14 May 2021

IBM Hyper Protect Accelerator 2021

Application Deadline: Not specified

About the Award: IBM Hyper Protect Accelerator is an investment-readiness and technical mentorship program, run in partnership with Village Capital and IBM. The program supports impact-focused startups leveraging highly sensitive data to improve the quality of, and access to digital, financial and healthcare services. The IBM Hyper Protect Accelerator has already supported 45 early-stage startups across the world and is now open to applications for Cohort 4. Check out Cohorts 2-3 hereNo equity will be taken in your company by IBM nor Village Capital as part of the program.

This year the program will expand to support more companies working on impactful datatech products. The 2021 program will consist of three components:

  • The IBM Hyper Protect Accelerator (15 companies): 2 years of technical mentorship from IBM (including up to $120,000 of free IBM cloud credits) & a 3 month intensive Village Capital Investment Readiness Accelerator with bespoke mentor and investor matching. 
  • Friends of Hyper Protect (40 companies): 2 years of quarterly technical mentorship from IBM (including up to $120,000 of free IBM cloud credits) & a 3-month Investment Readiness support fromVillage Capital focusing on milestone planning and investor matchmaking. 
  • The Datatech for Good Coalition: A coalition on Village Capital’s Abaca platform that matches datatech for good startups with like-minded investors and peers.

Read more about the different program components below, and watch this video about the program from IBM leadership.

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Every 39 seconds, a hacker attempts to steal personal information from people and businesses around the world. As the world adapts to a post-pandemic paradigm and financial, insurance, and health services are increasingly offered online, it is more important than ever for businesses to keep their data secure, especially when they are collecting, storing, or transmitting personally identifiable information like medical financial, or insurance records. 

At the core of most data-driven health and financial technology is customers’ personally identifiable information, which, according to ForgeRock, accounted for 98% of all data breached in 2019. The two most targeted industries, healthcare and banking/financial, accounted for 55% of all data breaches. As work and life increasingly moves online due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of companies compromising sensitive data increases, and regulators are responding with new restrictions. It’s not just about adhering to regulatory requirements, it’s also about doing the right thing.

This accelerator aims to support early-stage companies that leverage sensitive data to improve and increase access to global health and financial services, in a time with increasing risk and regulation. This year we are increasing the scale of our support with the Friends of Hyperprotect Program and the Datatech for Good Coalition. By working with these startups alongside closely aligned investors and mentors we hope to build a highly connected, global and impactful ecosystem within the nascent but growing datatech for good space.

Type: Entrepreneurship

Eligibility:

THE HYPER PROTECT ACCELERATOR 

Village Capital and IBM will  identify, vet, and recruit fifteen companies using highly sensitive data to increase access to digital, financial, and health care solutions. The virtual accelerator will take place between October and December 2021 and there will be continued technical support into 2023. 

 Each startup will receive IBM Cloud credits of up to $120,000, participate in 40+ hours of virtual technical and business mentorship, investment milestone planning, and access to IBM and Village Capital’s network of partners, investors, stakeholders and mentors.  

The Class of 2021 will also work with IBM collaborators, including Female Founders Alliance and Black Innovation Alliance, to help the cohort develop their ideas into sustainable and scalable companies. 

ELIGIBILITY

If managing sensitive data is at the core of your business, this accelerator is for you!  To be eligible, you must be:

  • Legally incorporated as a for-profit entity
  • Using personally identifiable information to increase access to digital, financial, or healthcare services.
  • Under $1 million in yearly revenue
  • Less than 5 years old
  • Have some traction (this is not limited to revenue, but can include successful pilot studies, number of users, and/or strategic partnerships)
  • Have positive social impact
  • Be able to commit to attendance of a founder/member of exec team (~40 hours total between October and December 2021, 3 hour sessions) 

APPLY HERE

FRIENDS OF HYPER PROTECT

Village Capital and IBM will also identify, vet, and recruit 40 additional companies to join “Friends of Hyperprotect (FOH)”. Companies will receive a lighter touch Village Capital & IBM curriculum, which includes; 

BENEFITS
  • Up to $120,000 in IBM Cloud credits
    • Up to $10,000 per month for one year
  • 6+ hours of virtual training by Village Capital
    • Investment readiness assessment
    • Investment milestone planning
    • Impact Metrics
    • 1/2 group mentor sessions specific to your needs
  • Village Capital coordinated mentor and Investor engagement
    • Invitation to join Village Capital’s global Abaca online network, with over 1,000 investors and organizations that are supporting social entrepreneurs. 
    • 1-/2 mentor tailored mentor/ investor sessions 
  • IBM collaboration
    • 2 years of technical mentorship from IBM on a quarterly basis. 
    • Go-to-market support
    • Co-marketing and branding
    • Access to the IBM network 
ELIGIBILITY

Companies eligible for Friends of Hyperprotect must meet all but one of the eligibility criteria for the full accelerator program (see above). For example, the sessions may be relevant to companies that do not yet have a proven impact thesis, cannot commit to the full 40+ hours, or have less proven traction. 

APPLY HERE

THE DATATECH FOR GOOD COALITION

The “Datatech for Good” coalition is a curated network of investors who are actively seeking investment opportunities in the datatech/data security space. 

