16 Jan 2023

Chinese National Health Commission discloses 60,000 deaths since abandoning Zero COVID

Benjamin Mateus


On Saturday, China’s leading public health institution, the National Health Commission (NHC), revealed that between December 8, 2022, when Chinese authorities announced the complete scrapping of all remaining aspects of its prior Zero COVID public health program, and January 12, a total of 59,938 COVID-19-related deaths took place.

President Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) were under intense international scrutiny to reveal the true extent of their public health crisis after lifting essentially all mitigation measures to contain the coronavirus and allowing a tsunami of hundreds of millions of infections to rip through the country.

As late as January 12, health authorities had confirmed that a mere 37 people had died from the virus, a figure known to be completely erroneous and outrageous given the three years of experience with the pandemic.

Several modeling estimates made by various research institutes estimated that the first wave of COVID infections in China could cause upwards of 2 million deaths. Even economists at Barclays had predicted that the Omicron wave would have a fatality rate of 0.4 percent among the unvaccinated, while the fully vaccinated may see a rate of 0.02 percent.

A study published in Nature Medicine estimated that in the last week of December approximately 76 percent of Beijing’s 22 million people had been infected and by the end of January that figure would rise to 92 percent.

The figure provided by the NHC is clearly intended to suppress any real assessment of the crisis sweeping over China. Many photos and videos taken at crematoriums show these facilities operating at capacity, indicating a significant shift in the number of people seeking to give their deceased family members a respectable burial. Last week, the Washington Post released a report using satellite imagery to show that several crematoriums in densely populated centers were seeing record numbers of visitors.

World Health Organization (WHO) COVID-19 Technical Lead, Dr. Maria van Kerkhove, spoke on China’s outbreak at a media briefing last Wednesday, noting, “There are some very important gaps that we are working with China to fill. First and foremost is to have a really deeper understanding of the transmission dynamics of COVID across the country.”

On Saturday, before the NHC’s release of figures on COVID-19 fatalities, WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus spoke with NHC head Ma Xiaowei on the country’s current COVID-19 prevention and control measures.

The figures presented Saturday only substantiate that the CCP is playing a statistical sleight of hand with the numbers to appease the WHO and international media, but they are doing so in accordance with every other country that has dismantled COVID-19 testing and tracking metrics and have allowed the pandemic to rip under their public health radars.

An article in the CCP-aligned Global Times said, “China has insisted on classifying deaths of patients with a positive nucleic acid test as COVID-19-related deaths, which is in line with WHO and international standards.” This was intended as a rebuke against the hypocrisy evident in numerous recent critiques by the Western media and governments against China’s actions on COVID-19, while they carried out similar measures in forcing their populations to accept mass infection and death.

In order to suppress official figures, Chinese health authorities have maintained a strict definition of COVID-19 fatality that must include respiratory failure caused by the virus. This misses a significant number of people that have died at home or from other causes not directly attributable to respiratory failure but a by-product of their infection.

Jiao Yahui, an NHC official, told the Global Times that 90.1 percent of the nearly 60,000 fatalities were above the age of 65, 56.5 percent over 80, and a significant majority had underlying health conditions when they died. However, Jiao added that only 5,503 were due to respiratory failure caused by SARS-CoV-2, and the other 54,435 died with COVID and not from COVID, in line with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) definition. In other words, confirmed COVID-19 deaths in China have only risen twofold.

In their article on the NHC data update, the New York Times noted, “The lack of transparency prompted several countries, including Japan and South Korea, to impose travel curbs on Chinese visitors after China reopened its borders last Sunday. Experts also warned that playing down the severity of the outbreak could lead people within the country to take fewer precautions.”

The hint of moralizing in these statements from the bourgeois press is hypocritical and cynical, as Japan is currently facing the highest mortality rate from COVID-19 it has ever experienced. In the US, the weekly death rate has jumped to almost 4,000, or an average of around 550 per day, a byproduct of the national spread of the highly infectious and immune-resistant XBB.1.5 variant.

