11 Dec 2021

Winter pandemic surges in Canada amid warnings Omicron variant could increase infections eight-fold

Dylan Lubao & Roger Jordan



A member of the Canadian Armed Forces working at a Quebec nursing home. (Canadian Dept. of Defence)

The winter surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada is accelerating rapidly, with Ontario and Quebec reporting a sharp increase in cases in recent days. The spread of the more infectious Omicron variant threatens to compound the danger posed by a wave of delta infections.

Modelling released Friday by the federal Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) predicted that infections could rise eight-fold from the current level of 3,300 daily infections to 26,500 in mid-January if Omicron becomes the dominant variant and turns out to be three times more transmissible than Delta. PHAC noted that Omicron’s “greater transmissibility” and the potential for “reduced protection from prior infection/vaccination” could drive the surge. Underlining this warning, British researchers reported Friday that people who have been double vaccinated have virtually no protection against an Omicron infection, and those with a booster jab only have a 75 percent protection against symptomatic infection.

Even in the unlikely event Omicron transmission does not take off and transmission rates remain at their present level, the PHAC modelers estimated that Delta infections alone could reach 6,000 to 7,000 per day next month.

Despite this grim picture, both the federal and provincial governments are committed to extending their “living with the virus” policies that have killed almost 30,000 Canadians to date. They cavalierly ignore the fact that even before Omicron established a presence in Canada, experts were projecting that a winter surge of infections would cripple already overstretched hospitals. Their indifference to the devastating health consequences for the population can only be described as criminal.

At a Friday press conference, Canada’s chief public health officer Dr. Theresa Tam dismissed the dire modelling projections as “another bump on the road,” before going on to acknowledge, “(W)e still don’t know enough about the Omicron variant, except it looks like it’s very transmissible.”

Quebec reported the highest provincial case total in the country with over 2,000 infections Friday. This marked the first time the daily case count had surpassed 2,000 since January, amid the devastating second wave.

Experts predict that with its current trajectory, Quebec will soon surpass the winter peak of 3,127 new cases recorded on January 9. With a reproductive rate of 1.15, second only to the small province of Prince Edward Island at 3.06, the growth of the pandemic in Quebec is exponential and will certainly explode in the days and weeks to come. The Coalition Avenir Quebec (CAQ) government intends to impose only token restrictions on indoor gathering limits.

Health Minister Christian Dubé doubled down on the “living with the virus” rhetoric by stating that the province was “exactly where we should be” in response to the jump in new cases. Insulting the intelligence of Quebec workers, Dubé pointed to the “relative stability in the number of hospitalizations,” and concluded, “I think we’re okay so far.”

In neighbouring Ontario, an alarming increase in new cases is taking place—1,290 infections were recorded on December 9, followed by another 1,453 on Friday. Friday’s infection numbers marked a 41 percent increase from a week earlier and the highest daily case count since May 23. For over a month, case rates have been rising, with the Progressive Conservative government of Premier Doug Ford paying lip service to the pending social catastrophe while doing everything in its power to ensure that schools and non-essential workplaces remain open to guarantee corporate profits.

Ontario has already recorded over 30 Omicron cases across almost all local health boards, suggesting that the variant is spreading widely in the community. This total does not include suspected Omicron cases under investigation. On Wednesday, Toronto reported its first school-related Omicron infection under conditions in which the number of COVID-19 outbreaks in schools is at a record high.

Tam confirmed at her press conference that 87 Omicron cases have been confirmed across Canada. She acknowledged that a growing number of Omicron cases had no links to international travel, underscoring that community spread has begun.

Despite the danger posed by Omicron owing to its increased transmissibility and ability to evade vaccine immunity, federal and provincial governments criminally downplay the threat. Virtually no specific measures have been adopted to block the new variant’s spread, other than a few token travel restrictions. This is in keeping with the “profits before life” strategy adopted throughout the pandemic by every level of government, from Trudeau’s Liberals on down.

Government officials and corporate media outlets are actively encouraging a barbarous policy of allowing the new variant to run rampant. Dr. Caroline Quach-Thanh, a member of the Quebec Immunization Committee that advises the provincial government, recently argued that booster shots for those under 60 may not be desirable if COVID-19 contracted via the Omicron variant was “mild.” Sounding like one of the fascistic advocates of the Great Barrington Declaration, she asserted, “maybe what you should do is let people get it and, as long as it doesn’t cause hospitalizations and death, that boosts the immunity naturally and that will protect the population.”

In Ontario, the Ford government has indefinitely halted its homicidal reopening plan, which called for the removal of all pandemic-related restrictions, including mask mandates and capacity limits, by March 2022. Although the government claims it wants more time to study the impact of Omicron and the winter surge, it has done nothing to curb the spike in infections already sweeping the province.

