17 Feb 2022

COVID cases surge in South Korea as virtually all public health measures ended

Ben McGrath



A medical worker in a booth takes a nasal sample from a man at a makeshift testing site in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, Nov. 24, 2021 (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)

The number of COVID-19 cases in South Korea has skyrocketed by tens of thousands in recent days. On February 10, the number of daily new cases reached 54,122, an increase of 31,218 from the number of daily cases a week earlier. Similar numbers hovering over 50,000 have been reported each day since then. This explosion in new infections is a direct result of the policies of the Moon Jae-in administration, which has essentially junked all measures to stop the spread of the virus.

Nearly 60 percent of all deaths during the two years of the pandemic have taken place since November 1 last year when Seoul began the so-called “with COVID” era, in which the population would be forced to “live” with the virus. The deadly consequences of this policy quickly became apparent as the healthcare system was overwhelmed and deaths shot up. This has not given Seoul pause, however.

On February 7, government health authorities announced that they would no longer provide care for most COVID-19 patients, claiming they would only focus on those over 60 or with underlying health conditions. Infected patients will receive treatment at home, divided up into a high-risk group and a so-called general care group, with the former receiving remote treatment and consultations while the latter will not be monitored at all. The policy of treating patients at home, rather than in designated facilities, is an extension of measures initially implemented last October.

In announcing the new measures, the Central Disaster and Safety Countermeasure Headquarters claimed, “The Omicron strain is less likely to develop serious symptoms and has a lower fatality rate compared to the Delta variant, and the majority of the patients suffer light or no symptoms. So the current disease control and medical system, which equally focuses on all patients, is less efficient and can neglect the care of patients at high risk.”

The decision is being presented as the inevitable and unavoidable outcome of the surge in Omicron variant cases. Actually, it represents Seoul’s decision to allow COVID-19 to run rampant throughout the country and remove any restrictions on big business’ ability to rake in profits.

In addition, the government will only monitor people who are unvaccinated and living with a confirmed COVID patient. Those who have been fully vaccinated will not be monitored or required to quarantine, instead only advised to get tested if they begin to show symptoms. Unvaccinated people living with a confirmed COVID patient will not be directly notified, but instead authorities will pass on the information through the patient. The quarantine period for those infected has been reduced to seven days.

Even testing has been restricted. Most people are forced to rely on at-home self-testing kits, which are currently unavailable at most pharmacies and stores. Contact tracing has essentially been discarded. As a part of the new measures, confirmed patients have been asked to merely fill out an online questionnaire regarding their social activities. All of this ensures that people who are infectious will pass on the deadly virus to others.

The surge in the number of cases that began at the end of last year was concentrated in schools as all online classes came to an end and students were forced back into classrooms. Four children and adolescents have since died from the virus, most recently on February 4. A 17-year-old boy from the city of Gwangju passed away, despite having received two doses of the COVID vaccine and no underlying health conditions. The boy was recuperating at home and was even released from quarantine on January 31 before his symptoms dramatically worsened. He was rushed to a hospital but died the following day.

When the pandemic initially began, Seoul implemented a number of measures to prevent the spread of the virus, including contact tracing, strict quarantines, mask requirements in all public places, restrictions on public facilities, and the closing of schools for in-person lessons. These measures played a big role in preventing mass infection in the densely populated country.

However, these steps were not taken out of concern for public health, but the fear that the failure to protect people from the virus would lead to mass anger. Gradually, these measures were ended as the government claimed the population could return to “normal,” giving a false sense of security.

The media focuses on a small minority of people opposed to vaccine and mask mandates to give the impression that there is widespread opposition to anti-virus measures. In fact, the opposite is true. About 86 percent of people have received two doses of the vaccine while nearly 60 percent have received a third dose. A survey conducted by Statistics Korea at the end of last year found 92 percent of people viewed mask wearing as a positive. An additional poll carried out by Research View in December reported that 71.3 percent of people supported stronger social distancing measures.

However, the huge opposition to the mass infection of the population finds no expression in the official political parties like the ruling Democratic Party of Korea or the right-wing opposition People Power Party. The same is true for minor, so-called progressive parties like the Justice Party and the trade unions. The “militant” Korean Confederation of Trade Unions has worked to block any worker opposition to the Moon government.

Ultimately, these changes are meant to force people carrying COVID-19 to continue going to work and to keep children in schools, so that workers do not have to take time off to care for their children or other family members. This is to ensure that big business can continue to extract record amounts of wealth from the working class as a result of widespread speculation during the pandemic.