In response to the growing number of daily new COVID-19 deaths in the US, Washington Post contributing columnist Leana Wen, one of the most notorious pandemic minimizers, wrote an opinion piece falsely claiming that the US is overcounting COVID-19 deaths and hospitalizations. She states, “According to the [CDC], the United States is experiencing around 400 COVID deaths every day. At that rate, there would be nearly 150,000 deaths a year. But are these Americans dying from COVID or with COVID?”

Since Omicron has dominated the pandemic, excess deaths have remained stubbornly high not only in the US but across Europe, Australia and other regions that have been tracking and documenting their mortality data. These are partly due directly to COVID-19 and complications experienced from COVID-19 infections that can impose a significant toll on the body’s various organ systems. In addition, the pandemic’s toll on every social aspect of life has been catastrophic, and the US has led many high-income countries in declines in life expectancy amid a free fall in its health care and public health infrastructure.

The concept of dying “from” versus “with” COVID was a right-wing talking point manufactured first by Donald Trump, which was embraced by the entire political and media establishment early during the Omicron wave, alongside the oft-stated but false notion that the strain was mild. Indeed, more than 277,000 Americans officially died from Omicron in 2022. The peak in deaths in January–February 2022 was second only to the first winter wave from December 2020 to January 2021, when the vaccines were first being distributed.

A widely-shared thread posted by Gregory Travis over the weekend places the political issues behind this ploy into perspective. It must be noted that the same data manipulation now on display in China was first pioneered in the US.

Next Sunday, January 22, will be the official beginning of the Lunar New Year, with officials forecasting that more than 2 billion trips will take place across the country over 40 days, the largest annual human migration in the world. Chinese officials have been more forthcoming about the concerns of bringing COVID-19 to rural regions, where vaccine uptake has been much lower and health care systems are much less able to cope with a deluge of patients.

A post on the Chinese social media platform WeChat from a small town in central Henan province noted, “In the face of a virus like Omicron, all people should be equal, but the fact is that as far as the virus is concerned, urban and rural areas are not equal. Not only are resources and opportunities unequal but there is also a wide gap in the understanding of how to handle public health.”

Biden and the secrets of the national security state

Patrick Martin



The Capitol is seen in Washington, Nov. 11, 2022. [AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File]

There are many unanswered questions that follow on the news that classified documents have been found in unsecured locations in Washington D.C. and Wilmington, Delaware, where they were taken by aides to then-Vice President Biden at the end of his eight years in office.

But they are not the questions over which Biden’s Republican opponents are howling and the corporate media is obsessing.

The important issues, which the media avoids raising, include the following: What is in these documents? Why are there so many secrets? And who is the US government keeping the secrets from?

Many of the documents that receive the highest classification—Top Secret, or Sensitive Compartmented Information—relate to the foreign policy of the United States. In other words, they concern the abominable crimes being carried out by US imperialism all over the world.

Let us suggest some possible subjects these documents might cover:

  • The role of the US-allied Saudi government in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, carried out by the Al Qaeda organization founded by the Saudi millionaire Osama bin Laden. Most of the 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals, and several were receiving financial support from the Saudi regime at the time of 9/11.

  • The US role in the 2014 regime-change operation in Ukraine that overthrew an elected government and installed a far-right, anti-Russian regime, riddled with neo-Nazis, and set the stage for the outbreak of war with Russia in Ukraine eight years later.

  • What the United States is doing in relation to Taiwan, in an effort to provoke a Chinese invasion, based on the example of Russia and Ukraine, which would become the pretext for an all-out US-led war against the Beijing regime.

  • US plans for regime-change through economic strangulation, internal subversion and outright war in Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, North Korea and other countries targeted by American imperialism.

  • Conversely, US plans to intervene to prop up reactionary authoritarian governments like the Saudi monarchy and other Persian Gulf autocracies, the bloodstained Egyptian military dictatorship, the Hindu chauvinist government of Narendra Modi in India and similar governments in Latin America and Africa.

  • In pursuit of any or all of these goals, plans for CIA assassinations and other covert operations in virtually every country in the world.

