28 Apr 2022

Russian miners work in “bondage-like conditions” says government official

Andrea Peters


A little more than five months after an explosion at the in Kemerovo, Russia, took the lives of 51 workers, Russian General Prosecutor Igor Krasnov declared Wednesday that an investigation has revealed that the Listvyazhnaya miners there “were forced to work in bondage-like conditions.” He listed the absence of personal safety gear and a lack of regard for work and time-off schedules as just two of 3,000 violations uncovered at the mine. He said that many thousands more have been identified at other operations across Russia.

Krasnov’s admissions, which feign concern, are a half-hearted attempt to address widespread anger over the ugly reality of life in Russia’s workplaces. The real attitude of the country’s ruling elite is revealed by the fact that a top official found responsible for allowing the gross violations at Listvyazhnaya to continue, Aleksandr Mironenko, was just appointed an adviser to the regional Kuzbass government. He will have special responsibility for consulting on socioeconomic issues.

People lay flowers and light candles in memory of the dead miners in the Listvyazhnaya mine in the Siberian city of Kemerovo, about 3,000 kilometers (1,900 miles) east of Moscow, Russia, Friday, Dec. 3, 2021. [AP Photo/Sergei Gavrilenko]

In December, Listvyazhnaya miners were made to swear an oath of responsibility in which they had to declare their commitment to safety standards. The mine operators were not. Despite promises that rescue workers, five of whom perished in last November’s disaster, would be given awards in recognition of their heroism, none have been forthcoming and news reports indicate that authorities have no plans to do so.  

In the days surrounding Krasnov’s statement, there have been multiple deaths in the country’s resource extraction, metallurgy, and construction industries.

On Monday, a water pipe explosion in a mine in Russia’s Kuzbass region left one dead and one injured and forced the evacuation of 200 others. Two days earlier, three workers were killed in an explosion at one of Russia’s largest copper mines in Orenburg, near the border with Kazakhstan. Another 58 people, working more than a kilometer underground, were pulled out in time. Safety violations appear to be the cause.

Earlier in April a fire at a phosphate mine in Murmansk threatened the lives of 110 miners. Simultaneously, two workers at the Taldinskaya-Zapadnaya mine in Kemerovo became trapped underground when a roof collapsed on them. A few weeks prior, the body of a worker at the Osinnikovskaya mine, which is in the same region, was pulled out from the rubble. He was suffocated and crushed by a combined gas leak and rock fall.

In January, a 33-year-old man in Miass, Russia died at a scrap metal factory after suffering injuries in the process of unloading material. The same month a worker in Moscow fell to his death when the cable on an elevator car that he was repairing gave way. Just this Wednesday, another laborer in Russia’s capital city died in a similar manner when he plunged 33 stories down an elevator shaft at a construction site. On Sunday, a 52-year-old employee at the machine building company Uralvagonzavod also fell to his death. A few days before this, a 26-year-old was crushed by a machine at a materials processing plant in Lipetsk, a city of just over 500,000 in western Russia. On Tuesday, an agricultural worker in his mid-40s was run over by a tractor at a farm in the Tambov region.

The list goes on and on. According to official government statistics, thousands of Russian workers die every year in work-related events. Some research outlets, which likely use different standards to measure the data, place the number in the tens of thousands.  

The deaths and disasters in Russian heavy industry come alongside of initial signs of growing working class resistance.

Sanitation workers in Novosibirsk, a major Russian city with a population of more than 1.5 million and a center of industry, are on strike. Two hundred and eleven garbage collectors walked off the job more than a week ago over the quality of the machinery they are made to use, contract violations, and inadequate wages.

In Sakhalin, which is in Russia’s far east, workers at a poultry factory are on strike over the company’s failure to pay them their wages and low compensation. Wage arrears are growing in Russia, a manifestation of the economic crisis provoked by anti-Russian sanctions.

Taxi drivers are protesting. In Tver in mid-April 100 refused to work, explaining to the press that they face an impossible situation. “Spare parts are expensive, cars are expensive, gasoline is expensive,” they told Tatar-inform. A 15 kilometer trip earns them about 200 rubles, about $2.70 at current exchange rates.