In the first half of 2021, for example, the top 30 major conglomerates like Samsung Electronics turned record profits, totaling 33.18 trillion won ($US27.69 billion), a 220 percent increase over the previous year. At the same time, these companies created less than 1 percent of new jobs in the same time period, with most companies actually reducing their workforces.

On February 13, it was announced that the four major banking firms in South Korea—Hana Financial Group, Shinhan Financial Group, KB Financial Group, and Woori Financial Group—are expected to pay out record dividends of 3.8 trillion won ($US3.2 billion) or approximately 26 percent of net profits from 2021.

COVID-19 deaths continue to rise among children in the US

Renae Cassimeda



Children ages 5 to 11 wait in line with their parents to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine at a pediatric vaccine clinic set up at Willard Intermediate School in Santa Ana, Calif., Nov. 9, 2021. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, File)

Despite the efforts by the ruling elite and the corporate media to falsely claim that SARS-CoV-2 has become endemic and will be more like the seasonal flu, COVID-19 infections and deaths continue at rates comparable to the peaks of previous waves.

A recent investigative report by Gothamist comparing provisional COVID-19 data by sex and age and preliminary influenza-associated pediatric deaths data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) explodes the lie that the disease is mild and is akin to the flu.

First, the report notes that influenza-related pediatric deaths nearly disappeared among children in 2021. This was largely due to the broad-based use of mitigation measures across the US and in schools. Second, COVID-19 deaths among children not only far outpaced flu-related deaths but have risen sharply throughout the pandemic.

Just three flu-related child deaths were reported in 2021 compared to 539 COVID-19 reported deaths among children in the same period. Additionally, as flu-related deaths diminished between 2020 and 2021 almost to zero, reported COVID-19-related deaths among children nearly tripled from 198 reported deaths to 539. The report also showcases that the greatest number of deaths in 2021 occurred during the last five months of the year, amid a surge of the Delta variant and after schools reopened for the fall semester.

Since the spread of Omicron, the frequency of deaths among children has only continued to rise. According to the same report, at least 58 reported deaths have been recorded since the start of 2022 alone.

It must also be noted that the CDC dataset used in the Gothamist report is a vast undercount of actual COVID-19 related deaths among children due to lack of systematic reporting and testing across the US. Further, the CDC dataset used in the report, which organizes the sex and age of reported COVID-19 deaths by month, year and location of death, is itself an incomplete tally of the total number of preliminary reported child COVID-related deaths by the CDC.

The CDC reveals on its website that the above cited data are “provisional” and do not represent all deaths that were reported from 2020 to present. A footnote in the data states, “Data during this period are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more.”

Another dataset on the CDC website, “Deaths by age group,” which is a preliminary report of the total number of reported deaths by age, shows a major discrepancy between the two datasets. While the provisional dataset used in the Gothamist report shows that 822 children have died from COVID-19 during the pandemic, the demographic dataset shows that 1,334 children have died from COVID-19.

This means that at least 512 reported child COVID-19 deaths have yet to be coded with date and location information and input into the provisional dataset. This discrepancy further counters the lie that COVID-19 is “mild” and does not significantly impact children. In reality COVID-19 is much more contagious and deadly than the flu, including in children.

Notably, in the past month since January 14, preliminary data from the CDC show that 293 new COVID-19 deaths among children have been reported.

While there is an overall lack of reporting in the mainstream media covering recent child deaths from COVID-19, one report in the local Missouri press points to the devastating impact it can have on infants. On February 1, Amelia Peyton of Iberia, Missouri, died from COVID-19 at just nine months old. Her twin sister also tested positive for the virus and recovered.

Children under 5 remain the most vulnerable to infection as they have yet to be eligible for the vaccine and vaccination rates remain low among children 5 through 11 with only 24.3 percent of children in this age group fully inoculated.

The level of COVID-19 infection among children has also reached record levels in recent weeks. The latest American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) report shows more than 4.7 million children have been infected with COVID-19 since the beginning of the spring semester in early January. Contrary to the lies that schools are safe, the reality is that they are known centers for disease transmission.

It is under these circumstances that mitigation measures are being lifted in schools across the US by both Democratic- and Republican-led states alike. This is coupled with the ongoing efforts by the ruling elite to cover up the devastating impacts of the pandemic on the population and impose mass infection policies.