 BENEFITS
  • Invitation to join Village Capital’s global Abaca online network, with over 1,000 investors and organizations that are supporting social entrepreneurs. 
  • Opportunities to engage with a network of investors who are actively seeking investment opportunities in the datatech space
  • Highlighted in an exclusive network of innovators that are leveraging datatech for social good. 
  • Notification of future Accelerator programs
ELIGIBILITY

All applicants are eligible for the Datatech for Good coalition as long as they are:

  • Legally incorporated as a for-profit entity
  • Using personally identifiable information to increase access to digital, financial, or healthcare services

How to Apply: APPLY NOW

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Food and Housing Hardship in the COVID-19 Recession

Simran Kalkat & Julie Yixia-Cai


The COVID-19 pandemic has caused historic economic pain and hardship for families and households in the US. But much of this pain has been felt unevenly across the country. The pandemic has exacerbated existing hardships for Black, Hispanic, and single-parent households.

This brief looks at food and housing insecurity from April 23, 2020, to March 29, 2021, and examines hardship by race, ethnicity, and family type using data collected from the US Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey. The data were collected over the Phases 1, 2 and 3, with each Phase representing roughly three months.

The survey has been a useful tool in gathering data in a swift and efficient manner to assess and measure how the current recession is affecting American households and families on various fronts such as employment status, education disruptions, financial difficulties, mental health, transportation, vaccinations, and more.

Key Takeaways:

+ Thirty-five percent of Black and Hispanic households reported housing insecurity compared to 14 percent of white households.

+ Households with children reported higher levels of housing and food hardship than the overall group of respondents.

+ Single or unmarried parents (regardless of the presence of other adults in the household) reported the highest levels of both food and housing insecurity over the survey period, while married adults without children in their household had the lowest levels.

Housing Insecurity

Respondents in the Household Pulse Survey were asked, “How confident are you that your household will be able to pay your next rent or mortgage payment on time?” We define households as experiencing housing hardship if they had deferred payments for the next month or had slight to no confidence in making mortgage and rental payments next month. As seen in Figure 1, over the course of the survey, Black and Hispanic respondents consistently reported the highest levels of difficulty with housing payments. On average over the survey period, Black and Hispanic respondents were more than twice as likely to experience housing hardships than white households.

Figure 1

As shown in Figure 1, there is a significant drop from July 16 to August 19 in the number of respondents answering they are not confident about meeting housing payments for the next month. This has less to do with a decrease in housing hardships and may be due to the accompanying sampling changes and changes in survey response rates due to the transition from Phase 2 to Phase 3. However, it is promising to observe slight downward trends for most groups in the past two months.

Housing hardships were also felt unevenly across family structures. This article looks at families by marital status, regardless of the presence of other adults, and presence of children in the household.  Households with children consistently reported higher levels of housing insecurity in comparison to households without children and the overall households in the sample. As Figure 2 shows, on average, 36 percent of unmarried parents experienced hardship, compared to roughly 21 percent sample-wide, nearly 68 percent higher. Similar to Figure 1, Figure 2 also shows a significant drop in the reported incidence of housing insecurity during the same period. As mentioned before, it is unclear if this is due to changes in the survey response rates as opposed to a real drop in housing insecurity.

On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed a $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief plan into law, the American Rescue Plan, which included $25 billion for emergency rental assistance and $5 billion in housing vouchers for those who were homeless, at the risk of homelessness, and those fleeing domestic violence, trafficking, stalking or assault. As seen in both Figure 1 and Figure 2, housing insecurity levels begin to taper off by Week 27, the last week of Phase 3, of the Household Pulse Survey. The survey results for Week 27 were taken from March 17, 2021, to March 29, 2021, shortly after the passage of the American Rescue Plan. There was also a ramping up of vaccination efforts and increased employment in March. Together with the American Rescue Plan, this brought more relief and security to people. Between Weeks 26 and 27, housing insecurity dropped by 18 percent in the overall sample, with a 22 percent drop in Hispanic households.

Figure 2

Food Insecurity

Just as with housing hardships, Black and Hispanic families have reported the highest levels of food insecurity over the survey period. Respondents in the survey were asked, “In the last 7 days, which of these statements best describes the food eaten in your household?.” In this report, we define adults reporting “sometimes” or “often not having enough food” as being food insecure. As shown in Figure 3, white households consistently reported the lowest levels of food insecurity compared to Black and Hispanic households, and households in the sample overall. Over the period examined, slightly over 20 percent of Black households and 18 percent of Hispanic households reported having food hardship, 13 and 10 percentage points higher than white households, respectively.

Figure 3

Similar to housing insecurity, households with children consistently reported the highest levels of food insecurity during the survey period. As indicated in Figure 4, this was especially true for unmarried parents. The incidence of food insecurity was nearly 70 percent higher for households with children than those without. Food insecurity was about 110 percent higher for unmarried parents as compared to households with married parents.

Figure 4

In the week since the passage of the American Rescue Plan, food insecurity has dropped by 18 percent across the board, with the largest difference thus far for Black households and households with children. In late March the USDA announced a 15 percent increase in SNAP benefits through the American Rescue Plan among other actions from the USDA to address food insecurity during the recession.

Conclusion

Households with children, particularly households of unmarried parents with children, were hit harder by the pandemic than overall households in the sample. However, unmarried parents, particularly with no other adults present in the household, almost consistently reported the highest levels of food and housing insecurity in the survey.

Over the survey period, approximately 41 percent of unmarried parents with no other adults in the household reported housing insecurity compared to 35 percent of unmarried parents with other adults in the household. The overall average of housing insecurity among respondents was approximately 22 percent. Similarly, 23 percent of households headed by unmarried parents with no other adults present reported food insecurity compared to 11 percent of the overall rate.

As mentioned in this brief, the food and housing insecurity levels fell during the last week of the survey going from March 17, 2021, to March 29, 2021. The American Rescue Plan was signed into law on March 11, 2021 and may have helped to alleviate some of the hardship levels in the overall sample though a more detailed analysis of the impact of the latest COVID relief bill has yet to come.

