5 Feb 2022

COVID-19 death toll in US officially surpasses 900,000, driven by Omicron

Benjamin Mateus


Despite attempts by every media pundit and world leader to characterize the Omicron variant as “mild,” this has proven to be a patently false assertion.

The United States--the global epicenter of the pandemic--recorded 3,895 deaths yesterday pushing the seven day average to 2,656, according to tally kept by Newsnodes.

The New York Times and other media outlets reported that the US had officially surpassed 900,000 total deaths. According to the Worldometer’s COVID-19 dashboard, that figure is at 925,000. By all accounts, the US is expected to surpass one million cases before the end of March if the current pace in fatalities continues. In January alone, more than 60,000 Americans perished.

Team of doctors and nurses caring for a critically ill patient in an ICU in Brazil. (Source: Wikipedia)

The persistent warnings by principled scientists and world health experts against dismissing this very infectious variant of COVID-19 have gone essentially unheeded. The price for this hubris has been the astounding rates of infection with concomitant rates of hospitalizations and deaths that have been seen during the current wave.

For more than two weeks, the daily average of new infections has remained over three million. For January 2022, there were nearly 90 million cases globally, accounting for almost one-quarter of all infections since the pandemic began in 2020. The week beginning January 24 saw the highest rates with more than 23.2 million cases. There were also more than 63,600 deaths or close to 9,100 deaths per day.

In total, nearly a quarter-million people perished in January. At present, the seven-day moving average of deaths has surpassed 10,000 per day. Officially, more than 12,000 people died yesterday, exceeding the Delta wave high recorded in late August. The current rising trend in deaths continues its upward trajectory 30 percent shy of the winter peak on January 27, 2021, when 17,541 deaths were recorded.

There is nothing mild about Omicron.

A quick survey of yesterday’s reported COVID-19 deaths by country underscores the global scale of the current surge. Everywhere Omicron has taken hold, the death toll has climbed irrespective of the level of vaccinations and previous infections.

India noted 1,100 deaths; Brazil registered 923; Russia saw 667 killed; Mexico acknowledged 573 died. Even Japan, one of the countries that had seemingly contained infections, saw 93,388 new infections, a one-day high, and 78 people died yesterday with fatalities rising exponentially.

In Israel, two-thirds of the population have received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Eighty percent of the eligible population have received two doses plus a booster jab, including 90 percent of people over 60 years of age. Despite being highly vaccinated, infections peaked in the last week of January, with more than 83,000 new infections on January 23, 2022. According to statistics reported by the Ministry of Health, the daily death toll has now approached last winter’s peak.

Placing the scale of death into context, according to the Economist ’s excess death tracker, the estimated day-to-day excess deaths have reached 82,700, a pandemic high. The total excess deaths for the first month of 2022 was around 2.2 million people, meaning that 10.6 percent of all excess deaths during the pandemic occurred in the last month of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost all due to Omicron.

As the BA.1 variant of Omicron is riding roughshod from one country to another; the more contagious BA.2 subvariant is rapidly following in its footsteps. According to the website covariants.org, which tracks the frequency of sequenced variants (and not the number of cases), BA.2 was present in 81 percent of sequenced cases in the Philippines at the beginning of January. In Qatar, 32 percent of sequenced cases were BA.2. Most recently, India has seen 79 percent of sequenced BA.2 subvariant, and South Africa is at 24 percent. It is dominant in Denmark and growing in Europe and the US.

This week, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO), warned, “It’s premature for any country either to surrender, or declare victory. The virus is dangerous, and it continues to evolve before our very eyes.” Though not designated on their website yet, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO’s COVID-19 technical lead, said on Monday, “since BA.2 is Omicron, it is a variant of concern.”

The original variant, BA.1, was designated a variant of concern by the WHO on November 26, 2021, very soon after it was detected in South Africa. Three other subvariants are now being followed—BA.1.1, BA.2, and BA.3, with BA.2 being the most concerning. In their February 1, 2022, weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19, the WHO reported that “BA.2 designated sequences have been submitted [infection tracking site] GISAID from 57 countries to date, with the weekly proportion of BA.2 relative to other Omicron sequences rising to over 50 percent during the last six weeks in several countries.”

In a report published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), the authors challenged the subjective assertions that Omicron was milder than previous SARS-CoV-2 variants, an unscientific conception based on initial and limited observations to which the media and world leaders rapidly gravitated to support their criminally malign policy to let everyone rapidly become infected with the virus.

After acknowledging Omicron’s growth advantage over Delta and that hospitalization rates have been lower and deaths not commensurate with the number of infections, they wrote, “Even more than for previous variants, however, caution is warranted when it comes to making inferences about Omicron’s intrinsic traits, particularly its severity, on the basis of population-level observations.”

They added, “One important factor that should guide the interpretation of Omicron’s population-level severity is the level of immunity in affected populations.” Compared to previous waves, a higher proportion of people have been previously infected or vaccinated. Therefore, there is a higher level of preexisting population immunity, which complicates comparisons to earlier variants.

According to the NEJM review, two studies—an Imperial College London study and another out of the University of Cape Town —that corrected for these assortments of biases that have plagued observational studies estimated that Omicron was about 75 percent as likely as Delta “to cause hospitalization in an unvaccinated person with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.” The difference is essentially negligible, making the Omicron variant comparable to earlier strains in severity.

