10 Dec 2022

Anti-government protests continue in Iran despite mounting repression

Jean Shaoul & Keith Jones


Iran’s bourgeois-clerical regime—led by religious conservative President Ebrahim Raisi and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei—was the target of a three-day “national strike,” from Monday through Wednesday of this week.

Iranian state censorship and the western media’s visceral hostility to the Iranian regime, which the imperialist powers view as an obstacle to their unbridled domination of the Middle East, make it difficult to gauge precisely the extent of the protests and their social composition.

That said, it is clear, the denials of the regime notwithstanding, that the “strike” had a significant, albeit varied, impact across all or at least most of Iran.

The most significant economic impact of the protest was the widespread closure of shops. But there were also several significant worker strikes, possibly the largest direct worker participation in the now almost three-month long wave of anti-government protests.   

People walk in front of closed shops of Tehran's Grand Bazaar as riot police look on, Iran, Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2022. [AP Photo/Vahid Salemi]

The fissures within the Islamic Republic’s ruling elite also appear to be deepening, with suggestions from some elements of the regime that the much-hated morality police has been or should be disbanded, and calls from others for more ruthless repression of the anti-government protests.            

The “strike” was timed to climax Wednesday on Student Day, an annual event honouring three students killed by the Shah’s regime in 1953, shortly after he was restored to power in a CIA-orchestrated coup against the nationalist government of Mohammad Mossadegh.

Industrial workers, including several thousand at the Isfahan Steel Company, Sanandaj Petrochemical workers, and Sepahan Cement works, and bus drivers in Mashhad joined part or all of the three-day protest. Workers at the Daroogar pharmaceutical plant held protests over the non-payment of their wages for the last four months.

The most widespread participation in the anti-government protests was in Iran’s Kurdish areas. They have borne the brunt of the government crackdown on the unrest that began in mid-September, after 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, detained by the morality police for wearing the hijab “improperly,” died in police custody.

Outside the Kurdish areas the anti-government agitation has been centered on university campuses, although several recent protests have seen shutdowns of bazaar shops, once a pillar of the regime.

Last month, Ayatollah Khamenei warned against what he claimed was the threat that the imperialist powers and their Middle East allies would seek to incite worker unrest. His remarks indicate the regime’s extreme nervousness that the protests and the growing fissures within the ruling elite could open the door to an eruption of mass working class opposition.

University campuses across the country appear to have been the site of significant protests this week. At a university in the city of Qom, home to many of Iran’s most prestigious religious seminaries, some students reportedly chanted, “We don't want a corrupt system, we don’t want a murderer as our guest.” Interrupting a speech by Amir-Hossein Ghazizadeh Hashemi, a close ally and deputy of President Ebrahim Raisi, they shouted, “This is the year of blood, the Supreme Leader will be toppled.”

The state media sought to downplay the shop closures and strikes, claiming most shop owners “ignored” the strike call and “intimidation” by protest supporters. For his part, Iran’s police chief Hossein Ashtari said the police had succeeded in keeping the protesters away from their “evil and empty” goals. He warned protesters, “Security forces will no longer exercise restraint” and praised his officers for their efforts to counter “seditionists.”

The protests that started in the Kurdish provinces last September after Amini’s  police custody killing soon morphed into wider, anti-government rallies throughout the country, testifying to the widespread anger over unemployment, social inequality and the soaring cost of living. The terrible plight of Iran’s workers and rural poor stems principally from the brutal sanctions regime imposed by Washington after the Trump administration unilaterally abandoned the 2015 Iran nuclear accords. But the systemic corruption and monopolization of the country’s economic resources by the Shia clerical establishment and its big business backers have exacerbated the widespread poverty.

There is also widespread anger over the mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic. The refusal to allow the import of western-produced vaccines led to higher death rates, under conditions where the sanctions regime has severely impacted the availability of medicines and other pharmaceutical products

The government’s decision to end its subsidized exchange rate and subsidy cuts have led to an unprecedented increase in food prices, making it almost impossible for poorer workers to put food on the table. Meanwhile, the surge in the price of agricultural commodities, including fertilizers—largely driven by the US/NATO-led war on Russia—amid a widespread drought and the government’s mismanagement of Iran’s water resources have had a devastating impact on the rural masses.

Mounting economic pressures have also severely impacted broad sections of the middle class. Some of the more privileged middle class layers support elements within the bourgeoisie and clerical political establishment that favour a rapprochement with the imperialist powers and/or imperialist-aligned emigré opposition groups.

While many protesters have chanted “Women, life, freedom!” and called for reforms, particularly to Iran’s strict dress code for women, others have declared “Death to the dictator” and called for an end to the country’s clerical regime. The protests and rallies, although not the largest, have lasted longer than those that rocked the country in late December-January 2018-2019 and November 2019.

This week’s national shutdown was called in response to a lethal crackdown by police and security forces. This has included intimidating protesters’ families and closing cemeteries to families trying to commemorate the deaths of those killed in the protests.

At the end of October, the authorities announced they would hold public trials in the capital, Tehran, for 1,000 people, over the protests, marking the government’s first major judicial action aimed at quashing dissent. The state-run IRNA news agency accused them of “subversive actions,” including assaulting security personnel and setting fire to public property. Some, it said, would be charged with collaborating with foreign governments, in line with the government’s frequent assertions that the protest movement is being fomented by the US and Israel.

The police have been under orders from the judiciary to “identify and put to trial” those promoting the shop “strikes,” amid threats to “seal” striking shops, remove their owners’ licenses to trade and confiscate their property. Masoud Setayeshi, a spokesperson, declared that “the judiciary will not make any concessions on the lives of 200 citizens” lost because of “provocations” by the opposition. He added, “The trials of defendants will be held quickly, carefully and seriously, and those who have committed crimes will face punishment.”

