26 May 2021

Amid raging pandemic, Peruvian police evict thousands of working class families

Cesar Uco


With Peru’s COVID-19 pandemic spiraling out of control and the country’s health care system in a state of collapse, the government has sent in police squads to evict thousands of homeless and unemployed people from land they had occupied in and around the capital of Lima.

Peru has recorded the highest number of COVID deaths per million of any country in Latin America, while simultaneously suffering the continent’s sharpest economic decline as a result of the pandemic. As a result, thousands of working class and poor families, left without jobs or roofs over their heads, have taken over land and erected makeshift homes on the outskirts of Lima and other Peruvian cities.

In March and April of this year, between 4,000 and 10,000 families set up shanty homes on the Lomo de Corvina and El Morro Solar hills, while another 100 families moved onto the small, polluted beach of La Chira, all located south of Lima. They constructed houses using materials such as stones, plastic and sticks, along with blankets, tents and cardboard.

Families moving onto the hills outside Lima (Credit: Oxfam)

Homeless families also set up structures on land in Jicamarca to the east of the capital city. Likewise, 300 people moved into the Hijo de la Caledonia II settlement, where houses have been built with prefabricated materials and corrugated metal roofs. “We have talked with the authorities. We are not invaders, and we have been there for more than two months. The only thing we ask is that the state gives us its support,” a woman commented to the daily La Rep ú blica .

The land occupations threatened to spread to San Cristobal hill, an icon of Lima where a large illuminated statue of Christ on the cross towers over the city. The hill is located in the Rimac district, originally built by the Spanish nobility in colonial times and today has been turned into an overcrowded and impoverished workers district.

The corporate media immediately denounced the invasions as illegal and demanded the Peruvian National Police (PNP) evict the settlers. They invoked a law passed in 2015 by Peru’s notoriously corrupt congress, which punishes land invasions with prison sentences.

With the aim of gaining time while an assault was being prepared, initially the authorities of the affected districts said the PNP would act with caution, respecting citizens’ rights. Nothing could have been further from the truth.

In numerous evictions, police resorted to force, firing tear gas at families, including children and the elderly, who resisted the orders to leave. To defend themselves, families threw stones at the attacking police. Several arrests were made. The operation was conducted by more than 2,300 police officers.

“We need a roof over our heads. We are ... sleeping (on Morro Solar). They are not going to remove us because we are in need. Even though we don’t have running water or electricity, we’ll find a way out. Every invasion starts like this, from scratch,” a man who had come with his wife and children told La Rep ú blica .

People evicted from the Lomo de Corvina hill are now camping in the streets of Villa El Salvador, a working class district in the southern cone of Lima. “We will be there every day until they give us a small piece of land. We have nowhere to live. We have no money; we haven’t eaten since yesterday. I have my 13-year-old daughter, and she is not studying,” said a woman who was evicted.

Another woman said she was evicted by her landlord in the Ventanilla district, located to the north of Lima about 10 kilometers from Lomo de Corvina, because she could not pay the monthly rent. A third woman stated that all her relatives had lost their jobs.

Miserable living conditions have led to the occupation of land reserved for real estate development projects in other cities.

In Iquitos, on the banks of the Amazon River, the police evicted 2,000 people who took over land dedicated to specialty crops.

Likewise, the government of the department of La Libertad, in northern Peru, reported the removal of “various rustic constructions and other acts of invasion, committed by those who were trying to take over land in the Huanchaco Sea Project Area.”

Showing contempt for the lives of families who have nowhere to live, the head of the Secretariat of Social Management and Dialogue of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers (PCM), Gisselle Huamaní, said of those being evicted by the police, “They should be the ones to leave the place and return to their original homes.”

It apparently did not occur to her that these people have no homes that they can return to precisely because they have lost their jobs and are homeless. This is the result of the criminal mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic by a corrupt government in the service of the Peruvian oligarchy and the transnational banks and mining companies.

Invoking the Constitution enacted in 1993 under the authoritarian regime of President Alberto Fujimori, which favored foreign and national investments at the expense of workers’ rights, the government declared: “Today in Peru there is no legal basis for expropriating land. This is an attack against private property in Peru and does not comply with the Constitution, which is above any law. It is an openly illegal project.”

“It only benefits land traffickers and causes families to live in precarious conditions and without basic services for several years,” stated the Minister of Housing Solange Fernandez, as if those occupying the land had access to better conditions somewhere else.

Fernandez’s statement was quickly refuted by those occupying the land. “There are no land traffickers here, we just want to live because before we were in a rented room that charged us 300 soles (US$ 80) and, due to the pandemic, we no longer have a job, they threw us out. I have been a tenant, we have been on the street, but now we occupy this place peacefully,” one of the occupiers told Am é rica Noticias .

To cope with the lack of cheap land and affordable housing, for many years working class families have been moving outside of Lima, looking for a space where they can afford to build a home for their children. Traveling south of Lima, one sees one settlement after another. In many cases, these residents are forced to commute 60 kilometers to the capital in search of work.

The precarious houses are built on barren hills because almost all of the coastline, up to 120 kilometers away from Lima, has been taken over by the bourgeoisie, building private beach-houses—some valued at more than US$ 500,000—with non-owners denied access to the beaches.

The invasions are one more expression of the inability of Peruvian capitalism to satisfy the basic needs of the working class and the poor. The eight-year deceleration of the country’s economy has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 crisis. The Peruvian state is collapsing under the weight of decades of corruption in which every living former president is implicated.

The health situation is out of control. According to the Ministry of Health (MINSA), as of May 22, the number of recorded deaths due to COVID-19 had reached 68,358, and the number of infections 1,926,923. “Excess deaths,” a concept developed by an economic model that includes 121 socioeconomic variables, indicates that the true COVID-19 death toll for Peru is at least three times higher than the one reported by MINSA.

Government incompetence has led to serious delays in vaccinating the population. Besides “essential personnel,” only those 60 years or older are scheduled to be vaccinated. Having money matters. The deadly virus attacks workers more severely than the wealthy, many of whom have flown to the US to be vaccinated.