Ontario schools are driving the current surge. The majority of outbreaks in the province are tied to schools, with a record-breaking 317 outbreaks, including 255 in elementary schools where children aged five to 11 have just begun receiving their first dose of the vaccine. The government has come under fire from educators and parents for withholding rapid testing kits that could stop infected children from attending school and infecting their teachers and classmates.

Ontario’s Science Table, which provides expert advice on the pandemic to the government, recently released new modelling that shows that cases and hospitalizations in Ontario will rise rapidly even without the entry of the Omicron variant. The model shows that even with 50 percent of children vaccinated by the end of December, the province will experience 1,700 cases per day by mid-January. A “worst-case” scenario, where only 30 percent of children are vaccinated, would produce 3,000 daily cases and 400 filled ICU beds during the same time frame, straining the health care system to the breaking point. This would put the situation nearly on par with the winter and spring 2021 waves that killed thousands.

The maritime province of New Brunswick reported its highest-ever daily case total of 174 new cases on December 9, along with two additional deaths. Since reopening schools to in-classroom learning in September, daily case numbers have remained at their highest levels since the pandemic began. The province has a population of just 760,000, 5 percent of that of Ontario, but has 13 percent of the latter’s daily cases.

Progressive Conservative Premier Blaine Higgs admitted that about 50 percent of new cases have been traced to schools, where children, the majority of whom have yet to receive even one dose of a vaccine, are crammed into classrooms with poor ventilation.

Although the winter surge is only in its initial stages, workplaces are already emerging as a breeding ground for the virus. In Montreal, infections jumped by 50 percent over the past two weeks, driven largely by outbreaks in workplaces, schools, and child care facilities.

Montreal’s public health unit reported a doubling of workplace infections in one week, representing 48 outbreak sites at workplaces, the highest number since the end of the third wave of the pandemic in the city on June 8. At least 78 cases were traced to a major manufacturing company in Montreal’s west end, one of the largest outbreaks so far.

In the rest of the country, new cases, hospitalizations, and deaths are holding relatively steady. However, as the experience of Ontario, Quebec, and New Brunswick demonstrates, a rapid upturn in infections is only a matter of time. Sharp spikes in infections and hospitalizations are being recorded in northern US states directly across the border.

Other provincial governments across the country have gone even further than Ontario and Quebec in dismantling public health measures. In Alberta and British Columbia, a deadly wave of infections struck during the late summer and early fall. For most of October and November, these two provinces led the country in hospitalizations and deaths, the byproduct of “living with the virus” policies implemented by United Conservative and New Democratic Party governments that effectively amount to the pursuit of a herd immunity strategy.

Schools emerge as new hotbed for COVID-19 infection in South Korea

Ben McGrath



A medical worker in a booth takes a nasal sample from a man at a makeshift testing site in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, Nov. 24, 2021 [Credit: AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon]

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to worsen in South Korea, threatening to overwhelm the healthcare system, as daily infections and deaths continually reach new highs. On Friday morning, health authorities reported 7,022 new cases from the previous day. Only two days prior, the total reached a record-high of 7,174 cases.

In total, more than half a million people nationwide have been infected with COVID-19 during the course of the pandemic. Furthermore, on December 4, 70 deaths were reported from the previous day, also a record-high. In total, more than 4,130 people have been killed by COVID-19 in the past two years—approximately a quarter in the last month.

The latest hotbeds of COVID-19 infections are in schools and private after-school study academies. According to the Ministry of Education, 3,948 students under 18 were newly infected between November 29 and December 5.

In a month, infections have nearly doubled for elementary and middle school-aged students from 6.7 to 12.6 cases out of 100,000 people. This is nearly twice as high as working-aged adults. At present, only about 33 percent of adolescents between 12 and 17 are vaccinated while those 11 and under are not eligible to receive the vaccine.

The surge in cases among youth is linked to the full reopening of schools on November 22, though schools had gradually begun reopening throughout the year, when students attended classes in person or remotely on a rotating basis.

In the span of less than two weeks, two children under the age of 10 have died from COVID-19, the first children to pass away from the virus since the pandemic began. The Korea Disease and Control Prevention Agency (KDCA) announced the latest child’s death on December 7, stating that the six-year-old boy had died the previous day. The first child was a five-year-old girl who died on November 28, and only tested positive for COVID-19 after her death.

Both children had underlying health conditions. However, it is the policies of the government of President Moon Jae-in that bears responsibility for these, and other deaths. Seoul is pursuing a vaccine-only approach, mixed with very limited restrictions, often unenforced, on public gatherings. These include restricting groups to six people in the Seoul metropolitan area and eight in other regions, as well as requiring people to show proof of vaccination at indoor facilities like restaurants, movie theaters, and internet cafés.

Seoul’s purpose, despite the obvious danger, is getting parents back to work to churn out profits for big business. The government is presenting the pandemic as largely over in order to do away with any remaining restrictions.