The Iranian authorities have acknowledged that around 200 people have been killed in the protests, including around 50 to 60 security personnel, as well as “rioters,” some “innocent” civilians and individuals who were victims of “plots” by dissident groups. Amnesty International has put the number of deaths at 305, including 41 children, while the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) claims at least 475 people have been killed, including 65 minors, and some 18,000 arrested.

On Monday, Iran carried out its first execution of a protester, hanging Mohsen Shekari, a 23-year-old man convicted of stabbing a member of the Basij, a voluntary organization under the command of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), and frightening people by blocking a street during the protests on September 25. The authorities claimed he had confessed, but close relatives say he was not allowed legal representation and that during his interrogation and trial, which was held in closed court, his face showed signs of bruising. His body has not been released.

In a separate case, five men have been sentenced to death for killing a member of the Basij in the city of Karaj west of Tehran. Eleven others, including three minors, have been sentenced to long jail sentences. As many as 21 people have been charged with sentences likely to carry the death penalty.

The IRGC praised the judiciary for its tough stance and urged it to move swiftly and decisively to issue judgments for defendants accused of “crimes against the security of the nation and Islam.”

This comes at the end of a year that has seen Iran execute more than 500 people, according to Iran Human Rights, up from 333 in 2021 and the highest toll in five years. On Monday, the Norwegian-registered NGO said four Iranian men were hanged in Rajai Shahr prison, accused of collaborating with Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency. Iran is second only to China in the number of executions carried out annually.

The protests have roiled Iran’s political elite. Speaking ahead of Students Day, former President Mohammad Khatami, who belongs to the so-called Reformist faction, urged the government to take a more lenient approach with protesters and listen to their demands before it was “too late.” He had earlier tweeted that “bitter events” in Iran were being caused by the “faulty and incorrect mechanism and method of governance.”

Attorney General Mohammad Jafar Montazeri announced that the morality police would be disbanded, a claim that was reaffirmed by Ali Khan-Mohammadi, the spokesman for the Headquarters of Promoting Virtue and Prohibiting Vice, one of the government’s religious agencies. However, it is unclear that this has any substance since the morality police have not been much in evidence in recent months, with most of the enforcement of Iran’s hijab laws carried out by the Basij.

This followed Montazeri’s announcement of the previous day that a committee was reviewing the laws surrounding the wearing of the hijab. He gave no indication whether the government would revoke the law.

Ahmad Rastineh, who chairs parliament’s cultural committee responsible for enacting the country’s morality laws, accused the government institutions responsible for “explaining the hijab issue” of weakness and even failure, calling on them to “educate” the public and carry out reforms. As Rastineh belongs to the regime’s conservative wing, his call reflects deep concern over its loss of support, the failure of the security services to suppress the protests and the urgent need for the government to protect the regime’s stability.

This comes as the Biden administration continues to ratchet up pressure on Iran, with a view to leveraging the splits within the ruling elite to bring about a political reconfiguration move amenable to Washington’s predatory interests, if not full-scale regime change.

Washington has signaled that reviving the Iran nuclear deal is no longer a priority for the United States. It is focusing instead on Iran’s supply of drones and missiles to Russia—a drop in the bucket compared to the tens of billions of dollars of weaponry and aid supplied by Washington to Ukraine. National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby claimed this week that Iran was continuing to send arms to Russia. On Dec. 3, US Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley said, “Iran is not interested in a deal and we’re focused on other things,” adding “Right now we can make a difference in trying to deter and disrupt the provision of weapons to Russia and trying to support the fundamental aspirations of the Iranian people.”

Low levels of testing in Europe obscure rapid COVID-19 winter surge

Samuel Tissot


Despite the near-total abandonment of testing across the EU, it is becoming clear that COVID-19 is surging across the continent. Alongside major surges of the flu and other respiratory viruses, this latest surge of COVID-19 threatens European hospital systems with another winter of overcrowding, horrendous working conditions, triaged care and mass death.

An intubated COVID-19 patient gets treatment at the intensive care unit at the Westerstede Clinical Center, a military-civilian hospital in Westerstede, northwest Germany [AP Photo/Martin Meissner]

According to Worldometer, Europe has recorded 1,966,286 COVID-19 deaths and nearly 240 million cases. In September of this year the World Health Organization Europe estimated that the number of Long COVID sufferers now number 17 million people, a figure that has undoubtedly risen across October and November.

The latest wave of infections is being driven by the BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 variants, which are both descendants of BA.5, itself descended from the original Omicron variant. BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 are estimated to account for over 50 percent of cases in Europe and are expected to account for 80 percent by the new year.

According to a study published in Nature on Tuesday by a team from the University of Texas Medical Branch, the anti-body response in people vaccinated with bivalent vaccines was four times lower against BQ1.1 than against BA.5. On Friday, the European Medicines Agency warned that the BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 variants, which appear to be becoming dominant in Europe, can at least partially evade anti-viral treatments due to radical changes in their spike protein.

A major issue facing health care workers, scientists and the wider population is the lack of accurate testing data across the continent. In many European countries, PCR testing has effectively stopped, and even access to professionally administered rapid antigen tests is restricted—forcing many symptomatic individuals to rely on unreliable home tests or to forgo testing altogether.

A low level of testing during the rapid circulation of any communicable deadly disease is extremely dangerous for a population. Firstly, no one, from concerned individuals, scientists to health care officials, let alone government officials, can have an accurate picture of the infection rate and all its consequences.

Secondly, as new, potentially deadlier COVID-19 variants evolve, it is impossible to accurately track their movement through local and global populations. Indeed, according to the European Center for Disease Control, over half of its member states, including Spain, Portugal, Italy and most of Eastern Europe, failed to reach the sequencing volume target as a result of an insufficient number of tests.