The CARES Act passed in late March 2020 was an important piece of legislation in ensuring that the economic pain from coronavirus recession could be staunched to some degree. An analysis of the Household Pulse Survey’s Phase 1 data by Poverty Solutions at the University of Michigan found that despite the relatively high unemployment rate at that point, the CARES Act was successful at staunching the pain during the early months of the pandemic. But even if Congressional action was able to keep hardship levels stable overall, the picture looks a little different for households by race and family structure. Black and Hispanic households, and households of unmarried parents with children continuously saw higher levels of food and housing hardship and more fluctuation in the reported incidence of both hardships.

The unequal burden of the recession has been widely reported and the findings in this article demonstrate a need for creating a recovery that is equitable and sustained. It should address the structural inequities that are causing a disproportionate amount of pain to Black and Hispanic households and households with children, particularly single-parent households.

13 Facts About American Prisons That Will Blow Your Mind

Lee Camp


In a few minutes time you’ll want to abolish prisons. If you’re not ready for that intellectual and emotional transformation, then please stop reading now. Or put on your thunder shirt.

If you grew up in the United States, like I did, then you probably think prisons are a fact of life. We just go through our day-to-day assuming that a huge chunk our population must be hardened criminals (which is very different from hard criminals: scalawags involved in burgling while aroused) and that without prisons these delinquents would be running everywhere, breaking things, kicking squirrels in the face, and urinating in your car window while you’re at a stoplight. We just assume prisons have been around forever — as if back in caveman times they had one of the caves walled off with sticks and vines where they kept Blartho because he was a real a-hole.

Yet, the truth is that large prisons were not a thing in America or really anywhere in the world until the 1800s. That’s the first in this list of 13 facts about American prisons that will blow your mind. (Pared down and adjusted from my previous list of 1,234 facts about American prisons that will give you liver damage.)

Number 1 – Prisons are relatively new.

The earliest penitentiary in America was Walnut Street Prison in Philadelphia, which opened in 1773. Even in Europe before that time — despite having a few dungeons where they had one or two guys they really hated sitting there for 40 years, living off termite stew — there were no jails holding millions or even thousands of people. This means that in the history of humanity, locking large percentages of your population in a penitentiary ranks as a rather new advent. We lived hundreds of thousands of years without doing it, and somehow we got by. Prisons are kinda like nuclear weapons and nipple clamps: We’ve gone basically the entirety of human history without them, but now that they’re here, we think we must have them or all is lost.

Number 2 – Prisons and capitalism go hand-in-hand.

Angela Davis makes the point in her book Are Prisons Obsolete? that the exponential growth of prisons correlated with the rise of industrial capitalism, which began around the 1830s. Once a man’s worth was measured in labor hours, taking that away from him could be viewed as a punishment. Furthermore, even though prisons became common during the 1800s and 1900s, America didn’t become the world’s largest prison state until the 1980s. (Ronald Reagan and the racist Drug War truly are the gifts that keep on giving.)

Before the 19th century, there were other punishments for breaking laws. This is not to say that 40 lashes for stealing a loaf of bread is the correct punishment, but if you were to ask modern day prisoners if they would prefer five years behind bars living in a bunk bed with a gassy roommate named Lars or 40 lashes, I bet 90% would take the whip.

We act as if we’re morally superior to those who came before us, but shall we not consider that locking someone away for 20 or 50 years is 100 times worse than some whipping? I’m not saying let’s start beating the shit out of everyone who runs a stop sign. I’m saying that a truly moral society would find alternative punishments, such as community service, instead of destroying lives.

Number 3 – The Land of The Free holds 22% of the world’s prisoners.

Two-point-three million people now inhabit U.S. prisons every year out of a global total of nine million. That means 22% of the world’s prisoners are in the Land of The Free. The U.S. is the largest prison state in the world (which means we’re also the largest prison state in the galaxy) with 698 prisoners per 100,000 people. According to a report published by The Institute for Criminal Policy Research (ICPR) in 2018, the next closest country is El Salvador at 572 per hundred thousand. Some other countries of note: Rwanda has 511 per hundred thousand, Russia has 331, and China has 121 per 100,000. So next time someone tells you we need to place sanctions on China because they don’t treat their people well, you might want to mention that China has essentially one-fifth the imprisonment rate of the U.S. As a wise man once said, “He who has stones shouldn’t throw glass houses.” …Don’t quote me on that.

Number 4 – Prisons are Slavery 2.0.

It may seem like the complexity of prisons and their interconnectedness with our societal fabric make them intractably crucial—one cannot even imagine a society without human cages—but there have been other institutions in America’s past that seemed crucial. Many thought society could not function without slavery. It turned out — wait for it — we could. (Another example is chamber pots. We thought we couldn’t live without those, but it turns out shitting in a soup bowl by your bed is not the best plan.)

So when America first ended slavery, the people accustomed to owning slaves exclaimed, “Why I dare say, I don’t fancy this one bit! I need an incredibly cheap form of labor that I can heavily abuse and for which I’ll not pay a buffalo penny!” Well, guess where they found their new slaves? Prisons. Which brings us to:

Number 5 – The 13th Amendment to the Constitution ended slavery and legalized it.

The 13th amendment has a big, juicy loophole. It reads, “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States.” That “except” has impacted millions of lives for the worse.

As Davis wrote, “Southern states hastened to develop a criminal justice system that could legally restrict the possibilities of freedom for newly released slaves. Black people became the prime targets of a developing convict lease system, referred to by many as a reincarnation of slavery. … [Authorities often declared unlawful anyone who was] guilty of theft, had run away [from a job, apparently], was drunk, was wanton in conduct or speech, had neglected job or family, handled money carelessly, and . . . all other idle and disorderly persons.”