In addition to the surge in new cases, there is the new Omicron variant, of which at least 63 cases have been discovered in South Korea. When it became clear the Moon administration planned to take no serious action, the stock markets rose sharply. Both the KOSPI and Kosdaq markets finished above 3,000 and 1,000 points respectively on Wednesday. Both markets have surged to new highs during the pandemic, with KOSPI in January closing above 3,000 points for the first time and Kosdaq closing over 1,000 points for the first time in 20 years in April.

Son Young-rae, the spokesman for the Health Ministry, essentially rejected any new measures on Thursday, saying: “As strengthened social distancing measures took effect from Monday, their results will show from the end of this week. We are monitoring the situation. We are discussing extra measures and the right time to put them into effect.”

In other words, while the country faces an immediate health crisis, the government is content to “discuss” possible future measures, any of which will be as toothless as the current ones.

The KDCA is now predicting that by the end of January daily cases could rise to as many as 11,000 per day. This is quickly overwhelming South Korea’s health care system, despite having nearly two years to prepare for such an explosion in new cases.

As of Friday, 852 COVID-19 patients are in critical condition, another record-high. Around the country, 78.8 percent of intensive care unit (ICU) beds had been occupied while 85 percent of ICU beds in the Seoul capital area had been occupied. Hundreds of people have also been left waiting for beds, with many arriving at hospitals dead.

Prime Minister Kim Bu-gyeom essentially admitted on Wednesday that the government was not prepared: “In the capital area, where 80 percent of the total cases are reported, we continue to add hospital beds with active cooperation from the medical community, but it is still tough to catch up with the pace of rising cases.” The Seoul region is densely populated and home to approximately half the country’s nearly 52 million people.

The government’s claim that vaccinations alone would be enough to initiate the so-called “with COVID” era, or living with the deadly virus, is falling apart. Vaccines are just one aspect of a campaign necessary to eliminate COVID-19, which includes strong social distancing measures.

The population is more vulnerable now as the new Omicron variant takes hold. At present, approximately 80 percent of the population is considered fully vaccinated with two doses while only 10 percent have received a third booster shot. Yet new information coming out about the contagious nature of the Omicron variant indicates that people will need at least three doses of the vaccine to be protected.

In addition, the vaccine pass system is experiencing push-back from confused and right-wing layers, to which the government is quickly bowing. Jo Hui-yeon, the superintendent of education in Seoul stated on December 7, “We are encouraging inoculation in regards to the seriousness of the COVID-19 situation, though it eventually is up to one’s own decision.” This is instead of requiring all workers and students to be vaccinated and working with scientists to educate the population as well as providing relief for those unable to be vaccinated for genuine health and age reasons.

The issue is not one of personal choice when those vaccinated can still catch and spread the disease, including to those unable to be vaccinated. Claims by officials like Jo are meant to push the belief that being vaccinated is enough in order to allow the government to continue lifting any restrictions on big business while forcing the population to suffer in the name of corporate profits.

Delta coronavirus variant overwhelms US hospitals as Omicron variant looms large

Bryan Dyne


Coronavirus cases in the United States have surged during the first full week of December. After the lull in reporting caused by the Thanksgiving holiday, confirmed daily new cases have jumped more than 30 percent from the end of November. At the time, cases stood at an average of about 90,000 a day and have now risen to just under 120,000.

In this Jan. 7, 2021, file photo, registered nurses Kyanna Barboza, right, tends to a COVID-19 patient as Kobie Walsh puts on her PPE at St. Joseph Hospital in Orange, Calif. [Credit: AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, file]

Hospitalizations have followed suit. Over the past month, hospitalizations have jumped from a recent low of more than 41,000 on November 10 to 57,000 today, including more than 14,000 in intensive care. And deaths have remained high, averaging more than 1,000 per day over the past month.

The rise in hospitalizations has already pushed hospitals across the Midwest and Northeast past their capacity. Geisinger Jersey Shore Hospital is operating at 130 percent, according to the Williamsport Sun-Gazette, of these patients 61 percent have COVID-19. The medical center’s CEO, Dr. Jaewon Ryu, noted in a press conference Wednesday that, “There was a day at Jersey Shore where every single patient other than one was admitted for COVID.”

The Indianapolis Business Journal reports that the Indiana University Health system has had to delay thousands of elective surgeries as a result of the state’s more than 5,000 daily cases. At Franciscan Health, medical workers have been forced to ration care in order to “match our caseload, both inpatients and outpatients, with available beds and staff on a daily basis.”

Indiana has also joined the growing number of states, including Maine, New Hampshire and New York, that have deployed the National Guard to medical centers in the past few days in response to rising COVID-19 hospitalizations. Other states that have called on the National Guard in recent weeks to assist with logistics, triage and vaccinations include California, Georgia, Kentucky, Oregon, Tennessee and Vermont.