The Biden administration has claimed that schools are the safest places for children during the pandemic and has endorsed anti-scientific guidelines promoted by the CDC in order to force children into unsafe classrooms. This includes recent changes around testing, recommendations to end individual contact tracing and the lowering of isolation and quarantine time for students and staff including allowing exposed children to quarantine at school as long as they are asymptomatic. Further, the CDC continues to refuse to promote the understanding of the airborne character for the virus and the need for adequate ventilation in indoor spaces.

The latest effort for removing all trace of pandemic mitigations in schools has been over indoor universal masking. Presently there are eight Republican-led states with bans on mask mandates and fifteen Democratic-led states with mask mandates presently still in place in schools. However, exposing the bipartisan effort to promote the lie that COVID-19 is endemic and the population must learn to live with the virus, thirteen out of the fifteen states with mask mandates for schools have announced plans to lift their mandates in the coming weeks.

Massachusetts and Connecticut will end school mask mandates by the end of this month. Governors in New Jersey, Rhode Island, Delaware and Oregon have announced plans to lift mask mandates in schools in March. Louisiana has left the choice to individual districts and Maryland is allowing schools to lift their mask mandates if more than 80 percent of the student population is vaccinated. Governors in California, New Mexico and New York have announced plans to reassess school mask mandates in the coming weeks.

The further lifting of mitigation measures in schools will facilitate more infection, death and long-term illness among students, staff and their families.

How Volkswagen plays off temporary workers against each other and the permanent workforce

Dietmar Gaisenkersting


The Volkswagen Group, its contract labour subsidiary Autovison, and its service subsidiary Volkswagen Group Services (VGS) employ a treacherous and sophisticated system to divide workers amongst themselves. Like a three-card Monte player, they push workers from one company to another in order to better dismiss and exploit them.

Volkswagen plant in Wolfsburg, Germany (Vanellus-Foto / CC BY-SA 3.0)

For the soon-to-be-launched production of the electric ID.4 model in Emden in northwestern Germany, the company plans to hire almost 1,500 new workers through Autovision by April. Volkswagen currently employs almost 9,000 workers in Emden.

At the end of last year, 148 temporary contract workers lost their jobs in Emden. Employees report that VW had already hired 160 new workers at the same time. The former temporary workers are now to be offered a two-year employment contract with the VW parent company. Another 200 are to come from Volkswagen Group Services, which was planning to cut jobs anyway.

Since VGS employees are usually not used in production, they receive lower wages than the contract workers from Autovision, who will be used in the production of the ID.4. At Autovision, wages for production workers are at lower levels than at Volkswagen itself.

For some VGS workers this is still attractive, as they sometimes come from jobs where they earn €10 to €12 per hour less. They are being lured with the higher wages at Autovision. Therefore, even VGS workers with permanent contracts are likely to give up their jobs to move to a better-paid temp job. They hope, of course, that they will be hired as full timers by Volkswagen after two or three years at the latest.

By hiring workers through VGS, Volkswagen thus saves itself both severance pay and exposure to potential labour court proceedings, as would be the case for laid-off permanent workers.

VW left the job of announcing the hiring of 1,500 workers in Emden to the union bureaucrats in the works council. Manfred Wulff, chairman of the Emden works council, announced the board’s decision, which it had already taken on Monday, at an IG Metall union press briefing on Thursday. Also according to the works council, the start of production of the ID.4, originally announced for March, will be postponed somewhat, but will take place “in the spring of this year.”

The announcement also serves to support the IG Metall slate in the next month’s elections for works council representatives. Leaving it to the works council to make the announcement allows the unions to save face after their approval of the dismissal of around 1,150 temporary contract workers at all VW locations late last year, which stirred anger against the union among the workforce.

In the meantime, Autovision has announced that beginning in March an additional 570 temporary workers will lose their jobs at the Baunatal plant, near Kassel. At the end of November, the contracts of more than 440 temporary workers had only been extended by three months, to the end of February. Another 150 workers have their contracts set to expire at the end of February, meaning a total of 600 contract workers will lose their jobs in the coming months. It is not yet clear whether they will be offered jobs in Emden, almost 400 kilometres away.

In addition to the production of the ID.4, production of Passat and Arteon models with combustion engines will continue in Emden. Works council leader Wulff did not say whether workers from other VW factories—for example, from the main plant in Wolfsburg, 250 kilometres away—could be temporarily transferred to Emden in addition to the temporary workers.

