14 Dec 2022

Iran publicly hangs second anti-government protester after show trial

Jean Shaoul & Keith Jones


In a gruesome attempt to intimidate the populace, Iranian authorities executed an anti-government protester early Monday morning—the second such execution in four days—and publicly circulated photos of his corpse hanging from a construction crane.

Twenty-three-year-old Majidreza Rahnavard was hanged “in the presence of a group of Mashadi citizens,” reported the Islamic Republic judiciary’s own Mizan news agency.

A court in the northeastern city of Mashhad had convicted Rahnavard of stabbing and killing two Basij security officers and wounding four others in an incident it termed a “terrorist attack.” According to the Oslo-based group Iran Human Rights, Rahnavard “was sentenced to death based on coerced confessions after a grossly unfair process and a show trial.” He was hanged just 23 days after his arrest.

Majidreza Rahnavard [Photo: @AlinejadMasih/Twitter]

Four days earlier, Mohsen Shekari became the first person to be executed for his role in a three-month-long wave of protests that has been the target of ruthless state repression and punctuated by violent clashes between some protesters and security forces.

Shekari, also just 23, paid with his life for what an Iranian court said were the crimes of participating in the blocking of a Tehran street and stabbing a Basij security guard, who survived the attack and required just 13 stitches. While the authorities claimed Shekari had confessed, his relatives said he was not allowed legal representation, his trial was held in a closed court, his face showed signs of bruising and his body had not been released.

In neither case did the Islamic Republic authorities link their two victims, at least publicly, to the “outside entities,” meaning US imperialism, Israel, and the Saudi absolutist monarchy, which they accuse of fomenting the protests.

Elsewhere, five men have been sentenced to death for killing a member of the Basij in the city of Karaj west of Tehran, with 11 others, including three minors, sentenced to long jail sentences. As many as 25 people have been charged with offences that carry the death penalty. Given that Iran has already executed more than 500 people this year, their lives must be considered to be in extreme danger.

The executions have sparked popular outrage, with a Farsi hashtag for Shekari hitting four million on Friday, with many Iranians noting that the execution was a “declaration of war” on the protesters. That in turn prompted a group of scholars and senior clerics from theological seminaries in the city of Qom to condemn the executions. They criticized the speed of the trials and the disproportionate nature of the punishment and called for a halt to further executions.

The hangings underscore the degree of crisis and fear within Iran’s bourgeois clerical regime. Some voices within the Shia clergy-led political establishment have called for attempts to mollify the anti-government protesters, including by dissolving the regime’s “morality police.” But the current administration, headed by President Ebrahim Raisi; the police, which report directly to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei; and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps appear determined to stamp out the movement through ever-escalating state violence.    

The protests—which began in the Kurdish provinces under the slogan “Women, Life,  Freedom”—have been ongoing since the police-custody death in mid-September of a young Kurdish woman, 22 year-old Mahsa Amini, who was detained for wearing the hijab “improperly.” The protest movement began and continues, at least outside the predominantly Kurdish northwest, to be centered among students and youth. In recent weeks some small traders have responded to calls for anti-government “strike” days by closing their shops and businesses in the bazaars. Teachers and some workers at major industrial facilities, including steel works in Isfahan, have staged walkouts in conjunction with the anti-government protests.   

The authorities have responded to the protests, which have denounced the political privileges of the Shia clergy and the endemic corruption of the institutions of the Islamic Republic and increasingly called to overthrow (“Death to”) Supreme Leader-for-life Ayatollah Khamenei, with repression. They have shut down access to social media; mobilised tens of thousands of the Basij—the voluntary police force affiliated with and led by the politically and economically powerful IRGC; carried out mass arrests and intimidated and threatened potential strikers with the loss of their livelihoods, while calling for speedy “justice” to be meted out to those whom the regime claim have committed “crimes against the security of the nation and Islam.” According to the authorities’ own figures, security forces have killed at least 200 people. NGOs outside the country, many of them oriented to the western imperialist powers, put the death toll at more than double that and arrests at around 18,000.

The regime’s harsh repressive measures are rooted in its fear that under conditions of ever deepening poverty and ever-widening social inequality, and after decades in which all factions of the ruling elite from the conservative Principlists to the Reformers have joined together in rolling back the social concessions made after the 1979 Revolution, the working class will erupt onto the scene. Recent years have seen a wave of strikes and protests against the non-payment of wages, privatization, precarious contract-labour jobs, and subsidy cuts.  

Washington, under Trump and now Biden, has been mounting a campaign of “maximum pressure” against Iran, imposing punishing sanctions that are tantamount to an act of war. The explicit aim of this campaign is to crash Iran’s economy. Its purpose is to leverage the divisions within the Iranian bourgeoisie so as to engineer a political realignment in Tehran, if not full-scale regime change, and impose on the Iranian people a neo-colonial regime, like that of the Shah, that will serve US imperialist interests in the Middle East and across Eurasia.

The hands of the capitalist elites of the US and its European allies drip with the blood of countless colonial and neo-colonial crimes across the Middle East, including the criminal wars of the past three decades that have razed entire societies from Afghanistan, Iraq and Yemen to Libya and Syria. Yet with unbridled cynicism and hypocrisy, they have seized on the bloody repression of the Iranian regime to posture as the votaries of democracy and human rights and impose further economic and geopolitical pressure on Iran. The EU’s top foreign affairs official, Josep Borrell, has announced that the EU is preparing “a very tough” package of sanctions against Iran, adding that this is both because of its human rights violations and supplying of drones to Russia.