Peru’s Central Reserve Bank (BCR) indicated that GDP contracted by 30.2 percent in the second quarter of 2020. Approximately nine million workers have lost their jobs since the start of the pandemic in March of last year, while an estimated 3,330,000 have fallen into poverty, bringing the share of the population living below the poverty line to over 30 percent.

The precarious economic situation led BCR President Julio Velarde to admit, “It is the biggest fall in the last hundred years, really dramatic.”

As a faithful servant of the national bourgeoisie, Velarde gave an optimistic projection aimed at preventing panic among foreign and domestic investors. He stated that the BCR was projecting an 11.25 percent increase in GDP for 2021. This figure can only be met if the government carries out criminal efforts to reopen the economy at the expense of more people dying. April 2021 was the worst month of the pandemic, with 8,255 dead, surpassing the previous record in June 2020 of 8,165 dead.

The national currency, the nuevo sol, has hit historic lows against the US dollar. In the last 12 months, it dropped 11.46 percent. And since the Peruvian economic slowdown began eight years ago, it has lost a third of its value. As result, prices are rising, particularly for basic food items.

The confrontation over land occupations is one more expression of the desperation and anger of millions of working class families who for the past 14 months have been living under nightly curfews and total lockdown on Sundays.

Since the end of 2020, hundreds of thousands of youth, university and high school students occupied the streets to protest an antidemocratic congressional coup. This was followed by agricultural workers blocking the main access roads into Lima for more than a month in a struggle over wages. Drivers in the capital have staged several strikes. Miners have struck over the spread of COVID-19 infections and deaths in the mining camps, and municipal workers have walked out over unpaid wages.

Peru will stage a second round of its presidential elections on June 6, with neither of the two candidates offering any alternative for the Peruvian working class.

The petty-bourgeois populist demagogue and rural teachers union leader Pedro Castillo of the Peru Libre party has sought since his first-round victory to reassure the Peruvian bourgeoisie and the transnational mining companies that he has no intention of implementing his party’s campaign promises of nationalizations. Instead, he has merely proposed a more rigorous enforcement of tax laws, while disassociating himself from “extremists” and declaring himself a “democrat” and a “Catholic.”

Castillo is running against the candidate of Fuerza Popular, Keiko Fujimori. The corrupt and fascistic daughter of the former dictatorial President Alberto Fujimori, now serving a 25-year sentence for crimes against humanity, she is running a rabidly anticommunist campaign.

According to the latest poll by the Institute of Peruvian Studies, Castillo is leading with 34 percent against Fujimori with 30 percent. One-third of those polled indicated they would cast blank or spoiled ballots in protest. This figure is remarkably high given that elections are less than two weeks away. But it still underestimates the popular anger against a capitalist society that has driven millions of working class families and small business owners into poverty, while making a tiny minority of the population very wealthy.

Given the growing political instability and popular anger, Peru is ripe for the kind of mass uprising that has erupted in the neighboring country of Colombia.

Sri Lankan government imposes censorship as experts warn of coronavirus surge

Pradeep Ramanayake


The Sri Lankan government on Monday announced “travel restrictions” for the next two weeks, until June 7, in response to surging coronavirus infections. It followed calls by medical experts for a “strict lockdown” of the island. President Gotabhaya Rajapakse, however, has warned state officials not to make any unauthorised media statements, claiming it could intensify popular concern about COVID-19.

The official total number of coronavirus infections in Sri Lanka has climbed to over 167,170 with more than 1,240 deaths. In the last five days, the daily average of new infections spiked to over 3,300 with an increase of 65,000 cases, or a 70 percent rise, in the past month.

Sri Lankan army soldiers guard a check point during restrictions imposed to curb the spread of the coronavirus in Colombo, Sri Lanka, May 22, 2021. (AP Photo/Eranga Jayawardena)

State Minister of Health Sudarshini Fernandopulle has admitted that there were “about three times as many patients in society as reported.” Her statement was in response to repeated statements by medical experts that the real number of coronavirus infections and deaths was much higher than officially reported. The number of COVID-19 infections is also inaccurate because the government has directed health authorities to use the limited PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test.

Last week, the Colombo office of the World Health Organization (WHO) held what it called a “brainstorming session” about Sri Lanka’s COVID-19 situation. More than a dozen epidemiologists and other medical experts participated, including Dr. Olivia Nieveras and Dr. Palitha Abeykoon from the WHO Colombo office, and Professors Malik Peiris, Nilika Malavige and Dr. Padma Gunaratne.

These highly-qualified experts called on the government to introduce “strict restrictions on non-essential human mobility” with a two- or three-week lockdown in high transmission areas, and an expansion of medical facilities with intensive care units. “The decisions we take now will affect the lives of millions of Sri Lankans,” they warned.

“The public sector health system is stretched to the limit, making it difficult to manage COVID-19 cases as well as other essential services. More health professionals and preventive staff (e.g., public health inspectors) are getting infected and HR [human resources] policies need to be geared to meet the urgency. There is a ‘tipping point’ beyond which the system can rapidly go out of control,” the experts stated.

This tipping point, in fact, is rapidly being reached. According to reports, thousands of infected patients are being told to stay at home due to the lack of hospital beds. Health workers are increasingly unable to deal with the worsening situation.

Sri Lanka’s health care infrastructure has been run down by successive governments which have slashed health spending. In this year’s budget, the Rajapakse government cut health by 28 billion rupees ($US140 million) and only allocated 10 billion rupees or 0.1 percent of gross domestic product to contain the pandemic. At the same time, it announced plans to increase defence and police spending to 440 billion rupees in 2021, up from 393 billion rupees in 2019.

A joint call for a 14-day lockdown was issued by the Sri Lanka Medical Association, Association of Medical Specialists, Sri Lanka Medical Intercollegiate Committee and Government Medical Officers Association (GMOA).