Recent data out of Israel have also found that some patients previously infected with Omicron have been reinfected with the BA.2 subvariant in a relatively short time. Though these numbers remain modestly small, they have considerable implications as infection or vaccination will see immunity wane considerably over a few months.

In an opinion piece published in the Globe and Mail, Blake Murdoch, a health law academic and privacy officer, wrote, “Many of us have now survived a COVID-19 infection, some with little effort and others with lasting debilitating effects. Sadly, not everyone made it—rest in peace, Grandfather. For some, there is a sense of calm that the worst must be over, that we will be able to heal and that the society we knew might return. But can our bodies handle, say, ten more COVID-19 infections over the next three years? That’s not ‘fear porn’—it is a possible scenario based on how we are handling Omicron.”

He added, “The idea that herd immunity from widespread Omicron infection will last longer than a few months is a mass delusion propagating in all forms of media. It’s the type of delusion sure to gain traction in a world where we are all absolutely sick and tired of the pandemic. It even ignores reality from three months ago, when Omicron didn’t exist and the idea of us benefitting from infecting everyone was a widely condemned idea.”

Yet, this is precisely what is being ordered by governments around the world with the added caveat that all attempts to track the critical statistics accurately—cases, hospitalizations and deaths—are being discontinued and the current state of affairs being presented as the new normal.

Dr. Hans Kluge, WHO regional director for Europe who has been pushing for declaring the pandemic over, speaking to reporters this week, said, “This period of higher protection should be seen as a cease-fire that could bring us enduring peace. This context that we have not experienced so far in this pandemic leaves us with the possibility for a long period of tranquility.”

Indeed, it has been this short-sighted, delusional optimism that has seen the repeated deadly waves cut through the population over and over again. Policies that allow the virus to run rampant across communities have functioned as an effective global gain of function experiment which spawned more virulent and infectious strains. The world cannot suffer to encounter the further variants spawned through these tactics and must immediately adopt an elimination strategy to bring the pandemic to an end. However, this is political question to which the working class holds the key.

In New Zealand, rising inflation, inequality intensify social crisis

John Braddock


Behind New Zealand’s outbreak of the COVID-19 Omicron variant, a slew of new economic figures points to the escalating assault on the social position of the working class by the Labour-Green Party government of Jacinda Ardern.

Reserve Bank of New Zealand [Image: Google Streetview]

Statistics NZ (Stats NZ) material posted late last month shows that, as elsewhere around the globe, inflation is rising more sharply than previously predicted. Official inflation at the end of 2021 jumped to 5.9 percent, its highest level since June 1990—up from 4.9 percent in the September quarter.

Inflation is rising globally due to fiscal and monetary policies put in place by central banks, led by the US Federal Reserve, which have pumped trillions of dollars to prop up big business and fill the pockets of speculators. The impact is now being exacerbated by supply chain crises restricting the production and distribution of many essential goods.

ASB bank economist Mark Smith told Stuff that inflation would rise above 6 percent in the current quarter, and it no longer looks “transitory.” The NZ Reserve Bank earlier forecast a 5.7 percent rise going into this year, and according to Smith clearly had “more work to do” to try to bring it under control.

Annual inflation is nearly triple the Reserve Bank’s target midpoint for price stability (between 1 and 3 percent), prompting expectations that it will continue ratcheting up interest rates. Infometrics forecasts the Official Cash Rate (OCR), currently 0.75 percent, will rise by 50 basis points at the bank’s February 23 review. The ANZ Bank expects the OCR to be lifted to 3 percent by early next year, its highest since 2015.

The rises will have a devastating effect on homeowners trying to service high mortgages. In December the national average asking price for a property jumped by a quarter year-on-year to reach a new high of $NZ956,150. According to a recent OECD report, house prices have increased more relative to fundamentals—household income and rents—than in most OECD countries. The share of the population under “intense rental stress” is the worst in the OECD.

New Zealand’s high inflation rate was partly due to “imported” inflation, with petrol prices increasing 30 percent in the year, according to Stats NZ. However, housing, household utilities and transport were major drivers. Construction prices were up 16 percent annually, while, according to Trade Me, the national median weekly rent rose by $40 last year to $560 a week. The latest food price figures showed their biggest jump in a decade—up 4.5 percent in December 2021 compared with the same time in 2020.

Wage growth was only 2.4 percent, well under half the inflation rate. Some 42 percent of workers did not get a pay rise at all last year, while of those that did, more than 80 percent were below inflation. In a boast that unwittingly exposed its own pivotal role in the onslaught on living standards, the NZ Council of Trade Unions declared the figures made it clear that “workers’ wages are not driving the current inflation changes.”

The suppression of wages is a product of the conscious policy of the Ardern government, which last year announced a pay freeze across the public sector, buttressed by the trade unions who have dedicated themselves to cancelling strikes and enforcing pay settlements below inflation. The unions are currently running a bogus campaign among low-paid workers, calling for a so-called “Living Wage” which is arbitrarily set at a totally inadequate $22.75 an hour, only marginally above the legal minimum of $20.

Economist Bernard Hickey declared on his The Kaka blog that the Stats NZ figures showed that, in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Labour government, supported by the Greens, “presided over policies that accidentally on purpose engineered the biggest transfer of wealth to asset owners from current and future renters in the history of New Zealand.”

