6 Mar 2021

Twenty-two million fall into poverty in Latin America during 2020, UN finds

Andrea Lobo


In its 2020 Social Panorama report issued Thursday, the UN Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) documents “unprecedented” social devastation during the COVID-19 pandemic, which set off the worst economic crisis in the region’s history.

After years with negligible economic growth since the end of the commodity boom in 2014, the region saw its GDP fall 7.7 percent last year. This is far worse than the 5 percent drop in 1930, at the height of the Great Depression, or the 4.9 percent drop in 1914 at the beginning of World War I.

A Tropical Medicine University virology lab researcher works to develop a test that will detect the P.1 variant of the new coronavirus, in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Thursday, March 4, 2021. (AP Photo/Andre Penner)

With 8.4 percent of the world’s population, the region accounts for 27.8 percent of the globe’s confirmed COVID-19 deaths. Brazil and Mexico have the second and third highest death tolls in the world, while Colombia, Argentina and Peru rank in the top 15.

The virus swept across societies shaped by imperialist oppression and the highest levels of social inequality—their health care systems overwhelmed even before the pandemic began. A majority of the region’s workers scrape by in the informal sector, while public treasuries have been depleted for decades by social spending cuts and payments to Wall Street vultures. With the spread of COVID-19, the transnational corporations inflexibly opposed any prolonged shutdown affecting their factories, plantations, banks and store chains.

The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reported in its last report, covering 2019, that 47.7 million people were going hungry across Latin America and the Caribbean, 9 million more than in 2015. It concluded that given the existing trend, this number would rise by another 20 million over the next decade. The agency warned, however, that the pandemic would cause the spike to go beyond their projections and called for “extraordinary measures” against an imminent social catastrophe.

Of course, no such measures were forthcoming. According to the ECLAC, 22 million fell below the official poverty line during 2020, reaching a total of 209 million, or more than one third of the region’s population. Seventy-eight million or 12.5 percent were categorized as living in extreme poverty, the highest number in two decades.

The poorer you were at the beginning of the year, the greater the drop in income. However, the entire working class and rural poor saw their incomes fall to desperate levels. The report found that the income for the poorest fifth fell on average 42 percent, while that of the top fifth fell 7 percent.

Eight out of every 10 Latin Americans fall into the category of what the ECLAC calls “economic vulnerability,” earning less than three times the minimum wage.

Unemployment rose to 10.7 percent from 8.1 percent. This doesn’t include the massive numbers of working-age people that stopped looking for jobs, which reached 10.3 percent of the work force in Argentina, 10.8 percent in Chile, 12.8 percent in Mexico and 26.7 percent in Peru.

While varying significantly between countries, the policies to reduce the social impact of the crisis were miserable across the region.

The ECLAC found that in 2020, social assistance in the form of cash transfers or staples benefited 326 million people or nearly half of the population. Between March and December, however, no government provided an average monthly transfer greater than the poverty line. Only in Brazil, Chile, Panama and the Dominican Republic did it exceed the extreme poverty line.

The inevitable conclusion is that the measures were designed to starve workers and their families into accepting the lifting of the limited lockdowns implemented in mid-2020 and a reckless return to work.

While the data it presents is a criminal indictment of the native ruling classes and imperialism, the ECLAC limits itself to moral appeals and a submission to the capitalist imperative of reopening businesses and schools.

ECLAC executive secretary Alicia Bárcena called on the region’s ruling elites to build a new welfare state based on “equality and sustainability,” starting with an emergency universal basic income. In the report’s presentation, a representative of UNICEF pointed to the huge disparities in access to online resources, but instead of demanding a massive investment in computers, internet access, training and hiring of teachers and specialists, he called for the reopening of schools.

What actually comes out of the report is the pressing need for a frontal assault on massive fortunes and brutal corporate exploitation across the region in order to contain the pandemic and meet basic needs.

This is clearly displayed in São Paulo, whose 33 dollar billionaires and 106,333 millionaires make it the most unequal metropolitan area in the region, and also the hardest-hit by COVID-19. At the same time, it has seen the eviction of thousands of families amid the raging pandemic. A woman unable to pay her $120 rent told AP after being threatened by police with eviction, “For the government, people like us are just dust.” Now, authorities and trade unions are proceeding with school re-openings so that students’ parents can generate profits at nonessential and unsafe workplaces.

Across Latin America and the Caribbean, according to the firm Wealth X, there were 8,260 individuals with more than $30 million in assets, with a combined wealth of $1.13 trillion. This enormous amount is likely an underestimation given the local elite’s growing use of tax havens. Over the last decade, for instance, Colombian investments in Switzerland rose 697 percent.

Today’s levels of inequality and the domination of economic life by Wall Street is the result of a protracted shift to the right of the entire Latin American bourgeoisie in response to globalization, the dissolution of the USSR and the deepening crisis of global capitalism. This process is mirrored in every part of the world.

This shift was reflected in the ECLAC itself, which kept its headquarters in Santiago, Chile after the 1973 US-backed coup, accommodating itself to the fascist-military Pinochet dictatorship even after the killing of four of its associates. After traditionally promoting state-led social reforms and import-substitution industrialization in backwards economies, the ECLAC chief at the time, Enrique Iglesias, applauded the “undeniable accomplishments” of Pinochet’s “shock-therapy” privatizations, claiming these supposed advances were consolidated by subsequent governments.

In the last two decades, the bourgeois-nationalist forces of the so-called “pink tide” led by Hugo Chávez in Venezuela implemented limited increases in social spending and partial nationalizations, only to re-adopt policies based on social austerity once commodity prices fell.

In recent years, millions across the region have taken to the streets and carried out mass strikes to overturn the staggering levels of social inequality.

Student-led demonstrations in Nicaragua, triggered by an IMF-dictated pension cut, were crushed by the police and paramilitary forces, which used live fire against mass marches and hunted down suspected leaders, killing at least 325, leaving thousands injured and displacing over 70,000. The widening uprising was channeled by peasant and student organizations tied to the US State Department, as well as the American Chamber of Commerce, behind an aborted National Dialogue with the Daniel Ortega government.

In Honduras, demonstrations by teachers, students and health care workers were brutally repressed, with four protesters shot dead and another 20 students shot by troops who invaded the National Autonomous University of Honduras (UNAH). Demonstrations were demobilized by “opposition” trade unions and politicians calling for a “national dialogue” overseen by “foreign mediators,” i.e., representatives of imperialism offering positions and buyouts.