The GMOA, the main doctors’ union, added its name in response to public criticism by its members over the association’s backing of the government’s dangerous policies and its ignoring of pandemic-related problems in the hospitals.

The government’s two-week lockdown announcement has been accompanied by growing calls for censorship.

Addressing a COVID-19 taskforce meeting last Friday, President Rajapakse declared that “responsible officials should not unnecessarily hold media briefings and panic the public about the pandemic.” Officials should directly contact him if there was a problem, he said.

Army commander General Shavendra Silva, who is head of the COVID-19 prevention taskforce, also criticised medical officials for holding press conferences without informing the president. Rajapakse appointed Silva task force chief in March 2020, marginalising health officials and placing the government’s response to the pandemic under military control.

Last week, Health Ministry Secretary Dr. S.H. Munasinghe, an in-service major general, issued a circular threatening disciplinary action against health officials who made media statements that violated the ministry’s “rules and regulations.”

State Health Minister Fernandopulle insisted that there was no government censorship, but added that the media had a “responsibility” to publish factual and accurate information.

The Rajapakse government is clearly nervous about the growing popular opposition to its increasingly reckless and criminal response to the deadly pandemic and is attempting to stifle any criticism of its policies.

After announcing the new COVID-19 travel restrictions, Rajapakse declared that steps had to be taken to “keep factories open.” On the same day his brother, Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapakse, told senior Central Bank officials “not [to] let the country fall, despite the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Colombo’s determination to keep its export factories operating—the apparel industry in particular—is taking a terrible toll on workers. This was revealed at MAS Holdings, the giant Sri Lankan and South Asian-based export apparel producer. While the company earned over $US1 billion in revenue last year, hundreds of its workers have tested COVID-19 positive at many of its Sri Lankan plants.

This includes 380 workers at Thulhiriya Thuruli, 300 at Biyagama Active Linea Intimo, 450 at Panadura Unichela, 100 at Pannala Slimline, 22 at Kilinochchi Vanavil. These factories employ between 2,000 and 3,000 people so many more workers are likely to be infected.

Hundreds of workers have also been infected in Sri Lanka’s free trade zones. Some of these factories were only closed after employees refused to keep working in the unsafe facilities.

Labour Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva hypocritically told the media that he had ordered health officials to inquire into whether the Thuruli factory management had followed guidelines. The factory, in fact, had only carried out PCR tests of its workforce. When three employees were privately tested, they discovered that they had been infected.

In March, President Rajapakse met with apparel factory owners and discussed “looking into the possibility of relaxing certain health guidelines imposed on the garment sector without affecting the public health conditions of the country.”

The Rajapakse administration, like its counterparts across the sub-continent and internationally, will do whatever is necessary to maintain company profits. As Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared last month, even as a tsunami of coronavirus infections and deaths swept across his country, “we have to save the country from lockdown”—in other words, capitalist profits take precedence over human lives.

India’s COVID-19 pandemic: Anatomy of a social crime

Wasantha Rupasinghe


With India’s official totals of daily new COVID-19 infections and active cases falling for the better part of two weeks, the country’s far-right Narendra Modi-led government has begun boasting that the pandemic is on a “downward trend.” Some opposition-led state governments, including that of Delhi, meanwhile, have announced plans to relax their limited lockdown measures.

Yet India is by any measure in the midst of a social catastrophe. According to the official tallies, in the eight weeks since April 1, total infections have more than doubled, rising from 12.1 to 26.9 million, while deaths have increased by 89 percent to total 307,231 as of yesterday morning. Just in the past week, India has registered an additional 1.73 million COVID-19 cases and 28,512 deaths, or more than 4,000 per day.

Family members pray next to the burning pyre of a person who died of COVID-19, at a crematorium in Srinagar, May 25, 2021. (AP Photo/ Dar Yasin)

Harrowing as these figures are, they are recognized by all—apart from Modi, his minions in the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government, and their apologists—as gross undercounts. All the more so now that the pandemic is surging through rural India, where testing is limited at best and health care facilities are dilapidated or nonexistent.

For weeks, crematoriums and burial grounds across wide swathes of India have been inundated with the dead, causing them to work through the night. In Modi’s home state of Gujarat, the heat has grown so intense in some crematorium furnaces that they have started to melt. Dozens of corpses were found floating in the Ganges River earlier this month, and according to NewsClick, citing local media reports, some 2,000 more were found “abandoned or hastily buried” along its banks in several districts of Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state.

Studies in multiple cities and states have shown that as India’s “second wave” of the pandemic surged in late March and April, crematoriums and burial grounds were processing five to ten times more corpses under COVID-19 protocols than indicated by the authorities’ pandemic death figures. If extrapolated to all of India, this would mean tens of thousands are currently dying from COVID-19 every day.

The full extent of the unfolding tragedy is unknown, but its scope is indicated by the estimates of scientific experts. Earlier this month, when India’s official death toll was less than 250,000, the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation said it believed COVID-19 had already killed almost triple that number, 736,000 people. Yesterday, the New York Times, in “consultation” with more than a dozen scientific experts from around the world, published three estimates of India’s COVID fatalities. They ranged from a “conservative” estimate of 600,000 deaths, almost twice the current official tally, to a worst-case scenario, which placed the true number at more than 4 million. The Times’ “more likely scenario” was that the pandemic is responsible for a staggering 1.6 million “estimated deaths” in India.

India’s governments guilty of social murder

This, it must be emphasized, is a man-made catastrophe. In late March 2020, the BJP government imposed an ill-prepared, calamitous six-week lockdown that failed to halt the spread of the virus because it was not accompanied by elementary public health measures and social support for the hundreds of millions who lost their livelihoods overnight. Since then, Modi, at the urging of India’s billionaires and business houses and with the complicity of the opposition parties, has relentlessly pursued a policy of “herd immunity” that prioritizes keeping the “economy” open and protecting the profits and wealth of the capitalist elite over fighting the pandemic and saving lives.

This resulted in a long wave of infections and death through last summer and fall, and then to a far more devastating second wave, fueled by new variants, that began in mid-February and threatens to rage through the summer and beyond.