So Black folks found themselves imprisoned for behaviors that usually weren’t illegal and that white people often partook in freely. I can verify that 53% of my white friends are regularly idle. (In fact, it’s their defining characteristic.) And how many white people are careless with money? I heard Charlie Sheen once gave a guy $10,000 in exchange for $9,000.

Point being — authorities arrested people of color for non-crimes and then threw them in prison where they could be bought for pennies in the convict lease program. Why does this sound familiar? Oh, that’s right. It basically continues to this day.

Number 6 – Prison Labor Continues Today

Currently inmates are still used for jobs like sewing “Made in America” labels on clothing that’s not made in America or fighting California wildfires because the state only has to pay them $3 per day. State officials generally claim such programs are different from the convict lease program of the 1800s in the same way the people behind Firecracker pops claim they’re different from Bomb Pops. We know they’re the same goddamn thing. I know sugar water mixed with red-40 when I taste it!

The U.S. differs from other countries. Since most other countries didn’t have to solve their “Black people problem,” they didn’t need to invent reasons to lock up all the people of color. Therefore in other countries theft, for example, is indeed illegal, but it won’t result in years in prison because then the punishment is morally worse than the crime. Yet, here in the Land of Liberty, you can end up serving twenty years for stealing candy. Angela Davis points out, these false crimes “also served as subterfuge for political revenge. After emancipation, the courtroom became an ideal place to exact racial retribution. In this sense, the work of the criminal justice system was intimately related to the extralegal work of lynching.”

In other words, the courtroom became the more bureaucratic and polite / elite / erudite way of lynching people.

Number 7 – A few people get filthy rich off of imprisoning millions of people. 

Companies collect billions of dollars from the Prison Industrial Complex now, which gives them all the more reason to make sure it keeps going. These companies in turn fund many of our politicians — both federally and in many states. Some states have contracts with private prisons guaranteeing their prisons will remain up to 90% full. That makes as much sense as having a contract with the fire department guaranteeing a certain number of terrible fires. And it’s not just private prisons — companies make money from all forms of prisons and jails.

Number 8 – Black Americans are the most imprisoned people in the world. 

Remember when I said the U.S. has 698 prisoners per 100,000 compared to China having 121? Well, if prison rates of African American were listed in the same way, they would have an incarceration rate of 1,501 per 100,000 (down from 2,300 a decade ago). Please pause a minute to try to wrap your brain around that number. Black Americans have a rate of imprisonment that is over 12 TIMES that of China. One in three Black men between 20 and 29 are in some way subjected to our prison system right now. If prison rates of African Americans were listed alongside countries, they would have the highest rate of any country.

Let me see if I can simplify this a little. …Our prisons are WILDLY racist.

Did I clear that up? Our prison system has racist origins, a racist past, a racist present, and a racist future (one can assume). So if you say to yourself, “I think our prison system is working great,” then you’re really saying, “I’m super racist.”

The inmates in our carceral state are made up of 21% Hispanics and 38% Blacks even though the American population is only 18% Hispanic and 13% Black. Once you add in other non-white races, our insane prisons are filled with over 65% people of color.

Number 9 – Police departments have admitted to targeting people of color. 

New York’s stop-and-frisk program is perhaps one of the best known efforts to abduct young men of color who were doing nothing wrong and try to find a reason to put them in jail. So please disabuse yourself of the liberal polite view of policing — “Let’s arrest this guy for having an open beer. Oh, he happens to be Black.” The way it really works is — “Let’s arrest this guy for being Black. Oh, he happens to have a beer with him. How convenient for us. It makes the paperwork easier.” New York City is 43% white, but only 7% of arrests for open alcoholic beverages are on white people. (And trust me, as a white guy who used to live in NYC and walk around with open alcoholic beverages all the time, the lack of arrests is not because white people don’t break this law.)

Number 10 – Prisons are not about rehabilitation.

The goal of American prisons is no longer rehabilitation (if it ever was). Now their only goal is incapacitation. Many prisons have little to no education programs and very few books. Internet access is often rare or expensive. Current inmate and longtime political prisoner Mumia Abu Jamal said, “What societal interest is served by prisoners who remain illiterate? What social benefit is there in ignorance? How are people corrected while imprisoned if their education is outlawed? Who profits — other than the prison establishment itself — from stupid prisoners?”

Number 11 – So much for #MeToo. 

While the #MeToo movement has swept across the country, the Prison Industrial Complex not only tolerates sexual assault, it perpetrates it. Female inmates almost always find themselves the victims of strip searches by guards, and often internal searches — which means exactly what you think it means. Here’s another way to phrase this: State-sanctioned sexual assault.

It’s used in much the same way sexual assault has been used over the years — to make people feel humiliated and powerless. So it’s time to do the same thing to the Prison State that we did to Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Les Moonves, and 900 other sleaze balls — Cancel it.

Number 12 – Prisoners have long been used for medical research and it is not over.

As Laura Appleman of Willamette University wrote, “The standard narrative of human medical experimentation ends abruptly in the 1970s, with the uncovering of the Tuskegee syphilis study. My research shows, however, that this narrative is incorrect and incomplete. The practice of experimenting on the captive and vulnerable persists.”

We can all sleep soundly at night knowing that we still have human guinea pigs in this country.

Number 13 – The mainstream media gets in on the action too. 

Corporate media perpetuates the idea that crime is always raging out of control, which then creates a fervor for harsher sentences among both the population and lawmakers. “Even during years when homicide rates were cut in half, stories about homicides multiplied exponentially,” writes Davis.

So our media doesn’t just manufacture consent for war, they manufacture consent for our catastrophic prison state.