October 2019 saw mass uprisings in Ecuador and Chile involving general strikes and marches with millions of people. The militaries were deployed in both countries leaving at least eight dead in Ecuador and 36 in Chile.

The trade union and indigenous organizations in Ecuador called off the protests after talks with the Lenín Moreno government. In Chile, a coalition involving the trade unions, the Broad Front and the Communist Party, backed by pseudo-left organizations, channeled discontent behind a referendum on re-drafting the Constitution in a process regulated by the far-right Sebastián Piñera administration.

Protests against the US-backed military overthrow of Bolivian president Evo Morales in November 2019 were crushed by security forces that left a death toll of 33 and involved the shooting at marchers from helicopters. With Morales, his party MAS and ostensible allies in the trade unions playing a leading role, demonstrations were channeled behind elections overseen by the fascistic coup regime.

In Colombia, a series of strikes and mass demonstrations began on November 21, 2019, against social inequality and austerity measures. Last September, protests were rekindled by a police killing. As the military and police massacred at least 17 demonstrators, the trade unions, working with the main opposition figure Gustavo Petro and the pseudo-left, channeled these demonstrations behind talks with the murderous Iván Duque administration, along with useless calls for the resignation of the defense minister, who has since died of COVID-19, and a superficial overhaul of the police.

In these recent experiences, workers and youth unwilling to accept further blows to their living standards and public services have taken to the streets outside of the control of the established institutions. So far, the ruling classes have relied on a carrot-and-stick strategy to bid its time: stints of murderous repression as preparations are made for dictatorship, combined with promises of democratic reform peddled by the official “left” and trade unions.

All the political forces and the trade unions that tirelessly work to subordinate the mass eruptions to bourgeois politics have paved the way to the murderous “herd-immunity” policies and the historic impoverishment over the last year, while laying the groundwork for the rise of a new wave of fascist-military dictatorships.

China’s National People’s Congress starts amid rising geo-political tensions

Peter Symonds


The annual week-long meeting of China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) began yesterday, overshadowed by a continuing rise of tensions with the US. Just weeks after his inauguration on January 20, President Joe Biden has already set out to escalate the confrontation with China that had its origins in the Obama administration’s “pivot to Asia,” of which Biden was a part, and was intensified under Trump.

The discussion at the NPC is shaped by fears in Beijing that Biden will continue Trump’s aggressive trade war measures, naval provocations in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait, close to the Chinese mainland, and a broader military build-up in the Indo-Pacific in preparation for war.

People walk past a video screen displaying an image of Chinese President Xi Jinping at an exhibition in Beijing, March 1, 2019 [Credit: AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein]

On the opening day of the Congress, Premier Li Keqiang delivered the government work report, focused on the economy in the context of the 14th five-year plan, which was also published on Friday. He foreshadowed an economic growth target of “above 6 percent,” indicating a substantial recovery from last year when the economy contracted by 6.8 percent in the first quarter before rebounding to grow at 2.3 percent for 2020 as a whole.

The target appears to be an underestimate, according to outside observers. In January, the International Monetary Fund forecast that China’s economy would grow by 8.1 percent in 2021.

The growth figures underscore the deep concern in Washington that China will eclipse the US—a situation that is intolerable for the American ruling elite, which will use all methods, including war, to prevent its global dominance being undermined. In his first foreign policy speech, Biden declared that he foresaw “extreme competition” with China.

The COVID-19 pandemic has accentuated the rivalry. Despite the weaknesses and bureaucratic character of its response to the coronavirus, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime did in large measure contain its spread and enable a revival of economic activity. The 2020 figure of 2.3 percent growth was the fastest of any major economy. By contrast, COVID-19 was allowed to run rampant in the US, resulting in more than half a million deaths and an economy that contracted.

Brookings Institution senior fellow Homi Kharas last year indicated that China would reach parity with the US economy by 2028 in absolute terms—two years earlier than he previously estimated. Analysts at the Japanese investment bank Nomura suggested that China would overtake the US as the world’s largest economy even earlier, by 2026.

Li boasted that China had recovered from an “extraordinary” year, saying: “Facing the adverse and severe impact of a sudden coronavirus epidemic and a deep global economic recession, we the Chinese people… responded with tremendous tenacity.”

However, the CCP leadership is acutely aware that it faces both the external threat posed by the US, and internal dangers, above all from the working class as a result of the acute social tensions fueled by deepening social inequality, rising unemployment and underemployment, and hostility to its oppressive police-state methods of rule.

In a speech to party officials last week, as reported in the New York Times, President Xi Jinping declared that China was entering a period of opportunity as “the East is rising and the West is declining.” But he warned that “the biggest source of chaos in the present-day world is the United States,” which was also “the biggest threat to our country’s development and security.”

The Beijing regime has no progressive answer to the US war drive. With the prospect of a compromise and eased tensions with Washington increasingly unlikely, the CCP is continuing to boost its military spending in a reckless arms race with the US that can only end in disaster. Li announced that military spending would increase by 6.8 percent for 2021, to 1.36 trillion Renminbi ($US210 billion), up from a rise of 6.6 percent last year, although still less than the 7.5 percent increase in 2019.

Xi in particular, and more generally the CCP, is heavily dependent on the Chinese military or People’s Liberation Army to prop up their rule. Generals and military officials, together with top representatives of the paramilitary People’s Army Police used for internal repression, make up around 400 of the more than 5,000 NPC delegates—one of the largest contingents at the congress.

Just as significant is the heavy emphasis being placed on research and development. Premier Li said the five-year plan aimed to increase R&D spending by at least 7 percent each year in an effort to establish “technological self-reliance” as a “strategic support for national development.” Key areas of research include next-generation artificial intelligence, semiconductors and quantum computing, as well as electric cars and green technology.

President Trump effectively forced China to boost its investment in research by imposing crippling sanctions on key Chinese corporations, including the hi-tech giant Huawei. More than 60 Chinese companies, notably leading computer chipmaker Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, were blacklisted during the final weeks of the Trump administration. The sanctions were aimed at cutting off access to high-tech components and technology, including much-needed advanced computing chips.

