, Alvarez Destiné and Meus Jeanril, were shot while covering protests on the Champ de Mars across from the grounds of the National Palace. Jeanril reportedly remains in critical condition.

The US-backed president has vastly expanded his authoritarian powers over the past year. In January 2020, he effectively dismissed the country’s parliament by allowing the terms of most deputies to expire without organizing constitutionally-mandated parliamentary elections. He has ruled by decree ever since and has dismissed all of the country’s elected mayors and imposed hand-picked replacements.

The absence of a legislature, which under the Haitian constitution is tasked with approving appointments to independent bodies and the police, enabled Moïse to fill these posts with close supporters.

He has also stacked the committee that is preparing his anti-democratic constitutional reform and the Election Commission with his own appointees.

Among Moïse’s most controversial initiatives is the creation of an intelligence service that reports directly to him. He has also broadened the definition of “terrorism” to include fires and roadblocks, which are common forms of popular protest.

In the latest round of attacks on his political opponents, Moïse ordered the arrest of 23 people, including a Supreme Court judge, whom he accused of plotting a coup because they opposed his unconstitutional actions.

In addition, he has ordered the removal of three Supreme Court justices named by the opposition as potential presidential candidates. According to article 177 of the constitution, Supreme Court justices are supposed to be irremovable.

Moïse has justified his authoritarian power grab with the specious claim that his presidential term only began on 7 February 2017, and that he therefore still has a year to serve. In reality, his term started one year earlier, when his predecessor and political mentor, Michel Martelly, stepped down and handed power to a provisional president in the aftermath of the 2015 elections, which were marred by fraud.

Both Martelly and Moïse are closely associated with the dominant faction of the Haitian ruling class that backed the Duvalier dictatorship, which savagely oppressed the Haitian people until it was brought down by a popular revolt in 1986.

Moïse has received backing from the military, which was only reconstituted by him in 2017 following its formal dissolution in 1995. In an interview with a local radio station, Jean Baptiste Joseph, a commander in the Haitian military, said he was “ready to do anything” to ensure Moïse remains in power.

Moïse’s power grab has been backed by the United States and other imperialist powers. Underscoring the utter hypocrisy of their claims to be defending democracy and the rule of law, it is worth recalling that when it came to Jean-Bertrand Aristide they argued the exact opposite. When Washington under Bill Clinton returned Aristide, who had been deposed in 1991 by a coup backed by Bush administration, to the presidency, it insisted that the three years Aristide had lived in exile be counted as part of his five-year presidential term.

Washington has no such qualms about Moïse. “He was sworn into office on February 7, 2017 for a five-year term, which is therefore scheduled to end on February 7, 2022,” State Department spokesman Ned Price said on February 5. “In accordance with the OAS position on the need to proceed with the democratic transfer of executive power, a new elected president should succeed President Moïse when his term ends on February 7, 2022.”

State Department spokesman Price disparaged the recent mass protests and implicitly endorsed the violent police response, commenting, “The remarkable lack of popular response to calls for mass protests in recent weeks indicates that Haitian people are tired of endless lockdowns [mass protests shutting down the capital] and squabbling over power.”

This blank cheque to Moïse and his corrupt allies issued by the Biden administration is entirely in keeping with US imperialism’s historic crimes against the Haitian people, which stretch back over a century. In addition to backing the vicious three-decade-long Duvalier dictatorship to the hilt, Washington and its allies, including Canada, have repeatedly sent troops to occupy Haiti and suppress the Haitian people, including on multiple occasions in the 35 years since the overthrow of Baby Doc Jean-Claude Duvalier.

The corrupt and widely-despised Moïse regime, which has faced repeated upsurges of mass protests since 2018, is capable of clinging to power only thanks to Washington’s continued unstinting support. Under the far-right President Trump, Washington backed Moïse during weeks-long protests involving tens of thousands during the fall of 2019, which were triggered by the worsening social situation and Moïse’s involvement in a massive corruption scandal that saw the siphoning off of some $4 billion in aid from Venezuela by his cronies in Haiti’s venal bourgeois elite.

The fact that the Biden administration has so decisively reaffirmed its backing for the regime, even as Moïse intensifies his authoritarian policies, makes a mockery of the Democrat’s claim that American foreign policy will be based on upholding “human rights” and “democracy” under his administration.

The alliance between US imperialism and a series of corrupt puppet governments in Port-au-Prince has presided over a further deterioration in the already catastrophic social situation in Haiti. The poorest country in the western hemisphere, Haiti has a per capita gross domestic product of just $797 and is ranked 169 out of 189 countries on the Human Development Index. The Moïse regime has overseen a worsening of this social crisis, with a sharp devaluation of the currency and rampant inflation putting basic necessities out of reach for large sections of the population. At the same time, it has guaranteed the profits of the major agribusiness, clothing, tourism, and mining interests that ruthlessly plunder the country.

These horrific social conditions have been compounded by the coronavirus pandemic. Although reported cases are relatively low compared to other countries, this is largely due to the absence of health care infrastructure to track the progress of the deadly virus. According to the World Bank, inflation is expected to surpass 20 percent and the fiscal deficit will double to over 6 percent of GDP compared to a pre-pandemic forecast of 3 percent.