On April 20, with India in the midst of the fastest rise in COVID-19 infections seen anywhere on the planet to date, Modi proclaimed in a broadcast to the nation that his government was determined to “save India from lockdown,” not save the population from the virus. This doubling down on a policy of mass death to save capitalist profit was coupled with reassurances to big business from Modi and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman that India’s second wave would not delay implementation of a volley of “pro-investor” measures. These include a massive sell-off of public sector enterprises and amendments to the labour code that further promote precarious contract-labour employment and illegalize most worker job action.

Facing the collapse of their health care systems due to the crush of COVID-19 patients, some state governments subsequently went beyond Modi’s stated preference for “micro-containment” measures and imposed partial statewide lockdowns. But they have invariably carved out large exemptions for big business, forcing industrial, construction, logistics and other workers to continue to work under unsafe conditions. And the state governments have offered no more than famine-style relief to the tens of millions of day labourers, hawkers, and service workers who as a result of the lockdowns have once again lost their livelihoods.

Thus, alongside the COVID-19 pandemic there is a second, no less devastating pandemic of joblessness and hunger that is impacting hundreds of millions of workers and rural toilers, whose meager incomes have already been squeezed. A recent study found that last year a further 230 million Indians were pushed below the 375 rupee (about $5) a day “poverty line.”

In an indication of growing anger and opposition within the working class, autoworkers in the southern state of Tamil Nadu are protesting against being forced to work under unsafe conditions by the transnational car makers and opposition-led DMK state government. Hyundai had to announce a five-day closure starting yesterday after workers staged a factory floor sit-in on Monday. Workers at a nearby Renault-Nissan plant are threatening to go on strike today.

Rural India ravaged by COVID-19

The raging pandemic in India’s rural areas is infecting a virtually defenceless population. Vaccine rates across India as a whole are catastrophically low, with just 11.1 percent of the population having received a first dose as of Monday. But they are only a fraction of this in rural districts. As of May 14, half as many vaccine doses had been administered in semi-rural areas compared to urban districts, and only one third in rural areas compared to urban districts.

Rural areas, which are home to almost two thirds of India’s 1.37 billion population, also lack even the most basic health infrastructure to treat those sickened by the virus—a consequence of all levels of the Indian state spending the equivalent of a miniscule 1.5 percent of GDP or less on health care for decades.

An annual report of Rural Health Statistics for 2019-20 published by the National Health Mission under the Union Ministry of Health pointed to the disastrous state of affairs in India’s three-tier health care system in rural areas. Due to a chronic lack of personnel, underfunding, and the absence of basic resources, the subcentres, primary health centres (PHCs) and community health centres (CHCs) are struggling to treat patients.

Based on 2020 population levels, India required 191,461 subcentres, but had only 155,400. Likewise, the number of functioning PHCs was 24,918 compared to the requisite 31,337, and there were only 5,183 CHCs as compared to the required 7,820.

The report went on to note that over 44,000 subcentres and over 1,000 PHCs have no electricity supply; nearly 23,000 sub-centres and nearly 1,800 PHCs have no water supply; about 28 percent of PHCs do not have a labour room for ensuring safe deliveries; a total of 65 percent of PHCs do not have a fully equipped Operation Theatre (OT) prescribed by the norms; and 30 percent of PHCs do not have the minimum of four beds for in-patients.

The acute shortage of healthcare personnel at the PHCs and CHCs was also highlighted by the report. In Bihar, while the government has sanctioned 4,129 posts of doctors for PHCs, only 1,745 have been filled.

CHCs lack key specialists, including surgeons, pediatricians, obstetricians and gynecologists. Despite the fact that the country's 5,183 CHCs need an estimated 20,732 specialists, only 13,266 have been authorised and just 4,957 are in place. These shortfalls are especially stark in some of India’s poorest states. Uttar Pradesh needs 2,844 specialists but has just 816 in place; Rajasthan requires 2,192 but has 438; Madhya Pradesh needs 1,236 but has a mere 46; and Gujarat should have 1,392 but has only 13.

The terrible conditions in Gujarat are revealing due to the fact that Modi spent 12 years as the state’s chief minister, and the state has frequently been touted as a model for India’s capitalist rise. In the rural Narmada district, which has a population of almost 600,000, there was only one dedicated COVID-19 hospital with 100 beds till the beginning of April. According to the Centres for Disease Dynamics and Economics, Gujarat has less than 100 hospital beds per 100,000 people and the country as a whole 138 beds—both far below the World Health Organization minimum standard of 300.

Due to the criminal refusal of central and state governments to provide the necessary resources to the chronically underfunded health care system, the task of caring for COVID-19 patients in rural India has largely fallen on Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA), an all-female workforce of volunteer community health providers who have received rudimentary public health training. Despite their dangerous and demanding jobs, ASHAs are paid 2000 rupees ($26.40) per month. They have been granted a miserly 1000 rupees ($13.20) in recognition of the additional duties they perform due to COVID-19. Many workers are not even receiving this meagre wage. On Monday, over 42,000 ASHA workers deployed across the southern state of Karnataka boycotted their jobs to protest the lack of proper personal protective equipment (PPE) and the state government’s failure to pay them for the last two months. “We are not even given proper masks, forget good quality PPE kits,” Farhana, an ASHA worker in the state capital Bengaluru (Bangalore) told the Indian Express. We are often neglected just like how it was last year as well.”

The COVID-19 calamity now engulfing India’s rural areas poses a grave threat to working people around the world. The Modi government’s policy of letting the virus rip is creating the perfect conditions for the emergence of new variants that could prove more resistant to vaccines. At the same time, India, which was expected to provide low-cost vaccines to many low- and middle-income countries in Africa and Asia, has banned the export of vaccines till at least the end of the year.

“Sacrifices” demanded for Tokyo Olympics, as Osaka hospitals reach breaking point

Emily Ochiai


Osaka city, the second largest city in Japan, has been the centre of Japan’s fourth wave of COVID-19 infections and deaths as the healthcare system is overwhelmed. As of now, Osaka has had over 17,098 reported new cases and a total of 734 deaths just in the month of May, with a daily average of 684 new cases and 30 deaths.