The Chinese government is making large investments in the military and research spending despite concerns over the impact of very high levels of debt for the stability of the financial system. Last year, the ratio of government debt to gross domestic product hit 270 percent, up from 246.5 percent in 2019, after Beijing boosted spending in a bid to maintain economic growth during the pandemic.

Last week the South China Morning Post noted that 15 of the NPC delegates owned or managed real estate companies with combined debt of 2.44 trillion yuan ($US375.5 billion). The wealthiest, Hui Ka-yan, is chairman of the Evergrande Group and China’s 14th richest person, with a fortune valued at $US28.5 billion. Their presence at the NPC makes clear whose interests the CCP represents—those of the ultra-wealthy oligarchs that have benefited from the four decades of capitalist restoration in China.

While the super-rich have grown even wealthier during the pandemic, the vast majority of the Chinese population has faced unemployment, financial stress and uncertainty. Xi last week again boasted that China had eradicated absolute poverty, describing it as “another miracle in the annals of history.” He will undoubtedly make much of the claim in the coming week, as he declares that China has met his target of becoming a “moderately prosperous country”—timed to coincide with this July’s 100th anniversary of the founding of the CCP.

The staggering growth of the Chinese economy over the past 40 years has undoubtedly lifted overall living standards—a fact that the CCP regime has relied on to limit opposition and dissent. But the elimination of absolute poverty—even if true—is based on an extremely low benchmark of just $620 a year. The continuing existence of serious financial hardship was indicated in May 2019 when Premier Li pointed out that 600 million people in China had to survive on a monthly income below 1,000 RMB [$US155], or about $5 a day.

Li’s comment points to the nervousness in Beijing about the acute social tensions, which have only been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In his work report, Li set a target of creating over 11 million new urban jobs this year, compared to a target of 9 million last year, and achieving an urban unemployment rate of 5.5 percent, compared to about 6 percent last year. These figures, which exclude the social problems confronting the rural population, are highly suspect.

For all of Xi’s boasting about creating a moderately prosperous country, the CCP regime is sitting on top of a social time bomb that its enormous police-state apparatus is incapable of containing.

British government intensifies assault on asylum seekers and migrants

Simon Whelan


The British Home Office is accelerating what is dubbed “Operation Oak”, the forced removal of asylum seekers from hotels into longer-term accommodation. A letter, seen by the Independent, from the Home Office to private accommodation companies indicates that more asylum seekers are to be moved from hotels into the contractors’ sub-standard accommodation.

Operation Oak, according to the newspaper, involves the “decanting” of asylum seekers from their temporary accommodation into longer term accommodation that will likely involve a general deterioration in their living standards. The choice of the term “decanting” is indicative of the disdain with which asylum seekers are treated. It recalls the thousands of elderly people who were callously “decanted” from hospitals, without being tested, to care homes to die early deaths from COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic.

Charities supporting asylum seekers have broadly welcomed the planned move away from hotels, raising concerns over poor conditions and treatment by staff in some. Chief executive at Refugee Action Stephen Hale said, “Getting people out of hotels is a welcome move. Long stays in these rooms have had a terrible impact on the wellbeing of many people in the asylum system.

“But”, he continued, “the Home Office can’t just shunt people from hotel to hovel. All too often we see dispersal accommodation that’s inappropriate, damp and dangerous. Ministers must act quickly and effectively to make sure people are housed in humane and habitable homes that are safe and close to support services and the wider community.”

Last month, the Guardian published photos of one such hovel in Derby which showed, “part of the kitchen ceiling missing, rubble in the base of a shower, cracked and missing tiles, rusted pipes and plaster missing from walls where wallpaper has peeled off. The garden is strewn with litter and discarded furniture.”

In July, a report by the National Audit Office found that the Home Office had failed to monitor the contractual requirements of the three companies awarded the new asylum accommodation contracts to ensure they were delivering an adequate service. The report found both the Home Office and the contractors severely wanting and concluded that vulnerable people’s needs were not being met.

In removing asylum seekers from hotel accommodation, the government is adopting the policies of the right-wing and fascistic forces. The right-wing xenophobe Nigel Farage, one of the chief architects of Brexit, has been campaigning for the removal of asylum seekers from supposedly “luxurious” hotel accommodation. His on-location rants about asylum seekers being housed in hotels “at English tax-payers expense” were acted on by the fascist Britain First group who then rampaged through hotels terrorising asylum seekers.

When the Independent asked the Home Office what sort of accommodation asylum seekers would be moved to and where this would be located, the government responded in the vaguest manner, saying only that it would move people out of hotels into properties where local authorities had supported procurement.

An incident on February 26 is indicative of the filthy campaign being whipped into a frenzy against asylum seekers. Approximately 30 asylum seekers were deliberately locked out of their accommodation at the Hoylake Hotel on the Wirral, Merseyside after the hotel fire alarm sounded and residents were told to evacuate the premises. Left outside in the cold on the pavement between approximately 4:30pm-9:30pm—with many dressed only in shorts, t-shirts and flip-flops—the asylum seekers were forced to seek shelter for several hours in the local Hoylake Methodist Church.

It emerged that because of a contract dispute between the Hoylake hotel and one of the accommodation contractors, Serco, the hotel sounded the fire alarm and locked the doors once the asylum seekers were outside. Only when the dispute was resolved were the asylum seekers, treated as collateral damage, allowed back in their accommodation.

The fire breaking out at the Napier barracks (credit: Care4Calais)

The kind of accommodation asylum seekers are to be moved into is typified by the Napier Barracks in Folkestone, a former military garrison. In January, a COVID-19 outbreak swept through the camp with at least 120 asylum seekers contracting the virus. Speaking to Sky News, one former Napier resident told a reporter, “When I first got there, it was like a prison. You could see all the fences and the security guards walking around.” He added, “It was really shocking for me. Twenty-eight people were in each block with just two toilets and two showers in a block. Everyone slept close to each other sharing the same air. There were no supplies to clean or take care of our health.”

Another resident at the camp during the COVID-19 outbreak said tensions began to build because of the lack of any proper social distancing, with many of those infected sharing the same space as others. “The security officers treated us very badly,” he said. “They didn't want to hear from us, and we weren't allowed to speak to anyone in authority. We were so shocked at the state of the barracks and it was this frustration that boiled over.”

On January 29, a fire broke out in the barracks, destroying a building and leaving the roughly 300 people housed there without electricity, heating or drinking water. Many of the asylum seekers suffering these conditions were sick with COVID-19, Only a limited number of those falling ill were transferred to hotels.