According to Hickey, there has been a “stark explosion in inequality” since the onset of COVID-19. The Reserve Bank printed $NZ58 billion to purchase bonds from the commercial banks, while the government handed over $20 billion in cash subsidies to business owners. These policies helped drive up property prices and made the owners of homes and businesses $952 billion richer compared with December 2019.

The government paid a total of $19.95 billion in wage subsidies, resurgence payments and other support packages to businesses which recorded profits totaling $27.16 billion, up by $15.492 billion on the previous 21-month period. Businesses have repaid less than $4 billion of the support money while many, such as Harvey Norman, Kathmandu, and Fulton Hogan handed out large dividends to shareholders.

Renters, wage earners and welfare beneficiaries are the losers. Beneficiaries and the poorest received just an extra $48m in cash grants over 21 months, while debts to the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) rose by $400 million to $1 billion by mid-2021. Last year, 66 percent of people on a benefit owed a debt to MSD. Demand for food parcels at the Auckland City Mission more than doubled to 20,238 in the six months to June 2021 compared to the same six months in 2019.

Meanwhile, Hickey wryly noted, Ardern told Labour MPs assembled at a recent caucus retreat that her government had managed “equity and fairness” with “Labour values” during the COVID crisis and would continue to “manage challenges and change when it comes to climate, housing, poverty, everything we continue to face as a nation.”

In fact, the figures damn the Labour-Green Party government as the most right-wing, pro-business government in New Zealand’s history. Speaking to Radio NZ on January 27, Hickey observed: “a trillion dollars of wealth in less than two years landed in the hands of people who were already wealthy. At the same time as the government last Christmas refused to increase the benefits by $50 because they were worried that it would increase the government debt.”

According to a recent government report, the number of people receiving a main welfare benefit increased from 286,225 in June 2017 to 363,497 in June 2021, with most of the increase coming since March 2020 and largely associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Welfare payments went to more than half of families with children, and to more than two-thirds of Māori and Pacific households with children.

There is growing outrage over the deepening poverty crisis. Auckland University academic Susan St John, a spokesperson for the Child Poverty Action Group, wrote on January 17 that progress on child poverty under Labour, even before COVID, was not “the transformative poverty reduction we were promised.” The numbers of children in severe poverty—living in households with less than 40 percent of the median disposable income after housing costs—have barely budged since Labour took office in 2017. This amounts to 160,000 children “drowning without a lifeline,” St John declared.

Ricky Houghton, chief executive of He Korowai Trust, a Kaitaia-based Māori social service provider, told Radio NZ things have never been so bad for poor people in Northland. “It’s on the verge of civil disobedience,” he said. [The] people who ‘have-not’ will be taking what they need—and food is a basic human right—they will be taking from those that ‘have.’”

The growing anger among the working class at the inability to keep living under such conditions will undoubtedly lead to a radicalisation of consciousness and deepening hostility to the Ardern-led government and entire political establishment, including the trade unions. In New Zealand, as internationally, an explosive upsurge in the class struggle is emerging.

Bomb threats sent to historically black colleges across the United States

Dominic Gustavo & Noah Ryan


At least 21 historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) received bomb threats over the course of two days earlier this week, triggering a wave of fear and anxiety among students and staff, and forcing many of the colleges to lock down their campuses or cancel classes as law enforcement investigated the threats.

Howard University (Wikimedia Commons)

At least six colleges reported bomb threats on Monday, January 31. This includes Howard University in Washington, D.C.; Bethune-Cookman University in Daytona Beach, Florida; Southern University and A&M College in Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Delaware State University in Dover, Delaware; Albany State University in Georgia and Bowie State University in Maryland. The following day, which was also the first day of Black History Month, saw more than a dozen additional colleges targeted.

NBC News reported on Wednesday that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had identified six persons of interest. The FBI described the offenders as “tech-savvy” juveniles that utilized “sophisticated methods to try to disguise the source of the threats, which appear to have a racist motivation.”

The Associated Press reported details provided by Daytona Beach police chief Jakari Young on the threats made against Bethune-Cookman University. Young described a 20-minute phone call, during which the caller who claimed to be part of the Atomwaffen Division, a neo-Nazi terrorist group, outlined a convoluted plot involving multiple bombs and a threatened mass shooting.

In most cases, the bombing threats were delivered over phone calls made in the early morning hours. Many of the colleges issued lockdowns and shelter-in-place orders while FBI and other law enforcement agencies searched their campuses. At Xavier University of Louisiana, for example, the college administration evacuated the threatened area and issued a campus lockdown until it was determined to be safe.

For Howard University, the threats made on February 1 marked the third time in a month that the college had been menaced with violence. On January 5, Howard was among at least 8 HBCU’s that reported bomb threats.

No sign of explosives was found at any of the targeted colleges. But the threats caused significant disruption, while provoking fear, anger and apprehension among students and faculty.

The Washington Post quoted Jamera Forbes, a senior at Morgan State University in Baltimore and president of the college’s student body as saying, “[m]y main concern is my students’ mental health. As college students, we already have so much mentally to deal with… We’ve tried to push through and overcome so much with covid over the years, and we’re just trying to get back to a norm.”

Mary Schmidt Campbell, president of Spelman College in Atlanta, denounced the threats in an email to staff and students, “The threats are despicable. They are designed to make us feel fearful and vulnerable.”