There were rumours among workers in Wolfsburg that they might be transferred to northern Germany in the course of the year. Last week, VW’s top management announced it would cut almost all night shifts in Wolfsburg from mid-April.

For the Tiguan, Touran and SEAT Tarraco vehicles, the shortage of microchips and other electronic components has forced VW to reduce production on these models to only one assembly line in three shifts after the Easter holidays. Everywhere else, a two-shift system will be enforced. This affects different versions of the best-selling model, the Golf. For workers, this means a severe drop in wages, as shift bonuses will be abolished.

The chairperson of the VW general works council, Daniela Cavallo, who also chairs the works council at Wolfsburg, tacitly agreed to the move, declaring only: “We have taken note of these plans of the company.”

In the upcoming works council elections in March, Cavallo faces opposition from within the company. Former Wolfsburg IG Metall secretary and VW works council member Frank Patta accuses Cavallo—as do other candidate slates—of not consistently representing the interests of the 60,000 workers in Wolfsburg. By refusing to produce an electric model at the site, he says, Wolfsburg has fallen behind.

But Patta and the other candidate slates are not concerned with the interests of the workforce. They can only be defended if workers at all sites—including internationally—unite and fight together. But Patta and the other works council candidates, like Cavallo, divide workers from one plant to another. Identifying with the perspective of CEO Herbert Diess and his management team, the main issues for them are sales, capacity utilisation, cost reduction, profitability, profit and dividends—never jobs, working conditions and wages.

Cavallo and Patta worked closely with the previous works council chairman Bernd Osterloh for many years. Cavallo was systematically built up by him as his successor, Patta was brought onto the VW works council by Osterloh in 2012 to ensure peace and order as general secretary and chair of the world and European group works council until 2018.

The dispute between these two long-time bureaucrats is not about who better represents workers’ interests, but who better enforces the interests of the company against the workers.

With decades in the leadership of the works council, and now on the company supervisory board, Cavallo is far removed from rank-and-file workers. When she speaks in public, she speaks like a member of the board. She always talks about “we,” meaning Volkswgen. The shop floor workers hardly feature in the thoughts of this co-manager.

In an extensive interview last week in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, she answered a question about how many jobs will be eliminated in the switch to electric vehicle production by declaring, “no one can say exactly today.” But what was clear, she said, was that “overall, there will be fewer jobs, in a socially acceptable way and along the demographic curve. Productivity will increase, digitalisation and new production technologies are advancing. We cannot and will not close our eyes to this.”

Patta is a works council member covering production and is more directly aware of the mood in the factory than Cavallo. He told the Wolfsburger Allgemeine Zeitung last November that the reason for his candidacy was “concern about jobs here in Wolfsburg, especially in production.” In spite of the industry-wide shift to electric vehicles, only internal combustion engines were being built in Wolfsburg, except for a few hybrids, Patta said.

The electric model being developed under project name Trinity will not arrive until 2026, and will then be built in a completely new factory building, probably on undeveloped land in a district of Wolfsburg. Workers are therefore justifiably worried about their jobs.

Prince Andrew settles out of court with Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse victim

Kevin Reed


Prince Andrew, the second son of Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom, has settled a lawsuit out of court brought by Virginia Giuffre, who accused him of sexually abusing her when she was 17 years old. The settlement was announced in a Manhattan court filing on Tuesday, while the financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

The prince, who is also known as the Duke of York, did not admit to any of the accusations made against him in Giuffre’s lawsuit. Instead, the court filing says that he “intends to make a substantial donation to Ms. Giuffre’s charity in support of victims’ rights.” The statement also says that Prince Andrew “never intended to malign Ms. Giuffre’s character” and that she has suffered “as an established victim of abuse and as a result of unfair public attacks.”

Prince Andrew [Credit: commons.wikimedia.org]

The announced settlement, which will lead to the filing of a stipulated dismissal of the lawsuit, enabled Prince Andrew to avoid being deposed by Giuffre’s attorneys under oath regarding the details of his interactions with the victim at various properties owned by Jeffrey Epstein in 2000–2001.

As such, the settlement represents a further coverup of the criminal enterprise run by Jeffrey Epstein and his assistant Ghislaine Maxwell in which underage girls were sexually abused by them and trafficked to their high-society friends and associates around the world for more than two decades.

Maxwell was found guilty on December 29 of multiple counts of child sex trafficking in a trial that similarly revealed very little new information about the Epstein sex ring, who participated in it and why it was permitted to operate for so many years. Maxwell is expected to be sentenced in June for up to 65 years in prison for her offenses.