Cases have also been sharply rising in Michigan and New York. Daily new cases in Michigan have doubled since October, spiking from a weekly average of about 4,000 per day to more than 8,000 a day. Deaths have followed suit, rising from an average of 51 a day to more than 100. And according to the Michigan Health & Hospital Association, COVID-19 hospitalizations jumped 88 percent during that same period.

Daily new cases in New York have also risen sharply in the past six weeks, rising from 3,800 on October 28 to more than 9,800 now. And while deaths have remained relatively low, they have still steadily climbed from an average of 35 a day to 53 per day. Hospitalizations, on the other hand, have soared at rates on par with Michigan, increasing 86 percent since November.

Hospitals are also reporting that many of their patients, including those that die, are younger, vaccinated or both. Jim Dover, president and CEO of Sparrow Health System in Michigan, told CNN that 25 percent of coronavirus patients that died at Sparrow hospitals were vaccinated. Katie Sefton, who has been a nurse for 20 years, noted that, “We’re seeing a lot of younger people,” among fatal cases of the virus. Sefton also warned, “we haven’t peaked yet.”

There have, however, been no calls for lockdown measures from government officials even as the pandemic races once again across the country. The most stringent measures have been taken in New York, where the state has been forced to announce a new indoor mask mandate, as well as a new vaccine mandate for private employers as cases continue to rise. In contrast, a federal appeals court recently reinstated an executive order by Texas Governor Greg Abbott banning mask mandates in schools.

Neither the Republicans nor Democrats, however, are genuinely concerned with saving lives. The Biden administration’s entire coronavirus policy banked on vaccinations being wholly effective, even in the face of emerging variants. A significant part of this strategy was forcing children back into unsafe schools, well before vaccines were authorized for younger age groups, helped along by Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers union.

The recent surge of the Delta variant in August and September, and the emerging winter surge, have proven this vaccine-only approach to be at best a complete failure, and at worst homicidally negligent. Since Biden took office in January, nearly 380,000 people have died from COVID-19.

Moreover, the current surge has occurred as the new Omicron variant begins to spread. So far, there have been less than 100 confirmed cases of the variant in the United States. Data from where the variant is more widespread, however, including South Africa, the United Kingdom and much of Europe, indicates that this variant is likely four times as infectious as the Delta variant and thus approximately ten times as infectious as the original variant. In South Africa, where the Omicron variant was first detected, the number of cases has skyrocketed from just 270 new cases a day to more than 15,000 in just one month.

A technical briefing from the UK Health Security Agency published on December 10 found a similar trend. The report estimates that by November 30, 1,219 of the 76,200 infections in the UK were caused by the Omicron variant, indicating a doubling time of just 2.5 days. The report then extrapolated the trend of increasing cases, warning that there could be 1 million cases a day by Christmas.

This is a staggering figure. Such sharp exponential growth predicts 3.7 million new infections in the UK in December. And while the infection rate will eventually peak as the virus saturates the population, the extent to which Omicron is capable of spreading raises the possibility of millions or even tens of millions more coronavirus cases in early January. In addition, Omicron has shown to cause reinfections, even among the vaccinated, indicating no one is safe from this incredibly infectious variant.

There is no reason to suspect that a similar situation will not arise in the United States. Assuming the same doubling time, 100 Omicron cases in the US will become 10,000 cases in just 12 days, 100,000 cases 8 days after that, and 1,000,000 cases 8 days after that. The dangers cannot be overstated and only the most comprehensive and urgent measures taken immediately to stop the spread of disease, above all closing schools and nonessential businesses, are capable of abating the oncoming wave of mass death.

Fifty-five immigrants killed, over 100 injured in Mexico truck crash

Bill Van Auken


The horrific crash of a truck packed with migrants in southern Mexico has laid bare the human cost of the anti-immigrant policies pursued by the Biden administration with the collaboration of the administration of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) in Mexico.

The death toll in the accident, which occurred on a highway in the southern Mexican state of Chiapas between Corzo and Tuxtlas, rose to 55 on Friday, after a 16-year-old girl being treated at a local medical center succumbed to her injuries. Reports indicate that a number of children and adolescents are among the dead and the more than 100 who were injured. According to preliminary counts, 83 men and 22 women were hospitalized in various facilities.

Bodies of immigrants killed in truck crash in Chiapas Mexico [Source: Twitter]

Videos and photographs from the accident site present a hellish scene. Some of the at least 161 migrants packed into the truck’s trailer were thrown from the vehicle, while others were left dead inside the wreckage or were seen making a torturous attempt to extricate themselves from the mass of bodies inside the damaged trailer.

The screams and wailing of family members desperately trying to revive those killed in the crash could be heard on videos recorded at the accident site. Rows of bodies were covered in white sheets, while others, their heads bleeding, protruded from the wreckage.

One man was heard in tears imploring a dying friend, “Remember what you promised your mother. Hold on!”

Residents of the working class neighborhood of El Refugio near the highway rushed to the scene to aid the survivors as best they could. They accused police of standing by and doing nothing.