On May 25, the city of Osaka Prefecture held a task force meeting and announced that they will request the central government to extend the COVID-19 state of emergency for the prefecture amid the current healthcare crisis.

People wearing masks to help protect against the spread of the coronavirus walk in front of a screen showing the news on U.S. warning against visits to Japan Tuesday, May 25, 2021, in Tokyo. (AP Photo/Eugene Hoshiko)

Doctors have been warning since April that the city is “on the edge of healthcare system collapse.” Since the end of last week, hospitals have been at full capacity with reports on Thursday that 96 percent of the 348 hospital beds reserved for severe cases were occupied.

The city is running out not only of beds and ventilators but other essential resources and prescriptions. Propofol, a drug used to sedate intubated patients, is becoming scarce. Thousands of people are waitlisted to be treated and in some cases are dying at home with no access to beds. At least 17,000 COVID patients are at home and waiting for care. As of May 22, the official count is that 19 people have died at home while waitlisted.

It was reported Monday that a healthy 30-year-old man, infected with COVID-19, died before the city health centre responded to the initial report of his infection. The man died after six days and was never contacted by the health centre to assess if he would qualify to get access to care.

The government of Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga continues to do everything in its power to cover up and downplay the severity of this healthcare crisis in order to proceed with the Tokyo Summer Olympics.

If the games proceed to take place it is estimated 90,000 athletes and staff members from around the world would arrive in Tokyo in July. Showing complete disregard for human life, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) announced last Friday that they will proceed with the Olympics even under the state of emergency.

John Coates, IOC vice president, told a public meeting, “I can say it’s now clearer than ever that these Games would be safe for everyone participating and, importantly, safe for the people of Japan.” Despite feigning concern for the health of the population, Coates added that “the most important thing is giving athletes a chance to compete.”

On Saturday, IOC president Thomas Bach said in a meeting of the International Hockey Federation, “The athletes definitely can make their Olympic dreams come true. We have to make some sacrifices to make this possible.”

Bach’s comments sparked a flurry of denunciations by the Japanese public on social media. One twitter user asked, “Does he say that the safety, health, and life of the Japanese should be sacrificed for the Olympics?”

A poll released last Monday by the Asahi Shimbun daily found that 83 percent of the population are against the games, with 43 percent of respondents wanting them cancelled outright, and 40 percent wanting them postponed.

Adding further fuel to the fire, Japanese Olympics officials have stated Games will have audiences and announced plans to fill stadiums with 810,000 children from public elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools. All of this points towards the Olympics turning into daily super-spreader events.

Mass opposition continues to mount against the Olympic Games. Over the past month nurses have protested on social media with a quarter of a million tweets against the government’s request to redeploy 500 nurses to assist with the games as hospitals are strained to capacity. Doctors have released letters calling for cancellation. They denounced the prioritization of the games, declaring, “If a dispatch is possible they should be dispatched to hospitals.”

There have been other protests calling for the outright cancellation of the Summer Olympics. An online petition to cancel the Tokyo Olympics has nearly 400,000 signatures from people from more than 130 countries around the world. At protests in Tokyo, people held signs saying “Murderous Olympics,” “Prioritize life over Olympics” and “Nurses and doctors are at the edge.”

Japan’s insistence on proceeding with the Olympic games is solely to maintain its geopolitical position and the profits of the ruling class. IOC President Bach’s call for sacrifices implies the sacrifice of lives and safety of millions of people.

Despite the mass opposition, Prime Minister Suga told the media, “[We will] take all possible preventative measures for the infection for athletes and staff and hope to carry out safe and secure Olympic Games,” implying that he has no intention of cancelling the Games.

Since the start of the pandemic, there has been no real effort by the Japanese government to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. As of May 12, only 2.8 percent of the population has received at least one dose of vaccine and less than 1 percent have had two shots. Despite a stabilized shipment of the vaccines into the country, Japan is months behind the United States and other wealthy nations in vaccinating its population.

The current surge and the grim reality facing strained hospital systems expose the lie, which has been peddled by the ruling establishment in Japan, that the country is untouched and immune to the COVID-19 pandemic because of its standard of living.

Last year right-wing Deputy Prime Minister of Japan Taro Aso stated, “I often get phone calls from other countries asking about the low mortality rate in Japan and I say to them ‘Our people and your people have different levels of cultural standard(民度).’” Aso, who is notorious for racist comments in the past, implies that the suffering in impoverished countries is due to their barbarism compared to ‘advanced’ Japanese society.

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the level of indifference to the health and lives of working people by the Japanese ruling elites in pursuit of their profits. COVID-19 is a global pandemic, affecting every nation in the world and as such there is no national solution to the crisis. It is only the unified international working class that can put an end to the skyrocketing death toll by fighting for the implementation of proven scientific health measures to bring the pandemic under control.

25 May 2021

DAAD Postdoctoral Researchers International Mobility Experience (PRIME) 2021

Application Deadline: 31st August 2021.

Eligible Countries: All

To be taken at (country): Germany

About the Award: With co-funding from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the European Union, the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) gives young postdocs the chance to spend a period of time researching abroad, in combination with a research phase in Germany. What is special about this programme is that is provides jobs, not scholarships. Applications are invited from postdoctoral researchers of all nationalities and subjects.

Type: Research

Eligibility: Requirements for applicants include the following:

  • PhD completed before the start of funding
  • free choice of country for the research phase abroad, providing that the candidate did not spend a total of more than twelve months there in the previous three years
  • agreement of host institutions in Germany and abroad
  • confirmation from the German host that it is willing to employ the postdoctoral researcher for the entire funding period if funding is approved

Number of Awardees: Not specified

Value of Program: 

  • basic salary and international allowance, plus travel allowance for the researcher, spouse/partner and children
  • invitation to attend an orientation seminar before programme begins

Duration of Research: 18 months

  • twelve months spent abroad
  • six months spent in Germany

How to Apply:

  • The application form is available in the application portal. To get to the portal please click on Stipendiendatenbank für Deutsche, fill in Fachrichtung (subject of your research), Zielland (country of the period abroad) and Status “Promovierte” (position), and select the programme.
  • Please mind the instructions on registering on the portal, choose English as portal language, activate, if necessary, the compatibility view of your browser and choose English as browser language. After registration in the portal, please click on the tab “personal funding“.