I’ll let Angela Davis sum this all up: “The prison functions ideologically as an abstract site into which undesirables are deposited… This is the ideological work that the prison performs — it relieves us of the responsibility of seriously engaging with the problems of our society, especially those produced by racism and, increasingly, global capitalism.”

The American prison system is not a way to deal with crime. It is a crime.

It’s not a way to deal with harm to society. It is a harm to society.

One hundred years from now, no one will remember what this particular small-time law-breaker did or that one did, but they’ll remember that the United States was the largest prison state in the world, perpetrating a forever war against our own people.

Mounting death toll as Israel’s war on Gaza escalates

Jean Shaoul


Air strikes have continued to pound the Gaza Strip, killing more than 100 Palestinians, among them at least 27 children, and wounding more than 980 people since the start of hostilities.

Israel has struck more than 750 targets associated with Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated group that controls Gaza, since the beginning of Operation Guardian of the Walls. These include buildings used by Hamas, its security and intelligence apparatus, banks, and a Hamas naval squad. It has destroyed three high-rise buildings and killed around 60 Hamas operatives, including 10 senior commanders.

A Palestinian medic gives treatment to a wounded girl in the ICU of the Shifa hospital, Thursday, May 13, 2021, in Gaza City. She was injured by a May 12 Israeli strike that hit her family house. Just weeks ago, the Gaza Strip’s feeble health care system was struggling with a runaway surge of coronavirus cases. Now doctors across the crowded coastal enclave are trying to keep up with a very different crisis: blast and shrapnel wounds, cuts and amputations. (AP Photo/Khalil Hamra)

Israel’s Minister of Defence Benny Gantz glorified the carnage, saying, “We have attacked many hundreds of targets, towers are falling, factories are collapsing, tunnels are being destroyed and commanders are being assassinated.”

He declared that military operations in the Gaza Strip would continue until it brings a “complete and long-term peace.”

Threatening the Palestinians in a video, Gantz said, “Gaza will burn.” He reminded them that he was Israel Defence Forces (IDF) chief during Israel’s last war on Gaza in 2014. That war killed 2,192 Palestinians, including 1,523 civilians of whom 519 were children, injured tens of thousands more, and destroyed or damaged thousands of homes and much basic infrastructure. Gantz warned, “If Hamas does not stop its violence, the strike of 2021 will be harder and more painful than that of 2014.”

On Thursday, Gantz ordered the called up of 16,000 army reservists and sent ground forces to the border in preparation for “all eventualities and an escalation.” IDF spokesperson Hidai Zilberman said that plans for a ground invasion were being prepared and that the IDF had begun an arrest campaign in the West Bank against Hamas members. At least three Palestinians have been killed in clashes with security forces in the West Bank and a further 27 injured as protesters took to the streets.

Gaza’s hospitals, already struggling to cope with the pandemic, are battling to care for the wounded amid a shortage of beds, staff, equipment and blood and problems with the power supply. A Red Crescent coordinator said, “The situation here is very difficult, I can’t describe the horror in words.”

This takes place in one of the most impoverished and densely populated areas in the world, with more than two million people living in just 140 square miles. Subject for 14 years to Israel’s illegal blockade of its borders, it has become an open-air prison like the Warsaw Ghetto. Gaza has the highest unemployment rate in the world, with 82 percent of the population now out of work. A recent survey by the New Family organisation reported that 63 percent of Gazans live below the UN-defined poverty line of $2 a day. Electricity is only available for a few hours a day, while almost all water is contaminated by untreated sewage or salt.

The IDF said Hamas and other Palestinian militant groups had launched more than 1,500 projectiles towards Israel. Rockets have killed seven Israelis, including two Palestinian citizens and two children, indicating the overwhelming superiority of Israel’s aerial weaponry.

Israel’s bombardment began after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ignored Hamas’s ultimatum to withdraw security forces from the al-Aqsa Mosque compound and Sheikh Jarrah, an East Jerusalem neighborhood, on Monday evening. More than 1,000 security forces had stormed the compound during Ramadan, attacking worshippers with rubber bullets and stun grenades and injuring hundreds.

East Jerusalem has witnessed weeks of increasingly violent clashes between the Palestinian residents of Sheikh Jarrah, who face a court order evicting them from their homes, and Jewish settlers and right-wing fanatics. Several families in Silwan, a neighborhood to the south of the Old City, are also facing expulsion. The planned evictions are part of a broader campaign of ethnic cleansing to remove Palestinians, who form 40 percent of Jerusalem’s population, in favour of Jewish settlers.

Last year, Israel increased home demolitions in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, making more than 1,000 Palestinians homeless. In the first four months of this year, in East Jerusalem alone, Israel has demolished more than 50 Palestinian homes and structures, issued 40 additional demolition notices and approved plans for nearly 5,000 new settlement units.

The reaction from the US and the major European powers to Israel’s pre-meditated criminality has been one of staggering hypocrisy. For months, they have demonized China for its supposed genocide of the Uighurs without citing evidence to support their claim. Yet in the case of Israel, its war crimes against Gaza are greenlighted with the mantra of “Israel’s right to defend itself,” while its plans for ethnic cleansing in East Jerusalem are portrayed as no more than a legal dispute over ownership.

Netanyahu has also declared war on Israel’s Palestinian citizens opposing the planned evictions of the Sheikh Jarrah families, the racist attacks on East Jerusalem residents, and the storming of the al-Aqsa mosque. Israel Palestinians, some 21 percent of the population, are the poorest in Israel, with nearly half of Arab households below the poverty line. They have suffered decades of discrimination, made official in 2018 with the passage of the “Nation-State Law” enshrining Jewish supremacy as the legal foundation of the state.