The threats have been made under conditions in which schools and universities are becoming focal points of political radicalization. The reopening of schools for in-person learning in the midst of the uncontrolled spread of COVID-19, which has had predictably catastrophic results, has encountered significant opposition among students and educators, expressed most recently in the wave of protests and walkouts by high school students all over the United States.

The response of the Democratic Party, which has been leading the charge to reopen schools, has been first to center the discussion on race and second, to call for a heavier police presence on campuses. Typical was a perspective article in the Post by columnist Theresa Vargas, which declared: “For many students, HBCUs are more than learning institutions. They are havens. They are second families. And the recent bomb threats have taken away the security that comes with having that space.”

Howard University was itself the site of significant student protests last fall, with protesters occupying the student center and camping out in tents for over a month in protest of abysmal living conditions. The students were met with a heavy-handed response by the university administration, including attempts by the police to forcibly remove them.

The widespread existence of black mold in ventilation systems, vermin and rats living in student dormitories exposed the falsehoods spread by advocates of identity politics that HBCUs were “havens” and “safe spaces” for African American students.

While there can be no doubt that racism played a major role in the deliberate targeting of historically black colleges by white supremacists, the growth of far-right and fascistic forces in the United States and internationally has deep-going roots in the crisis of capitalism and of American democracy.

On the other hand, Democratic Party officials are utilizing the threats being made against HBCUs to promote the police and the FBI. The tone was set by Florida Democratic Representative and former police chief of Orlando Val Demings, who tweeted on January 31, “[t]he threats against HBCUs today demand a response. As a former law enforcement officer I'll keep working to make sure our institutions and law enforcement have the resources they need to keep all of our students and communities safe.”

Demings was on Democratic President Joseph Biden’s shortlist for Vice President during the 2020 election before he selected then-California Senator Kamala Harris for the position. In April last year, Demings appeared on CBS’s “Face the Nation” to defend the police killing of 16-year-old Ma’Khia Bryant in Columbus, Ohio. Bryant was shot several times by an officer during a domestic disturbance.

Demings defended this action, saying at the time “it appears that the officer responded as he was trained to do” when he shot the teenager.

Demings comments on the bomb threats were reinforced by Biden Press Secretary Jen Psaki, who told TheGrio that the administration takes “these threats incredibly seriously.” Psaki informed the news publication that the Department of Homeland Security “is in close touch with law enforcement authorities at a federal and local level” and was planning a response.

The Democratic Party’s invocation of law-and-order echoes similar remarks made by the far-right Trump administration. “I will always support the incredible men and women of law enforcement as much as you have always supported me,” said Trump in 2017, shortly after taking office. 'Our country is suffering from a far-left radical movement ... that is trying to defame, demoralize, defund, dismantle and dissolve our great police departments,' he declared in August, 2020, amid mass anti-police brutality protests.

The Democratic Party’s dual-promotion of law enforcement and racialist politics has been a constant theme following the mass protests against police brutality that swept the globe following the brutal murder of George Floyd in May 2020. Those protests, which were multiracial and multiethnic, were met with fierce repression by both the Democratic Party and by the Trump administration. 

This promotion of the police and identity politics found a culmination in the election of former police officer Eric Adams as New York City mayor in November. Adams and the New York Democratic Party have been feverishly promoting “law and order” following the killing of two New York City police officers last week. On Thursday, President Biden joined Adams alongside leading New York City police officials to hail the resumption of “anti-gang” neighborhood safety patrols and call for more funding for police agencies across the country.

AP reporter challenges US lies about Russian war preparations

Clara Weiss


In a remarkable exchange on Thursday, State Department spokesman Ned Price was challenged by Matt Lee from the Associated Press for selling baseless allegations about an impending attack by Russia on Ukraine to the public as “facts” based on “declassified information.”

Ned Price (Credit: C-SPAN)

Ned Price—a former CIA operative—appeared before the press on Thursday, declaring that “The United States has information that Russia is preparing fabricated attacks by Ukrainian military or intelligence forces as a pretext for a further invasion of Ukraine.”

This would involve, Price continued, the “production of a propaganda video with graphic scenes of false explosions, depicting corpses, crisis actors, pretending to be mourners, and images depicting destroyed locations and military equipment—entirely fabricated by Russian intelligence. To be clear, the development of such a propaganda video is one of many options that the Russian government is developing as a fake pretext to initiate and potentially justify military aggression against Ukraine. … Russia has indicated it’s willing to continue to diplomatic talks, but actions such as this suggest otherwise.”

Turning to the press for questioning, Price clearly expected everything to go as usual. In the past three decades, the US government and intelligence agencies have fabricated one lie after another to justify the illegal invasion and destruction of entire countries in Yugoslavia, the Middle East and North Africa, with little to no questioning from the media. On the contrary, these lies were gladly picked up and recycled bythe New York Times and other outlets that then either cheered on the bombing of innocent civilians or covered up these war crimes.

Julian Assange, who has exposed some of the most horrendous war crimes of US imperialism, has been persecuted, surveilled and tortured at the behest of Washington for over a decade and now faces extradition to the US. The vast majority of American media outlets and journalists have dropped any pretense of defending Assange and, along with that, the freedom to publish and free speech.

Yet, in a rare moment of lucidity and sign of critical thinking among journalists, Matt Lee from the Associated Press challenged Price after the conclusion of his presentation. The exchange is worth quoting at some length.