Call for applications 2021/22 (German) [pdf-file]
Call for applications 2021/22 (English) [pdf-file]

Visit Research Webpage for details

TED Fellows Program 2022

Application Deadline: 30th June 2021 at 11:59pm UTC.

About the Award: Every year the TED Fellows program selects a new group of extraordinary, multidisciplinary individuals by open application. We look for innovators on the rise in their respective fields who are doing bold, original work.

Since launching the TED Fellows program, we’ve gotten to know and support some of the brightest, most ambitious thinkers, change-makers and culture-shakers from nearly every discipline and corner of the world.

Whether it’s discovering new galaxies, leading social movements or making waves in environmental conservation, with the support of TED, Fellows are dedicated to making the world a better place through their innovative work. And you could be one of them.

Apply to be a TED Fellow now through June 30, 2021 — that’s coming up soon, so don’t procrastinate!! We do not accept late submissions!

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility:

  • An idea worth spreading!
  • A completed online application consisting of general biographical information, short paragraphs on your work and three references. (It’s fun, and it’ll make you think…)
  • You must be at least 18 years old to apply.
  • You must be fluent in English.
  • You must be excited to participate in a collaborative, interdisciplinary global community.
  • You must be available for in-person conference in Vancouver (April 7-15, 2022).

Eligible Countries: International

To be Taken at (Country): Vancouver, Canada

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: TED will cover the costs of transportation to and from the TED conference, any visa you may need, accommodations and food while at the conference and conference registration.

  • You become part of a diverse, collaborative and global community of more than 500 emerging and established experts.
  • You receive professional development through virtual workshops and webinars.
  • You gain valuable feedback from TED’s expert coaches on how to hone, express and communicate your work and your ideas.
  • You will give a TED Talk (at a virtual or live event, depending on the state of the global pandemic).
  • You’ll receive career coaching and mentorship from our team of professional coaches.
  • You’ll get public relations guidance and media training.
  • You’ll participate in virtual programming for TED Fellows.
  • You will have the opportunity to participate in and contribute to a thriving and connected global community.
  • You will get a possible invitation to attend the special TEDMonterey conference in Monterey, California. (Note: while we are currently planning on an in-person conference in Monterey [May 29–June 4, 2021], given the global pandemic this conference may be cancelled and the TED Fellowship may become entirely virtual. This will depend on expert advice and local health safety protocols.)

Duration of Award: April 7-15, 2022.

How to Apply: Apply now

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

AfDB Japan Africa Dream Scholarship (JADS) 2021/2022

Application Deadline: 31st August 2021

Eligible Countries: African countries

To Be Taken At (Country): Japan

About the Award: The Japan Africa Dream Scholarship (JADS) Program – capacity building in energy sector through skills development for sustainable development– is a joint initiative by the AfDB and Japan that aims at providing two-year scholarship awards to highly achieving African graduate students to enable them to undergo post-graduate studies (i.e. a two-year Master’s degree program) in priority development areas on the continent and abroad (including in Japan). This Japan Africa Dream Scholarship programme is funded by the Government of Japan.

The overarching goal that the AfDB and the Government of Japan seeks to attain is to enhance skills and human resources development in Africa in a number of priority areas pertaining to science and technology with a special focus on the energy sector. JADS’s objectives are aligned with the Bank’s High 5 agenda (i.e. Light up and power Africa, Feed Africa, Industrialize Africa, Integrate Africa and Improve the quality of life for the people of Africa) and key Japanese development assistance initiatives to Africa and the 6th Tokyo International Conference for African Development (TICAD VI) outcomes.

Upon completion of their studies, the beneficiary scholars are expected to return to their home countries to apply and disseminate their newly acquired knowledge and skills, and contribute to the promotion of sustainable development of their countries.

Type: Masters

Eligibility: The Japan Africa Dream Scholarship is open to those who have gained admission to an approved Masters degree course at a Japanese partner university. Candidates should be 35 years old or younger; in good health; with a Bachelor’s degree or its equivalent in the energy area or related area; and have a superior academic record. Upon completion of their study programs, scholars are expected to return to their home country to contribute to its economic and social development.

Details on Eligibility Criteria are provided in that call’s Application Guidelines, and these detailed eligibility criteria are strictly adhered to. No exceptions are made.

Broadly speaking, nationals of African countries must:

  • Be a national of a AfDB member country;
  • Be in good health;
  • Hold a Bachelor (or equivalent) degree in the energy area (or related field) earned at least 1 years prior to the application deadline date;
  • Have 1 years or more of recent development-related experience after earning a Bachelor (or equivalent) degree;
  • Be accepted unconditionally to enroll in the upcoming academic year in at least one of the JADS partner universities for a Master’s degree;
  • Applicants living or working in a country other than his or her home country are not eligible for scholarships.
  • JADS does not support applicants who are already enrolled in graduate degree programs.
  • Not be an Executive Director, his/her alternate, and/or staff of all types of appointments of the African Development Bank Group or a close relative of the aforementioned by blood or adoption with the term “close relative” defined as: Mother, Father, Sister, Half-sister, Brother, Half-brother, Son, Daughter, Aunt, Uncle, Niece, or Nephew.

Selection Criteria: The Japan Africa Dream Scholarship programme uses the following four main factors and the degree of cohesion, to review eligible scholarship applications, with the aim of identifying the candidates with the highest potential, after completion of their graduate studies, to impact the development of their countries.