The UK is one telling example. Official tracking of the virus has been almost completely abandoned by the government. Using self-reported data from voluntary participants across the UK (excluding Northern Ireland), the Zoe Health study group estimates that on December 9 there were 182,579 new infections. This single day total is over five times larger than the UK government’s official weekly tally of 28,830 (including Northern Ireland).

The UK is hardly unique in its near-total destruction of measures to accurately track the virus. In Italy, Spain and Sweden, cases are also only published once a week. The Netherlands publishes case tallies only once every three days.

Countries like France, where case and hospitalization data are published each weekday (but not over the weekend), give an insight into actual conditions in neighboring countries where it is being more thoroughly suppressed.

On December 9, the seven-day average of 59,138 daily cases is the highest since the summer surge of the virus in France. In the last seven days, hospitalizations for COVID-19 (6,771) are up 16.4 percent and deaths 20.2 percent (435).

Even in countries like France these figures are highly incomplete. France’s current test positivity rate of 28.6 percent indicates a huge undercount. The upfront cost of both PCR and antigen tests and the promotion of complacency toward the virus by the bourgeois media discourage the population from promptly testing for and reporting cases of COVID-19.

While during previous waves the test and trace efforts pursued by health authorities across Europe was far from sufficient to find and isolate all cases, it at least allowed scientists, health officials and members of the public to have a relatively accurate idea of the extent of infection on any given day.

In June 2020, then US President and fascist coup-plotter Donald Trump stated, “if we stop testing right now, we’d have very few cases.” While this statement was widely ridiculed on both sides of the Atlantic at the time as the words of a deranged far-right COVID conspiracy theorist, this murderous suggestion in the face of a deadly pandemic has become the modus operandi of the European ruling class.

In November 2021, European countries followed the lead of US President Biden and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by declaring Omicron as a “milder” variant, despite there being no evidence for this assertion. On this anti-scientific basis, new lockdowns were ruled out, and isolation requirements were cut. Over the spring of 2022, this policy was extended to the end of even the most limited mask mandates and the drastic reduction in testing.

In the face of another deadly winter surge—and the ninth wave since the beginning of the pandemic—European governments not only refuse to take any action against the virus, by deliberately dismantling test infrastructure, they prevent the population from accessing the information necessary to make informed decisions to protect themselves, their families and the wider society. This actively aids COVID-19’s spread.

A drastic winter pan-European resurgence confirms once again that the “herd immunity” policy is not only criminal in demanding millions lay down their lives and “live with the virus,” but that is also a false concept.

A very high proportion of the European population has had multiple infections or a three or four vaccine doses, or both. However, due to COVID-19’s capacity to evolve extremely quickly under conditions of mass infection, once again a new variant is moving its way through the population.

Adopted by nominally left- and right-wing governments across the continent, the final destruction of measures to track the virus is the logical outcome of all capitalist governments’ “herd immunity” policy. That the capitalist system can only respond to the pandemic by a systematic attack on science and truth is a natural consequence of its historical bankruptcy.

Sick children turned away as crisis deepens in Australian hospitals

Clare Bruderlin


Australia’s health system is being pushed to breaking point, with new reports emerging daily of hospitals unable to meet demand as a result of chronic underfunding and crippling staff shortages exacerbated by surging COVID-19 infections.

Staff prepare to collect samples at a drive-through COVID-19 testing clinic at Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia, Saturday, Jan. 8, 2022. [AP Photo/(AP Photo/Mark Baker)]

On Monday, the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne, Victoria, released a statement advising families to seek alternative care because it faced “unprecedented demand” in its emergency department. The hospital said a high number of “extremely unwell children” were presenting to the ED, and it expected that some patients would wait more than 12 hours to be seen.

Elective surgeries have been deferred at two major hospitals in Victoria. The Alfred Hospital, one of Melbourne’s largest trauma hospitals, cancelled all elective surgeries on Tuesday, reporting its highest level of staff sick leave since early 2022. At the Royal Melbourne Hospital, “Category 3” surgeries were deferred. These include joint replacements for mobility, eye surgeries to prevent blindness, and certain cardiac surgeries to prevent heart attacks.

Ambulance Victoria issued a “code red” in Melbourne last week, meaning some emergency cases could not be reached on time, due to a “surge in workload and demand.” Ambulance Victoria has reported eight such alerts in 2022. According to ABC News, “code orange,” meaning people requiring “non-emergency care” must find alternative transport to hospital, was called 17 times in November alone.

Ambulance and other health services are seeing major staff shortages due to COVID-19 infection. Some 1,635 public hospital and 126 ambulance workers in Victoria were unable to work due to COVID-19 last week, according to a report in the Age.

In New South Wales, Australia’s most populous state, 1,897 healthcare workers were off work with COVID-19 on December 7. The ongoing staffing crisis means many health workers are forced to work double-shifts and overtime, placing them under immense psychological and emotional stress.

The catastrophic conditions in hospitals are a product of “let it rip” COVID-19 policies, implemented with bipartisan approval since late 2021 and deepened by the federal Labor government of Anthony Albanese.

Even the most basic of public health measures to stop the spread of the virus, such as testing and isolation requirements, pandemic leave payments, daily reporting of cases and mask mandates have been abandoned. This has been carried out in defiance of epidemiologists and medical experts, whose advice has been ignored because it conflicted with the demands of big business that there could be no further disruption to corporate profits.

Amid a “fourth wave” of COVID-19, hospitals are facing a renewed influx of patients. More than 3,100 people are currently hospitalised with COVID across Australia, including some 1,500 in NSW.

In NSW, Bureau of Health Information (BHI) reports reveal that the state saw its worst ambulance response times on record between April and June this year, smashing the record set in the previous three months. Urgent cases categorised as “P1” are supposed to be attended within 15 minutes, but half of patients under this classification waited more than 16.3 minutes.