President Joe Biden epitomizes the fusion of the state and the individual, to the extent that he hardly knows where one ends and the other begins. He was a senator for 36 years, elected to his first term at the age of only 29. He spent much of that time on the Foreign Relations Committee, either as chairman or ranking minority member, giving him access to many such secret plans. He was then vice president for eight years, with a portfolio that included Latin America and Ukraine.

It is likely that when his eight years in the Obama administration came to an end, he had so many thousands of pages of classified documents in his possession that it was easy for aides to miss a few. A handful of press reports suggest that some of them concern Ukraine and Iran, two of the most sensitive areas of US subversion.

Nor are Top Secret papers limited to foreign policy. It is noteworthy that last month the National Archives released a tranche of documents relating to the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, with significant redactions and with many documents withheld at the request of the intelligence agencies.

In other words, 60 years after the Kennedy assassination, the CIA still refuses to come clean about its ties with the supposed assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, a former Marine who moved to the USSR at the height of the Cold War, married a Russian woman, then returned to the United States and joined the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, a group purportedly opposed to the US blockade that was manipulated by the US intelligence agencies.

As far as the political impact of the revelations is concerned, the Democratic Party is hoist with its own petard. While Trump was in office, it focused its attacks on him on foreign policy, suggesting that he was an agent or stooge of the Putin regime in Russia. After Trump left office, it focused its opposition to Trump on his possession of Top Secret papers at Mar-a-Lago, and Biden himself banged the “damage to national security” drum in an interview with 60 Minutes.

The president’s Republican critics have used the revelations not just to undermine Biden politically, but to foment anti-Chinese sentiment. They hint darkly that Chinese spies could have had access to the unsecured documents and demand detailed visitors’ lists for the Penn Biden Center in Washington, Biden’s home in Wilmington and even his garage.

The hypocrisy here is obvious, since these same warriors for transparency opposed the release of visitors’ logs to the Trump White House, after Trump broke with the longstanding practice of public disclosure.

There is cynicism, hypocrisy and reaction aplenty on both sides, as is characteristic of disputes within the US ruling elite.

But if there is a crime in these stories, it is not the endangering of secrets; it is the existence of them. The real victim of the crime is the American people—and the populations of the world targeted by US imperialism—not Biden, Trump or the massive military-intelligence apparatus.

Biden is the leader of a supposedly democratic government that is buried in secrets, many of which are known to other governments in the world, but are not made known to the American people. As far as the US ruling class is concerned, the American people must be kept in the dark about how US wars are prepared and what the trillion dollars in annual US military-intelligence spending is really buying. They fear that if the American people knew what crimes were being carried out, they would rise up in anger and outrage.

That is why a courageous exposer of secrets like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is being held in a British dungeon on a US extradition warrant: his “crime” was to make public evidence of US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, records of torture at Guantanamo Bay, diplomatic cables documenting conspiracies to subvert and bully governments around the world, and CIA techniques for hacking and surveillance.

The American corporate media has turned the Biden documents affair into a further justification for suppressing secrets and keeping the American people ignorant of what is being done in their name.

The Berlin Senate and the German government end compulsory mask wearing on public transport

Tamino Dreisam


In the midst of the Senate election campaign in Berlin, the Senate leadership—comprised of the SPD, the Green Party and the Left Party—together with the federal government has decided to end the compulsory wearing of masks on local and long-distance public transport. The Berlin Senate has also agreed to relax the law regarding the isolation of COVID-19 victims.

The Berlin Senate made the public transport decision last week, setting February 2 as the date for the new policy to take effect. The mask requirement will therefore end in the middle of winter, a time when particularly large numbers of people use public transport in Berlin and are often crammed together in overcrowded trains.

A packed BVG bus in Berlin, Germany. [Photo: WSWS]

The Berlin Senate thus became the first city administration not headed by a conservative party, i.e., the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) or Christian Social Union (CSU), to lift the mask requirement for local transport. The decision underscores once again that the nominally “left-wing” Berlin Senate parties follow the same ruthless “profit before lives” pandemic policies as Germany’s traditional right-wing parties.