In the settlement, Prince Andrew places all the responsibility for the abuse of Giuffre on the now-deceased billionaire sex offender, saying he “regrets his association with Epstein, and commends the bravery of Ms. Giuffre and other survivors.” He goes on to claim that he will support “the fight against the evils of sex trafficking and supporting its victims.” Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his New York City jail cell under suspicious circumstances in August 2019 after he had been charged and arrested for trafficking dozens of young girls.

As Julie K. Brown, author of the book Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story, co-wrote with Ben Weider in the Miami Herald about the settlement by Prince Andrew on Tuesday, “It was the bombshell lawsuit that wasn’t. … The lawsuit’s speedy conclusion leaves more questions than it answers.”

Virginia Giuffre (formerly Roberts) filed her lawsuit against Prince Andrew on August 9, 2021, in US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing lays out the relationship between Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein that began in 1999 through Ghislaine Maxwell.

The brief states, “Prince Andrew committed sexual assault and battery upon Plaintiff when she was 17 years old. As such, Prince Andrew is responsible for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress pursuant to New York common law. The damage to Plaintiff has been severe and lasting.”

The lawsuit then provides a description of Epstein’s recruitment and sex trafficking operation: “Epstein had perfected a scheme for manipulation and abuse of young females. As part of the scheme, Maxwell or another female recruiter would approach a young girl and strike up a conversation in an effort to quickly learn about the girl’s background and any vulnerabilities they could expose. Epstein’s recruiters found their targets everywhere and anywhere, including schools, spas, trailer parks, and the street.”

The brief states that Epstein and Maxwell would “normalize” the sexual abuse of young girls by making them think they were taking part in “massages.” They manipulated the young girls with money and with threats made by lawyers in Epstein’s inner circle.

Giuffre’s lawsuit recounts the development of her relationship with Epstein, Maxwell and Prince Andrew. It says, “Between 2000 and 2002, Epstein sexually abused Plaintiff at numerous locations including his mansion in this District, at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York 10021.” A map illustrates at least 30 flights that Giuffre made with Epstein, including to London, Paris, Atlantic City, West Palm Beach, the Bahamas and the US Virgin Islands.

The brief reviews at least three instances in which Prince Andrew abused Giuffre at Epstein’s New York City mansion and at his private Little St. James Island in the Caribbean and says that she “feared death or physical injury to herself or another and other repercussions for disobeying Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew due to their powerful connections, wealth, and authority.” The brief includes a photo of Giuffre with Prince Andrew at the apartment of Ghislaine Maxwell in London.

At the time that Giuffre’s lawsuit was filed, Prince Andrew said he had no recollection of ever meeting her. He then proceeded to make a motion to have the lawsuit thrown out by the court on the grounds that it was “baseless, nonviable and potentially unlawful.” Prince Andrew’s lawyers also attempted to argue that the lawsuit was invalid because of a settlement Giuffre made with Epstein in 2009. He also put forward the idea that the photo of him with Giuffre was a fake.

US District Judge Lewis Kaplan rejected all of Prince Andrew’s motions on January 12 and said that the case would proceed. The next day, Queen Elizabeth II stripped Prince Andrew of his military titles and royal patronages. He was no longer able to use the title “His Royal Highness,” effectively banishing him from Buckingham Palace. In November 2019, Prince Andrew had already announced he was indefinitely stepping away from public life.

Once it became clear that he could not stop the trial from moving forward and that he would be deposed, Prince Andrew began negotiating for an out-of-court settlement. Giuffre sued Ghislaine Maxwell for defamation in 2015 and settled out of court with Epstein’s assistant in 2017. Statements that Maxwell made on the witness stand in that proceeding are the basis of two counts of perjury against her that are still pending.

Medical officials estimate Long COVID affects 1 million in Spain

Alejandro López


Recent data on the long-term impact of COVID-19 exposes the disastrous results of the vaccine-only strategy implemented by the Socialist Party (PSOE)-Podemos government and its allied trade unions. One million Spaniards are likely suffering from Long COVID, including around 200,000 children.

Last week, Spain passed the milestone of 10 million confirmed COVID-19 cases in a population of 47 million, according to the Ministry of Health. Despite high vaccination rates, COVID-19 cases exploded over the Christmas holidays, giving Spain one of Europe’s highest incidence rates. Of Spain’s 10 million cases, over 3.6 million were recorded in January 2022 alone, driven mainly by the highly infectious Omicron variant, with over three times more cases in January than in December 2021.