Tehran for its part has sought to justify its violent response to the protests by claiming they are being instigated by its “foreign adversaries,” particularly the US and Israel. It has accused them of using their regional allies, including Iraqi Kurds, to arm and support demonstrators.

In recent weeks, Tehran has carried out a series of military strikes on anti-regime Kurdish groups based inside Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq, where the CIA, the British Secret Intelligence Service MI6 and Israel’s Mossad spy agency have long been active. It claims these groups have been sending in armed teams to support protesters in the Kurdish areas of northwestern Iran that have seen the most extensive unrest.

Various rival Kurdish exile groups that are based just inside the Iraqi border —including the Kurdish Democratic Party, Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, PAK (Parti Azadi Kurdistan) and PJAK (Kurdistan Free Life Party)—have received funding from the CIA. They have sought to exploit the legitimate grievances of Iran’s 10 million strong Kurdish minority that have long faced discrimination at the hands of the clerical regime, including the banning of their language as the main medium of instruction in schools, to press for some form of regional autonomy that would benefit a tiny handful of families as has happened in Iraq’s corrupt Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) that is dominated by the Barzani clan.   

A December 9 Jerusalem Post article cited officials from these parties interviewed in Iraqi Kurdistan in mid-November as rejecting Tehran’s accusations. It claimed that the Kurdish organizations are not leading the current protests, nor do they claim to do so, although they are involved in activities that assist the uprising. Komala activist Kawthar Fatahi, told the Post, “We have ‘illegal hospitals’,” and “We pay doctors to bring aid to wounded people. We pay the families of wounded people. We assist the movement a lot, but not via armed action.”

This is hard to believe. As the Post stated, “All three of these movements (Komala, PDKI and PAK) have light weaponry, including machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), as this author witnessed on their bases. The demonstrators inside Iran, meanwhile, are being killed daily. More than 450 people have now died. The organizations are faced with a dilemma. Why not use the available weaponry in order to defend the protesters? And if not now, when? so to speak.” To which the Post’s interviewee responded, “People do call on us to come inside, yes. But we think it’s not yet the time.”

Abdullah Mohtadi, the Komala Party’s Secretary General, has been in Washington in recent days where he has held meetings on the situation in Iran with key members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee—including its Democratic Party chairman, Senator Bob Menendez, a leading anti-Iran hawk—and Republican Party Congressman Michael Waltz from Florida He is one of a large new group of military-intelligence veterans in Congress, and an ardent supporter of the war in Ukraine.

The role of the Kurdish groups allied with Washington is far from unique. A whole series of émigré political forces, from the royalists and the remnants of the bourgeois National Front to the Tudeh Party and the pseudo-left, are in the name of the fight for democracy and women’s rights promoting an “Iranian people’s movement” oriented and beholden to the imperialist powers.

Such a movement would express not the interests and aspirations of Iranian workers and youth to win basic democratic rights and social equality. Rather, it would express the predatory ambitions of sections of the Iranian bourgeoisie and upper middle class who calculate that they can profit handsomely by becoming the local clients and police enforcers of an Iran returned to neo-colonial bondage.

The reality is all talk of a struggle for democracy outside of a struggle against the imperialist powers that have ravaged Iran and the entire Middle East for over a century, waging war, supporting one bloody dictatorship after another, and inciting religious and national-ethnic divisions is a monstrous fraud.

Basic democratic rights, including 

Police killings fuel protests across Peru against newly installed US-backed Boluarte regime

Andrea Lobo


Escalating demonstrations demanding the resignation of newly installed president Dina Boluarte in Peru have brought the country’s major cities largely to a standstill, as the police and military have carried out a brutal onslaught that has killed at least eight protesters.

People attend the funeral procession of a child who was killed during protests against new President Dina Boluarte in Andahuaylas, Peru, Monday, Dec. 12, 2022. [AP Photo/Franklin Briceno]

According to national ombudswoman Eliana Revollar on Monday, those slain include Jonathan Encino Arias, 18; Wilfredo Lizarme Barboza, 18; Becan Quispe, 18; Jonathan Lloclla, 26; the minors D.A.Q., 15, and R.P.M., 16; and Miguel Arcana, 38. All were killed as a result of “projectiles from firearms,” and several died during the occupations of the Huancabamba and Arequipa airports, she reported. Moreover, at least a hundred more people have been injured.

On Monday night, an additional killing was reported of a young man from a gunshot to his neck, only a few blocks from the presidential palace in Lima.

The demonstrations follow the rapid installation of Boluarte as president hours after the impeachment and arrest of President Pedro Castillo on December 7. The White House and the European Union immediately recognized Boluarte as the rightful successor and safeguard of democracy and the “constitutional order.” Meanwhile the corporate media launched a campaign to celebrate her as the country’s first female president and congratulated the armed forces for protecting democracy.

Within days, the U.S.-backed Boluarte and the state forces are already violently cracking down on peaceful demonstrations and roadblocks that oppose Castillo’s impeachment. On Monday, Boluarte declared a state of emergency for 60 days in the departments of Apurímac, Arequipa and Ica—all in southern Peru, where support for Castillo is relatively higher—suspending democratic rights including “freedom of assembly, liberty and personal security.”

While Boluarte initially insisted that she would finish Castillo’s current term until July 2026, she has since announced a bill to move the general elections forward to April 2024. But this has failed to dampen the unrest.