In Moscow, employees with the courier service Delivery Club are on strike because the company changed the way in which their compensation is calculated that the majority of workers have seen their incomes fall by 20 percent. Anger among the workers is high. In February, Delivery Club fired an employee for missing his 14-hour shift in order to attend his mother’s funeral. The leader of the Delivery Club workers’ protest has just been detained by the police for staging illegal meetings.

In January, doctors, paramedics and ambulance drivers in Ishimbay, a town of about 65,000 in the Russian Republic of Bashkortostan, staged a “work to rule” action to protest against poverty wages, gross understaffing, and violations of their work schedules. They say that the best paid among them bring home just 29,000 rubles a month ($390), with many making far less.

In a public statement addressed to local, regional, and federal officials, including President Vladimir Putin, the medical workers declared, “We conscientiously fulfill our responsibilities, but our professional pride does not allow us to see our fellow citizens be deprived of emergency medical care. We are against dispatching ambulance brigades that are not fully staffed, when instead of the legally required two medics there is only one. We are essentially forced to violate standards of rendering medical care.”

In retaliation, the leaders of the labor action were fired. A number of them received calls telling them that their employment had been terminated because they were sent a letter in the mail telling them they had to work on the weekend but did not show up for their shift. Needless to say, they never received any such letter, which, in addition, could not have been put in the mail in time for them to receive it. After protesting, many have since been reinstated.

The oppressive conditions that face the majority of Russia’s workers are intersecting with a growing economic crisis. Inflation, particularly for basic consumer items, is rising sharply, placing many essential items out of workers’ reach and threatening millions with destitution. The efforts of Washington and NATO to remove the Putin government by creating an economic catastrophe in the country are taking a toll, intersecting with the brutalization of the population at the hands of its own ruling class.

Russia vows “lightning” response to NATO as war threatens to spill beyond Ukraine

Andre Damon


Following the declaration by US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin this week that the US is seeking to “weaken” Russia, and that the US is already in a “fight” with the country, Russian President Vladimir Putin made his most open threat to date to retaliate against NATO members for their  involvement in the war.

“If someone decides to intervene into the ongoing events from the outside and create unacceptable strategic threats for us, they should know that our response to those oncoming blows will be swift, lightning-fast,” Putin told Russian lawmakers on Wednesday.

“We have all the tools for this — ones that no one can brag about. And we won’t brag. We will use them if needed. And I want everyone to know this. We have already taken all the decisions on this.”

A Ukrainian soldier stands near an apartment ruined from Russian shelling in Borodyanka, Ukraine, Wednesday, Apr. 6, 2022. (AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky)

Also on Wednesday, Russian officials said that a large batch of weapons supplied to Ukraine by NATO members were destroyed in a missile strike in Central Ukraine.

A day prior, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov had warned that NATO-supplied weapons shipments inside Ukraine “will be a legitimate target for the Russian Armed Forces.”

“Warehouses, including in the west of Ukraine, have become such a target more than once. How else could it be? NATO is essentially going to war with Russia through a proxy and arming that proxy. War means war.”

On Wednesday, Russia cut off natural gas supplies to Poland and Bulgaria in response to crippling economic sanctions levied by the US and European Union. The Kremlin is also threatening to end its supplies to other NATO members, including Germany, which is highly dependent on Russia for natural gas.

Also on Wednesday, fires at arms depots inside Russian territory were reported. That same day, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken raised in a Senate briefing the prospect that “Ukrainians should take actions that go beyond their borders”—clearly referring to attacks on Russian territory.

The Russian military said in a statement that strikes inside Russia would lead to retaliatory attacks on “decision-making centers in Kiev.” Attacks on Russia “will immediately lead to our proportional response,” the Ministry of Defense said. “As we have warned, the Russian armed forces are on standby around the clock to retaliate with long-range high-precision weapons against decision-making centers in Kiev.”

Blasts were also reported in Moldova. The Financial Times reported, “The mysterious blasts, which targeted the state security ministry, a radio tower and military unit, happened days after a senior Russian commander claimed Russian speakers in Moldova were being oppressed.”

Russian forces are meanwhile pushing deeper into Eastern Ukraine, capturing several villages. The Russian army has been concentrating their advances on the south and east of the country after having retreated from the suburbs of the capital of Kiev.