At Maitland Hospital in regional NSW, which has reported some of the worst wait time statistics in the state, the BHI reported that 70 percent of patients are leaving hospital emergency departments without receiving treatment. There was a 15 percent drop in the number of patients starting treatment on time compared to the same July to September quarter last year.

Similar conditions exist across the country. Recent data from the Australia Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) for 2021‒22 show that nearly 40 percent of patients across the country waited more than four hours in emergency departments, the worst performance recorded in 20 years, up from less than 30 percent in 2017‒18. The longest wait times were in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Tasmania and Victoria.

In Tasmania, 44.8 percent of all patients waited more than four hours for care. Of those triaged as urgent, just 43 percent were seen within the clinically recommended time frame. The ACT’s average emergency department wait time was the longest nationally for the fifth year in a row, with 47.6 percent of patients waiting more than four hours.

In South Australia, Labor Health Minister Chris Picton revealed last week that ambulance ramping outside hospitals had increased substantially to 3,516 hours in November, up from 3,331 hours the previous month.

In Queensland, government department figures made public in November showed that from June to September, more than 6,900 patients waited longer than 24 hours in hospital emergency departments across 26 hospitals.

In Western Australia (WA), ambulance ramping figures for November were the worst ever for that month, with paramedics across the state spending more than 5,700 hours outside emergency departments. Western Australia saw a 23 percent reduction in elective surgeries in public hospitals this year, the second-largest after NSW, as a result of staff shortages exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Elective surgery wait times have blown out across the country, the product of decades of funding cuts to public healthcare under successive Labor and Liberal governments and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which has exacerbated the strain on public hospitals.

This crisis is being compounded by general practitioner (GP) shortages and a decline in Medicare “bulk-billing,” a system whereby doctors and medical clinics send their patients’ bills direct to the government. This has forced patients to seek care from public hospital emergency departments.

Dr Sarah Arachchi, a general paediatrician in Melbourne, told the Guardian, “GPs are overwhelmed and many no longer bulk bill… that has resulted in a lot of people unable to afford the gap and so they’re bringing their children to the emergency departments.”

This crisis will only worsen under the Albanese Labor government. After a decade-long virtual freeze, the federal government has refused to increase rebates under the Medicare insurance scheme for doctors in its latest budget. Nor was there any increase in remuneration for longer consultations, or reinstatement of longer telephone consultations.

According to Labor’s budget, announced in October, payments to the states and territories for public hospitals will be slashed by more than $755 million this financial year and $2.4 billion over four years. The government has imposed a cap on federal hospital funding of 6.4 percent, while inflation, currently at 7.3 percent, continues to soar.

These increasingly intolerable conditions have sparked a wave of strike action and protests by health workers across Australia. This year, public sector nurses in NSW have gone on strike five times, demanding safe staffing and opposing the slashing of real wages.

In November, nurses across WA went on strike for 24 hours, their first statewide action in more than two decades, in defiance of a ruling by the Industrial Relations Commission. Nurses are fighting an offer from the WA Labor government of a 3 percent per annum pay “rise,” a substantial pay cut compared to inflation, and a nurse-to-patient ratio plan that will do nothing to resolve a major staffing and patient safety crisis in Western Australia (WA).

These struggles reflect the determination of health workers around the country to fight. But in every case, they are running up against a union apparatus that is actively working to isolate, minimise and shut down disputes, to clear the way for sell-out deals that do nothing to address the demands of workers for improved pay, decent conditions and patient safety.

In WA, the Australian Nurses Federation (ANF) announced last week that it would not defy any further rulings by the industrial court, in other words, that there will be no more strikes.

This is a continuation of the role union bureaucracies, in health and throughout the working class, have played over decades as the enforcers of the cost-cutting demands of governments and corporations. The decimation of the public health system, under state, territory and federal governments, Labor and Liberal-National alike, could not have been carried out without the full collaboration of the health unions.

9 Dec 2022

Danish Social Democrats seek coalition with right-wing parties

Jordan Shilton


Denmark’s Social Democrats are seeking a coalition government with right-wing and even far-right parties after emerging from last month’s general election as the largest party.

After campaigning prior to the vote for a “broad government” of the centre, interim Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has been in talks with the right-wing Liberals and far-right Danish People’s Party for over a month.

Frederiksen’s goal is to establish a government behind the backs of the population, ready to enforce Denmark’s continued participation in the US-NATO war with Russia, a major increase in military spending, and “reforms” to health and social services that will entail sweeping austerity measures.

Mette Frederiksen [Photo by Sandra Skillingsås / CC BY-ND 4.0]

The Social Democrats decided against continuing its previous minority government, even though the “red bloc” of parties that backed it secured a parliamentary majority of 90 seats against 89 for the “blue bloc” in the election. The “red bloc” consists of the Social Democrats, Social Liberals, Socialist People’s Party (SF), the pseudo-left Red-Green Alliance/Unity List (RGA), and The Alternative. The right-wing parties, including the Liberals and conservatives, and far-right Danish People’s party (DF), New Right, and Denmark Democrats, are part of the “blue bloc.”

The formation of a coalition between the Social Democrats and Liberals in the coming weeks appears likely. On Monday, Liberal leader Jacob Ellemann-Jensen told broadcaster TV2 that he was satisfied with the “good rhythm” of the talks with the Social Democrats, and Frederiksen added a day later that her party has “spent a lot of time” with the Liberals.

All of the parties, including the SF and RGA, have participated in talks and helped give legitimacy to a process which will result in a sharp shift to the right. They did so even though Frederiksen held initial talks with the New Right and Danish Democrats, who are considered to stand even further to the right than the DF, whose support for previous Liberal-led governments has seen Denmark establish one of Europe’s most stringent immigration systems.