Alberto Otárola, who has been defense minister since Saturday, “absolutely rejected” that Boluarte will resign and vowed to “restore order.” Moreover, he said that all the regional prefects in charge of local security and administration that were named by Castillo will be deposed.

Amid an already worsening economic situation and a massive COVID surge, the protests dramatically escalated after two teenagers were killed by police during demonstrations on December 11 in the southern Andean region of Apurimac. The UN Human Rights Office condemned “instances where the police appear to have resorted to unnecessary and disproportionate use of force and indiscriminate use of tear gas,” including against journalists.

Spontaneous protests rapidly spread across the country on Sunday and Monday demanding the resignation of Boluarte, the closing of Congress and the holding of immediate elections. These have shut down the main Pan-American Highway in the north and south, which threatens food shortages in the cities.

While many openly support the liberation and reinstallation of Castillo, the most common slogans on the signs carried by demonstrators demand general elections and to “Throw them all out!”

On Monday December 12, thousands of demonstrators occupied the Arequipa international airport, the third largest in the country, which was re-taken hours later “thanks to the Armed Forces,” according to an official statement. Demonstrators also occupied and set fire to equipment in the Gloria milk processing plant, while students occupied the University of Cajamarca, both in Arequipa. Hundreds of miners also marched against Boluarte in Arequipa.

In Cusco, thousands of students also occupied the University of San Antonio Abad. Later that night, demonstrators shut down the Cusco International Airport, which remained closed throughout Tuesday.

The Agrarian and Rural Front of Peru, an umbrella group of peasants, Indigenous, women and other social organizations, launched an “indefinite strike” on Tuesday demanding the liberation of Castillo, the shutdown of Congress, new elections, and a new constitution. They will be joined by the Peruvian Student Federation on Tuesday.

Moreover, the leaders of the Indigenous Ashaninka community in the Peruvian Amazon announced preparations for a “great march to Lima to dissolve Parliament.”

According to Jornada, Castillo supporters “from humble social backgrounds,” including representatives of rural self-defense committees or ronderos, have gathered at the San Martin Plaza in Lima, a historic gathering place for demonstrations, to discuss how to proceed amid calls for a “popular insurgency.”

Castillo has been able to publish several statements on Twitter declaring that he has been “abducted” and will not resign, while depicting Boluarte as an “usurper” and calling on the police and armed forces to lay down their arms.

Meanwhile, the governments of Mexico, Argentina, Colombia and Bolivia, associated with the so-called “pink tide” released a statement on Monday that continues to recognize Castillo as president.

The main concern cited by the corporate media in Peru and internationally is the lack of any institution, political party or organization that is not discredited or holds any popular support to channel the demonstrations back into the fold of capitalist politics, which is also the reality across the region and beyond.

The Los Angeles Times concludes its report citing an accountant and single mother in Lima: “They all steal, and who ends up with real power? The richest…”

On December 7, President Pedro Castillo tried to preemptively cling to power by dissolving Congress and establishing a ‘state of exception’, which would temporarily suspend democratic rights and begin curfews.

Only a week earlier, the Organization of American States had concluded that it would not agree to Castillo’s appeal to this de facto arm of the US. State Department to oppose the drive by the far-right opposition in Congress and the courts to oust him. Then, almost immediately after Castillo’s speech on December 7, the US Embassy released a statement opposing Castillo’s orders, which was undoubtedly coordinated in back-channel discussions with the military, political and business leaders in the country.

The police and military then announced that they would not comply with Castillo’s orders, and Congress proceeded to impeach him in a 101-6 vote, with 10 abstentions. Congress has since removed his immunity to expedite his criminal prosecution.

Castillo was unwilling to make any popular appeal to oppose the attempts of the far-right to oust him precisely because he is a capitalist politician entirely devoted to protecting bourgeois rule.

The barrage of corruption allegations used to depose his elected administration are a drop in the bucket compared to the massive web of kickbacks and money laundering engulfing the entire political establishment, especially the leader of the opposition, Keiko Fujimori, whose corporate backers confessed to handing over millions to her party.

At the same time, by implementing pro-market economic policies no different from those advocated by the far-right, including lifting anti-COVID mitigations, Castillo had lost virtually all popular support. Barely a year after coming to power, U.S. and European imperialism, precisely the forces that Castillo relied on, had concluded that his presidency was not useful given his inability to maintain illusions in the prospect of social reforms and continue suppressing the class struggle.

Regarding Washington’s claims to defend democracy and oppose corruption in Peru, US aid to the country increased dramatically and was the highest in the region right after former president Alberto Fujimori dissolved the Congress and convened a constituent assembly to draft the current reactionary constitution that all institutions are so keen on defending. He is currently jailed for organizing death squads and engaging in widespread corruption. His intelligence chief, Vladimiro Montesinos, who was videotaped paying congress people for backing the Fujimorists, was known for decades as an asset of the CIA, which paid him millions.

Following his impeachment, Castillo had attempted to flee to the embassy of Mexico, whose President Andrés Manuel López Obrador had agreed to grant him and his family asylum, but the leadership of the security forces ordered his escorts to hand over him to the police in Lima, which arrested him for “rebellion.”

FTX founder Bankman-Fried indicted on criminal charges

Nick Beams


When outright corruption and criminality is exposed in the capitalist system, whether it be in the sphere of politics, economics or elsewhere, its institutions, including the corporate media, go into overdrive as they try to maintain that what has been revealed is not systemic but merely the product of “bad” individuals.