Matt Lee: What actions [suggesting that Russia is not interested in diplomatic talks] are you talking about?

Ned Price: The action that I just pointed out, the fact that Russia continues to engage in disinformation.

Matt Lee: You made an allegation that they might do that, have they actually done it?

Ned Price: What we know Matt is what I have just said is that they have engaged in that activity.

Matt Lee: What activity? What activity?

Ned Price:….We told you a few weeks ago that we have information that Russia has also already propositioned a group of operatives conditioned to conduct a false flag [operation] in Eastern Ukraine. So that, Matt, to your question, is an action that Russia has already undertaken.

Matt Lee: It is an action that you say that they have taken, but you have shown no evidence to confirm that and I’m going to get to the next question here which is: What is the evidence that they planned [this action]? What is this? Crisis actors? Really? I mean this is Alex Jones territory you’re getting into now. What evidence do you have to support the idea that there is some propaganda film in the making?

Ned Price: This is derived from information known to the US government, intelligence information that we have declassified.

Matt Lee: OK well where is it? Where is this information?

Ned Price: It is intelligence information that we have declassified.

Matt Lee: But where is it? Where is the declassified information?

Ned Price: I just delivered it.

Matt Lee: No, you made a series of allegations. …

Ned Price: What would you like Matt?

Matt Lee: I would like to see some proof that you can show that shows that the Russians have been doing this.

Ned Price: You have been doing this for—

Matt Lee: That’s right, I have been doing this for a long time. … I remember WMDs [weapons of mass destruction] in Iraq, and I remember that Kabul was not gonna fall….I remember a lot of things. So where is the declassified information other than you coming out saying it?

With just one simple question — “what evidence do you have?” —Lee threw Price completely off and exposed a simple fact: The current press campaign over an allegedly impending “Russian invasion” of Ukraine and “false flag attacks” has no more credibility than Colin Powell’s lies of “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq.

This campaign is aimed at creating both a pretext for conflict, and conditions where Russia can be blamed for such a war. In fact, the allegations of a “false flag operation” being prepared by Russia are a clear indicator that a real false flag operation is being concocted by the CIA and the White House. Its likely helpers and executors are US proxy forces in Ukraine, chief among them neo-Nazi paramilitaries like the Azov Battalion, which have been heavily armed and funded by Washington and NATO over the past several years.

But the exchange didn’t end here. Clearly irritated by Lee falling out of line, Price said, “I’m sorry you don’t like the content, I’m sorry you’re doubting the information that is in the possession of the US government. … If you doubt credibility of the US government, of the British government and of other governments and want to find solace in information that the Russians are putting out, that is for you to do.”

This implicit questioning of Matt Lee’s “national loyalty”—“if you want to find solace in information that the Russians are putting out, that is for you to do”—has a sinister and threatening undertone. It is a clear indicator that preparations for both war and dictatorship are well underway. Everyone is supposed to fall in line for the sake of “national unity” and “defense of the fatherland.” Those who question the US government, the intelligence agencies and the military will be portrayed as “friends of Putin,” and, by extension, “traitors” to the fatherland.

The first victim of war is the truth. This is why the role of the media—or, rather, the transformation of the media into a tool of government propaganda—is critical for every war effort. The very fact that Price was taken by a long-time journalist daring to “doubt the credibility of the US government, of the British government and of other governments”—the most basic professional obligation of any journalist worth the name—shows that the integration of the media into the state and security apparatus is already very far advanced.

But the exchange also shows something else: the extreme nervousness of the ruling class. The most basic of all journalistic questions clearly threw Price off and exposed the fabrications of the latest propaganda effort of the US state machine as a house of cards, ready to collapse at the slightest pressure.

Neither this nervousness nor the war hysteria and preparations can be understood outside their class context. The United States is a powder keg. Over 900,000 people have died from COVID-19 in a preventable pandemic. The lives of millions of workers have been upended by social misery and the deaths of their loves ones, while the billionaires and “pandemic profiteers” have grown their wealth to staggering proportions. These conditions are mirrored internationally.

Olympics open under clouds of war

John Malvar


The opening ceremonies of the 2022 Winter Olympics were staged on Friday in Beijing. Two thousand nine hundred athletes have gathered from 91 countries and regions throughout the world to compete in the games.

The Olympic flag is carried into the stadium during the opening ceremony of the 2022 Winter Olympics, Friday, Feb. 4, 2022, in Beijing. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

The global pageantry of the Olympics, its celebration of extraordinary athletic prowess realized through competition and solidarity, retains the ability to move viewers throughout the world. There is breathtaking gracefulness to figure skating and an electric intensity to the slalom. One senses, albeit onesidedly, the truth in Hamlet’s lines describing humanity “infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable.”

Nationalism has always distorted this humane core to the games, fragmenting the universality of competition behind the bitter rivalries of nation-states. Imperialist war and great power rivalry disfigure the Olympics, turning sports into a form of politics by other means. Inordinate sums of money chasing after yet greater profit—advertising, endorsement contracts—flood the games, squeezing the humanity, sometimes even the life, from the athletes.

The distortion has seldom, if ever, been as pronounced as it is now. The 2022 Winter Olympics in China are being staged in a world wracked by disease and poised on the edge of global conflict. There is an air of unreality within the Olympic bubble, as just outside the safety of its bounds, Washington churns out propaganda and lies to justify war with Russia over Ukraine and to attack China’s Zero-COVID public health measures as authoritarian, even fascist.