After a meeting with Frederiksen in late November, the RGA announced its departure from the talks. Media reports interpreted the move as an effort by Frederiksen to send a clear signal to the Liberals, the traditional leading party in the “blue bloc,” that she is prepared to sacrifice cooperation with “extreme” left-wing parties to finalize a coalition deal with the political right. The SF soon followed the RGA, announcing earlier this week that it is withdrawing from the government talks.

Frederiksen is now pursuing a coalition or some formal agreement to guarantee parliamentary support with the Liberals, Social Liberals, and the Moderates of former Liberal prime minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen. This coalition would have the support of 96 of the 179 deputies. Alternatives are possible, with DF’s five MPs or 14 deputies from the libertarian Liberal Alliance, another “blue bloc” party, potentially playing a role.

“We can build a broad government in Denmark,” Frederiksen stated on November 23. “A precondition for that is our ability to agree on the political content… There is a real desire from several parties to cooperate more closely and in a new way.”

Underscoring that this “broad government” involves a strengthening of the political right, Frederiksen’s Social Democrats refrained from installing their preferred candidate as speaker of parliament with the votes of the “red bloc” parties when parliament reconvened last month. Despite the “red bloc” majority, the Social Democrats supported the election of Liberal candidate Sören Gade. A similar approach was taken to elections for the parliamentary presidium, which determines the bills and other motions placed on the agenda.

The Social Democrats pushing for an alliance with right-wing and even far-right parties is the logical outcome of its own shift sharply to the right. During three years at the head of a minority Social Democrat government, Frederiksen pursued a hardline immigration policy, including the retention of the discriminatory measures adopted by previous right-wing governments under the direct influence of DF. These measures include the notorious “ghetto law,” rebranded “parallel societies” by the Social Democrats, which enables authorities to declare districts of towns to be “ghettoes” if they have a high percentage of migrant residents. When an area is declared a “ghetto,” punishments for crimes can be doubled and residents are obliged to obey “integration” measures.

Frederiksen’s government also oversaw a major bailout of big business in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, including billions of kroner in subsidies and tax breaks. Her government’s pandemic response was so business friendly that the Economist gave Denmark the top spot in its rankings for best-performing economies in the OECD during the pandemic. Criteria for the ranking decisions included share market performance, capital investment, GDP growth, and government debt levels.

The Social Democrats’ policies while in power, which were backed by the supposedly “left” SF and RGA as supposedly the best way to keep the right out of power, helped politically strengthen the far-right. Although DF lost ground in the elections, the overall representation of far-right parties in parliament grew.

The Denmark Democrats, set up by former Interior Minister Inger Støjberg, who served a prison sentence for violating the law by illegally separating asylum-seeker couples on the pretext of combatting “child marriages,” won 14 seats. The New Right, with ties to Giorgia Meloni’s fascist Brothers of Italy, secured six seats. If the mandates of DF, the Denmark Democrats, and New Right are counted together, the far-right has a larger parliamentary group than the Liberals and is second only to the Social Democrats. The “left” parties, meanwhile, saw their support stagnate, with the RGA losing four deputies and SF gaining one.

The Social Democrats’ overtures to the right-wing parties are in recognition that the deeply unpopular policies the next Danish government must carry out will be worked out behind the scenes and then supported by a strong parliamentary majority. These policies include the implementation of the initial stages of a plan to almost double military spending to 2 percent of GDP over the next decade, and further expand Danish support for the US-NATO war on Russia. The new government will also seek to enforce stringent controls on public spending to pay for the war, military rearmament, and the large sums made available to support big business during the pandemic.

These austerity measures will have a devastating impact on the country’s health care system, which is already breaking at the seams. Last year, health care workers took two months of strike action to demand wage increases of 5,000 kroner (€600). The strikes were halted when parliament intervened to impose a real-terms pay cut, including a 5 percent increase over three years. In the year since the strike, 6 percent of nurses have quit the profession.

By contrast, for a country of just 5.8 million people, Denmark has provided significant financial and logistical support to the war. According to figures from the Danish government, total financial support since the Russian invasion amounts to €510 million for military operations and €147 million for civilian purposes, including humanitarian aid. Denmark supplied harpoon anti-ship missiles to Ukraine with US approval, a significant escalation of the conflict that enabled Kiev to strike Russian vessels in the Black Sea. The Danish army is sending 130 officers to Britain to participate in the UK’s training of 10,000 Ukrainian servicemen and will host an unspecified number of Ukrainian troops for training on Danish soil.

The Social Democrats, Liberals, and most parliamentary parties joined forces to successfully campaign for the scrapping of Denmark’s “opt-out” from the European Union’s common defence policy in June. The move means that Danish forces can be integrated into EU military operations and that military forces from other EU states, above all Germany and France, can operate in strategically significant areas in the Arctic due to the Danish military presence in Greenland and the Faroe Islands.

Netanyahu strikes deal with fascistic Religious Zionism in bid to form Israeli government

Jean Shaoul


Following the victory of his right-wing bloc in last month’s election, opposition leader and former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has signed a series of deals with factions of the fascistic and racist Religious Zionism, now the third largest party in the 120-seat Knesset.

He has moved closer to creating what would be the most rightwing and reactionary government in Israel’s historyHe has until December 11 to form a government, though he is expected to request a two-week extension from President Isaac Herzog.

Such a government heralds a stepped-up war against the Palestinians, the strengthening of Jewish supremacy and the implementation of measures synonymous with apartheid, further undermining the democratic rights of both Palestinian and Israeli workers and intensifying the social tinderbox that is Israel-Palestine today.

Former Israeli Prime Minister and the head of Likud party, Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife Sara gesture after first exit poll results for the Israeli Parliamentary election at his party's headquarters in Jerusalem, Wednesday, Nov. 2, 2022. [AP Photo/Tsafrir Abayov]

The November 1 election was the fifth in four years as no party since 2019 had been able to form a stable coalition. It was precipitated by the collapse last June of the fragile coalition with a one seat majority headed by Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett out of eight parties united only by opposition to the scandal-ridden Netanyahu.