This phenomenon is again on display with charging of the founder and owner of the failed crypto currency exchange FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, on multiple counts.

Bankman-Fried, who was arrested in the Bahamas on Monday, has been charged by US prosecutors in an indictment unsealed yesterday with engineering “one of the biggest frauds in American history.”

The Department of Justice has charged Bankman-Fried on eight counts, including conspiracy to commit wire fraud on customers and lenders, money laundering and violating election funding laws.

The charges centre on the claim that Bankman-Fried used the money deposited with FTX to fund the operations of his private firm Almeda Research to make investments and to finance the lavish lifestyle of himself and others.

FTX was once valued in the market at around $32 billion. It is now virtually worthless with untold losses incurred by investors, creditors and retail investors.

In testimony to a US congressional hearing yesterday, John Ray, appointed as chief executive of FTX after it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, said creditors were looking at “massive losses.”

“At the end of the day, we are not going to be able to recover all the losses here,” he said, and it would take months, not weeks, to track down all the lost funds.

Outlining the operations of Bankman Fried, Ray told the hearing: “This isn’t sophisticated whatsoever, this is just plain old embezzlement.”

One of the charges against Bankman-Fried unveiled by Damian Williams, US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, is that he violated election campaign funding laws by funneling tens of millions of dollars to both Republican and Democratic committees which he claimed came from wealthy individuals but in fact were funded by Almeda with the money coming from FTX.

The money was eagerly grasped with both hands, and Bankman-Fried was one of the largest donors to the Democrats.

“All of this dirty money was used in service of Bankman-Fried’s desire to buy bipartisan influence and impact the direction of public policy in Washington,” Williams said.

The Securities and Exchange Commission, the supposed watchdog of the American financial system, came in behind the Justice Department and filed a series of civil charges. But the remarks by SEC officials amounted to a damning self-exposure.

According to the SEC, Bankman-Fried orchestrated a fraud from the day that FTX was launched in 2019 and that it continued under his personal direction until the company collapsed in November.

Customers’ assets were used to make “undisclosed venture investments, lavish real estate purchases and large political donations.”

SEC Chair Gary Gensler said: “We allege that Sam Bankman-Fried built a house of cards on a foundation of deception while telling investors that it was one of the safest buildings in crypto.”

But the SEC boss did not even touch on the question, let alone address it, of how it was that this fraud, perpetrated in plain sight over three years, did not evoke any response from one the supposed guardians of the US financial system.

The answer to that question is not to be found in any supposedly “magical” powers possessed by Bankman-Fried as a con man.

It lies in the broader financial environment, above all, the conditions created by the US Federal Reserve which had pumped trillions of dollars into the financial system after the 2008 crash and injected trillions more after the financial crisis of March 2020 at the start of the pandemic.

This ocean of ultra-cheap money boosted the value of all financial assets, not least crypto currencies, to record heights on Wall Street and elsewhere as enormous amounts of wealth were created seemingly out of thin air. And while there was money to be made hand over fist, the SEC was not going to intervene.

Speaking to reporters yesterday, Gurbir Grewal, director of the SEC’s enforcement division, said FTX “operated behind a veneer of legitimacy” created by Bankman-Fried. “But as we allege in our complaint, that veneer wasn’t just thin, it was also fraudulent.”

But as with Gensler, he made no effort to explain why this “thin veneer” was never penetrated.

Again, that question can only be answered by an examination of the broader context in which the FTX operation was carried out. The supposed “legitimacy” of FTX was not created by Bankman-Fried but by a veritable campaign involving powerful financial and media forces.

Major financial interests, including some of the world’s best-known investors, such as BlackRock, Sequoia Capital and the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, backed FTX.

Bankman-Fried was promoted on television, interviewing such “luminaries” as former US President Bill Clinton and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair. FTX was promoted by super-model Gisele Bundchen and the most famous NFL player, quarterback Tom Brady.

He will most likely be convicted of fraud and sent to jail. But the real criminals will never appear in the dock as the coverup operation gets underway.

There are parallels here with the political sphere. The essential thrust of the January 6 committee into the coup attempt, orchestrated by the Republican war hawk Liz Cheney, has been to deflect any investigation into the role of the agencies of the state in facilitating Trump’s plot.

Likewise, there will be no investigation, let alone charges, arising from the facilitating of Bankman-Fried’s operations by the supposed financial guardians and the political and media establishment.

His connections with top levels of the political establishment also recall the case of Enron chief Kenneth Lay, convicted of securities and wire fraud in 2001, who was a major financial backer of George W. Bush as he framed energy policies favourable to the company’s operations.

The decision of the powers that be to throw Bankman-Fried to the wolves on criminal charges is aimed at trying to protect the criminality of the system over which they preside.

Just as with Trump in the political sphere, he was not some kind of snake who had mysteriously slithered into a financial Garden of Eden but the representative of its essential modus operandi—the siphoning of the wealth created by the labour of the working class to the upper echelons of society.

The crypto crisis which led to his demise is an expression of a broader process—the ongoing disintegration of the financial house of cards built up over decades to which the ruling financial elites are responding by intensifying the attacks on the working class, the creators of all wealth.