Commenting on the widening scale of the war, New York Times reporters David E. Sanger and Steven Erlanger published an article noting, “Fears Are Mounting That Ukraine War Will Spill Across Borders.” They conclude:

“For nine weeks, President Biden and the Western allies have emphasized the need to keep the war for Ukraine inside Ukraine.

Now, the fear in Washington and European capitals is that the conflict may soon escalate into a wider war—spreading to neighboring states, to cyberspace and to NATO countries suddenly facing a Russian cutoff of gas. Over the long term, such an expansion could evolve into a more direct conflict between Washington and Moscow…”

They continue,

“Seth G. Jones, who directs the European Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said on Wednesday that “the risk of a widening war is serious right now.”

“Russian casualties are continuing to mount, and the U.S. is committed to shipping more powerful weapons that are causing those casualties,” Mr. Jones said. Sooner or later, he added, Russia’s military intelligence service might begin to target those weapons shipments inside NATO’s borders.”

Sanger and Erlanger warned that while Russia “has never attacked … supply lines inside NATO territory. Now, there are signs that the restraint is fracturing.”

The US media, meanwhile, is full of increasingly open and unguarded calls for nuclear war. On Wednesday, Seth Cropsey, a deputy undersecretary of the Navy, published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal titled, “The U.S. Should Show It Can Win a Nuclear War.”

He writes, “The reality is that unless the U.S. prepares to win a nuclear war, it risks losing one. Robert C. O’Brien, a former White House national security adviser, proposed a series of conventional responses, which are necessary but not sufficient.”

Cropsey concludes, “The ability to win is the key. By arming surface ships with tactical nuclear weapons as well as attacking a nuclear-missile sub and thus reducing Russian second-strike ability, the U.S. undermines Russia’s ability to fight a nuclear war.”

He then declares,

“Jeopardizing Russian second-strike capability would tangibly raise the military stakes. Mr. Putin could no longer unleash his nuclear arsenal with impunity. Instead, he would need to reckon with the possibility that NATO could decapitate the Kremlin—yes, suffering casualties in the process, but still decapitate it.”

The proxy war in Ukraine is emerging increasingly openly as a war between Russia and NATO, threatening to spill over into a war throughout the European continent. The United States has worked to systematically destroy any prospect of a peaceful settlement of the war, and is instead doing everything to fan the flames to instigate the conflict.

The aims being pursued increasingly openly by the United States in this war inevitably involve the expansion of the conflict. There is nothing left of the fiction that the United States and NATO are not at war with Russia. In pursuit of regime change, the dismemberment of Russia and the plundering of its vast resources, American imperialism is risking nuclear war.

Half of all Americans infected with COVID-19, three-quarters of children

Patrick Martin


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced Tuesday that almost 60 percent of the US population has been infected with COVID-19 at least one time by the end of February 2022, when the most recent Omicron BA.2 wave ebbed. Even this staggering figure was outstripped by the 75 percent of all children and adolescents who were infected at least once by the same point.

This is a public health catastrophe unprecedented in American history. It is not a “natural” disaster but the product of a deliberate policy of mass infection, carried out first by the Trump administration and now by the Biden administration. The Republican Party and then the Democratic Party have demonstrated their class character, as they sacrificed a million lives—and counting—in order to maintain the operations of corporate business and ensure the uninterrupted flow of profits to the American capitalist oligarchy.

Passengers wait in line at the security checkpoint at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Tuesday, April 19, 2022, in Arlington, Va. [AP Photo/Evan Vucci]

During the same period that COVID-19 killed 1 million people and infected 200 million, the stock market roared to record heights and the fortunes of the financial aristocracy swelled to unimaginable proportions. The wealth of US billionaires rose by more than 70 percent, to over $5 trillion. These two outcomes—mass death and unprecedented wealth—are inextricably linked. Wall Street’s Midas touch has turned mass suffering and death into gold.

And SARS-CoV-2 has not finished its deadly work. Far from it. Thanks to the effective end of all mitigation measures, the resumption of “normal” life in terms of workplaces, schools, shopping centers, social gatherings, mass travel and mass arena events, and the ending of masking and other limited forms of protection, the virus is being furnished with a virtually unlimited supply of new victims and new opportunities for mutation.