The majority of those traveling in the truck were from Guatemala, while others were from Mexico, Honduras, Ecuador and the Dominican Republic. A number of the dead have yet to be identified.

The cause of the accident has been determined to be the truck speeding into a sharp curve and crashing against the wall of a pedestrian overpass, throwing the vehicle onto its side. It may have lacked functioning brakes, and the weight of the human bodies packed into the trailer was potentially a contributing factor. The driver of the vehicle fled the scene.

United Nations Secretary General António Guterres issued a statement on social media saying he was “horrified” by the mass death toll and declared that “Every person searching for a better life deserves safety & dignity.” He gave no indication, however, as to what forces are denying immigrants this right, supposedly guaranteed under international law, to “safety and dignity.”

In a press conference Friday, Mexico’s President López Obrador (AMLO) said that the tragedy had to be seen within the context of the world’s “monstrous economic and social inequality.” He went on to urge the US government to address the “root causes,” increasing aid to Central American countries to ameliorate conditions driving migrations, and to initiate a program of “temporary work visas” to allow entry of some refugees and immigrants.

The head of the Mexican National Guard, Luis Rodríguez Bucio, stressed to the media that the truck had not passed through any checkpoints manned by this military force to stop the flow of immigrants northwards.

The reactions of both AMLO and the National Guard chief were crafted to cover up their responsibility for the mass death through their enforcement of draconian anti-immigrant policies demanded by Washington to prevent migrants and refugees from reaching the southern border of the United States.

This repression has seen the detention in Mexico of over 228,000 migrants so far in 2021, according to Mexico’s National Institute of Migration (INM). It has forced migrants to pursue ever more dangerous means of crossing Mexico, while leaving them at the prey of criminal cartels working in tandem with Mexico’s security forces.

The mass deaths in southern Mexico come on the heels of the Biden administration’s reinstatement of the Trump-era’s Migrant Protection Protocol (MPP) or “Remain in Mexico” program, forcing all those seeking asylum on the US southern border to languish in makeshift camps in Mexico, awaiting the slow progression of their applications in US immigration courts.

The program, combined with the utilization of Title 42, a supposed health measure allowing authorities to turn back all migrants on the spurious grounds that they pose a threat of spreading COVID-19 in a country that already has the highest number of cases in the world, is aimed at suppressing immigration and intimidating those managing to reach the US border.

A report released this week by Mexico’s National Commission on Human Rights (CNDH) found that fully half of those sent back across the border under Washington’s MPP program had been victimized by crimes, including kidnappings, robberies, extortion, murders and sexual violence. In most cases, the victims made no reports to police for fear that they would only suffer further violence at the hands of authorities.

While bemoaning the effects of the MPP program, the Mexican government headed by the supposed “leftist” AMLO is fully complicit in it, agreeing to accept the return of the mostly Central American migrants denied their rights under international law as asylum seekers.

The crocodile tears shed by the likes of AMLO, Central American heads of states and US officials over the mass death caused by the crash in Chiapas cannot hide the fact that they are all complicit in the repressive regime designed to impede the flow of migrants to the US border that created the conditions for this tragedy.

The abject refusal of the US government and its servile clients in Mexico and Central America to provide immigrants a safe and humane means of reaching the United States and making their case for asylum, as guaranteed under international law, has created mass death and untold human suffering.

US consumer prices rise 6.8 percent, near 40-year high

Gabriel Black


US consumer prices continue to rise at rates not seen in four decades. The inflation rate—an index used to track the cost of living—rose by 0.8 percent during the month of November, according to data released Friday by the Department of Labor. The cost of goods and services has now risen 6.8 percent since last year—the highest annual rise since 1982.

The rise in costs follows last October’s rise of 0.9 percent. As in prior months, costs have surged in nearly every area. Below is a breakdown of the price increases compared to November 2020.

  • The cost of gasoline has increased 58.1 percent. The national average, according to AAA is $3.34 per gallon, up from $2.16 last year.
  • The price of food items at the grocery store has risen 6.4 percent. The largest increases have been seen in the meat, poultry, fish, and eggs category, which, as a whole, rose 13 percent. Beef, in particular, is up 21 percent.
  • The cost of fast food—which many working people rely on—has increased by 7.9 percent. Generally, eating away from home has increased by 5.8 percent.
  • The cost of gas to heat the home has increased 25.1 percent. While this increase is high, it has increased more rapidly in other parts of the world. In Germany, for example, natural gas prices are up 500 percent year-over-year.
  • The cost of buying a new car or truck has risen by 9.4 percent.
  • The cost of buying a used car or truck has risen by 31.4 percent. Edmunds.com reports that the average cost of a used vehicle is now a record $29,011.
  • Apparel costs have risen by 5 percent.
  • Electricity costs have risen by 6.5 percent.
  • The cost of ‘shelter,’ which includes rent, owners’ equivalent in rent, and lodging away from home, rose 3.8 percent.
Figure 1: Contributions to inflation [White House Council of Economic Advisors, Twitter, @WhiteHouseCEA, December 10, 2021]

These price increases have made a substantial dent into the well-being of tens of millions of people. Any worker on a fixed income, one that does not increase each year, has effectively received a 7 percent cut to their income over the last 12-months.