Chinese hospitals face deluge of patients with end of Zero COVID

Benjamin Mateus


Although the confirmed seven-day average of new COVID cases in China has been sharply declining recently, the press in Asia is reporting that public hospitals in major cosmopolitan centers are being swamped with COVID patients presenting with fevers and respiratory symptoms. All this takes place but a matter of days after the complete abandonment of Zero COVID.

Workers at a hospital in Beijing, Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2022. [AP Photo/Andy Wong]

Over the past two weeks, centralized testing has been dismantled and the “mobile itinerary cards” on cell phones that track travel history have been deactivated. The true magnitude of COVID infections and their locations have quickly grown dark on the map of the pandemic. Now, only the number of those who are reported sick and dead, can provide an indication of the scale of China’s growing public health crisis.

Health officials in Beijing said at a briefing on Monday that 22,000 patients had attended fever clinics the day before, a rate 16 times higher than the prior week. An eye surgeon speaking on conditions of anonymity with the Washington Post indicated that half the hospital staff where she worked had recently tested positive for COVID. She added, “Patients who visit the fever clinic have grown several times compared with last week, and it’s likely to go one for weeks or even months more.”

The sudden surge in patients has caused confusion in health systems and the level of panic among official responders and the population at large is palpable in the reports being given by health workers to the media.

While hospitals have been ordered to expand their staffing, stock more medical resources and intensive care supplies, the number of hospital beds and ICU capacity will be unable to meet the deluge of patients densely populated cities are expecting. Over the counter anti-fever medications are running short in supply and price gouging is being reported for such goods. Meanwhile, close contacts and those infected with mild symptoms are being told to stay home, running the risk of infecting their friends and families, including the elders in the household who are most vulnerable.

Chinese state media has been asking the population to avoid using the emergency hotlines unless severely ill. At the Beijing Emergency Medical Center, call volumes have jumped six-fold with 30,000 calls per day. Where previously long lines were waiting for testing, now they are queuing outside hospitals and pharmacies.

Illness among medical staff and workers means the beginning of disruption for health and basic services. These mean delays and staffing shortages which wreak havoc on organizing shifts and the smooth transitions required for the safe administration of care to patients. Healthcare workers are being called in from their days off and vacations to cover for colleagues who have fallen ill.

With COVID restrictions lifted and testing requirements being abandoned, hospitals will become vectors of new infections for those seeking care for other health conditions. A medical worker said that at his hospital in Beijing patients are being asked to sign disclaimers acknowledging admission may result in catching COVID. Urgent procedures and treatments will have to be withheld in order to attend to the immediate care of those who have fallen ill, and treatable ailments may thus become life threatening.

A medical worker at a Beijing hospital who withheld his name reported that more than half of the staff had been infected and the nurse-to-patient ratio had quadrupled to one in 10. Over two-thirds of the 1,000-bed hospital was engaged in treating COVID patients. Many families seeking medical attention are being turned away due to high patient loads.

The numbers being reported by the National Health Commission no longer reflect reality. Prominent pulmonologist and epidemiologist, Dr. Zhong Nanshan, who was a leading advisor in managing the crisis when the pandemic first broke out in Wuhan three years ago, told state media, “We can see that hundreds of thousands or tens of thousands of people are infected in several major cities.”

Zhong, who previously promoted the traditional Chinese medicine, Lianhua Qingwen, for the treatment of influenza, is playing a critical role in downplaying the dangers posed by COVID, comparing the pandemic’s fatality rates to the flu. “The death rate from Omicron is around 0.1 percent, similar to the common flu, and the infection rarely reaches the lungs. Most people recover from the variant within seven to 10 days.”

Like his counterparts in the west, Zhong presents boosters as means of mitigating the impact of the inevitable spread of the pandemic. “It’s unlikely people will stay put for the 2023 Lunar New year holiday so I advise those who travel home to get booster shots so that even if they are infected, symptoms will be mild.” During the holiday, hundreds of millions of Chinese head back to their provinces to reunite with their families which will only exacerbate the spread of the coronavirus.

Responding to these developments, Dr. Zhang Wenhong, chief of the Infectious Diseases division at Shanghai’s Huashan Hospital told his staff that the months ahead will be difficult. If the Chinese Communist Party elects to let the virus runs its course in one massive surge, he stated, the catastrophic impact of the infections on the health system will drive mortality rates higher than those projected in the best-case scenario that is being presented. He added that he disagreed with Zhong’s claim that Omicron only attacks the upper respiratory tract and declared that he is seeing cases of pneumonia too.

Two hundred million of China’s 1.412 billion population are over the age of sixty-five and 40 million are over eighty. They are the least boosted with the current versions of the Chinese COVID vaccines and are at highest risk. The level of COVID fatalities in the US and Europe with Omicron suggest that there could easily be more than 500,000 deaths among the elderly in China in the next several months.

If access to health care is severely impacted and resources exhausted, however, the estimates made by several prominent studies that somewhere between 1.5 to two million people could die of COVID in China are reasonable and harrowing. Though the vaccination campaign has recommenced to get shots into older Chinese arms, the upheaval caused by the current surge will certainly redirect resources to immediate care and the vaccine campaign may very well fall far short of what is being promised. Currently the seven-day average in COVID vaccines have only reached a startlingly anemic 700,000 per day.

Professor Ali Mokdad at the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation and chief strategy officer for population health at the University of Washington, in a statement to Japan Times, said, “It will be all over the country almost at the same time, but first in urban areas and then in rural because of the crowding. It will be one month from now when we see very high number of cases, and mortality will come two weeks later. It will never come back down to where it is now.”