Jewish racists along with hundreds of settlers from the occupied West Bank have marched through Arab neighbourhoods in towns and cities, chanting “Death to the Arabs,” throwing bottles and stones and provoking violent clashes while the security forces turned a blind eye.

While such attacks have long gone on in the occupied West Bank, attacks now taking place openly within Israel itself echo the ethnic cleansing that drove the Palestinians from their homes between 1947 and 1949.

This week, in the central city of Lod, riots broke out, with violent clashes between Jewish mobs and the Palestinians, leading to the death of a Palestinian and further riots in which a synagogue, school and several vehicles were burned by Palestinians. The government announced a city-wide nighttime curfew and declared a state of emergency, the first time the government has used emergency powers since the lifting of military law over Arab communities in 1966.

In Bat Yam, a seaside town south of Tel Aviv, gangs of Jewish extremists marched down the main streets, smashing Arab-owned businesses and attacking passersby. They took turns beating and kicking a man presumed to be an Arab, even as his body lay motionless on the ground, on live television. Four of the alleged attackers were arrested while chanting “death to Arabs” and “may your village burn.” All have been released on bail anonymously. According to the city’s mayor, the riots were “organized by provocateurs who came from outside the city.”

Video clips have circulated on social media of Jewish mobs trying to break into Palestinian homes, shops and setting up roadblocks.

President Reuven Rivlin warned that the country was descending into a “senseless civil war.” Netanyahu said the attacks amounted to “anarchy”, and that he was sending in military forces, including 10 reservist units, to help police maintain order in towns and cities with mixed populations.

A major factor in Netanyahu’s calculated efforts to ram through the ethnic cleansing of East Jerusalem and provoke a war was his determination to end any possibility of opposition leader Yair Lapid forming a government. He appears to have been successful. Naftali Bennett, leader of the right-wing Yamina Party, said that in the light of recent events, a “government of change,” made up of parties seeking to replace Netanyahu as prime minister was now out of the question and he was in favour of a unity government.

Dozens of corpses found floating in Ganges as India’s humanitarian crisis deepens

Wasantha Rupasinghe


Shocking pictures showing dozens of corpses floating in the Ganges River, published by the Indian media Monday evening, provide yet further evidence of the mounting humanitarian crisis the COVID-19 pandemic has triggered in the world’s second most populous country.

India, which has emerged over the past month as the global epicenter of the pandemic, passed the grim milestone of a quarter-million officially registered deaths this week. On Thursday, it added another 4,120 COVID-19 deaths, taking the death toll to 258,317.

People watch burning funeral pyres of their relatives who died of COVID-19 in a ground that has been converted into a crematorium in New Delhi, India, Thursday, May 6, 2021. (AP Photo/Ishant Chauhan)

India currently accounts for half of new COVID-19 cases and 30 percent of new deaths worldwide, according to the World Health Organization. It is widely acknowledged that the official figures are a gross undercount of the true extent of the calamity. One recent estimate put the death toll at 1 million.

The country’s total caseload stands at over 23.7 million. As of May 13, India had 3,710,525 active cases. Even so, the far-right Bharatiya Janatha Party (BJP) government continues to deny that India is experiencing “community transmission,” absurdly describing the pandemic as being characterised by “clustered cases.” In truth, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s policy of prioritising corporate profits over the protection of human lives has produced a situation where the virus is totally out of control. India’s chronically underfunded ramshackle health care system has already collapsed under a surge of patients.

In a disturbing video, which was shot at Buxer, a small city in the eastern state of Bihar, Times Now reported over 150 bodies recorded as COVID-19 fatalities were dumped on the banks of the Ganges River. “These COVID bodies will be washed down further and can be eaten by stray dogs which will further spread coronavirus,” the news website added.

In a separate case, NDTV reported that on May 9, several partially burnt bodies were seen floating in the Yamuna River, a tributary of the Ganges, at Hamirpur in Himachal Pradesh. A few days later, multiple bodies were found buried in sand at two locations along the same river in Uttar Pradesh’s Unnao district, just 40km from the state capital Lucknow.

These horrific stories point to both the criminal failure of the Modi government to deal with the pandemic, and the deliberate undercounting of COVID-19 deaths. According to AFP, residents believe that the bodies were dumped in the river because cremation sites were overwhelmed or because relatives could not afford wood for funeral pyres.

These reports point to the emergence of the long-anticipated nightmare that would occur if the virus spread to India’s rural areas, where health care facilities are almost non-existent. Underlining the massive spread of coronavirus infections in rural India, the Indian Express reported May 12 that as many as 533 of the country’s 718 districts are now reporting test positivity rates of more than 10 percent. Meanwhile, Dr. Balram Bhargava, director general of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), said, “The national positivity rate is around 20-21 percent, and about 42 percent of districts in the country are reporting a positivity rate more than the national average.”

According to the central government, 13 states have more than 100,000 active cases, six have between 50,000 and 100,000 active cases, and 17 states have less than 50,000 active cases.

Pointing to the woefully inadequate medical facilities in rural areas, where 65 percent of Indians live, India Today noted that of the 819 COVID treatment centers in Madhya Pradesh—which with a population of 85 million is India’s fifth largest state—only 69 are located in rural areas. Of the total 21,637 isolated beds in the state, only 3,039 are in rural areas. While the urban areas have 22,145 oxygen beds and 927 ICU beds respectively, there are only 338 oxygen beds and 51 ICU beds in the rural belt.