Their “government of change” that included Labour and Meretz, both ostensibly committed to a mini-Palestinian statelet alongside Israel, continued Netanyahu’s aggressive stance towards the Palestinians as well as his pro-business agenda on behalf of Israel’s plutocrats, including lifting all measures aimed at restricting the spread of the pandemic.

According to the United Nations, it has presided over more killings of Palestinians in the Occupied Territories in 2022 than at any time since 2005. Israeli forces and settlers have killed 139 Palestinians, including at least 30 children, in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, including the deliberate targeting of US-Palestinian Al-Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh. Israel’s three-day bombardment of Gaza in August killed a further 49 Palestinians, including 17 children.

Under the Lapid-Bennett government, Israeli security forces carried out more administrative detentions and more house demolitions than in the last few years of Netanyahu’s tenure. It advanced the ethnic cleansing of Masafer Yatta, conducted almost daily raid and mass arrest operations, imposed collective punishments on the Palestinians and designated six leading Palestinian NGOs as “terrorists”. It escalated Israel’s covert wars against Iran and its allies, Syria and Lebanon’s Hezbollah in Iran, the Persian Gulf, Syria and the eastern Mediterranean.

The “government of change’s” failure to put forward any policies to alleviate social inequality—one of the highest in the OECD group of advanced countries—flowed from its class position as representative of Israel’s oligarchs against the working class, Jewish and Palestinian.

The political beneficiaries have been the far-right, fascistic forces of Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, leaders of Religious Zionism, an alliance of three groups, aided and abetted by Netanyahu who brokered their merger to enable their entry into the Knesset to bolster his bloc prior to the 2021 elections. Following last month’s elections, the party has split into its three constituent parts: Religious Zionism, Jewish Power and Noam.

According to Davar's recent socioeconomic analysis of the 25th Knesset election results, the surge in support for the far-right Religious Zionism and the secular right-wing Yisrael Beiteinu came from the higher income groups that have traditionally supported the official “centrist” and “leftist” parties. It was the three wealthiest deciles that provided the bulk of the votes for the centrist and left parties in the Lapid-Bennett coalition.

The two strongest parties among the lowest income groups are the United Torah Judaism party that is part of Netanyahu’s bloc which has its main support base among the ultra-orthodox or Haredi Jews, with about 20 percent of the vote, and the Muslim Brotherhood-linked United Arab List, with about 15.5 percent. Both groups, Israel’s ultra-orthodox and Arab citizens, are the poorest in the country. Together, the two parties received about three quarters of the votes in the three lowest economic deciles, with almost no votes from upper income workers.

While Netanyahu’s Likud Party secured the largest number of seats at 32, he depends on Religious Zionism (14) and the two parties whose support base lies with the orthodox Jews, Shas (11) and United Torah Judaism (7), to form a government with a four-seat majority in the Knesset.

Currently on trial for bribery, fraud and breach of trust in three separate cases, he welcomes in particular Religious Zionism’s willingness to introduce a law preventing a sitting prime minister from being indicted while in office. Other parties that have no substantive policy disagreements with him have refused to serve under an indicted prime minister.

In a series of deals, Netanyahu has offered key posts to legislators in Religious Zionism, which is committed to annexing the West Bank that Israel has illegally occupied, along with East Jerusalem, Gaza and the Syrian Golan Heights, since the 1967 Arab Israeli war. It pledges to expel “disloyal” Palestinian citizens of Israel, who make up 20 percent of the country’s population, demolish the al-Aqsa Mosque to make way for the building of a Jewish Temple, impose religious law and destroy the judicial system.

Netanyahu’s first deal was with the extreme-right Jewish Power party, making its leader, Itamar Ben-Gvir, the new national security minister. Ben Gvir, who regularly incites violence against the Palestinians, chanting “Death to the Arabs,” has faced dozens of charges of hate speech. Until a couple of years ago, he kept a picture in his house of the Israeli-American terrorist Baruch Goldstein, who in 1994 massacred 29 Palestinians and wounded 125 others while they were praying in Hebron.

This disciple of the American-born fascist Meir Kahane, whose movement was banned in Israel and declared a terrorist organization by the United States, will be given control over the police and other forces, including the Border Police unit that operates in the West Bank and the force that controls security at al-Aqsa Mosque. This gives Ben Gvir, who has already set up a vigilante group in the Negev and has sought to do so in Bat Yam, an impoverished suburb of Tel Aviv, a free pass to set up an anti-Palestinian militia.

Netanyahu’s second deal was with Avi Maoz, the sole member in the Knesset of the Noam faction. Notorious for his racist, homophobic and misogynist views, he will become a deputy minister in the prime minister’s office heading a newly created body charged with the task of promoting “Jewish identity.” Last week, Maoz said he would try to cancel the annual gay pride parade in Jerusalem, which he described as “an obscene abomination.” He will have authority to approve or expunge external content programmes from the list currently offered to Israeli schools.

Netanyahu has also signed a deal with Religious Zionism leader Bezalel Smotrich. A lawyer, he has defended settlers accused of incitement and provocations against the Palestinians. He advocates a shoot-to-kill policy for the military when dealing with Palestinians throwing stones. When he was asked what he would do should there be another intifada and a Palestinian child were to throw stones, he replied, “Either I will shoot him, or I will jail him, or I will expel him.” He played a key role in outlawing the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement in Israel, banning its advocates from even visiting the country. Along with leaders of the other religious parties, he is seeking to reform the judicial system to ensure that it is consistent with Jewish religious tradition.

This provocateur had originally demanded the defence portfolio a step too far for the Biden administration and is to become finance minister. As a further sweetener, his party will also get a ministerial position within the defence ministry responsible for the agencies overseeing the construction of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and Palestinian and Israeli civilian life in the Occupied Territories. In effect, Religious Zionism will have almost complete control over the West Bank.