There are 100 million Americans who are entirely unvaccinated, 130 million vaccinated but not boosted, and a further 100 million whose boosters are waning rapidly in effectiveness. These large and varied pools of potential victims provide optimal conditions for a virus that mutates quickly in response to changed conditions. SARS-CoV2 has been given an invitation, not merely to entrench itself as a permanent factor in human life, but to develop new variants that are more infectious, more vaccine-resistant and more lethal.

A particularly cruel element of the policy of allowing the virus free rein is its impact on children and adolescents. The 75 percent infection rate demonstrates that the reopening of schools to in-person instruction turned the education system into a main driver in the spread of the pandemic, as the WSWS and many rank-and-file teachers warned. Children are not unlikely to contract COVID-19—as both Trump and Biden falsely claimed—but are equally or perhaps even more susceptible to the deadly disease.

Over 1,500 children in the US have already died from COVID-19. The pandemic has only entered its third year, and already there are estimates that Long COVID—the umbrella term for continuing consequences of infection, including damage to the brain, heart, lungs and other vital organs—may be as high as 30 percent. Who authorized the government to conduct a medical experiment of such dreadful proportions on innocent children?

The CDC report noted the phenomenal acceleration of the infection during the Omicron surge. During the Delta wave, which began a year ago and reached its peak in the fall, new infections in the United States averaged 1 to 2 percent of the US population per month (3.3 million to 6.6 million cases). But during the three months ending in February 2022, there were some 80 million new cases, more than 25 million cases per month. An estimated 21 million children were among those newly infected.

Despite attempts to characterize the Omicron subvariant as mild, Omicron already accounts for almost 1 in 5 of total COVID-19 deaths. And now that the original Omicron BA.1 variant has been supplanted by BA.2, which is more infectious and potentially more virulent, a new surge in the pandemic is on the horizon. Infection with BA.1 apparently incurs little or no immunity from a repeat infection by BA.2.

In the face of these grim figures, the Biden administration is pushing ahead with the policy of mass infection, which was once described under the Trump administration as “herd immunity” and now goes by a different label—endemicity, or “living with the virus.” While Trump advocated quack remedies like ivermectin and hydrochloroquine, the Biden White House has simply dropped any pretense that COVID-19 can or should be prevented.

Dr. Ashish Jha, the newly installed White House pandemic coordinator, declared this openly at his first press briefing Tuesday, saying, “It is going to be hard to ensure that no one gets COVID in America. That’s not even a policy goal.” No one in the White House press corps questioned that assertion, since the corporate media accepts the premise that prevention is impossible, and even undesirable.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, Biden’s chief adviser on the pandemic, said the same day that the United States is now “out of the pandemic phase,” hailing the decline in daily deaths from 3,000 in January to an average of 300 last week. “I believe that we’re transitioning into endemicity,” he said, using a term which implies that COVID-19 has become a permanent, and acceptable, feature of American life.

In a further step in the campaign to “normalize” COVID-19, Biden himself appears to be deliberately courting infection, knowing that with the immense medical resources available to the White House, including Paxlovid and other therapeutics, he faces little personal danger. After Vice President Kamala Harris tested positive, there was no change in Biden’s schedule, and White House aides went out of their way to suggest that they were not unduly concerned over the possible impact of infection on the 79-year-old president.

Biden delivered a eulogy to former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright at a memorial service Wednesday at the National Cathedral, packed with official mourners. The president is also scheduled to attend the White House Correspondents’ Association annual dinner on Saturday night, along with about 2,600 officials, journalists and others in a basement hotel ballroom. Last month’s similar but smaller Gridiron Club dinner resulted in more than 1 in 10 attendees contracting COVID-19.

The United States leads the world in COVID-19 deaths, despite being the richest country in the world and preeminent in medical technology, because the American population has fewer social benefits, including access to health care, than any other industrialized society, and the ruling class has fewer limits. But the recklessness and criminality of the American financial oligarchy’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic have only set the pace for capitalist ruling classes all over the world.

The COVID-19 death toll in Europe is approaching 2 million. Some 1.7 million have died in Latin America, where the death rates in Mexico, Brazil, Peru and other countries rival or exceed those in the US. Uncounted millions have died in the Indian subcontinent, disguised only by the refusal of right-wing governments, like that of Narendra Modi in New Delhi, even to tally the victims. There are huge new outbreaks in Indonesia, South Korea and Australia. South Africa has seen mass casualties, and the pandemic is spreading through that continent as well.