Athletes from around the globe depart from countries in the grip of mass death to the one country on the planet where the virus has been effectively eliminated. Over 900,000 Americans have died of COVID in less than two years, according to official numbers, while in China, a nation with four times the population, the death toll is less than five thousand.

Global capitalism, with the United States at its core, is intransigently unwilling to take the necessary measures to save human lives. Millions have died of a virus whose spread was entirely preventable. The pandemic has fundamentally destabilized social relations and in the developing struggles of the working class, whose very lives are at stake, the ruling elite glimpse the specter of revolution.

It is the crisis of capitalism, the need to suppress unrest and to secure reliable sources of profit, that has driven Washington war-mad. Over the past month, the United States, with NATO in tow, has piled high a mountain of baseless allegations and lies all directed toward provoking a war with Russia over Ukraine, a war that if it erupted would inevitably spill past borders and ignite a global conflagration. Without pausing for breath, Washington spews a stream of bile at China, an unending series of slanders, each more unhinged than the last. China is termed “fascist,” a “genocidal regime,” repressive to its people and a coldblooded killer of puppies and hamsters.

The perilous geopolitical stakes surrounding the Olympics found expression in the summit held before its opening ceremonies. Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin met to grapple with the mutual threat they face from US imperialism.

They issued a lengthy joint statement which declared “Russia and China stand against attempts by external forces to undermine security and stability in their common adjacent regions.” They expressed a joint intent “to counter interference by outside forces in the internal affairs of sovereign countries under any pretext, [and] oppose color revolutions.” These declarations pointedly target the war machinations of Washington and NATO.

The statement continued, we “oppose further enlargement of NATO and call on the North Atlantic Alliance to abandon its ideologized Cold War approaches.” Putin affirmed Russia’s support for the one-China principle, declared that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, and expressed opposition to all forms of Taiwanese independence. Most significantly Putin and Xi concluded a deal for the sale of Russian oil and gas to China worth an estimated $117.5 billion. 

The United States is staging a diplomatic boycott of the Olympics. White House press secretary Jen Psaki declared that the boycott was in response to the “ongoing genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang.” The claim that China is engaged in genocide of the Uyghur population is a lie manufactured out of whole cloth. Washington is drawing on the playbook of Goebbels and Hitler, employing the technique of the “big lie,” repeatedly insisting on a falsehood of such spectacular magnitude that no one calls it into question.

The Biden administration attempted to orchestrate a global campaign of official boycotts involving other governments. A small number of close US allies followed suit, but the efforts were largely in vain. The end result was that the opening ceremonies were deprived of the presence of the customary entourage of high-ranking American officials.

This is an Olympics being boycotted by the war-makers. Normally it is pacifists who will not go to a country that is making war, but now it is the opposite.

There is an objective logic to the rhetoric of lies spun by Washington and its pliant corporate media. Each must compound what came before. The headlines and editorial pages of the major papers around the world are imbued with the spirit of war propaganda.

An op-ed in the Washington Post on Monday argued that China was a “fascist state.” Fox News speaks of the “Genocide Olympics.” The Economist depicted a young woman of dual US and Chinese citizenship who chose to compete for China as a “Cold Warrior” being stolen by a Chinese hand with chopsticks. The chauvinist and openly racist targeting of China has immense consequences. Anti-Asian hate crimes rose 339 percent last year in the United States.

Washington had hoped that its provocative rhetoric would encourage athletes to boycott the opening ceremonies, but almost none did. Eighty percent of the American team participated and the majority of those absent were either at remote locations or quarantined with COVID. Looking to cover up the abject failure of these provocations, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced on Thursday that she “discouraged” Olympic athletes from protesting at the opening ceremony in Beijing, saying that it was not “worth the risk of reprisal from a ruthless Chinese government.”

Every lie from Washington stands reality on its head. They accuse the one country in the world that has taken the necessary public health measures to stop the spread of COVID of “human rights abuses,” while nearly one million Americans are dead of the virus. They denounce China for suppressing information, while they move to stop the reporting of daily cases and the total number of dead in the United States.

Washington declares its profound concern for the Uyghurs, and then demands China end its Zero-COVID policy. How many Uyghurs would die if Beijing followed Washington’s dictates? If China truly wished to carry out genocide, it could find no more effective means than implementing the domestic policies of the Biden administration.

China remains a country wracked by profound contradictions. Its extraordinary economic growth is driven by the intense exploitation of the working class and the foundations of its development rest upon the bloody massacre of workers at Tiananmen. The allegations and denunciations of China from Washington are a pack of lies, but China is no oasis of freedom and democracy.

China remains caught up in the fundamental problems posed by the 1949 revolution, which was deformed from the outset by the nationalist policies of its Stalinist leadership. It is impossible for the Chinese masses to liberate themselves from the threats of imperialism outside of a revolution of the working class in the advanced capitalist countries. The remorseless objective logic of the pandemic has demonstrated that it is impossible to eliminate Covid on a national basis. Outbreaks will recur again and again, and will require aggressive measures to be contained.

The only way to put an end to the pandemic and its reign of mass death is through a globally coordinated policy to eliminate the virus building upon the scientific public health measures that have been put into practice in China. The success or failure of Zero-COVID rests with the international working class.