People wearing face masks to protect against the spread of coronavirus walk along a commercial street in downtown Madrid, Spain, Saturday, June 5, 2021. (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)

This is the result of the PSOE-Podemos policy, shared by all Europe’s major governments, embracing mass COVID-19 infections under cover of declaring the virus “endemic.”

The 10 milllion threshold drove primary care doctors, pharmacists, nurses and psychologists to establish a consensus on defining Long COVID last week. Despite the impact on the lives of millions of patients who report symptoms derived from the COVID-19 infection, there is no consensus on action and no procedure established to treat the symptoms of these patients in Spain, even though the World Health Organization (WHO) has had an official definition since last October.

According to the WHO, Long COVID “refers collectively to the constellation of long-term symptoms that some people experience after they have had COVID-19.” It adds :

“While most people who develop COVID-19 fully recover, some people develop a variety of mid- and long-term effects like fatigue, breathlessness and cognitive dysfunction (for example, confusion, forgetfulness, or a lack of mental focus and clarity). Some people also experience psychological effects as part of post COVID-19 condition.

“These symptoms might persist from their initial illness or develop after their recovery. They can come and go or relapse over time.

“Post COVID-19 condition can affect a person’s ability to perform daily activities such as work or household chores.”

In Spain the Association for Self-Care of Health (Anefp), with the support of the Spanish Society of General and Family Physicians (SEMG), the Spanish Society of Clinical, Family and Community Pharmacy (Sefac), the General Council of Nursing, the General Council of Psychology of Spain and the patient association Long COVID Acts promoted a first report focused on the mild symptoms of the disease that some long-term patients present.

Anefp General Director Jaume Pey told the Spanish daily ABC that the document aims “to give some guidelines for action: firstly, to identify these patients effectively and, secondly, to treat them by relieving their symptoms and monitoring their evolution, so as to improve their quality of life.”

As there have been more than 10 million positive cases reported in Spain as of this month, according to data from the Ministry of Health, “it can be estimated that there are approximately more than 1 million people affected by persistent COVID in Spain, which represents at least 10 percent of those infected by COVID-19,” the report states.

The head of the pulmonology service at the Quirón de Córdoba hospital, Luis Manuel Entrenas, told the daily La Vanguardia that Long COVID is not related to the severity of the initial infection: it can affect both patients who suffered mildly and those who suffered severely and had to be hospitalized. In addition, normally, Long COVID sufferers are not people with a history of previous pathologies.

Spain still has COVID-19 indicators at high levels. The number of daily new infections is still above 60,000. In the last week, 1,760 deaths have been recorded, and since last February 1, 2,362. The daily average of deaths so far exceeds 200 in February. Spain has suffered over 122,000 excess deaths since the pandemic began.

At 9,126 COVID-19 deaths in Spain since mid-October, the current wave of infections over the last four months is more deadly than any four-month period since the winter of 2020–2021, before the availability of vaccines.

The enormous death toll and incalculable wider effect on health is the direct result of the criminal and murderous policy pursued by the PSOE-Podemos government. Having refused to follow a scientifically-guided policy to eliminate the pandemic, instead prioritising the interests of Spain’s banks and big business over the health and lives of its population, it is now proceeding to eliminate the last remaining mitigation measures in place.

Last week, it announced the end of the mandatory wearing of masks outdoors. Testing and contact tracing have been slashed, and the infection figures are being calculated using new counting methods. It now plans to reduce the number of days people infected with COVID-19 should self-isolate from seven to five days or as little as three days for the asymptomatic.

Among the regions of Spain that as of February 15 no longer have any official restrictions related to COVID-19 are the Madrid region, Catalonia, Andalucia and Murcia. Only four regions—Aragon, Galicia, La Rioja and Valencia—still maintain a vaccine passport requirement.

Scientists are voicing their opposition. Epidemiologist Quique Bassat of the Global Health Institute told the Spanish online daily Nius Diario that there is scientific proof that “many people are still capable of infecting others from five to six days after testing positive.” He added: “It’s a risk to reduce the isolation period of positive cases if we are letting potentially infectious people move around freely outdoors.”

César Carballo, vice-president of the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine, said: “It’s clearly not an epidemiological measure, but rather an economic and work one.”