In response to these developments, the population isn’t responding with joyous shouts of “freedom” and celebration of the end of Zero COVID and lockdowns. A sense of dread grips the country. With cases and illnesses expected to swell, people are staying home, avoiding public venues and spending. Many have canceled trips and are afraid it will be impossible to avoid infection.

Dr. Eric Topol, director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute in La Jolla, California, told Bloomberg, “Unless they get uptake of better vaccines and boosters quickly across the whole population, it looks like lockdowns will no longer hold and a huge surge is in store. It looks like major trouble is brewing.”

Sri Lanka president threatens to take “tough decisions” on budget

Saman Gunadasa


Sri Lankan President Ranil Wickremesinghe who is also finance minister, ended the parliamentary budget debate last Thursday insisting that his government will implement its harsh austerity measures to the letter whatever opposition emerges against them.

Sri Lankan President Ranil Wickremesinghe arrives at the parliamentary complex in Colombo, Sri Lanka on Aug. 3, 2022. [AP Photo/Eranga Jayawardena]

Complaining that the country faces “adverse repercussions today due to the short-sighted popular decisions taken in the past”, Wickremesinghe said: “Unpopular decisions have had to be taken for the future prospects of the country.” While insisting electricity tariffs will be increased, he reiterated the point: “We have to make tough decisions… We are here because we didn’t take tough decisions.”

The electricity tariff increase is only one measure of the “tough decisions” that the government is determined to implement. Others include the privatisation of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), slashing price subsidies for electricity, water and fuel, increased taxes on working people even as inflation soars, and amending the labour laws to facilitate the destruction of hundreds of thousands of jobs.

These budget austerity measures are fully in line with the dictates of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as the pre-condition for an emergency loan facility to provide temporary relief amid the country’s acute financial crisis.

The government had already increased electricity bills by 75 percent in August. Now the cabinet has approved a further increase of 70 percent in two stages in January and June next year.

The government also increased water rates by 127 percent in August for two million families. Prices for fuel and cooking gas increased by 200 to 300 percent earlier this year. Ending price subsidies for water and fuel will add to the intolerable burdens facing workers and the rural poor.

The government has already appointed a committee to draft laws to break up the Ceylon Electricity Board to 15 entities in preparation for privatisation while vowing to expedite the sale of Sri Lanka Telecom and the Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation. These privatisations will inevitably lead to major job losses and further price increases.

At the conclusion of the debate last Thursday, the budget was passed by 123 to 80 votes. Most MPs of the ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), the discredited party of the ousted president Gotabhaya Rajapakse, voted for the budget.

The Wickremesinghe government lacks any popular support and is completely dependent on the SLPP’s parliamentary majority. Since ousting of former president Gotabhaya Rajapakse in mid-July by a popular uprising that began in early April, the SLPP has been fractured. With A few exceptions, the SLPP MPs who sit as “independents” in parliament voted against the budget.

The main opposition parties—the Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB) and Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)—voted against the budget, despite the fact that they insist that seeking IMF assistance and accepting its austerity demands is the only means of addressing the country’s economic crisis.

The Tamil bourgeois parties, including the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), abstained in the vote, thus helping the government pass the budget. In exchange, Wickremesinghe for a vague “promise” to solve the problems of the Tamil people by convening an all-party conference.

This sordid deal underscores the contempt that the Tamil ruling elites have for the masses who will be hard hit by the austerity measures. They are interested above all in a power-sharing arrangement with the Colombo government that boosts their political and economic position at the expense of Tamil working people. Like the SJB and JVP, the TNA is committed to a deal with the IMF.

Workers are already engaged in struggles against the austerity measures. Last week, thousands of workers, including from telecom, insurance, banks, electricity, railways, healthcare and free trade zones, participated in protests in Colombo and other cities against the budget provisions. Last Monday, postal workers joined a one-day strike.

The government and the ruling class as a whole fear that the harsh austerity measures put forward in the budget will spark a new wave of working class struggles and opposition among the rural poor. The government is preparing to crush this growing popular opposition.

During the budget debate, on November 23, Wickremesinghe threatened to crush anti-government struggles imposing a state of emergency and deploying military and police forces. He has imposed the draconian Essential Services Act to ban strikes in the electricity, petroleum and health sectors. He has used the repressive Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) against anti-government protesters, including leaders of the Inter University Students’ Federation (IUSF).

As the government prepares for state repression, the 2023 budget bolsters funding for the armed forces and the police. While education and healthcare are being starved of funds, the military and police have been allocated 539 billion rupees ($US1.46 billion) in the budget.

13 Dec 2022

Modern Britain has Returned to the “Old Corruption” the Victorians Tried to End

Patrick Cockburn



Photograph Source: Benh LIEU SONG (Flickr) – CC BY-SA 4.0

Britain has entered an era of legalised larceny by the politically well-connected some 150 years after the Victorians ended what they execrated as the “Old Corruption”. By this they meant the toxic system whereby the ruling elite enjoyed a parasitic relationship with the state enabling them to obtain jobs and money through patronage, partisanship and purchase.

Generals appointed because of their wealth and social connections, rather than ability, produced spectacular debacles, such as the Charge of the Light Brigade. The best-known achievement of the Victorian reformers was the Northcote-Trevelyan Report of 1854 that intended to produce a Civil Service in which “none but qualified personnel will be appointed”.