The thrust of all Washington’s propaganda is that China must end its Zero-COVID policy. Every day that this policy persists reveals to the world’s working class that there is an alternative to global mass death. The Winter Olympics has put this alternative at the center of world attention.

As opening ceremonies commenced in Beijing, the New York Times ran an article headlined “Zero-Covid in China” that made the following extraordinary statement: “China’s strategy would obviously not be possible in a country that emphasizes individual rights as much as the US does.”

The conclusion that flows inexorably from this declaration is that “individual rights,” as understood by the US ruling class, is opposed to—and certainly held to be more important than—the protection and saving of lives. But what about the “individual rights” of the one million Americans who have died because of the government’s refusal to implement effective public health measures? The only “right” left to a dead person is the right to be buried.

In essence, when the Times speaks of “individual rights,” it is concerned only with the “right” of capitalists to exploit labor, reap profits, and accumulate massive personal wealth. Where that conception of “individual rights” predominates over the right to live, the policy of Zero-COVID—i.e., the prevention of viral transmission and the elimination and eradication of COVID-19—is “obviously,” as the Times bluntly admits—not possible.

This is a devastating exposure—by the authoritative voice of finance capital—of the present-day priorities of American society. The New York Times, in its attack on the policy of Zero-COVID, has unwittingly made a powerful argument for socialist revolution.

4 Feb 2022

Commonwealth Distance Learning Scholarships 2022/2023

Application Deadline: 15th March 2022

Eligible Countries: Bangladesh, Cameroon, Eswatini, Ghana, Guyana, India, Kenya, Kiribati, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Rwanda, Samoa, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, The Gambia, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia

To be taken at: UK Universities

About the Award: 

Commonwealth Distance Learning Scholarships are offered for citizens of certain developing Commonwealth countries. These scholarships are funded by the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), with the aim of contributing to the UK’s international development aims and wider overseas interests, supporting excellence in UK higher education, and sustaining the principles of the Commonwealth.

These scholarships are offered under six themes:

  1. Science and technology for development
  2. Strengthening health systems and capacity
  3. Promoting global prosperity
  4. Strengthening global peace, security and governance
  5. Strengthening resilience and response to crises
  6. Access, inclusion and opportunity

Find out more about the CSC Development themes.

Type: Masters

Eligibility: To apply for these scholarships, you must:

  • Be a citizen of or have been granted refugee status by an eligible Commonwealth country, or be a British Protected Person
  • Be permanently resident in an eligible Commonwealth country
  • Hold a first degree of at least upper second class (2:1) standard; a lower qualification and sufficient relevant experience may be considered in certain cases
  • Be unable to afford to study your chosen course without this scholarship.

The CSC aims to identify talented individuals who have the potential to make change. We are committed to a policy of equal opportunity and non-discrimination, and encourage applications from a diverse range of candidates.

Selection Criteria: Selection criteria include:

  • Academic merit of the candidate
  • Potential impact of the work on the development of the candidate’s home country

How to apply: The CSC’s online application form is now open.

  • You should apply to study an eligible Master’s course at a UK university that is participating in the Distance Learning scheme. Click here for a list of participating universities and eligible courses.
  • You must also secure admission to your course in addition to applying for a Distance Learning Scholarship. You must check with your chosen university for their specific advice on when to apply, admission requirements, and rules for applying. You must make your application using the CSC’s online application system, in addition to any other application that you are required to complete by your chosen university. The CSC will not accept any applications that are not submitted via the online application system.
  • You can apply for more than one course and/or to more than one university, but you may only accept one offer of a Distance Learning Scholarship.
  • It is important to go through all application requirements on the Programme Webpage see link below) before applying

Visit the Scholarship Webpage for Details

L’Oréal-UNESCO Sub-Saharan Africa Young Talents Programme 2022

Application Deadline: 25th March 2022

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: Sub- Saharan African countries listed below

To be taken at (country): Sub-Saharan African Universities

About L’Oréal-UNESCO Sub-Saharan Africa Young Talents Programme: Founded in 1998, the L’Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science Sub-Saharan Africa Fellowships aims to promote and encourage young African women in science. Its programs reward established women scientists whose outstanding achievements have contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge and of its benefits to society and provide support to promising young women who are already making significant contributions in their scientific disciplines.

Eligible Field of Study: This program identifies and rewards talented young female scientists in the field of Life Sciences (such as biology, biochemistry, biophysics, genetics, physiology, neurosciences, biotechnologies, ecology and ethology) as well as Physical Sciences (such as physics, chemistry, petroleum engineering, mathematics, engineering sciences, information sciences, and earth and universe sciences).

Eligibility: Applicants for L’Oréal-UNESCO Sub-Saharan Africa Young Talents Programme must meet the following general criteria:

  • Having obtained Ph.D. degree in Life or Physical Sciences or pursuing studies leading to a Ph.D. degree
  • Having the nationality of a Sub-Saharan African country
  • Working in a Research Laboratory or Institution in one of the region’s countries or being- enrolled in a doctoral programme at a University in Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Candidates must be no more than 40 years old by the end of the application period for- PhD and not more than 45 years for Post-doctoral.