In Bihar, India’s third most populous state, with more than 100 million residents, Dr. Shakeel, consultant of Polyclinic, a non-profit health organization, and convener of the Jan Swath Abhiyahn (Public Health Campaign), told the Wire news website, “There is one doctor to serve 28,000 patients in Bihar against the World Health Organization’s recommendation of one doctor per 1000 patients.” The state, he continued, is next to the bottom on the ladder of health indices among the 21 major states drawn up by the Niti Ayog, a government think tank. Uttar Pradesh stands 21st. While there have been 3,429 officially recorded deaths in Bihar thus far during India’s current “second wave” of the pandemic, Dr. Shakeel told the Wire that the actual figure “might be 10 times or even more than what official figures say.” He added, “The government (has) no machinery to test and treat 75 percent to 80 percent of the people living in the villages. The situation is alarming at the ground level.”

Meanwhile, a shortage of medical oxygen is continuing to claim more lives. In the latest tragedy, 47 COVID-19 patients died in the government-run Goa Medical College (GMC) due to an “interrupted oxygen supply” over 48 hours from May 11 to 12. The Wire, which was given access to an internal note from the hospital to the central government, noted that “the hospital requires 1,200 cylinders a day,” but had received “only 400 on May 10.” With these tragic deaths at GMC, the Wire calculated, using official records, that at least 223 COVID-19 patients have died because of oxygen shortages in hospitals across India during the past few weeks. The news website did not include another 70 deaths reportedly linked to oxygen shortages that have yet to be confirmed by the authorities.

These horrendous conditions are the direct product of the criminal “open economy” policy, which has been spearheaded by the far-right Modi government and supported by the entire Indian ruling elite. Following last year’s disastrously-prepared lockdown, which drove millions into destitution because the government refused to provide adequate financial assistance to working people and the poor, Modi’s BJP government has focused, together with the opposition Congress, on keeping businesses open with as few restrictions as possible, creating the conditions for the virus to run rampant. Modi has also pressed ahead with a frontal assault on jobs and workers’ rights, while accelerating a privatisation drive and the easing of business regulations to promote foreign investment. Underscoring that the ruling elite has no intention of allowing the pandemic to get in the way of its class war agenda, Modi declared last month that it was necessary to “save India from lockdown,” not from the virus.

The ruling elite’s total indifference to the mass loss of life is fueling widespread opposition among workers and the impoverished rural population. NDTV reported May 10 on growing nervousness within the ranks of the ruling Hindu supremacist BJP and its ideological mentor, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), about growing popular anger over the scale of devastation caused by the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. According to NDTV, “Sources say the BJP and RSS are concerned with the perception that the government dropped the ball on COVID, given that almost everyone in the ruling party’s core support base is affected by the deadly pandemic. The middle class are the worst-hit and now the virus is spreading to the villages, especially in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.”

The tsunami-like spread of COVID-19 across India is creating more deadly variants of the virus. Earlier this week, the World Health Organization designated the B.1.617 variant, which was first discovered in India, as a global “variant of concern.”

AFP reported May 10 that a growing number of current and recovered COVID-19 patients in India are contracting a “deadly and rare fungal infection” called Mucormycosis, which is likely being triggered by COVID-19 steroid treatments. Speaking to AFP, Ahmedabad-based infectious diseases specialist Atul Patel, a member of the state’s COVID-19 task force, said, “The cases of mucormycosis infection in COVID-19 patients post-recovery is nearly four to five times than those reported before the pandemic.” Another doctor told AFP that the drugs used to treat those infected with the fungus are “expensive,” and one of the drugs is running short in government hospitals due to the sudden increase in demand. According to the news agency, hundreds of cases have been reported from Maharashtra and Gujarat.

India’s COVID-19 catastrophe is rapidly engulfing neighbouring countries, some of which are even less prepared to cope with a surge in very ill patients. Nepal, which is one of the least developed countries in the world, shares a 1,770 kilometre-long border with India and has experienced a dramatic increase in infections. While daily cases averaged around 150 in early April, the nation of 30 million people reported nearly 10,000 new cases on Wednesday and 168 deaths. According to the BBC, there are almost no spare intensive care beds and ventilators in the Kathmandu Valley. Vaccines and oxygen supplies are also running out after India blocked exports to cope with its own crisis. This prompted Kathmandu to halt its vaccine campaign, and many hospitals have stopped taking in new patients due to a lack of oxygen.

The official death toll has surpassed 4,200, but this is certainly a vast undercount. Health officials say the test positivity rate in the country stands at a staggering 50 percent.

In Sri Lanka, which has detected eight variants of COVID-19, including B.1.617 and the B.1.351 strain first found in South Africa, the pandemic is also out of control. Over a 4-day period from May 9 through 12, 10,000 infections were reported, raising the total number of cases to 133,484. The number of patients receiving treatment has increased beyond the number of hospital beds, resulting in growing numbers of COVID-stricken people being trapped in their homes without care. The death toll has risen to 868, with 18 deaths Thursday. A country of some 22 million people, Sri Lanka has less than 700 ICU beds, of which a mere 104 have been allocated to COVID-19 patients. The situation has been exacerbated by increasing infection rates among health staff, including doctors.

Thousands protest against New Zealand government’s anti-immigrant policies

Tom Peters


Hundreds of migrant workers and supporters rallied outside New Zealand’s parliament in Wellington yesterday to protest the Labour Party-Greens coalition government’s anti-immigrant policies.

The day before, hundreds attended protest vigils in Auckland, Christchurch and Hamilton. About 60 demonstrators also gathered in Queenstown, a tourism centre where many migrants lost their jobs last year due to the COVID-19 border closure and the economic collapse. Thousands of migrants were unable to access unemployment benefits.