The old corruption

Fast forward 170 years to the allegations against Baroness Michelle Mone over PPE procurement which so “shocked” Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and notice how many of the worst ingredients of the “Old Corruption” are re-emerging in modern Britain. The Victorians did not use the term to mean exclusively those doing anything illegal, but, then as now, the system was all the more pernicious because so much that was destructive to good government was permitted. We have yet to reach the stage, as happened long ago in Russia and the oil states of the Middle East and Africa, where government has become a looting machine run by a kleptocracy, but we are further down this road than most people in Britain imagine.

Signs of the retreat from the standards of honest and competent government to which the Victorian reformers aspired are today visible everywhere. What makes this decline so serious is the vast size of the sums of money now being wasted or misused. The most flagrant example of this was the waste of £12 billion spent on defective or over-priced PPE during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Probably, the figures are too gargantuan for people to take on board, but in a report published on June 2022, the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, scarcely a muckraking body, spelled out the losses: equipment worth £4 billion did not meet NHS standards, £2.6 billion was not of a type or standard preferred by the NHS, £4.7 billion was written off because too much had been paid for it, and £673 million was spent on PPE that was defective.

The theft of the century

What we are really looking at here is one of the thefts of the century. The Government brushes aside this enormous useless expenditure of public funds, most of which ended up in somebody’s pockets, blaming it on an unprecedented emergency with which ministers were heroically seeking to cope. They argue that no time was available to check on PPE suppliers, however inadequate or dodgey they subsequently turned out to be.

This dubious argument silences many potential critics, aided by a certain naivety in Britain about the traditional mechanics of corruption. Our nineteenth-century ancestors would not have been so simple-minded, and would have been instantly suspicious of such self-serving government pretensions. They would not have been taken in by its claim that it was only its laudable enthusiasm to fend off disaster that regrettably led to so-many well-connected companies close to the Conservative Party winning profitable contracts.

And they would have been right: a study by the New York Times in December 2020 found that out of a sample of 1,200 Covid-19 related central government contracts worth £16 billion, about half of which worth £8bn, “went to companies either run by friends and associates of politicians in the Conservative Party, or with no prior experience or a history of controversy. Meanwhile, smaller firms without political clout got nowhere.”

The best moment to strike

I have heard too many excuses about an existential crisis producing understandable errors too many times during corruption scandals in the Middle East to believe them. People intending to steal billions from a government are not fools. They put a great deal of thought into their planning. They must have insiders working for them, but they must also avoid official scrutiny by departmental committees and oversight bodies.

A war is the best moment to strike for anybody intending to plunder the public purse without their activities being closely monitored. I was in Iraq after the US invasion in 2003 when the entire military procurement budget of $1.2 billion disappeared, nominally spent on some Soviet helicopters too old to fly purchased from Poland and a contract with a Pakistani company for military equipment worth hundreds of millions of dollars scribbled on a single sheet of A4 paper in such poor hand writing that Iraqi officials could not tell what had been ordered.

Wars may be good for mass thefts but a pandemic turns out to be even better because of the general panic. People plotting to part a government from its money have a nose for this sort of chaos and know how to exploit it. They know how to sniff out and pay off influential people they need to help them, safe in the knowledge that their lobbying is legal with no risk of punishment aside from reputational damage. If unmasked as secret influencers, they can hide behind the unlikely claim that they were paid a lot of money by some very tough and worldly-wise people – for whom they then did almost nothing to further their interests.

Another superficially plausible way to downplay the current avalanche of scandals is to say that nothing much new is happening and there have always been such scandals. So there have, but the lobbyists and influencers are now playing for much higher stakes than previously with tens of millions of pounds in the offing. Past scandals such as “cash-for-questions” in parliament or MPs’ expenses commonly involved paltry sums.

Looting government was easy in the eighteenth century because so many functions of government were out-sourced, a notable example being the East India Company with its own empire and army. Such outsourcing was a recognised feature of “Old Corruption” because profit was prioritised over performance and regulatory control was minimal. Much the same now happens in modern Britain as state functions are outsourced and degraded in the supposed interests of efficiency.

At the heart of the Northcote-Trevelyan Report was a determination that future members of the civil service would be appointed on merit and they would not lose their jobs following a change of government. But when Liz Truss became prime minister and Kwasi Kwarteng chancellor of the exchequer in September, almost their first act was to sack Sir Tom Scholar, the permanent secretary at the Treasury.

Or go back a couple of years to May 2020 at beginning of pandemic in 2020 when Baroness Dido Harding of Winscombe was appointed by the Health Secretary Matt Hancock to establish NHS Test and Trace to prevent the spread of Covid-19 among an unvaccinated population in England. The complicated task was taken out of the hands of experienced local officials and handed over to Harding, assisted by consultants paid £1,000 a day. Even in corrupt cynical eighteenth century Britain, people might have jibbed at that.

Two-year-old killed by household mould exposes UK-wide public health crisis

Simon Whelan & Thomas Scripps


Last month, a coroner ruled that the death in December 2020 of two-year-old Awaab Ishak had been caused by “prolonged exposure” to mould spores in his family’s rented flat.

Awaab was initially hospitalised with flu-like symptoms and difficulty breathing. He was readmitted to urgent care two days after being discharged, suffering respiratory failure, and died of cardiac arrest. A pathologist told the inquest into his death that Awaab’s throat was swollen enough to hinder his breathing, with exposure to fungi the most likely cause.