Selection Criteria: The selection criteria of the candidate by the jury are the following:

  • The candidate’s outstanding academic records (including number, quality and impact of the publications (impact factors to be submitted), conference presentations, patents…)
  • The scientific quality of the research project
  • The innovative nature and productivity of the research and its potential application in science

Number of Awards: The Program honors 15 doctorates and 5 post-doctorates every year.

Value of L’Oréal-UNESCO Sub-Saharan Africa Young Talents Programme:

  • €10,000 each will be granted to Ph.D. Students enrolled in- an African University.
  • €15,000 each will be granted to 2 postdoctoral researchers- working in a laboratory or research institute registered in one of the region’s countries.

Eligible Countries: South Africa, Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Comoros, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Equatorial Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Namibia, Níger, Nigeria, Uganda, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, Sao Tomé & Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Chad, Togo, Zambia and Zimbabwe

How to Apply for L’Oréal-UNESCO Sub-Saharan Africa Young Talents Programme: Applications can be only made  here  by the candidates themselves.  An application is considered complete only if it includes all documents below:

  • A detailed Curriculum Vitae (including outreach activities among youth, tutoring, etc.)
  • Certified copies of the degrees or recent diplomas-
  • A proof of having obtained a Ph.D. degree for postdoctoral candidates-
  • A proof of being enrolled in an African University for doctoral candidates-
  • A detailed project of maximum 2 pages, including:
    • The research project description
    • The proposed use of the grant motivating the candidature with some budget indications
  • Letters of recommendation from the research supervisor and/or the director of the- scientific institution where the research project is carried or the Dean of the University under which the candidate is running her research
  • The list of publications and patents

Incomplete files or received after the deadline for application, as well as candidatures that do not meet the requirements mentioned above, will not be taken into consideration.

It is important to download and go through application rules and regulations from the Fellowship Webpage below before applying

Visit Fellowship Webpage for details

The Pope, Children and Furry Companions

Monika Zgustova


During his first audience of the year, the Pope called couples who do not procreate or do not procreate enough “selfish”: “One of the forms of selfishness today is that some people do not want to have children, or only one,” Francis said: “However, they do have dogs and cats that take the place of children. Yes, I know it’s funny, but these people feel that it is more comfortable to have dogs or cats. The denial of fatherhood and motherhood undermines us and humanity is lost.”

Presumably the Pope was aware of the controversy to which his words would give rise. Because what does society think about this issue? According to surveys conducted among Western European citizens between 18 and 40 years of age, the majority prefer pets, and the prevailing reasons for not having children are, above all, of an economic and ecological nature. These people argue that our overpopulated planet does not need more inhabitants: population growth is one of the causes of both global warming and the loss of biodiversity. Moreover, the vast majority of salaries do not allow for decent housing, either to buy or to rent. Having two or three children is a huge expense that not everyone can afford. Likewise, raising children well requires dedication and time, neither of which is in abundance thanks to today’s busy work schedules.

It is surprising that the Pope, a strong advocate of preserving the environment and making adoption measures more flexible, who never misses an opportunity to condemn inequality and consumerism, does not take into account the opinions of these potential fathers and mothers, who, like him, are aware of their responsibility towards the environment. He should also pay more attention to women around the world who are demanding the right to contraception and abortion.

The Pope is aware that the billions of people who live in poverty need more food and water, land and energy, as well as infrastructure. He also knows that the Christian community is shrinking in the Western world while Christianity is gaining influence in sub-Saharan Africa and the Asia-Pacific region, i.e. in densely populated areas. He knows this and yet he asks for more children.

Instead of calling for population growth, the Pope and the Church should reconsider their very closed attitude towards abortion and start funding contraceptive methods to alleviate the lack of contraception in many parts of the world. According to CNN’s op-ed writer Alistair Currie, “270 million women have an unmet need for modern methods of contraception”. By encouraging or even sponsoring contraception rather than opposing it, the Pope and the Church would do a great favor to women, humanity and the planet as a whole.

Since the Catholic Church has a long history of dictating to women what to do with their bodies, criticism has been quick to follow these statements by the Pope. Both men and women consider the Pope’s statements to be not only insensitive but offensive to women. The Washington Post quoted Dana Nessel, Michigan’s attorney general, who referenced her experience in this way on Twitter: “Having done a great deal of work with the foster care system, I can tell you nothing is more “selfish” than having kids you don’t want just because the Pope thinks you should. Your children will know they weren’t wanted, and it leads to terrible outcomes for both the kids and parents.” Lydia Spencer-Elliott argues in the British Grazia Magazine that “the individual choice (and it always should be a choice) of whether or not to bring a child into the world can’t be taken lightly. It’s a monumental life-changing responsibility that calls for consideration of your mental health, finances, living-situation, career goals and environmental ethics.”

Dictatorial regimes often extort and blackmail people with children more easily than those without. In totalitarian countries, many parents would like to take an active part in dissent; if they stay in the background, it is because they fear the reprisals their children might face. Something similar happens at work: those who do not have children can stand up to injustice without so much fear because they lack the responsibility of being a mother or father. This freedom to oppose what is considered unjust is another reason some people give for not having children.

For all these reasons, more and more people are opting for furry companions. Eighty-three percent of Spaniards boast about motherhood or fatherhood with respect to their pets. In this context, it is excellent news that, since the beginning of this year, pets in Spain, where I live, have been considered by law as “living beings endowed with sensitivity” and have become members of these multi-species families not only de facto but also in the eyes of the law.