A High Court in February heard that the government was warned months before the outbreak at the barracks that Napier was "not suitable" for use during a pandemic. The concerns raised by Public Health England focused upon the inappropriateness of the dormitory accommodation which made social distancing impossible. The warning was revealed as six asylum seekers were granted permission to challenge the legality of the Home Office's decision, on the grounds that conditions at Napier breached human rights.

As far back as seven years ago, the barracks was already judged not to “meet acceptable standards of accommodation”. However, ministers, including immigration compliance minister Chris Philp and Home Secretary Priti Patel, have insisted that the spartan dormitories are suitable for desperate and often traumatized asylum seekers.

Speaking to Sky News, Majid, who was among those at Napier barracks to contract the deadly disease, said there was very little medical assistance or any general support. Some traumatised residents, many who had made a perilous journey to the UK, were pushed over the edge. "I saw several people attempt suicide and others were self-harming. They were desperate, afraid," said Majid, who added, "We've been treated like criminals and we don't know what we've done to deserve that."

On March 1, Patel intensified the government’s assault on the rights of migrants and asylum seekers by announcing plans to jail for life those deemed “people smugglers”. This would increase the sentence dramatically from the present maximum of 14 years in prison. Prime Minister Boris Johnson backed up Patel, saying the government would “absolutely, ruthlessly stiffen the sentences…”

Since August 2020, at least 17 migrants who steered dinghies across the English Channel have been sentenced to terms behind bars ranging from 16 months to at least three years. They will be deported under draconian anti-immigration laws once their sentences are served. This legal outrage breaches the United Nations Refugee Agency definition of smugglers as facilitating journeys for “a financial or other material benefit”.

The director for Detention Action Bella Sankey commented, “Priti Patel has been encouraging the prosecution of those who seek asylum themselves, simply for steering their boat to safety, and now she wants to leave those same people at risk of a lifetime in British prison”.

The criminalization and sadistic persecution experienced by asylum seekers are a product of the government’s long-standing policy to enforce an “hostile atmosphere” for migrants. In the UK, as in every country, immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers are being used as scapegoats to shift the blame for the social ills of the failing capitalist system and test cases for the destruction of democratic rights.

Workers in Britain must come to the defense of all migrants and asylum seekers. The only way to end the wars, environmental destruction and economic ruin that threaten entire populations and force millions from their homes is though the struggle for socialism, encompassing all sections of the international working class.

Political turmoil in Nepal intensifies as Supreme Court orders reinstatement of parliament

Rohantha De Silva


In a political setback for Prime Minister K. P. Sharma Oli, the Nepali Supreme Court ruled on February 23 that his dissolution of parliament’s lower house was unconstitutional and ordered it to be reconvened within 13 days.

K. P. Sharma Oli [Source: Wikipedia]

Responding to months-long fighting inside the ruling Stalinist Nepal Communist Party (NCP), Oli prorogued parliament to avoid a no-confidence motion and then on December 20 dissolved it.

Nepal President Bidya Devi Bandari sanctioned Oli’s decision to dissolve the parliament two years prematurely and declared there would be national elections on April 30 and May 10.

Factional conflict erupted between NCP co-chairs, Pushpa Kamal Dahal and Oli, over who would be prime minister. Dahal insisted that he should have been appointed prime minister mid-last year, in line with the merger agreement between his Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist Centre and the Oli-led Nepal United Marxist-Leninist in 2017.

A total of 12 petitions, including from various “civil rights” groups and the Dahal faction of the party, were presented to the Supreme Court (SC) challenging Oli’s decision to terminate parliament.

The five judges, headed by Chief Justice Cholendra Shumsher Rana and sitting as a constitutional bench, unanimously ruled that dissolution of parliament was unconstitutional. They rejected Oli’s claim that he had closed parliament because he lacked a majority, saying he could have formed a government and pursued other avenues without “putting a monetary burden on the people.”

Notwithstanding its legal reasoning, the Supreme Court verdict indicates that a considerable section of the ruling elite is hostile to Oli’s actions and concerned by the growing discontent against his corrupt and increasingly autocratic rule.

Prior to the Court ruling, four former chief justices—Min Bahadur Rayamajhi, Kalyan Shrestha and Sushila Karki, Anup Raj Sharma—issued a public statement declaring Oli had violated the constitution.

A day before the official judgement, Nepal’s Chief of Army Staff General Purna Chandra Thapa met with Chief Justice Rana. While the meeting was said to be about another issue, the timing of the meeting makes clear the dissolution was discussed.

There was also a show of force by the military, which publicly paraded its forces on February 1. The army, which was a central pillar of the previous rule by the Nepali monarchy, may be making its own calculations about how to resolve the deep-going political crisis gripping the administration.

Despite media speculation that Oli would resign “on moral grounds” after the Supreme Court judgment, he has clung to his post. All the parliamentary parties are now involved in backroom horse-trading to cobble together a majority and form government.

Nepal Congress (NC) leader Sher Bahadur Deuba is sounding out the possibility of becoming the next prime minister. NC General Secretary Shashank Koirala told journalists that the party should not hesitate to join hands with the Dahal-Madhav Kumar Nepal faction of the Nepal Communist Party “to oust Oli.”

While the Dahal-Nepal faction is calculating whether it can pass a no-confidence motion against Oli it needs support from other parties. To do so, however, it must name an alternative prime minister. Oli is now seeking an alliance with other parties and on Thursday lifted a ban on the activities of the Netra Bikram Chand-led Communist Party of Nepal.

Underlying the deep divisions in the ruling elite is the rising mass opposition of workers and the poor whose lives, jobs and social conditions have been devastated by the pandemic.

While the overall death toll of over 2,000 from coronavirus in Nepal is relatively low and the number of recorded infections is more than 200,000, these figures, according to experts, are the result of low testing levels.

From the outset, the Oli government has ignored the impact of COVID-19 on the Nepali population, with disastrous economic effects.

According to World Bank estimates, Nepal’s 2020 gross domestic product growth was only 0.2 percent, down from 7 percent in 2019. Job losses in tourism and the informal sector has produced soaring personal debts levels.