Washington is keen to laud the virtues of democracy and human rights when opposing its enemies, yet is unphased by its attack dog in the Middle East espousing openly racist and anti-democratic policies. On Sunday, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the Biden administration would judge Israel’s incoming far-right government based on its policies, not the people in it—in other words: business as usual.

Peru’s President Castillo is impeached and arrested after attempting to dissolve Congress

Andrea Lobo


Peru’s elected President Pedro Castillo was locked up in prison Thursday following a series of extraordinary events over the previous day in which he desperately sought to preempt the threats by the judicial and legislative branches to oust him by ordering the shutdown of Congress and declaring an authoritarian state of exception.

Castillo’s bid to remain in power collapsed after the combined commands of the armed forces and police issued a statement describing his actions as unconstitutional and warning that they would not support them.

Castillo marches in front of police and troops in Pampachiri, Apurímac region in Peru, November 26. [Photo: @PedroCastilloTe]

Congress defied his order to dissolve and instead voted by an overwhelming majority to impeach him. Several of his ministers immediately resigned and condemned his actions as an attempted “coup,” and within hours Congress had sworn in his vice-president, Dina Boluarte, as Castillo’s successor.

The ignominious fall of Castillo, a former rural teacher and union leader, has thoroughly exposed not only the bankruptcy of his own rule, but that of the politics of broad layers of the pseudo-left who celebrated his election as a victory for “socialism.” Faced with the intransigent opposition of the military and the political right, he proved unable and unwilling to even attempt the mobilization of any popular support in his defense.

Aside from his personal fate, the events in Peru portend a sharper turn by the ruling classes across Latin America toward dictatorship, as they seeks to place the entire burden of the deepening economic crisis on the shoulders of the workers and rural masses.

Peru’s ongoing crisis of bourgeois rule, which has seen six presidents in just over four years, as well as the arrest and imprisonment of every surviving head of state on corruption charges, has reached a new level of intensity.

A political nobody before joining Castillo’s ticket in 2021, Boluarte has no popular support or party. While she had previously stated she would resign if Castillo were impeached, she quickly changed her tune once it had happened. Expedited congratulations by the US State Department and the European Union, along with efforts by the corporate media to promote her as the country’s first female president, already ring hollow amid right-wing maneuvers to oust her as well and force early elections.

Acknowledging her precarious position, Boluarte appealed in her inaugural speech for a “political truce to install a national unity government” and for “a broad dialogue between all political forces represented or not in Congress.” In other words, she is offering her services as a figurehead in a government dominated by the right.

The far-right opposition in Congress, however, is unlikely to accept the offer. It had already attempted to oust her almost as viciously as it did Castillo, with the aim of installing the president of the Congress, José Williams, who is next in line of succession. Williams is a fascistic former military official who continuously rails against “Marxist ideology” and was accused of ties to drug cartels and for trying to cover up the 1985 Accomarca massacre of 69 peasants.

At dawn on Thursday, the Prosecutor’s Office raided the presidential and ministerial offices to gather evidence against Castillo, and potentially also Boluarte.

Since taking office in July 2021, Castillo named five different cabinets and 80 ministers, faced two failed impeachments by the unicameral Congress and left his party Free Peru. He lurched consistently to the right, including through his appointments, which only emboldened the far right and its allegations of corruption and nepotism.

The fact is that the entire political establishment, including the police and military, have been thoroughly discredited. The charges against Castillo were penny-ante compared to the vast web of corruption that envelops every state institution.

A Datum poll published hours before the impeachment debate found that Castillo’s ridiculous approval rating of 24 percent was only greater than the 11 percent for Congress.

Castillo’s preemptive bid to forestall his impeachment collapsed as soon as the police and military commands, along with their handlers in Washington, refused to enforce it. US Ambassador Lisa Kenna quickly condemned Castillo’s announcement on Wednesday and called on him to “take back his attempt to shut down Congress.” Nervously, she added, “We encourage the Peruvian public to keep calm during these uncertain times.”

Castillo’s reaction was to take flight. Having secured an offer of asylum from Mexican President Andrés Manuel López, he and his entire family rode in a limousine toward the Mexican Embassy in Lima before the head of national security ordered Castillo’s escort to bring him to the Lima police headquarters instead. There he was arrested for “rebellion” and “breaking the constitutional order” and sent to prison under a preventive detention order.

The Congress was then able to move forward its impeachment debate and quickly vote by a majority of 101 of the 130 members for deposing him due to “permanent moral incapacity.”

Before Castillo’s coup attempt to dissolve Congress, however, every report suggested that the far-right parties were still far behind the 87 votes needed to depose him, having only garnered 55 votes in the latest attempt in March.

At the same time, parties of the official center like Alliance for Progress, Popular Action and the Morado Party had gradually joined the impeachment drive, even as the far-right resorted to strikingly reactionary allegations of “betrayal of the fatherland” against Castillo for even considering aiding land-locked Bolivia in gaining an outlet to the sea.

Far from being defenders of democracy as the media now claims, the police and military comprise the same repressive state apparatus with a long record of brutally repressing peaceful protests and massacring peasants and workers. Only two years ago, the police killed Inti Sotelo and Brian Pintado in a demonstration against Manuel Merino, whose presidency lasted only six days.

The Biden administration has continued to train and arm these forces in preparation for a larger crackdown. In August, the Castillo administration and Congress approved the entry of US troops for joint exercises with the Peruvian military and police involving special combat operations, intelligence support and psy-ops.

Castillo directed his appeals against the far-right not to the working class, but to US imperialism by sending a letter last month to the Organization of American States (OAS), an agency complicit in numerous CIA-backed coups. He begged this US-dominated body to defend him against a “new type of coup d’état.”