Comparing wage increases to price increases shows that workers’ incomes are not keeping up. Real average weekly earnings have now fallen 1.9 percent compared to a year ago, according to Bloomberg.

Jason Furman, a Harvard economist, estimated Friday that the average American family is now spending $4,000 more this year on costs. Writing on Twitter, Furman further noted that real wages are 2.9 percent below their historic trend of increase (see Figure 2).

Figure 2: This figure from Professor Jason Furman effectively shows real wages in contrast to its historical trend [Twitter, @Jasonfurman, December 10, 2021]

Rising costs disproportionately impact the working class. The poorest fifth of households, for example, spend between 29 and 43 percent of their income on food, according to a 2016 report by the US Department of Agriculture. In contrast, the richest fifth spend only 7 to 9 percent of their income on food.

Moreover, those in the upper ten percent of American society have their fortunes tied to the stock market. A record 89 percent of the stock market was controlled by the top ten percent of the US in 2021. While inflation has risen, the stock market is rising faster—with the Dow Jones Index up twenty percent from last year, sending the fortunes of the rich soaring.

Trader Robert Arciero works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Tuesday, Aug. 10, 2021. [Credit: AP Photo/Richard Drew, File]

The dramatic increase in the cost of living better puts in perspective the growing surge of working-class struggle in the United States. Likewise, it demonstrates why a series of important labor contracts in American industry have been concessionary contracts that leave workers with less pay, despite nominally providing an increase.

  • Kellogg workers recently voted down a contract which would see the highest paid tier of laborers only receive a 3 percent annual pay increase. When adjusted for inflation, Kellogg is effectively asking all workers to take a near 4 percent pay cut.
  • Dana auto parts, in collaboration with the United Auto Workers, barely passed a contract in October which saw wages rises for new hires increase from $17 to $18 an hour over the contracts four-and-a-half-year cycle. This effective 1.5 percent annual increase translates, with inflation, to about a five percent pay cut for these already low paid workers.
  • Sixty-thousand film and television workers organized under the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE) were forced to accept a 3 percent annual pay increase (the majority of workers voted it down, but the union claimed ratification based on its anti-democratic delegate system). This would amount to a near four percent annual decrease in pay.
  • Some 32,000 nurses and health care workers at hospital giant Kaiser were set to strike last month but the two unions representing them, the United Nurses Association and Union of Healthcare Professionals called off the strike, claiming they had reached a favorable agreement. In fact, the tentative agreement included just a 3 percent wage increase the first two years and a 2 percent wage increase the second two years of the contract—a significant pay cut against a seven percent inflation rate.

While multiple factors, including supply chain disruption and worker rebellion against low wage jobs, play a role in price increases, a central cause remains the policies of the US Federal Reserve.

Since the 2008 global financial crisis, the US central bank has injected some $8 trillion dollars into financial markets. Other central banks have followed suit.

This policy was intensified in March 2020 as the pandemic threatened to collapse the house of cards holding up global finance. Since then, the Fed has pumped $120 billion into markets every month. This wave of easy money for the financial aristocracy has driven their wealth to new highs. But it has also driven prices up across the economy, effectively foisting the bill of saving Wall Street onto the working class through higher costs and low wages.

The working class is responding to this with strikes, withdrawing from low wage jobs, and a general leftward shift in outlook. As Bloomberg cautioned, “Rising inflation is eating away at what the average American is taking home… how are workers reacting to this? With strikes across various industries.”

The ruling class faces an impossible situation.

If it stops its policy of providing endless money to financial markets, the unresolved debt and economic difficulties of the economy could implode, tanking the stock market and destabilizing economic growth.

However, if it continues with its policy of endless money, as it is currently, it will drive the working class deeper into poverty, threatening an eruption of class struggle that will directly threaten their rule.

10 Dec 2021

China’s Sputtering Economy

Tom Clifford


China’s economic engines are spluttering as they seek thrust to emerge from a stall.  The property sector is mired in debt. Empty apartment blocks, about 65 million units, dot the landscape. They represent just over 20 percent of homes in urban China. They seem to taunt the many millions in the country who desperately need better housing.  The World Bank estimates that 61 percent of China’s population lives in cities, up from 36 percent at the turn of the century. It is a property-owning society. About 90 percent own their own homes, with at least 20 percent having more than one.

On top of this, it is estimated that about 100 million properties have been purchased but not occupied.

New home prices in October fell by 0.2 percent, the biggest decline since February 2015.