In addition, the Berlin Senate has decided to relax the isolation requirement for infected persons. From 16 January, a negative coronavirus test is no longer required to end quarantine as long as the patient has no symptoms 48 hours before.

This policy can only be described as criminal. The relaxations are being implemented even though the pandemic remains rampant, and around 175 victims are dying nationwide from the virus every day. The number of COVID-caused deaths totaled 937 last week, and an average of 10,000 people have to be hospitalised every week.

The number of infections is exploding particularly in Berlin, although this is not reflected in official statistics. This is being made clear by the extent of coronavirus detected in the city’s sewage. Although these values cannot be used to determine the exact incidence of the virus, they do provide important information about the basic course of the infection.

During the pandemic, the values recorded from wastewater monitoring have largely corresponded to those stemming from PCR tests. In the meantime, PCR testing has been drastically cut back, although at the end of October last year the concentration of coronaviruses measured in wastewater “shot through the roof,” according to the molecular biologist Emanuel Wyler.

Within the space of one to two months, the values measured in wastewater tripled, and even the Berlin health administration was forced to acknowledge that this was worrisome figure but then concluded that “we can only speculate about its level and causes.”

This spread of the virus is also evident in Berlin clinics. In the week before Christmas, Charité University Hospital was forced to operate on an emergency basis, faced with the so-called 'tripledemia' of RSV, influenza and the coronavirus. Last Wednesday, the Berlin Medical Association criticised “untenable conditions” in the city’s hospital for forensic psychiatry. The conditions for patients were “in part inhumane and the working conditions for staff intolerable,” declared the president of the Berlin Medical Association, Peter Bobbert.

The Berlin Senate's decision anticipated what is now being imposed in all other federal states. On January 9, federal Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (SPD) announced the nationwide end of compulsory masks in local and long-distance public transport, beginning February 2. To justify the move, the minister resorted to blatant lies, claiming that the situation showed the pandemic had stabilised, sewage monitoring values were constant or falling, the number of hospitalisations was decreasing, and new variants were not on the horizon.

Personally, he added cynically, he advocated “voluntarily wearing masks indoors,” but “it was now necessary to place more emphasis on personal responsibility and voluntary behaviour.” What this means is clear: the ditching of all remaining protective measures.

The states of Thuringia and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania have also announced they intend to abolish the regulation for the isolation of infected persons. In Thuringia, the date of February 3 has already been set, while the state government of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania plans to lift the isolation obligation about four weeks after ending the rule regarding the wearing of masks.

So far, the states Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria, Hesse, Rhineland-Palatinate and Schleswig-Holstein have already lifted the isolation requirement for infected persons. And the regulation requiring masks will apply in only just under half of the country’s states.

The latest relaxations also expose the role of the Left Party. Of the four federal states in which the Left Party is in government, only Bremen currently maintains the mandatory mask requirement in local transport. But even there, the SPD-Left Party-Green state government has announced that it will end the mask requirement at the end of March.

The state governments of Thuringia, led by the Left Party, and the SPD-Left Party governed state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania are planning to abolish the isolation requirement. To the extent that the Left Party’s coronavirus policy differs from other parties, it is because it is the most aggressive party on this issue.

The state of Thuringia is the best example. The administration led by the Left Party prime minister Bodo Ramelow was the first state government to openly propagate the Swedish policy of “herd immunity,” i.e., the deliberate contamination of the population. As a result, Thuringia was for a long time the state in Germany that registered the most deaths. Currently, it occupies second place for corona deaths measured by the number of inhabitants.

14 Jan 2023

African Union Commission (AUC)-EU Skills Initiative for Africa funding Window III

Application Deadline:

6th February 2023

Tell Me About Award:

The Skills Initiative for Africa (SIFA) Financing Cooperation (FC) is a pan-African initiative established in 2016 by the African Union Commission (AUC) and co-funded by the German Government and the European Union (EU), with support from national governments in eight SIFA partner countries: Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Togo, and Tunisia. SIFA’s overarching goal is to improve the occupational opportunities of African youth. During its pilot period (2016-2025), the Programme sponsors skill development projects that are projected to contribute to the development of employment-oriented skills for young people in African nations.