  1. Quality of Education Background
  2. Quality of Professional Recommendations
  3. Quality of Professional Experience
  4. Quality of Commitment to your Home Country
  5. Quality of Statement of Purpose

Japan Africa Dream Scholarship (JADS) awards scholarships to applicants who have had at least 1 year of paid employment in the applicant’s home country or in other African countries acquired after receiving the first Bachelors (or equivalent university) degree within the past 3 years.

The JADS Secretariat uses the following criteria to select the finalists:

  • Maintaining a reasonably wide geographical distribution of awards, that takes into account the geographic distribution of eligible applications;
  • Maintaining a reasonable distribution of awards across gender that takes into account the distribution of eligible applications across gender;
  • Giving scholarships to those applicants who, other things being equal, appear to have limited financial resources
  • Unusual circumstances / hardships, when assessing the employment experience and other aspects of an application.

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: The scholarship program provides tuition, a monthly living stipend, round-trip airfare, health insurance, and travel allowance.

How to Apply:

  1. Applicant requests for information and application forms and procedures from the chosen JADS partner university. For any inquiries, please contact JADS@AFDB.ORG(link sends e-mail)
  2. Applicant completes required documents and sends them to the university.
  3. University evaluates and selects applicants.
  4. University sends selected candidates to the AfDB.
  5. AfDB reviews submissions from universities, prepares and approves the final list.
  6. AfDB contacts selected awardees, and informs the universities.

Visit the Program Webpage for Details

Newton International Fellowships 2021

Application Deadline: 16th June 2021.

Eligible Countries: Non-UK countries.

To be taken at (country): UK

About the Award: The scheme provides the opportunity for the best early stage post-doctoral researchers from all over the world to work at UK research institutions for a period of two years.

The scheme covers the broad range of the natural and social sciences and the humanities. It also covers clinical and patient orientated research for applicants from Newton Fund partner countries.

The scheme is jointly run by the British Academy, the Academy of Medical Sciences and the Royal Society. Currently there is one round per year which opens in January.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: To be eligible to apply you must:

  • have a PhD, or will have a PhD by the time the funding starts
  • have no more than 7 years of active full time postdoctoral experience at the time of application (discounting career breaks, but including teaching experience and/or time spent in industry)
  • be working outside the UK
  • not hold UK citizenship
  • be competent in oral and written English
  • have a clearly defined and mutually-beneficial research proposal agreed with a UK host scientist

Before applying, please ensure that you meet all the eligibility requirements, which are explained in the scheme notes.

Number of Awardees:  Not specified

Value of Fellowship: 

  • Newton Fellowships last for two years. Funding consists of £24,000 per annum for subsistence costs, and up to £8,000 per annum research expenses, as well as a one-off payment of up to £2,000 for relocation expenses.
  • Awards include a contribution to the overheads incurred, at a rate of 50% of the total award to the visiting researcher.
  • Applicants may also be eligible to receive up to £6,000 annually following the tenure of their Fellowship to support networking activities with UK-based researchers.

Duration of Fellowship: 2 years

How to Apply:

Your application will go through the process detailed on the Making a grant application page overseen by the Newton International Fellowships Physical Sciences and Biological Sciences Panels.

Visit Fellowship Webpage for details

RNTC Fully-funded Media & Journalism Scholarships 2022/2023

Application Deadline: 22nd June 2021 16:00 CET.

Eligibility Subject Areas: As of today you can apply with a scholarship for the following courses:

  • Investigative journalism
  • Media campaigns
  • Producing media to counter radicalisation
  • Using media for development

About Scholarship: The RNTC Netherlands training centre provides training for media professionals from all over the world: from journalists and programme-makers to social activists and communications professionals from non-governmental organisations. Whether you are a journalist, a blogger or a media manager, there are courses to fit your needs.

The most commonly used scholarship for RNTC courses are the NFP and MSP (MENA) scholarships. NFP stands for Netherlands Fellowship Programmes (NFP), MSP stands for MENA (Middle East and North Africa) Scholarship Programme

Type: Short courses

Selection Criteria: The scholarships will be awarded on academic and professional merit.

Eligibility: RNTC Netherland Fellowships are available for professional journalists, programme-makers, broadcast trainers and managers coming from the countries listed below (a combined NFP list and low-middle-income countries according to the World Bank criteria).

Scholarship Benefits: An NFP or MSP scholarship will cover the full cost of your travel and visa (if required), accommodation and meals, insurance, and the course fee. The NFP and the MSP scholarship programmes are funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and administered by Nuffic, the Netherlands Organisation for International Cooperation in Higher Education.

Duration: scholarships are available for courses of two weeks or longer.

Eligible African Countries: Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Djibouti, DR Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Mali, Mauritania, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa, Sudan, South Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe

Other Countries: Afghanistan, Albania, Armenia, Autonomous Palestinian Territories, Bangladesh, Belize, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Brazil, Cambodia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Eritrea, Fiji, Georgia, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, Kiribati, Kosovo, Laos, Macedonia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Moldova, Nepal, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Samoa, São Tomé and Principe, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Syria, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vietnam, Yemen

To be taken at (country): The Netherlands

How to Apply: If you want apply for a scholarship to cover the costs of the course, you need to apply to both RNTC (for your course application) and OKP (for a fellowship).

You can apply twice a year during an ‘application window’ to see if you are eligible for a OKP or MSP scholarship. There are many more applications than there are scholarships available. Therefore, it is important that you meet all of the RNTC criteria (see individual course pages) as well as the Nuffic criteria, which you can find at the bottom of this page. If you meet all the RNTC ánd Nuffic criteria, and you would like to apply, then please follow all the steps in our How to apply page.

It is important to visit the Scholarship Webpage (see Link below) for more information on how to apply.

Visit the Scholarship Webpage for details

What’s Happening to the Telecom Trust?

David Rosen


Well, the telecom media rollercoaster is once again rolling.  On May 17th, AT&T announced that it was spinning off its WarnerMedia subsidiary that includes HBO and Warner Bros. for $5 billion and merging it with Discovery.  This followed the May 3rd announcement that Verizon was selling off its media holdings, AOL and Yahoo, for $43 billion.  Nevertheless, Comcast still owns NBC-Universal.  What’s going on?