A banner at the Wellington protest: “690 days split from my kids as a single parent: Enough is enough! Bring them home.” (Source: WSWS Media)

The events expressed mounting anger among immigrants, who make up a large portion of the population—about one in four people in NZ was born overseas. Thousands of migrant workers and international students, whose visas entitle them to live in New Zealand, have been stranded for more than a year outside the country. Many have been separated from their families, jobs and homes in New Zealand. Meanwhile, thousands who live in New Zealand are facing interminable delays after applying for residency.

Like governments internationally, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s government is responding to the social crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic by seeking to scapegoat immigrants and stoke nationalism.

In a blatantly discriminatory action, the government temporarily banned all travel from India from April 11 to April 28. The Australian government recently took similar action. No such ban was ever implemented for travel from the US, UK or other countries where COVID-19 has been rampant.

The NZ rallies were organised by the Federation of Aotearoa Migrants (FAM), a recently formed umbrella group. It includes Migrants NZ, which began as a Facebook group for migrants to share their stories; the Migrant Workers Association, which is linked to the trade unions; the Migrant Rights Network NZ; and the Association of New Kiwis Aotearoa.

FAM called for migrants already in NZ to be given residency, an end to visa processing delays, and for migrants stuck overseas to be allowed back. It is also demanding an end to work visas being linked to specific employers—a rule that gives companies power to exploit migrant workers and threaten them with deportation if they complain.

Immigration Minister Kris Faafoi addressed the crowd outside parliament. He feigned sympathy for migrants while declaring that “these are extraordinary times” and the “border controls and managed isolation regime” were essential to keep people safe. He gave no explanation for the extraordinary backlog of unprocessed visa applications.

Faafoi said, “Others will say: open the borders to everyone who has family here and wants to be reunited, but it is not that simple… I can’t, today, bring you the news that you want to hear.” The minister ended his brief speech amid shouts of “Shame,” “Not good enough!” and “Bring them back!”

The government has repurposed several hotels into managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) facilities, where citizens and residents must spend two weeks after returning from overseas. These hotels are often understaffed, and poor management has led to leaks of COVID-19 cases into the community. The government has refused to set up properly run facilities to accommodate more returnees, including migrants.

At the Wellington rally, migrants from China, India, Sri Lanka, the UK and South Africa, spoke about their experiences with Immigration New Zealand (INZ) and the traumatic effects on their families.

Alan John Koshy, a journalist from Kerala, India, who moved to New Zealand in 2017, denounced INZ’s practices as “short-sighted, greedy and xenophobic.” He applied for residency under the Skilled Migrant Category in January 2020, hoping that his family would soon be able to join him in New Zealand, but they have been “stuck in limbo” ever since. The Ardern government’s policies have “created a migrant population that’s left with few rights and at risk of exploitation, with no benefits to fall back on,” he said.

Jonathan, an electrical maintenance worker, told the World Socialist Web Sitethat his partner, from the Philippines, is barred from entering New Zealand to process her visa application, unless he goes back to the Philippines, at great expense, and then returns with her. “If she was from a Western country, it wouldn’t be a problem at all. I can be here, continue my work and do the application,” he said, but there are different rules for “Third World” countries.

Jonathan (Source: WSWS Media)

He described the situation as “modern-day racism. Here’s a Labour Party talking about being inclusive and a ‘team of five million,’ but it’s not.” He said he was “shocked at how New Zealand has changed” in terms of its immigration policies.

Jennifer (not her real name) told the WSWS she and her husband moved to New Zealand from China more than six years ago and have been waiting more than a year after applying for residency. They have a young son who “loves New Zealand very much” and has spent most of his life in NZ. She said Immigration NZ had given “no reason” for the extreme delay.

Despite being highly qualified and employed in an area with a skills shortage, Jennifer said, “my salary doesn’t meet the ‘high priority’ requirements” for Immigration NZ to fast-track her application. To qualify as “high priority,” an applicant needs to earn over $100,000. “It’s not fair to set the priority rule based on the salary,” she said.

As well as Faafoi, MPs from the right-wing opposition National and ACT Parties briefly addressed the rally, falsely claiming to support immigrants. The previous National-ACT government presided over widespread exploitation of migrant workers, anti-refugee policies, and frequent deportations—which has all continued under the present government.

Green Party MP Ricardo Menendez-March also spoke, declaring that the Greens would “keep working constructively with our colleagues [in Labour] to ensure that your calls are heard.” The Greens have been part of the Labour-led government for nearly four years. From 2017 to 2020 the coalition government included the right-wing NZ First Party, which has repeatedly made racist statements against Chinese people, Indians and Muslims. The Labour-Greens government has essentially adopted NZ First’s anti-immigrant policies.

A protester in Wellington (Source: WSWS Media)

The Migrant Workers Association (MWA), one of the protest organisers, has worked with the Greens and Unite union to organise a petition calling on the government to address FAM’s demands. Unite leader Mike Treen supported Labour and the Greens in the 2017 and 2020 elections and the union seeks to persuade migrants that this right-wing, anti-immigrant government can be pressured to defend their rights.

MWA spokesperson Anu Kaloti told the migrants gathered in Wellington that “unions will always stand up for your rights.” In fact, unions have repeatedly agitated against foreign workers. In February, the Maritime Union opposed foreign cruise ship workers coming to NZ, saying the jobs should be reserved for “New Zealanders.” E tū responded to mass redundancies at Air New Zealand last year by calling for the airline to slash its overseas-based workforce to cut costs. In 2018, Unite applauded a government decision to temporarily ban migrants from working at fast food chain Burger King—an extraordinary attack on dozens of workers.

The aim of these nationalist organisations is to subordinate the movement of migrant workers to the very government that is responsible for the escalating attacks on their rights.