Oxfam’s 2019 annual report noted that more than 8.1 million of the country’s 26 million-strong population live in poverty. “Women and girls are more likely to be poor… More than one-third of Nepal’s children under five years are stunted, and 10 percent suffer wasting due to acute malnutrition,” it stated. The income of the richest 10 percent of Nepalis is more than three times that of the poorest 40 percent.

More than 500,000 persons enter the labour force annually but about 80 percent of those migrate due to a lack of job opportunities. Around 32 percent Nepali labourers work less than 40 hours per week for a meagre income.

Strikes and demonstrations erupted against Oli’s dissolution of parliament. While some were called by political parties, those participating did so not because they had any confidence in these organisations but to voice their anger against the entire ruling class.

Global geopolitical tensions and rivalry are major factors in the Nepal political crisis. The US and India are keen to extend their influence in Kathmandu and outmanoeuvre China. For its part, China is determined to maintain its presence in Nepal. India and China have both sent high-level delegations for discussions in Kathmandu.

On February 26, the Indian ambassador, Vinaya Mohan Kwatra, met with Congress President Deuba. It is no secret that New Delhi would welcome a Nepali Congress administration.

China, which has had close relations with the Oli administration, first tried to patch up the internal factional differences. Beijing, however, will not rule out new alliances if the Nepali Congress makes gains from the NCP split. Chinese ambassador Hou Yanqi has reportedly held discussions with the Congress leader.

A March 1 opinion piece in the Kathmandu Post about the battle for influence in Nepal by the US, India and China declared that, “the priority of the Western powers, including the US naturally coincides with that of India. But, for Nepal, this endless meddling by big powers will only further complicate the political process, rather than facilitate it to amicably settle down.”

Nepal has been drawn deeper into the geo-political maelstrom. At the same time, the ruling elite sits on a social powder keg because none of the capitalist parties, including the Stalinist-Maoist organisations, can address the social and democratic questions facing Nepal’s workers and the poor.

5 Mar 2021

RNTC Fully-funded Media & Journalism Scholarships 2022/2023

Application Deadline: 23rd March 2021 16:00 CET.

Eligibility Subject Areas: As of today you can apply with a scholarship for the following courses:

  • Investigative journalism
  • Media campaigns
  • Producing media to counter radicalisation
  • Using media for development

About Scholarship: The RNTC Netherlands training centre provides training for media professionals from all over the world: from journalists and programme-makers to social activists and communications professionals from non-governmental organisations. Whether you are a journalist, a blogger or a media manager, there are courses to fit your needs.

The most commonly used scholarship for RNTC courses are the NFP and MSP (MENA) scholarships. NFP stands for Netherlands Fellowship Programmes (NFP), MSP stands for MENA (Middle East and North Africa) Scholarship Programme.

Type: Short courses

Selection Criteria: The scholarships will be awarded on academic and professional merit.

Eligibility: RNTC Netherland Fellowships are available for professional journalists, programme-makers, broadcast trainers and managers coming from the countries listed below (a combined NFP list and low-middle-income countries according to the World Bank criteria).

Scholarship Benefits: An NFP or MSP scholarship will cover the full cost of your travel and visa (if required), accommodation and meals, insurance, and the course fee. The NFP and the MSP scholarship programmes are funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and administered by Nuffic, the Netherlands Organisation for International Cooperation in Higher Education.

Duration: scholarships are available for courses of two weeks or longer.

Eligible Countries: Afghanistan • Algeria • Bangladesh • Benin • Burkina Faso • Burundi • Colombia • Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) • Egypt • Ethiopia • Ghana • Guatemala • Guinea • Iran • Iraq • Jordan • Kenya • Lebanon • Liberia • Libya • Mali • Morocco • Mozambique • Myanmar • Niger • Nigeria • Palestinian Territories • Rwanda • Senegal • Sierra Leone • Somalia • South Africa • South Sudan • Sudan • Suriname • Syria* •Tanzania • Tunisia • Uganda • Vietnam • Yemen • Zambia

To be taken at (country): The Netherlands

How to Apply: If you want apply for a scholarship to cover the costs of the course, you need to apply to both RNTC (for your course application) and OKP (for a fellowship).

You can apply thrice a year during an ‘application window’ to see if you are eligible for a OKP or MSP scholarship. There are many more applications than there are scholarships available. Therefore, it is important that you meet all of the RNTC criteria (see individual course pages) as well as the Nuffic criteria, which you can find at the bottom of this page. If you meet all the RNTC ánd Nuffic criteria, and you would like to apply, then please follow all the steps in our How to apply page.

It is important to visit the Scholarship Webpage (see Link below) for more information on how to apply.

Visit the Scholarship Webpage for details


Scottish Documentary Institute: Connecting Stories 2021

Application Deadline: 22nd March 2021.

About the Award: Connecting Stories is a 9-month programme for documentary filmmakers developing their first or second feature film, from Africa, Asia and the Middle East.

It combines seminars exploring various aspects of the industry, including the development and the production of feature films, individual mentorship sessions, and masterclasses with international key players in the current documentary landscape.

Having delivered our Stories workshops over 10 years, working with over 170 participants, from 9 countries, we have developed Connecting Stories as an opportunity to help Stories alumni and others to take their documentary practice to a new level. In the process we will establish and host a peer-network of participants and our international speakers and mentors, bringing documentary filmmakers from across the world, with diverse experience, to share and learn from each other. 

Type: Short course

Eligibility:

  • We are looking for documentary filmmakers who have already directed one or two short films, which screened in festivals or had a broadcast on TV. Alumni of Stories workshops or other international labs are encouraged to apply. 
  • Applicants are expected to be in development, production or early post-production of their first or second feature length documentary, to have already engaged with their characters and to have some early footage showing their access to the story. Connecting Stories aims to support under-represented creative voices.
  • For further details of the eligibility criteria and programme structure, please see our guidelines. 

Eligible Countries: in Africa, Asia and the Middle East.

Number of Awards: 12

Value of Award: Up to 12 participants will be selected to take part in various online activities (group seminars, individual mentorship, industry events) designed to help them grow their knowledge of the industry, their confidence to navigate the international scene, to work with co-producers and to put together the right material to pitch their projects and apply for funding.

Duration of Award: 9 month

How to Apply: Apply here.