The market is saturated and the population is aging which means the number of newly-built homes was set to decline anyway before this glut. It was the construction of homes that helped propel the economy. With a growing hostility to the US and a shift to state rather than private enterprises economic vitality seems to be draining. Major power cuts in cities and Covid cases are also taking a toll.

Covid has dampened international demand for goods manufactured in China.  And the country is no longer the answer it once was to the question; where will global growth come from? Courier services, delivering everything from hot meals to medicines, with long hours demanded for low wages, are mushrooming in Chinese cities but that means that people are spending less in the actual shops. Consumer consumption is weak.

There is much to admire and cherish about living in Beijing. The streets are clean and safe and for a city of 21 million it is remarkably efficient. But, there is always a but, there are caveats. Pollution is a problem. Less so than say four years ago but still a problem. Bookshops that sell quality tomes have closed. The best, Bookworm in the shopping area of San Li Tun, stopped trading about a year ago. Of course, bookshops are not an obvious economic indicator. But they can serve as the canary in the coalmine.

E-bycycles, those that can only be unlocked by smartphone apps, clog the pavements. This forces pedestrians to walk on the road and dodge the traffic. It is a hazard that causes injury to hundreds of people a year. The badly parked e-bicycles on busy pavements represent the clear and present danger of over-investment. Debt in China has increased 13-fold in the past 15 years  according to the Bank for International Settlements. It has mushroomed to about three times the size of the entire economy. Many of those loans, about 30 per cent, will never get repaid. GDP per capita is $10,500, about one sixth of the US equivalent.

The boys from the Chicago school of economics would be rubbing their hands with glee at the prospect of getting their hands on the economy  and letting market forces rampage, not necessarily for the benefit of the people. But even allowing limited economic reform would face stiff opposition from President Xi Jinping who would view this step as tantamount to loosening its grip.

Better a weaker economy and stronger party, from his point of view.

China’s economic miracle was simple. Unleash capitalism, red in tooth and claw.

A state sector, wasteful of both resources and investment, knows that it is Xi’s favorite economic model. Four decades after reform the population is still relatively poor, especially inland.

US export restrictions are beginning to bite. “Self-sufficiency” campaigns hope to replace foreign technology with homemade alternatives. But that, too, could be a drag on the economy.

If China is not on a trajectory to overtake the US economically then Washington needs to recalibrate and respond accordingly.

Xi could also use it to his advantage in another way, a flatlining economy may require a distraction. Growing nationalism? Certainly. A Taiwan crisis? Possibly. A weaker, rather than stronger, country poses challenges not just to the West but to itself.

IREX Community Engagement Exchange Program 2022

Application Deadline:

14th January 2022, at 11:59 pm EST.

Tell Me About IREX Community Engagement Exchange Program:

The CEE Program is a dynamic global network of innovators working with communities to address critical 21st Century issues. CEE equips dedicated visionaries with the expertise, skills, and resources to develop multisector approaches and build healthy and engaged communities in over 100 countries. 

A transformational leadership development experience, CEE is a year-long program designed to enable civil society leaders, ages 21-28, to harness the power of networks, relationships, and information for the public good, specifically on issues related to civic dialogue and peacebuilding, open and participatory government, women and gender, resilience and sustainable development, and youth engagement. 

Fellowship components include:

  • Three-month Practicum in the United States: IREX matches CEE fellows to civil society organizations throughout the United States. Designated supervisors and peers support the fellows through a three-month, hands-on professional practicum.
  • Leadership and Civic Engagement Academy: CEE Fellows explore the program themes through interactive curriculum that includes service learning, face-to-face trainings, mentorship, professional coaching, and inclusion in a global network.
  • Community Engagement Project (CEP): With the help of their U.S. host organization and mentors, CEE fellows design and plan a community engagement project to carry out after they return home. Once the fellows depart the U.S., they put these projects into action in their home communities.
  • Community Engagement Project (CEP) Exchange: Select U.S. hosts and CEE Specialists will travel to a CEE Alumnus’ country and work collaboratively to support the fellow’s project implementation and bring back what they learn to strengthen communities across the United States or their home country. 

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Fellowship

Who can apply for IREX Community Engagement Exchange Program?

Competition for the CEE Program is merit-based and open to emerging civil society and community leaders who meet the criteria below. Applications that do not meet these eligibility requirements will be disqualified and will not be reviewed by the selection committee.