Only in China has there been a serious effort to carry out a scientifically based Zero-COVID policy, with the result that there have been fewer than 5,000 deaths in a country of 1.4 billion people since the pandemic began in December 2019. Most of these occurred in the first four months, before the nature of the infection was fully understood.

COVID-19 has occasionally been compared to the influenza epidemic after World War I, which took more lives, some 50 million, than that appalling slaughter. The current pandemic may well precede the outbreak of global war, rather than follow it. But there is a clear connection: The same ruling class that accepts and even encourages millions of dead in the pandemic will not shrink from World War III because of the prospect that millions, or even tens and hundreds of millions of people, may die in a nuclear exchange.

Germany supplies heavy weapons to Ukraine, risking nuclear war

Peter Schwarz


It is now exactly two months since Chancellor Olaf Scholz announced a “turn of the times” in foreign and military policy in the Bundestag (federal parliament). The arms budget would be increased threefold by €100 billion, the principle of not supplying weapons to areas of tension abandoned, and Ukraine supplied with German war materiel.

Gepard anti-aircraft tank of the Bundeswehr (Photo: Hans-Hermann Bühling/CC BY-SA 2.0/ wikimedia)

Since then, this programme has been vigorously put into action. Germany has supplied Ukraine with large quantities of anti-tank weapons, anti-aircraft equipment, ammunition, vehicles and other materiel from Bundeswehr (Armed Forces) stocks. It has given Kiev a list of deliverable weapons from German arms companies, for which Berlin is footing the bill, and has made two billion euros available for arms deliveries. Ukraine will receive operational Soviet-designed tanks from Eastern European NATO countries, which Germany will then replace with German-made tanks.

Despite this, Chancellor Olaf Scholz came under fierce attack. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his ambassador Andriy Melnyk, German and international media, the Christian Democrat (CDU-CSU) opposition and even members of his own coalition have accused the chancellor of being too hesitant, of not keeping promises and of stabbing Ukraine in the back out of economic self-interest. Now the government has responded to the pressure and agreed to supply heavy weapons directly from Germany.

In the run-up to a top-level meeting of representatives from around 40 countries held yesterday at the US Ramstein Air Base in Rhineland-Palatinate, Defence Minister Christine Lambrecht gave the green light for the delivery of Gepard anti-aircraft tanks from former Bundeswehr stocks. The Düsseldorf-based arms manufacturer Rheinmetall has also applied for the delivery of 88 used “Leopard” battle tanks and 100 “Marder” infantry fighting vehicles to Ukraine. The government wants to decide on this quickly.

In Ramstein, Lambrecht also promised to train Ukrainian troops on German soil to use artillery systems. “We will provide training on howitzers and ammunition for Ukraine together with the Netherlands, because we all know that artillery is an essential factor in this conflict,” the minister said.

By supplying heavy weapons and training artillerymen, Germany is becoming more and more openly a direct party to the war. It is not only prolonging and intensifying the war in Ukraine, but also risking it spreading to Germany and escalating into a nuclear third world war.

Just last Friday, Chancellor Olaf Scholz had declared in an interview with Der Spiegel that everything must be done “to avoid a direct military confrontation between NATO and a highly armed superpower like Russia, a nuclear power.” He had asserted, “I am doing everything to prevent an escalation leading to a third world war. There must be no nuclear war.” Now he has thrown his own warning to the wind.

He is thus following the US, which is calling the shots in Kiev and will not allow the war to end until, in the words of Ben Hodges, former commander of the US Army in Europe, Russia’s “backbone” is broken to the point “where it is no longer able to exercise power outside Russia.”

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin traveled together to Kiev before the Ramstein meeting to make sure President Zelensky sticks to this goal. “We focused the meeting on the things that will enable us to win the current fight and also build for the future,” Austin explained afterwards.

In Ramstein, the necessary weapons for the war against Russia were arranged and a monthly contact group set up to coordinate military support. “Heaven and earth” will be moved to ensure that Ukraine gets what it needs to defend itself, affirmed Defence Secretary Austin.

The US alone has delivered $3.7 billion worth of weapons to Ukraine since the war began, including man-portable anti-aircraft and anti-tank missiles that locate their targets themselves. But to “break the back” of the Russian army, far heavier weapons, such as tanks, artillery pieces and fighter planes, and direct support from NATO are needed.

The chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley warned in Ramstein that time was not on Ukraine’s side. “The outcome of this fight here today depends on the people in this room.” There is no clearer way to say that NATO itself is at war with Russia and is merely using the Ukraine conflict, which it has fomented for years, as a means to an end.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov had already warned of the real danger of a nuclear war on Russian state television before the meeting in Ramstein. NATO’s arms deliveries were a “legitimate target for Russian forces,” he threatened. “If NATO enters into a de facto war with Russia through a proxy and arms that proxy, then you do in war what you have to do in war.” The danger of a third world war was serious, real and should not be underestimated, he said.

But instead of working to defuse this danger, NATO is pouring oil on the fire.

In Germany, where, according to a recent Forsa poll, 56 percent of the population fear an expansion of the war to the whole of Europe and 63 percent advocate ending it through negotiations and a diplomatic solution, the war hysteria is particularly shrill.

A compliant media, which endlessly regurgitates NATO’s war propaganda and has close ties to trans-Atlantic think tanks, has been attacking Chancellor Scholz for weeks for allegedly being too hesitant. For example, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung headlined a commentary: “Weapons for Ukraine: A German tragedy.” And the latest issue of Der Spiegel appeared with the editorial, “Chancellor Scholz and the war in Ukraine: proclaimed, delayed, bungled!”

The CDU and CSU tabled a motion in the Bundestag to oblige the government to expand arms deliveries to Ukraine “immediately and perceptibly in quantity and quality” and also to deliver “heavy weapons.”

The “traffic light” coalition parties—SPD, Greens and Liberal Democrats (FDP)—responded with a motion of their own calling on the government to “continue and, where possible, accelerate the delivery of needed equipment to Ukraine, including extending the delivery to heavy weapons and complex systems.” For example, this would mean in the framework of back-filling Eastern European NATO members with German weapons, replacing the Soviet-era weapons they supply to Ukraine.

At the FDP party convention last weekend, the leadership only barely managed to stop delegates from passing a resolution against their own government. FDP Parliamentary Deputy Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, who accused the chancellor of only hearing a “deafening silence” when it came to heavy weapons, was enthusiastically applauded.

The Greens are even more belligerent. Bundestag Deputy Anton Hofreiter, a former pacifist, goes from TV studio to studio with his FDP colleague Strack-Zimmermann to demand more weapons for Ukraine.

Green Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock toured the three NATO Baltic states recently to reassure their governments: “The Baltic States can rely 100 percent on Germany.” She visited a newly erected monument to the “victims of communism,” while ignoring the victims of Nazi terror—usually an obligation for German politicians. Yet the Nazis and their local collaborators, who today are once again revered as heroes, almost completely exterminated the Jewish inhabitants of the Baltic states.

The proponents of comprehensive arms deliveries are deliberately playing with fire. They know that they are risking nuclear war.

For example, Der Spiegel Editor-in-Chief Steffen Klusmann writes in the above-mentioned editorial: “In the Chancellery, they now assume that the man in the Kremlin could use nuclear weapons as a last resort. But what if these bombs do not fall on Ukrainian soil, but in Warsaw or even in Berlin?” The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung also admits, “Never since the end of the Cold War has the risk of a military confrontation with Russia been so high.” But even the prospect of nuclear bombs falling on Berlin cannot slow down the determination to intensify the war.

The war hysteria among politicians, journalists and, unfortunately, some cultural figures is so widespread that it cannot be explained by subjective motives. It has deep objective causes.

On the one hand, there is the social division of society, exacerbated by the pandemic and inflation, which undermines the stability of bourgeois rule and will lead to fierce class struggles. War and militarism serve as a tried and tested means of temporarily diverting domestic social tensions outwards.

And there are, on the other hand, the geopolitical interests of German capital, which can no longer be realised by peaceful means in the face of growing international tensions. In the last century, Germany has already waged war twice against Russia, or the Soviet Union, and occupied Ukraine in the process. Now, German imperialism—in fierce competition with the US—is returning to its traditional direction of expansion, eastward.