The PSOE-Podemos government is now leading the push within the European Union to change the way COVID-19 is monitored to one like seasonal flu. Having abandoned the mitigation strategy, the government is now pursuing herd immunity strategy like the rest of EU and US governments.

The costs of this policy are appalling. Already over 3,000 people die every day in Europe, and this number is rising due to the steep increase in infections and low vaccination rates in many countries. This inevitably leads to increased infections on other continents, where even fewer people are vaccinated, and increases the risk of more infectious and deadly variants developing that are resistant to existing COVID-19 vaccines.

There is no scientific justification for the murderous herd immunity strategy, which has political motivations. To keep the economy running and profits flowing, the ruling class is willing to sacrifice countless lives and the health of entire generations.

The entire Spanish political establishment supports herd immunity policies, from the fascistic Vox party to the ruling PSOE and Podemos parties and their various political satellites.

16 Feb 2022

GRI Post-Doctoral Fellowship in Urbanization and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa 2022

Application Deadline:

Till position is filled

Tell Me About GRI Post-Doctoral Fellowship:

The Global Research Institute (GRI) at William & Mary invites applications for a two-year Post-Doctoral scholar position with a focus on urbanization, formal sector development and job creation in Sub-Saharan Africa. This position is designed to strengthen GRI’s research capacity in this research area, increase the diversity of the scholarly community at GRI, provide a mentored learning experience to the Post-Doctoral fellow, and support and provide additional research opportunities for undergraduate students. The Institute seeks to attract promising researchers and educators from different backgrounds, races, ethnic groups, and other diverse populations whose life experiences and research experiences will contribute significantly to the academic mission of William & Mary and the Institute.

The Post-Doctoral scholar will support a new research project at William & Mary’s Africa Research Center (a research lab within the GRI) which will focus on the rapid urbanization of African countries and their ability to create stable and well-paid employment positions in the formal sector with an eye on the region’s peace, stability, and prosperity. Additionally, for each year of the award, s/he will teach one course and direct a team of undergraduate researchers. The Post-Doctoral Fellow will receive mentoring from faculty members and/or senior researchers affiliated with the Institute. In addition to mentorship on the candidate’s ongoing research, s/he will receive mentorship on how to pursue funded research, how to organize an undergraduate research lab, and how to improve his/her classroom teaching.

This is a two-year position, beginning in summer 2022. The position will remain open until filled, with a review of applicants beginning on February 10, 2022.

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Postdoctorate

Who can apply for GRI Post-Doctoral Fellowship?

Required:

The successful candidate must:

• have a PhD by the time appointment begins (June 2022) in development economics, political economy, public policy, or a closely related quantitative field 

• be engaged in research on a related research topic with some real-world application preferably in the context of Sub-Saharan Africa

• have advanced quantitative methods training and ability to work with one or more of the following software programs (e.g., R, Stata, Python, GIS)

• have strong organizational and communication skills

Preferred:

 • Experience working collaboratively on large research projects
 • Track record of publications in peer-reviewed outlets and/or preparation and presentation of conference papers
 • Experience writing and securing external grants
 • Experience teaching or mentoring undergraduate students
 • Willingness to travel abroad
 • Previous experience in international development research 

How Many Fellowships will be Given?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of GRI Post-Doctoral Fellowship?

William & Mary offers our employees a full array of benefits including retirement, health insurance with options for expanded dental and vision along with group and optional life insurance with coverage for spouse and children, flexible spending accounts, and an EAP (Employee Assistance Program).

Our employees enjoy additional university benefits such as educational assistance, professional development, wellness benefits, and a robust holiday schedule. All employees have access to fitness facilities on campus. Staff members also have access to the university libraries, and much more.

How Long will the Program Last?

2 years

How to Apply for GRI Post-Doctoral Fellowship:

Required Documents

  1. Resume/Curriculum Vitae
  2. Cover Letter

Optional Documents

  1. Other Doc
  2. Other 2

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Genomics Africa Medium to Long-term Fellowships 2022

Application Deadline:

28th February 2022

Tell Me About Genomics Africa Medium to Long-term Fellowships:

The medium to long-term fellowship will cover travel, accommodation, and a daily stipend (around US$50). We will prioritize the selection of individuals from national institutes of health and academic organizations in Africa that already have SARS-CoV-2 genomic data production and analysis experience and need to build skills in statistics, epidemiology, wet-lab genomic data production, bioinformatics and phylogenetic data analysis. 

Which Fields are Eligible?