Early on in his mandate, Castillo—like the pseudo-left presidents Petro in Colombia and Boric in Chile—sought accommodation with Washington by denouncing the Nicolas Maduro government in Venezuela as undemocratic. This year, after an October meeting in Lima with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the Castillo administration issued a joint condemnation of the Russian military operation in Ukraine.

On December 1, from Washington, the envoys of the OAS recommended a “political truce,” after warning that the actions by both ruling factions, including the corruption investigations against Castillo and his threats to dissolve Congress, “risk the democratic institutionalism of Peru.” This was widely interpreted as a refusal to back him and a green light to the right wing to move ahead with his ouster.

Castillo combined a right-wing program of mass deportations of migrants, constantly depicting them as criminals, and lifting virtually all mitigations against COVID-19—even though Peru has suffered the highest death rate per capita in the world—with demagogic slogans like “No more poor people in a rich country.” But the only income redistribution he implemented was upwards through handouts and other incentives for businesses ostensibly to abate unemployment.

This year, he boasted that his policies had greatly reduced poverty; however, even the unsafe re-openings only slightly reduced the numbers living in poverty from 9.93 million to 8.61 million during his first year, compared to 6.6 million before the pandemic.

The whole region has been gravely affected by the ongoing global supply chain issues due to the pandemic, the increase in interest rates by the major central banks, and the NATO war against Russia in Ukraine. Peru’s public debt, which it holds mainly in euros and dollars, rapidly jumped from less than 20 percent of its GDP in 2013 to over 36 percent. Moreover, the country’s agriculture is highly dependent on grain and fertilizer imports largely produced in Russia and Ukraine.

During the harvest this year, the Castillo administration failed three times to carry out an international purchase of fertilizers, which was exploited by those pushing for impeachment.

These pressures added to the continuous devaluation of the Peruvian sol against the dollar since 2014, when the commodity boom ended. Copper sales to China, whose demand remains anemic and whose prices have failed to keep up with inflation, represent, by far, Peru’s main export, followed by gold and gas.

As the economies of Peru and across Latin America slow down dramatically, the political crisis in Lima signals, above all, that the ruling elites will be unable to continue suppressing the class struggle by promoting empty illusions in an entirely bleached “Pink Tide.”

8 Dec 2022

UNICEF Venture Fund 2023

Application Deadline:

9th January 2023 11:59 PM ET 

Tell Me About Award:

The UNICEF Venture Fund is looking to make up to US$100K in equity-free investments to provide early-stage (seed) funding to for-profit technology start-ups developing software solutions using frontier technologies for climate action. If your startup leverages frontier technology for climate analytics and forecasts, greener economies, climate and disaster risk mitigation, carbon offsetting or emission reduction, or youth engagement around climate action, we are looking for you. If your product is registered in one of UNICEF’s programme countries, is a working prototype, has demonstrated results, and is (or could be) open-source licensed, we encourage you to apply.

What Countries are Eligible?

UNICEF member countries

Who is Eligible?

  • You must be registered as a private company in a UNICEF programme country; 
  • You are working on open source technology solutions or willing to be open-source under the following licenses or their equivalent: BSD, GNU, MIT (software), CERN, MIT, TAPR (hardware), or CC-BY (content); 
  • You have an existing prototype of the solution with promising results from initial pilots; 
  • Your solution has the potential to positively impact the lives of children. 

Please note: Applications must be submitted in English

How are Applicants Selected?

If your startup leverages a frontier technology such as drones, blockchain, extended reality (XR), Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML) or novel data science (DS), UNICEF is looking for you. 

How many Awards?

Not specified

What is Value of Award?

up to US$100K in equity-free investments 

How to Apply?

APPLY NOW

Visit Application Webpage for Details

US Government Community College Initiative Program 2023

Application Deadline:

16th December 2022

Tell Me About Award:

The Community College Initiative Program (CCI) provides scholarships to spend up to one academic year at a United States community college. Participants build technical skills and may earn certificates in their fields of study.  Through professional internships, service learning, and community engagement activities, participants strengthen English language proficiency and immerse themselves in the culture and day-to-day life in the United States.

Participants study in one of the following eligible fields: agriculture, applied engineering, business management and administration, early childhood education, information technology, media, public safety, and tourism and hospitality management.

CCI Program participants are recruited from historically underrepresented and underserved communities. After completing the program, participants return home with new skills and expertise to help them contribute to the economic growth and development of their country.

What about Eligible Field(s) of Study?

Participants study in one of the following eligible fields: agriculture, applied engineering, business management and administration, early childhood education, information technology, media, public safety, and tourism and hospitality management.

What Countries are Eligible?

See Link below

Where will Award Take Place?

A community college in USA

Who is Eligible?

All applicants must:

  • Be able to begin the academic exchange program in the United States in July 2022
  • Be 18 years old at the start of the program         
  • Have a diploma from a secondary school
  • Possess a basic knowledge of English
  • Desire to build professional and leadership skills to contribute to the development of their home communities
  • Be able to begin the academic exchange program in the United States in July 2020
  • Meet country-specific requirements

How are Applicants Selected?

The recruitment  and nomination of candidates in the eligible countries is administered by the Fulbright Commission or the Public Affairs Section of the U.S. Embassy. CCI awards are not Fulbright awards. See location details below for contacts in participating countries and to ask for more information about application eligibility requirements.

The CCI Program will recruit from these 16 countries for the 2022-2023 academic year. 

How many Awards?

Not specified

What is Value of Award?

The Community College Initiative Program (CCI) provides scholarships to spend up to one academic year at a United States community college. Participants build technical skills and may earn certificates in their fields of study.  Through professional internships, service learning, and community engagement activities, participants strengthen English language proficiency and immerse themselves in the culture and day-to-day life in the United States.

How to Apply?

Apply below

Visit Application Webpage for Details