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Udacity Blacks In Technology 2021

Application Deadline: 13th April 2021

About the Award: Blacks In Technology and Udacity have teamed up to solve a critical problem: Black people are dramatically underrepresented in the tech industry, which comprises some of the highest growth, most in-demand careers. The statistics are sobering:

  • Black people make up only 3% of employees in the top 75 Silicon Valley tech companies, compared to 24% of the total workforce.
  • Black people hold less than 3% of cybersecurity jobs and are paid 33% less than White employees.
  • 20% of computer science graduates are Black and Latinx, but they only make up 6% of the tech industry overall.
  • The unemployment rate for Black individuals exceeds 10% and underemployment estimates exceed 30%.Blacks In Technology and Udacity have teamed up to solve a critical problem: Black people are dramatically underrepresented in the tech industry, which comprises some of the highest growth, most in-demand careers. The statistics are sobering:Black people make up only 3% of employees in the top 75 Silicon Valley tech companies, compared to 24% of the total workforce.
  • Black people hold less than 3% of cybersecurity jobs and are paid 33% less than White employees.
  • 20% of computer science graduates are Black and Latinx, but they only make up 6% of the tech industry overall.
  • The unemployment rate for Black individuals exceeds 10% and underemployment estimates exceed 30%.

 In the first cohort, we will be awarding 150 full Nanodegree scholarships to empower individuals to learn in-demand tech skills in Programming for Data Science with Python, Product Management or Cloud DevOps Engineering.

Scholarship recipients will complete a portfolio of real-world projects that demonstrate mastery of highly sought-after skills. Plus, they will have the opportunity to engage with Blacks In Technology’s network of Black tech professionals and participate in a vibrant Udacity student community.

Type: Training

Eligibility: Anyone 18 years of age and above is encouraged to apply. Scholarship recipients should be prepared to invest about 3-5 hours per week during the Challenge Course and about 5–10 hours per week during the Nanodegree programs.

Prerequisites

  • Programming for Data Science with Python: There are no prerequisites for this program, aside from basic computer skills. You should feel comfortable performing basic operations on your computer (e.g., opening files, folders, and applications, copying and pasting).
  • Product Manager: No prior experience with Product Management is required. You will need to be comfortable with basic computer skills, such as managing files, using third-party online programs, and navigating the Internet through an online browser. You will also need access to a video camera on a computer.
  • Cloud DevOps Engineer: In order to succeed in this program, you should have basic skills in any programming language. You should also feel comfortable with the command line and using Github.

Additional for Cloud DevOps Engineer:
In some programming language, you should feel comfortable doing the following:
Defining functions
Using loops and conditional statements
Working with various data structures

In the Command Line, you should feel comfortable:
Navigating through folders and files
Running scripts from the command line
Installing packages

In Github, you should feel comfortable:
Creating and cloning repositories
Making commits to a repository

Eligible Countries: Young, Black students of any nationality

To be Taken at (Country): Online

Number of Awards: 150

Value of Award: dacity and Blacks In Technology are committed to closing the divide between the numbers of tech jobs available and the number of Black people working in tech. That starts with ensuring a robust pipeline of trained, talented Black tech professionals. Together, we are offering:

  • 1,000+ Nanodegree program scholarships for Black individuals to build practical, in-demand, cutting-edge tech skills.
  • Exposure to the Blacks In Technology community and network of Black tech professionals.
  • Professional development and career resources support.
  • Subject matter experts and on-demand tutors.

Duration of Award: July 15th, 2021 – December 8th, 2021

How to Apply:

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Open Society University Network (OSUN) Research Fellowship 2021

Application Deadline: 19th March 2021

About the Award: OSUN is global in scope, with deep partnerships among diverse institutions committed to addressing global challenges collaboratively. The network seeks to integrate curricula and research across institutions in different countries. The Research Hub is a critical part of OSUN’s broader work in Eastern Africa, which includes undergraduate course offerings for displaced and host community learners as well as teacher training in these same contexts.

Eligible Field(s): Research proposals should focus on one of OSUN’s Academic Themes and should situate research in the region of Eastern Africa:
*Democratic Practice
*Sustainability
*Inequalities
*Human Rights
*Arts and Open Society
*Global Public Health

The Hubs are also very interested in research related to pedagogical developments in marginalized settings.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: We are prioritizing this fellowship for people from or working in Eastern Africa. Candidates should submit a resume showing their interests and experience in conducting research, two letters of reference, a writing sample of not more than 10 pages, and a one-page proposal for the research and writing they propose to complete by the end of the fellowship period. The work can include written, audio or video material. Final submissions will need to be in complete, edited, publishable form by January 2022.

Eligible Countries: Eastern Africa

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award:

  • Fellows will receive a stipend of US $700 each month over a ten-month period. During the fellowship, recipients will be guided by an OSUN faculty member or other specialist for regular readvising and editorial input.
  • In addition to completing a research / writing project, fellows will support the development of OSUN’s Eastern Africa Research Hub.
  • They will be required to participate in a monthly planning session with the Hub Leadership Team and affiliate faculty, as well as to present at least twice during the 10-month period to the OSUN Network.
  • The fellowship will conclude with a January 2022 reflection session as well as a final presentation on the completed and publishable work.

Duration of Award: 10 months

How to Apply: Please send application materials to granato@bard.edu.

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

FAO/Government of Switzerland International Innovation Award for Sustainable Food and Agriculture 2021

Application Deadline: 19th March 2021

About the Award: The Federal Government of Switzerland, with the technical support of FAO, established the International Innovation Award for Sustainable Food and Agriculture in 2019 and is pleased to announce the second edition.

The award is open to individuals, private companies or institutions and comprises two categories:

  • Category A awards excellence in digitization and innovation for sustainable food systems (USD 30 000)
  • Category B recognises an innovation that empowers youth in sustainable food systems (USD 30 000).

Agricultural innovation is the process whereby individuals or organizations bring new or existing products, processes or ways of organization into use for the first time in a specific context in order to increase effectiveness, competitiveness, resilience to shocks or environmental sustainability and thereby contribute to food security and nutrition, economic development or sustainable natural resource management.

In the spirit of the forthcoming Food Systems’ Summit in 2021 and aligned to the aspirations and goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the candidates should demonstrate the important role of their innovation in transforming food systems through sustainable food and agriculture and the improvement of food security and nutrition for all, particularly in the face of increased environmental challenges. In line with the requirements and technical competencies of the Federal Office of Agriculture of Switzerland, all innovations must apply to agriculture and pastoral systems only.