A quarter-century ago, Pres. Bill Clinton signed the 1996 Telecommunications Act arguing that it would “promotes competition as the key to opening new markets and new opportunities.”  He insisted, “it will protect consumers by regulating the remaining monopolies for a time and by providing a roadmap for deregulation in the future.”

Unfortunately, Clinton’s “for a time” was short lived.  Immediately after the Act’s passage, the telecom industries began a period of mega mergers and acquisitions (M&As) that continues today.

This is noteworthy because it is led to greater market consolidation and the integration of telecommunications and the entertainment industries.  Two major acquisitions took place in 2005 – (i) SBC acquired AT&T for $16 billion; and (ii) Verizon acquire MCI for $6.6 billion.  After the acquisition, SBC kept the AT&T name, and then, in 2006, purchased BellSouth for $86 billion.

These mergers were followed by a series of additional M&As that included but not limited to the following:

+ Comcast acquired a controlling stake (51%) in NBC-Universal, a subsidiary of General Electric and French media conglomerate Vivendi Universal Entertainment for $6.2 billion in 2011.

+ Charter Communications acquired Spectrum (aka Time Warner Cable) for $55 billion and Bright House Networks for $10.4 billion in 2016.

+ AT&T acquired DirecTV for $67.1 billion in 2015; it bought Time Warner for $85 billion in 2018; and acquired AppNexus, a digital ad exchange that competes with Google and Facebook, for between $1.6 and $2 billion in 2018.

+ Verizon acquired AOL in 2015 for $4.4 billion and Yahoo! in 2017 for $4.8 billion.

+ Mobile and Sprint, valued at $26.5 billion, merged in 2020.

The outcome of telecom industry consolidation turned the traditional duopoly of phone and cable companies into today’s integrated voice, internet, video wireline and wireless communications system.  AT&T and Verizon dominate the nation’s wireless and wireline networks; Comcast and Charter/Spectrum control the full-screen, full-length wireline video signal market.

Since Clinton signed the Communications Act, federal regulatory policy has promoted M&As, a policy driven by the nation’s most influential conglomerates, ostensibly repositioning the U.S. for global competitiveness.  As a result, meaningful competition at the national level has all but disappeared, thus sacrificing a “free market” of communications services for an ever-more powerful handful of giant conglomerates.  And ordinary consumers, including telecom subscribers, have suffered.

Today, the “Telecom Trust” companies control the pipes — the wire and the wireless networks – that link the nation’s homes, businesses, schools, governments and people.  While the dominant financial, health-insurance and energy trusts have come under public scrutiny during the last couple of years due to their individual crises, little attention has been paid to the mounting power of the Telecom Trust.

During the fin de siècle and the early-20th century, the U.S. economy was dominated by a giant corporations dubbed “trusts” – and AT&T was one of them.  According to one source, between 1897 and 1904 over 4,000 companies were consolidated down into 257 corporate firms. U.S. Steel was formed by the merger of nine of the largest steel companies.

By 1904, some 318 companies controlled nearly 40 percent of the nation’s manufacturing output. One estimate claims that a single firm produced over half the output in 78 industries. These corporations became known as “trusts” – and they ruled with vengeance, using predatory pricing, exclusivity deals and other anti-competitive practices to undercut smaller local businesses and gain market dominance.

The development of the trust-dominated economy fueled the rise of the Progressive era and what Teddy Roosevelt dubbed “muck-rakers,” journalist who investigated and publicized social and economic injustices.  They included Jacob Riis, Upton Sinclair, Lincoln Steffens, Ida Tarbell and Ida B. Wells.

Progressives sought to elimination of government corruption, supported women’s suffrage, championed social welfare, prison reform, civil liberties and prohibition. Some supported civil rights, even backing the formation of the National Association for the Advancement for Colored People (NAACP).  Many Progressives feared that concentrated, uncontrolled, corporate power threatened democratic government.  They argued that large corporations could impose monopolistic prices to cheat consumers and squash small independent companies.  And these trusts could strongly influence both federal and state governments.

A century later, following merger after merger, the Telecom Trust — dominated by a postmodern “cartel” consisting of AT&T, Comcast and Verizon — came to control wireless services and broadband, internet and telephone (local and long-distance) services.

However, with the exception of Comcast’s acquisition of NBC-Universal, the recently announced sales of the AT&T’s and Verizon’s media holdings suggest that bigger is not always better.  It’s unclear how the spin-offs will playout for the new media companies that are being formed.

Verizon’s holdings of AOL and Yahoo recall the glory days of the early internet, with AOL founded in 1985 and Yahoo in 1994.  It is unclear if they can capture a significant audience – and advertising dollars – in today’s broadband streaming world.

However, the new Discovery with WarnerMedia suggests a different outcome.  As assessed by DocumentaryBusiness, the deal involves such established media brands as HBO, HBO Max, CNN, Cartoon Network and Warner Bros. Studio. Looking specifically at documentaries, it notes that the combined company includes HBO Documentary Films, CNN Films, Discovery Channel / Discovery+, and HBO Max.

DocumentaryBusiness points out that “the new Discovery/WarnerMedia venture is still primarily an ‘old model’ channels company.”  It adds that “75% of combined 2021 earnings (EBITDA) comes from the very linear cable networks that are in decline as they lose audiences to streamers.”  And warns: “The new Discovery may be even more tied to cable’s melting ice cube of cord-cutters and shrinking revenues.”

The sales of the media holdings by Verizon and AT&T suggests that a phase of Telecom Trust development may be over.  These conglomerates could not successfully – in a financial sense – make their respective acquisitions work.

Nevertheless, the Telecom Trust control wireline and wireless services.  It’s time to recall the 1948 Supreme Court decision, U.S. v. Paramount Pictures, that broke up the Hollywood studies control over movie theatres.  Why not separating wire from wireless distribution?