Petition started after the death of Awaab Ishak [Photo: Screenshot: change.org]

The child’s parents, Faisal Abdullah and Aisha Amin, had complained about the mould to landlords Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBH) for three years, even requesting rehousing. A health visitor also raised concerns, asking for the rehousing request to be prioritised.

RBH were dismissive, writing the problem off as “unsightly” but not a serious risk,and placing what senior coroner Joanne Kearsley called “too much emphasis… on the cause of the mould being due to the parent’s lifestyle.” The housing association failed to address the lack of adequate ventilation in the property.

Awaab’s parents have called for the entire board of RBH to resign, warning that tenants remain “in danger” so long as the current leadership is in post. The housing association’s head Gareth Swarbrick was eventually sacked by the RBH board, but only after public outrage at his refusal to step down.

Awaab’s unsafe home was one of many on the estate run by RBH.

According to the Mirror, the association received 106 complaints about mould and damp in the year after Awaab died. An investigation by Manchester Evening News this August found another three households on the same estate who said their children had been hospitalised with issues related to damp and mouldy homes, with reporters shown letters from GPs advising families to move. The BBC described other properties with mould that resembles “black slime on the walls”.

The inquest into Awaab’s death unleashed a torrent of similar reports from across the country, in council, housing association, social rented and private rented properties under local authorities of all political stripes. The common factor is that they are occupied by working-class families left to rot by negligent landlords in poorly built, insulated and maintained homes which they can barely afford to heat.

A woman with a potentially terminal lung disease she believes was caused by mould told the Guardian she was taking her private sector landlord to court after years of inaction. She pays £1,400 a month to live there.

The BBC reported the cases of Noorullah Hashmi in a housing association property, whose two young children have suffered multiple chest infections since they moved in, and Vicky McLaughlin in a council house in Birmingham, whose three children suffer from asthma—believed to have been brought on and exacerbated by their living conditions.

Selenawit Asfaha was ignored by her private landlord for five years, reported Bristol News, before the Environmental Agency intervened. She also developed asthma while living in a mould-ridden house.

According to the latest English Housing Survey, 3.5 million occupied homes did not meet the Decent Homes Standard in 2020, with two-thirds having at least one Category 1 hazard—the most severe, indicating a risk of death, paralysis or permanent loss of consciousness—and 941,000 serious damp.

Mould is rife, affecting an estimated 120,000 social housing households, and 176,000 private renting households. The problem is so serious and widespread that the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health now suggests doctors ask about living conditions when presented with a child with a respiratory condition, describing this as a “critical issue for child health.”

These health hazards frequently go unaddressed by landlords. In a 2021 report, housing ombudsman Richard Blakeway reviewed a representative 410 mould and damp complaints and found maladministration in more than half of the cases.

Blakeway told BBC Radio 4 last month that his office had seen “a significant increase in the casework on damp and mould,” publishing the 2021 report “because we were so concerned about what we were seeing”.

This public health crisis is a symptom of a housing system in which the basic human right to shelter is subordinated to the rampant profiteering of private landlords and cost-cutting of central and local government.

The social housing system has been run down by Tory and Labour governments alike, with the loss of 24,000 homes a year on average since 1991, leaving one million households on the waiting list. Families have been forced into the cripplingly expensive private rented sector which has more than doubled its share of the housing system in the last two decades. Just in the last year, average rents have increased 12 percent to £1,078 a month, according to property website Zoopla.

Both sectors leave huge numbers of people in squalid conditions. Roughly 13 percent of social rented homes and 21 percent of private rented homes are rated non-decent nationally.

An already bleak situation will be made far worse this winter, as soaring energy prices leave families unable to heat their homes. Professor of Environment Engineering for Buildings Catherine Noakes, wrote the BBC, “warned that mould conditions could be made worse this winter if people don’t put on the heating because of high energy bills.”

Just two months before the verdict was given on Awaab’s death, the Institute of Health Equity (IHE) published a report titled Fuel Poverty, Cold Homes and Health Inequalities. Looking at their impact over the last eight years, the authors wrote, “If fuel poverty and cold homes were a concern in 2014, now, with the rapidly increasing price of energy, they are likely to become a significant humanitarian crisis.”

Lead author Professor Ian Sinha, Consultant Respiratory Paediatrician at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, commented on its release that he had “no doubt” children would die this winter as a result.

The report noted, “Cold homes are more prone to damp and mould, both of which contribute to developing asthma and acute asthma attacks. Damp and mould may contribute to approximately 10–15 percent of new cases of childhood asthma across Europe.”

Furthermore, “it is estimated that 1.7 million school days are missed across Europe due to illnesses associated with damp and mould. UK children miss more school days due to disease burden from damp than any EU member state, with rates over 80 percent higher than the EU average.”

The government’s response to the inquest into Awaab’s death has plumbed the depths of cynicism. Housing Secretary Michael Gove mouthed support for “Awaab’s law”, championed by his parents, to require landlords to investigate the causes of damp and mould within 14 days of complaints being made and provide tenants with a report on the findings. A petition in support has gained over 150,000 signatures.

Even as Gove spoke, the government was planning to instruct councils to examine “behavioral factors” when deciding whether to take action against landlords, giving license to the excuse used by RBH against Awaab’s family.

Stephen Battersby, vice president of the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, told the Guardian he worried that “the draft guidance will provide an even greater opportunity for landlords to blame the tenants for dangerous housing conditions, such as dampness and mould.”