Type: Entrepreneurship

Eligibility:

  • Individuals, private companies and institutions responsible for an innovation that has demonstrated particular efficiency and used novel tools, products or services to enhance and promote sustainable food and agriculture. Both categories of the award consider innovations that have been successfully implemented and validated.
  • The Award is conferred for innovations implemented during the biennium preceding the current one. In line with the requirements and technical competencies of the Federal Office of Agriculture of Switzerland, all innovations must apply to agriculture and pastoral systems only.
  • Application forms that are incomplete, do not comply with the terms and conditions specified, or are submitted beyond the deadline, according to the instructions provided, will not be considered.
  • No applicants under the age of 18 will be considered for the Award.

Selection Criteria:

Award specific criteria:

  • Award for digitization and innovation for sustainable food systems (USD 30 000):
    • The innovation must impact more than one level of the supply chain from farmers to consumers.
    • The innovation must strengthen the link between farmers and consumers, e.g. through tracking sustainability features of traded food and agriculture products on labels.
  • Award for innovations that empower youth in sustainable food systems (USD 30 000):
    • − The innovation must strengthen the role of youth (under 35) in sustainable food systems.

General criteria:

  • Quality and merit of the innovation
  • Potential benefit, impact and sustainability
  • Scalability
  • Value for money

Eligible Countries: International

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award:

  • scroll describing the achievements of the recipient and/or an award;
  • a cash prize of USD 30 000 for excellence in digitization and innovation for sustainable food systems
  • a cash prize of USD 30 000 for an innovation that empowers youth in agriculture and food systems

How to Apply: Applications should be submitted using the attached application form by 19 March 2021 to the Secretariat of the Award at the following email address: Innovation-Award@fao.org for endorsement and submission to the screening committee

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

US Government TechWomen Program 2021

Application Deadline: 5th May 2021 09:00AM PDT (GMT-07:00)

Eligible Countries: Be citizens and permanent residents of Algeria, Cameroon, Egypt, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Palestinian Territories, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan or Zimbabwe at the time of application and while participating in the program.

To be taken at (country): USA

Eligible Field of Study: Any STEM fields

About the Award: From the moment the Emerging Leaders arrive, they are immersed in the innovative, constantly evolving culture of Silicon Valley and the San Francisco Bay Area. Emerging Leaders work closely with their Professional Mentors to design meaningful projects while exploring the San Francisco Bay Area with their Cultural Mentor and fellow program participants.

TechWomen Emerging Leaders will:

  • Challenge themselves with new questions and concepts
  • Collaborate with like-minded women in their fields on an innovative project
  • Network with influential industry leaders
  • Discover their own innovative leadership style
  • Create meaningful friendships with women from all over the world
  • Explore the diverse communities of the San Francisco Bay Area and Washington, D.C.
  • Inspire the next generation of women and girls in their home countries

Type: Training, Fellowship

Eligibility: Applicants must

  • Be women with, at minimum, two years full-time professional experience in the STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) fields. Please note that internships and other unpaid work experience does not count toward the two-year professional experience requirement.
  • Have, at minimum, a bachelor’s degree/four-year university degree or equivalent.
  • Be proficient in written and spoken English.
  • Be citizens and permanent residents of Algeria, Cameroon, Egypt, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Palestinian Territories, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan or Zimbabwe at the time of application and while participating in the program.
  • Be eligible to obtain a U.S. J-1 exchange visitor visa.
  • Not have applied for an immigrant visa to the United States (other than the Diversity Immigrant Visa, also known as the “visa lottery”) in the past five years.
  • Not hold U.S. citizenship or be a U.S. legal permanent resident.

Preference will be given to applicants who

  • Demonstrate themselves as emerging leaders in their chosen professional track through their work experience, volunteer experience, community activities and education.
  • Are committed to return to their home countries to share what they have learned and mentor women and girls.
  • Have limited or no prior experience in the United States.
  • Have a proven record of voluntary or public service in their communities.
  • Have a demonstrated track record of entrepreneurialism and commitment to innovation.
  • Demonstrate a willingness to participate in exchange programs, welcome opportunities for mentoring and new partnership development, and exhibit confidence and maturity.

TechWomen encourages people with diverse backgrounds and skills to apply, including individuals with disabilities.

Selection: TechWomen participants are selected based on the eligibility requirements above. Applications are reviewed by independent selection committees composed of industry leaders and regional experts. Semifinalists may be interviewed by United States Embassy personnel in their country of permanent residence.

Number of Awardees: 100 women

Value of Scholarship: International travel, housing, meals and incidentals, local transportation and transportation to official TechWomen events are covered by the TechWomen program. Participants are responsible for the cost of any non-program activities in which they wish to partake, such as independent sightseeing and non-program-related travel.

Duration of Scholarship: The 2020 TechWomen program will occur over five weeks from February 2022 – March 2022. Due to the fast-paced nature of the program, arrival and departure dates are not flexible.

How to Apply: CLICK HERE TO APPLY

  • Interested TechWomen participants should apply based on the application requirements in link below.

Visit Programme Webpage for details

Freedom of Thought and the Death of Ideology

Graham Peebles


Amidst widespread mistrust of authority and governing institutions (politicians, particularly governments, are the least trusted group in society)dogma, from whatever source, appears to be losing its suffocating hold on the minds of people everywhere. Disillusionment with ideologically based solutions is being strengthened by the consistent failure of existing methods to solve the problems of the times, which are many and considerable.

If global and national challenges are to be met fully and whole-heartedly, creative reimagining, free of doctrine, is required; independent thinking outside the ideological box. Decrepit systems must be reappraised, the good retained the rest rejected; values realigned, belief systems revised and expanded. Humanity has been wedded to ideologies of one kind of another for eons. Our devotion to them strengthens self-identity, albeit limited and false, and provides a degree of comfort and order in a chaotic world that has no easily discernible logic or purpose to itThis is particularly so in relation to organised religions with their defined order, fixed doctrine and mapped-out route to ‘God’.

Capitalism, democracy and Christianity (2.2 billion believers) are the most pervasive global ideologies, but there are a host of others. In the religious field there’s Islam, the fastest growing religion (1.8 billion); Hinduism (the world’s oldest, one billion), which is not really a religion but a collection of traditions and ancient philosophies; Buddhism, Jainism, Judaism and Sikhism, plus a bundle of sub-sects. Then there are the socio-economic/political structures: Socialism, Neo-liberalism, Communism, Fascism, and the many divisions; on and on it goes.