27 Apr 2022

Japanese Government MEXT Scholarships 2023

Application Deadline: Varies (see below)

Type: Undergraduate, Masters, PhD, Training

Eligibility: Before inquiring the Japanese Embassy/consulate, please take a moment to read the basic eligibilty thoroughly. 

Eligible Countries & Deadlines:

College of Technology Scholarship

Specialized Training Scholarships

Undergraduate

Research Scholarship: Masters & Doctoral

To be Taken at (Country): Japan

Number of Awards: Numerous

Value of Award: MEXT scholarship is one of the few opportunities covering full expense hence very competitive in nature. Being eligible and having a high academic performance (GPA 2.3 or above out of 3.0) is vital. 

How to Apply:

  1. Submission of application should be done to the Embassy/consulate of Japan of your home country. DO NOT SUMBMIT TO MEXT. Application forms can be found here: College of Technology studentsSpecialized training college studentsUndergraduate Students, and Research students.  
  2. Enrollment types, screening procedure and deadlines for submission differs by the country, check the application detail on at the website of the Japanese Embassy/consulate of your home country.
  3. Previous years examination can be found here
  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

DAAD Leadership for Africa Scholarship Programme 2022/2023

Application Deadline: 30th June 2022

About the DAAD Leadership for Africa Scholarship : All “Leadership for Africa” scholarship holders benefit from a complementary study programme in good governance, civil society and sustainable project management. The mandatory programme with several attendance phases each year has to be completed in addition to the regular studies. 

What can be funded? The scholarship includes:

  • Language course (2-6 months) in Germany before the start of the university studies
  • M.A. or M.Sc. degree programme completed at a state or state-recognized university in Germany
  • Accompanying side study programme (mandatory) in good governance, civil society and sustainable project management. This has to be completed in addition to the regular studies.

Type: Masters

Eligibility: To be qualified for DAAD Leadership for Africa Scholarship:

1) Highly qualified refugees who hold refugee status and fulfil the necessary qualifications for Master’s studies in Germany.
Applicants must fulfil the following conditions:

  • Holding refugee status in their host countries, being granted before 17.05.2021
  • Country of asylum has to be either Ethiopia, Kenya, South Sudan or Tanzania
  • Completed Bachelor’s degree at least at the time of arrival in Germany

2) Highly qualified graduates from Ethiopia, Kenya, South Sudan or Tanzania.
Applicants must fulfil the following conditions:

  • Citizenship of Ethiopia, Kenya, South Sudan or Tanzania
  • Country of residence is Ethiopia, Kenya, South Sudan or Tanzania at the time of application
  • Completed Bachelor’s degree at least at the time of arrival in Germany

Selection

A pre-selection will take place based on the submitted application documents. Preselected candidates will be invited to an interview with an independent selection committee of university professors in Ethiopia, Kenya, South Sudan or Tanzania.
Please note: Preselected candidates must present originals of all previously submitted documents at the interview.

In addition to previous achievements in school and university, language skills and the general motivation, the main selection criterion is a convincing description of the planned studies in Germany. Equally important will be a reflected answer how the chosen academic field can contribute to the further development of the home country.

As a general rule the candidate‘s personal appearance for an interview is a requirement for the award of the scholarship. The journey to the place of the interview is at the candidate’s own risk. Travel costs have to be covered by the applicant.

Eligible Countries: Ethiopia, Kenya, South Sudan and Tanzania

To be Taken at (Country): Germany

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of DAAD Leadership for Africa Scholarship: The scholarship includes:

  • If necessary: Language course (2, 4 or 6 months) in Germany before the start of the study programme including the coverage of the test fees for a German language certificate
  • Accompanying study programme
  • Monthly scholarship rate payments of 861 EURO
  • Adequate health, accident and private/personal liability insurance in Germany
  • Travel allowance
  • One-off study allowance
  • If applicable, family allowance and monthly rent subsidy

Duration of DAAD Leadership for Africa Scholarship: Generally, selected candidates will start their German language course in April 2022 and take up their M.A. or M.Sc. studies at a German institution of higher education by October 1st, 2022. The duration of funding is determined by the standard period of study of the chosen program. In general, Master’s programs require two years of full-time study.

How to Apply: Please note that the “Application portal” tab in the scholarship database only appears while the current application period is running. Once the application deadline is expired, the portal for this programme is not accessible until next year’s application period.

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details