Fellowships are available to:

  • Laboratory Technologists
  • Post-graduate Students
  • Post-doctoral Research Fellows
  • Bioinformaticians 
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases Specialists
  • Public Health Officials
  • Senior Scientists 

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Fellowship

Who can apply for Genomics Africa Medium to Long-term Fellowships?

The majority of the fellowships will be provided to African researchers. However, we also encourage established international scientists and post-doctoral fellows from other regions of the world to also apply for the fellowship given they are committed to contributing to institution-building work in the hosting African institutions and/or c on-site training of African fellows.

Where will Award be Taken?

  • African Centre of Excellence for Genomics of Infectious Diseases (ACEGID), Nigeria
  • Centre for Epidemic Response and Innovation (CERI), Stellenbosch University, Cape Town and Stellenbosch, South Africa
  • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya
  • KZN Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform (KRISP), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, Durban, South Africa

How Many Scholarships will be Given?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of Genomics Africa Medium to Long-term Fellowships?

The medium to long-term fellowship will cover travel, accommodation, and a daily stipend (around US$50).

How Long will the Program Last?

2 months, 6 months, and 12 months

How to Apply for Genomics Africa Medium to Long-term Fellowships:

Application form: Please download the application form in Word or PDF format

Visit Award Webpage for Details

SAP Education Scholarships 2022

Application Deadline:

Not specified

Tell Me About SAP Education Scholarships:

This year is SAP’s 50th anniversary. That’s why we’re celebrating this moment in 2022 and are ready to support young people who seek a brighter future in times of change. To do so, we couldn’t imagine a better partner than the University of the People.

Today, we are excited to announce a new scholarship program for refugees and displaced youth aged between 18 and 30. In total, SAP will fund 50 associate degrees and 50 bachelor’s degrees in computer science or business administration. This demographic has the greatest need for scholarships according to University of the People, with data from UNICEF showing that only three percent of refugees have access to higher education. University of the People currently enrolls more than 10,000 refugees — more than all other U.S. colleges and universities combined.

“Refugees and displaced peoples have the greatest need for educational support right now,” says University of the People President and Founder Shai Reshef. “This partnership with SAP will help to alleviate the financial burden on our students who are seeking support. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the spiraling costs of higher education, a growing number of students are flocking to our online education model because it provides flexible, affordable, and equitable opportunities to earn a college degree. We have expanded our enrollment significantly over the past few years with the support of over 29,000 volunteer faculty members and administrators — many of whom are from some of the leading universities around the world.”

This scholarship opportunity for students at University of the People is a small contribution toward alleviating these educational pressures. It will bring us a bit closer to a world with equitable education opportunities and future innovation, especially for those adjusting to the challenges of uprooting their lives in search of a hopeful future. SAP is committed to supporting the leaders of tomorrow, and access to higher education is a significant first step to equip them with the right skills for the future.

Offering a cost-effective alternative to traditional universities, University of the People students pay a one-time application fee and an assessment fee for each course completed toward their degree. They are not charged to enroll or pay for course materials. The SAP Education scholarships provided will cover the application and degree assessment fees for 100 students seeking higher education.

“After spending more than 30 years in the international education field, I realized that traditional colleges and universities were not meeting the educational needs of millions of people across the globe desperately seeking affordable and accessible higher education,” Reshef says. “That is why I decided to create an entirely new kind of university that would swing the gates of higher education open to help as many people around the world as possible achieve their educational dreams. With SAP as our partner, our worlds align with our shared commitment to education through the means of technology. We are in the midst of unprecedented times, but we know that for these students their educational dreams will become a reality thanks to SAP’s generous support.”

Which Fields are Eligible?

In total, SAP will fund 50 associate degrees and 50 bachelor’s degrees in computer science or business administration.

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Postgraduate

Who can apply for SAP Education Scholarships?

For interested students who meet the scholarship criteria of being a refugee or displaced person aged 18 to 30

Where will Award be Taken?

University of the People

How Many Scholarships will be Given?

In total, SAP will fund 50 associate degrees and 50 bachelor’s degrees in computer science or business administration.

What is the Benefit of SAP Education Scholarships?

The scholarships provided will cover the application and degree assessment fees for 100 students seeking higher education.

How to Apply for SAP Education Scholarships:

Applications are now live. Students can apply for cohorts that matriculate in either April 2022 or June 2022, and all virtual classes are taught in English, with the exception of the associate and bachelor’s of business administration degrees, which are also available entirely in Arabic.

Visit Award Webpage for Details