A veritable jumble of isms then, conditioning the minds of everyone, everywhere, enabling control, fueling social divisions, historic conflicts, sparking terrorism and wars too numerous to count. Ideologies consisting of systemized forms, inflexible rules and cherished beliefs administered by devotees, suited and enrobed intermediaries — between the ignorant masses and the state or the divine. Ordained or elected to perpetuate the system, devoutly deliver the doctrine, condition the unsuspecting from the pulpit, the election rally or news channel, and orchestrate the hollow rituals designed by their predecessors. Mass media and education, plus already infiltrated peers and parents are key feeding grounds for the perpetuation of ideologies

Love in Action

Alongside the calls for justice, a relentless rhythm of the times is the collective demand for freedom. It adorns the placards and lyrics of protest songs around the world. Various freedoms are contained within The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights (UNDHR): “Freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want, freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.” And crucially, “The right to freedom of thought” (Article 18). This ‘right’, which is the most important of them all, like numerous others contained within the aspirational articles of the UNDHR, does not exist anywhere in the world; it cannot exist within the boundaries of any ideology, and no society is free, not just from a specific ideology, but a potent cocktail of isms.

All belief systems inhibit and condition thinking, colour attitudes and impact behavior. Rigid adherence to isms of all kinds creates divisions, within the individual and by extension the society, and where division exists conflict and fear prosper. All of which runs contrary to the impulse and need of the time, for unity, collective action, cooperation and tolerance. It is these perennial ideals that need to be strengthened if we are to overcome the major issues facing us. All that separates and divides needs to be discarded.

Existing ideologies are in varying states of decay, with devotees of the doctrine lacking the freedom and imagination to allow the system (socio-economic, political or religious) to evolve. But as attitudes and values shift, and this is happening apace throughout the world, in order to be relevant and to adequately meet the demands of the time, evolve they must.

Unity is the key element in any such shift — the required guiding principle underlying the development of existing systems and modes of living. Systems and methodologies rooted not in ideology but in compassion and brotherhood, leading to love in action; systems designed to foster social justice, reduce inequality, dismantle divisions and build relationships.

Unity does not equate to mechanical conformity, that is what exists now; in a tolerant, non-judgmental space where the common good is the collective aim, different ideas can happily co-exist, each contributing to the enrichment and beautification of the whole. Oneness is the very nature of things, the essence of who we are; creating ways of living that are rooted in and encourage expressions of this inherent fact is essential if we are to face the challenges of the time, safeguard the environment and begin to build a just and free world.

Ideologies of all colours –– political, socio-economic, religious, — condition and inhibit.

Ideologies of all colours imprison and

Enslavement to ideology, in the form of a political/economic order or a religious doctrine

Isms of all shapes and colours have dogged

If ideologically rooted belief systems, including organised religion and socio-economic/political structures, are to adequately meet the demands of the day and serve the needs of the people they need to develop as the consciousness of humanity itself evolves.

Such a shift is underway among large numbers of people everywhere, is becoming increasingly clear; attitudes and values are moving, and behavior, which is the most stubborn link in the chain, is changing, and with momentum.

Corruption, inadequacies and failings of existing structures — social, economic, political, religious — and the governing institutions that administer the relevant doctrine are being exposed.

Bad Stimulus: the Problems with Biden’s COVID Relief Package

Albena Azmanova & Marshall Auerbach


The new Democratic administration is poised to make its first proud step in delivering on its electoral promise to build back (America) better: the successful adoption of a $1.9 trillion stimulus package, the main components of which are a third round of stimulus checks, a renewal of federal unemployment benefits, and a boost to the child tax credit, as well as funding for school reopenings and vaccinations. It will probably not include a federal minimum wage hike.

Biden’s stimulus is not the stuff of economic revolution—it’s a mix of common sense and keeping the lights on. And the fundamental thinking behind the stimulus approach reflects a continuation of neoliberal policies of the past 40 years; instead of advancing broader social programs that could uplift the population, the solutions are predicated on improving individual purchasing power and family circumstances. Such a vision of society as a collection of enterprising individuals is a hallmark of the neoliberal policy formula—which, as the stimulus bill is about to make clear, is still prevalent within the Democratic and the Republican parties. This attention to individual purchasing power promises to be the basis for bipartisan agreement over the next four years.

The reality is that social programs on health care and education, and a new era of labor and banking regulation, would put the wider society on sounder feet than a check for $1,400.

There are very few federally elected officials who behave as though they understand that economic insecurity can breed political instability and governing paralysis. Globalization, deindustrialization, the contraction of the public sector, and the rise of contract labor via the gig economy have made individuals feel insecure in their private circumstances. This has contributed to the appeal of populist politicians, whose tenures generally are corrosive to liberal democracies. Moreover, these tendencies have together undermined our social contract as a whole, depriving governments of the means and resources to tend to the public interest.

Missing from the frame of thinking that dominates the stimulus debate, therefore, is something essential—the commons, a robust public sector of goods (e.g., energy) and services (e.g., health care) that makes societies resilient to crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and weather-incurred power shortages. Ironically, it is this very deficiency—achieved through decades of cuts to public spending and privatization of public assets—that transformed the COVID-19 epidemic into a public health care disaster (and likewise turned Texas into the equivalent of a broken-down banana republic during the worst of its power grid shutdowns, brought about by decades of adherence to market fundamentalism in regard to public infrastructure goals).

These have been occurring against the backdrop of economic lockdowns that were implemented to prevent the spread of a pandemic and an even greater public health disaster. A veritable Sophie’s choice was imposed because of insufficient hospital capacity and a chronic deficiency of basic protective gear for medical personnel and medical equipment to care for the gravely ill—in other words, more market fundamentalism that eviscerated a robust public health infrastructure. Increasing the number of hospital beds is a worthy objective, but in many instances, this will simply restore cuts to previous programs that were attacked by a private health insurance/pharmaceutical industry complex that prioritized profits and returns on equity over public health considerations.

It is no replacement for the bold social experimentation that would truly address the flaw in capitalist democracies that have dominated the 21st century. If the Biden administration is serious in its ambition to build back better, it must adopt a broader proactive policy approach on these issues, rather than keeping American society on life support through a trickle of stimulus packages that tackle the symptoms, as opposed to the underlying disease.