  • You are between the ages of 21-28 at the time of application
  • You are a citizen of one of the eligible countries listed below
  • You have a minimum of two years of professional or volunteer experience at the time of application
  • You are living and working in your home country
    • Individuals with refugee status working on behalf of their home community may be given special consideration
    • You are working on a community engagement initiative in your home country, either in a professional or volunteer capacity, with a vision to pursue a career working to support civil society
  • You have a high level of proficiency in spoken and written English at the time of application
    • Semifinalists will be required to take or submit recent scores for a TOEFL or IELTS English language test
  • You are available to travel to the U.S. for three months
  • You are committed to returning to your home country to complete a Community Engagement Project (CEP)
  • You are not a citizen or permanent resident of the U.S. and have not applied for U.S. permanent residency within the past three years
  • You are eligible to receive a U.S. J-1 visa
    • Applicants who have participated in an exchange program sponsored by the U.S. Government must have fulfilled their two-year home residency requirement by the time of application
  • You are committed to returning to your home country for a minimum of two years after completing the program and
  • You are not a current IREX employee or consultant, or their immediate family member

Which Countries are Eligible?

  • Africa: Angola, Botswana, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe
  • East Asia and the Pacific: Brunei, Burma, Cambodia, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Mongolia, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Republic of the Marshall Islands, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam
  • Europe and Eurasia: Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia, Herzegovina, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Turkey, and Ukraine
  • Middle East and North Africa: Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, and West Bank/Palestinian Territories
  • South and Central Asia: Bangladesh, Bhutan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan
  • Western Hemisphere: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, and Uruguay

How Many Scholarships will be Given?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of IREX Community Engagement Exchange Program?

The program covers the cost of most expenses associated with:

  • J-1 visa support
  • Round-trip travel from participants’ home city to the U.S.
  • Monthly allowance to cover housing, meals, and other living expenses while in the U.S. and
  • Accident and sickness insurance

How Long will the Program Last?

12 months

How to Apply for IREX Community Engagement Exchange Program:

APPLY NOW!

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Orskov Foundation Grants 2022

Application Deadline: 31st December 2021

Offered Annually? Yes

Offered Since: 2006

Eligibility for Orskov Foundation Grants: If your application does not meet all the following criteria it will not pass the initial shortlisting for consideration by the Trustees.

  • Applications from students registered at university in a country not classified by the UN as lower middle income, or low-income will NOT be funded.
  • Applications seeking funding for equipment, or attendance at conferences, will NOT be funded.
  • Applications seeking scholarships to cover the costs of complete Bachelor, Masters or Doctorate courses, or parts of Bachelor, Masters or Doctorate courses will NOT be funded
  • Applications seeking funding to cover the costs of Bachelor, Masters or Doctorate research projects will NOT be funded
  • Applications that cannot demonstrate the potential to alleviate poverty and/or provide sustainable environmental benefits will NOT be funded.
  • Applications from students not studying degrees related to agriculture, land use or the environment will NOT be funded.

If you have got this far then keep reading, as the next section contains some important guidance that must be followed for a student application to be successful.

  • The Orskov Foundation Grants are only provided to help support costs of training at a university or similar organisation other than the university/college in which you are registered at the time of the application.
  • Eligible students MUST be registered for graduate degrees and MUST be able to demonstrate that they have full support from the relevant university department/organisation that they are seeking training from.
  • Preference will be given to support training aimed at sustainable land use problems with an emphasis on animal, plant and soil interactions, where it can be demonstrated that, in addition to contributing to knowledge, they will (a) have the potential to alleviate poverty and (b) provide sustainable environmental benefits, including adaptation/mitigation to the impact of climate change. Training out with these areas will not be funded.
  • The Trustees will only consider projects with a budget up to a maximum of £2,500.   This is the upper limit, not an indication that you should request this amount.
  • Applicants will be expected to provide a budget and FULL justification for the funding claimed. Applicants that do not provide an adequate breakdown of the anticipated expenditure will not be shortlisted for evaluation.
  • Please do not send any additional documentation, such as exam results, CVs, letters of support, etc.  These will not be used in the evaluation of your application.  Appropriate references will be sought for student applications that pass the evaluation stage.
  • Orskov Foundation Grants Projects will be selected by an open application process.  Grants will be awarded in March/April.
  • The deadline for receipt of applications is 31st December each year. Applications received after this date will not be considered for evaluation.
  • All applicants will be sent notification that their application has been received.  Applicants will also be sent an email in March or April of the following year to inform them whether they have been successful or not.  We will use the contact email address that you include on your application form, so please ensure that it is the correct address.
  • All successful student applicants will be expected to provide a full report at the end of their funding period.  This report will outline the outcomes from the application and a breakdown of the expenditure made.
  • Applications MUST be submitted using the Orskov Foundation application form and sent as a MS WORD attachment to an email.
  • All applications must be submitted in English.
  • Each section of the application form has been included for a reason.  In order to evaluate your application against all the others received you must include text in each section of the application form, otherwise your application will not be shortlisted.

How to Apply for Orskov Foundation Grants: Due to the evolving global impact and responses to COVID-19, as well as considering the carbon footprint of travel, this year we are inviting applications for either grants for online training, OR for grants for international travel for in-person training.

If you would like to apply for individual support from the Orskov Foundation follow these easy steps:

Visit Programme Webpage for Details 

Award Provider: The Scottish Government Small Grants Scheme