The official bourgeois opposition to Moïse has nothing to offer Haiti’s impoverished masses. While criticizing the President’s increasing authoritarianism, opposition politicians have concentrated on issuing pathetic appeals to the imperialist powers to defend democracy in Haiti, i.e., the very same powers that have imposed desperate social conditions on the impoverished country for decades. As opposition leader André Michel commented, “Clearly, Jovenel Moïse has ceased to be the constitutional president of Haiti. It is up to the population to continue to mobilize, to induce them to step down from power ... We ask the international community to take into account the decision of the Haitian judiciary, which noted the end of the constitutional mandate of Jovenel Moïse. It must help Haiti to make the transition a success.”

President Macron rejects troop draw-down in French military intervention in the Sahel

Will Morrow


French President Emmanuel Macron spoke on Sunday via videoconference at a meeting of the Sahel G5, which includes the five countries in the region participating in the French and German-led military intervention: Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso and Tchad.

Macron used the speech to reject rumours of an imminent withdrawal or scaling down of the French military occupation of the Sahel. “Significant changes will no doubt be introduced to our military force in the Sahel at the appropriate time, but they will not happen immediately,” he said. “A French withdrawal, to massively reduce the number of men, which is an option I have studied, would be an error.”

French soldiers of the 126th Infantry Regiment and Malian soldiers, March 17, 2016. (Wikimedia Commons)

France invaded Mali in 2013 against separatist and Islamist forces that came from Libya after the 2011 NATO regime-change war in that country. There have been more than 4,100 French troops stationed there for almost eight years, increased to 5,100 troops by Macron one year ago.

The French army has waged the war under the cynical banner of the fight against terrorism and the defence of the local population. In reality, it is a brutal neo-colonial war aimed at subjugating the resource-rich and geo-strategically critical region.

The Sahel contains uranium deposits that supply France for its energy production, as well as the major French drone base in Niger. The region is situated in a geographically important area of western Africa, which contains not only the third largest gold deposits in the world, but where European imperialism is seeking to hold back the growing economic and diplomatic influence of China.

The war has been marked by a series of military setbacks for the French occupying forces in recent months, including the deaths of another two French soldiers on January 2 when their car was struck by an improvised explosive device.

Macron did not refer in his speech to the continuing reports of war crimes committed by the armies with which France is jointly operating and who were participating in Monday’s summit. The reports include evidence of acts of collective retribution against entire towns accused of harbouring sympathizers with Islamist groups, and of tacit backing for ethnic sectarian massacres against the predominately Muslim, Peuhl (or Fulani) communities.

On December 21 last year, AFP leaked selected portions of a United Nations report accusing the Malian army of committing war crimes. The report was transmitted by the Security Council but was immediately dropped and has not since been commented upon by the French government.

The document is almost 350 pages long. According to the AFP report, the authors claim to have “reasonable grounds to believe” that the Malian army “has committed war crimes.” It cites one incident in 2017, which occurred during a joint operation involving French and Malian army troops.

“On May 2 around 4pm, many people, principally Peuhl men,” were arrested, and were “violently beaten by Malian soldiers with batons, to force them to admit that they belonged to armed extremist groups, [the troops] threatening to kill them if they did not admit.” It claims that three men were killed on the scene.

However, this is only one of countless reports of war crimes by the occupation.

On November 1, Libération published a report based on witness testimony claiming that the Malian army massacred 24 people in a single village eight days earlier, in the town of Lièbè.

“Multiple witnesses accuse the army of responsibility in the massacre,” it states. “Between 15 and 20 vehicles of the Malian forces arrived in Lièbè in the mornings, [the witnesses] state. Soldiers rapidly opened fire. Six victims were tied up, their eyes blindfolded, before being shot, according to one survivor… The method indicates summary executions…” The witnesses state that the troops then set fire to houses and continued to shoot indiscriminately at the townspeople. Half of the victims were aged over 50, and three were aged over 70.

The attack is reported to have been retribution following a terrorist attack by Islamist forces one week earlier near Sokura, 50 kilometres away from Lièbè, which killed 10 civilians and 11 soldiers.

Last July, Human Rights Watch released its own report, based on interviews with 23 people from Djibo, a town in the north of Niger, 45 kilometres from the border with Mali. More than 180 graves were discovered in Djibo over several months last year, all believed to have been people killed by security forces between 2019 and 2020.

The occupying troops are also widely reported to be collaborating with local militia, in particular groups from the ethnic Dogon community. The local security forces are reported to have armed and backed the Dogon militia and turned a blind eye to sectarian massacres of ethnic Peuhl communities.

A series of increasingly horrific ethnic massacres have taken place in the past two years, including the killing of over 150 people by Dogon militia groups in the town of Ogossagou in 2019. For Paris, these attacks serve not only to intimidate and terrorise the local population, but to provide a human rights justification for the maintenance of a permanent occupation force.

Last August, the Malian government was overthrown in a military coup. The military government was immediately given the support of Paris and announced that it was calling on Malian troops to continue their support in the French-led international occupation of the country.