SIFA is an African Union Commission (AUC) program backed by the German government to improve the employment chances of African youth. SIFA funds skill development programmes in a number of African countries. Projects should help young people build skills that will help them find work.

Thematic Areas

  1. Digital Tools and Skills
  2. Female Entrepreneurship and Employability
  3. Training Innovation in Informal Sectors

Who is Eligible?

  1. Responsiveness to COVID-19
  2. Demonstrated Jobs
  3. Demonstrating Value for Money
  4. Proposals shall refer to the conceptualisation, development and commercialisation of
    products, services, or processes solving an identified problem/skills gap in the labour
    market
  5. Demonstrated Viability and Sustainable Future Financing

How are Applicants Selected?

Professional TVET entities from the public and private sectors, academia, civil society, and organisations supporting entrepreneurship in the labour market

Grant details:

FW3 funding is targeted for the implementation of the proposed innovation, and hence it will not support the following:
• projects that exclusively focus on research
• projects that exclusively focus on market surveys
• projects that exclusively focus on policy development
• projects that exclusively focus on capacity building or training
• projects that exclusively focus on building infrastructure

What is Value of Award?

Selected projects can receive a grant between EUR 0.2 to 3 million for sustainable and innovative initiatives.

How to Apply?

Apply here

Visit Application Webpage for Details

Flourish Africa N1 Billion Grant 2023

Application Deadline?

29th January, 2023.

Tell Me About Award:

The Flourish Africa Grant for Female Entrepreneurs is a One Billion Naira Fund created to support and promote African female-owned businesses over 5 years through training, mentoring, and funding.

The programme seeks to empower the entrepreneurial activities of at least 2,500 female business owners through funding and structured training over five years. Through the programme, a minimum of 500 female entrepreneurs would be trained in business and life skills each year, after which the top 100 achievers from the pool would be eligible for grants of up to 2 million naira each from a 200 million naira annual fund.

The Flourish Africa training curriculum has been designed to educate and prepare female entrepreneurs for their business journey and give them wings to fly. It also gives female entrepreneurs an enabling platform for practical skill development, mentoring, business capital, and access to the marketplace.

Where will Award Take Place?

Nigeria

Who is Eligible?

To qualify, you must meet the following criteria:

  • Applicants must be between the ages of 18yrs – 50yrs.
  • Applicants must be female. If co-owned with a man, applicants must have at least 51% ownership of the business, with proof.
  • Applicants must have access to internet-enabled devices for training and must be willing to commit to virtual training for a period of 4 months.
  • Applicants’ businesses must be in the Start-up phase.
  • Your business must be domiciled in Lagos, Abuja, or Port Harcourt.

How many Awards?

Numerous

What is Value of Award?

2 million naira grants each.

How to Apply?

Apply below

Visit Application Webpage for Details

HICOOL Global Entrepreneurship Competition 2023

Application Deadline:

31st January 2023

Tell Me About Award:

The HICOOL Global Entrepreneur Summit and Entrepreneurship Competition are for Entrepreneurs.

It aims to build a multi-level, multi-dimensional, and diversified international entrepreneurial model, seeking high-quality startups worldwide, and facilitating entrepreneurs to grow and expand their businesses in Beijing.

The competition invites top investors, famous mentors, and leading entrepreneurs to provide all-around entrepreneurial guidance and acceleration, to continuously empower entrepreneurs in Beijing by providing a full range of “Beijing Services” such as talent settlement, children’s education, healthcare, designated apartments, etc.

Which Fields are Eligible?

The Competition is focused on 7 Tech Areas:

1. AI/VR/FinTech: AI Foundation Layer, AI Technical Layer, AI Scenario Application, FinTech, General Technology, VR, Others

2. Medicine & Healthcare: Modern Medicine, Medical Devices, Medical Services, Drug R&D and Manufacturing, Biotechnology, and Others

3. New Generation Information Technology: Communication Networks, Industrial Internet, Network and Information Equipment, Emerging Software Development, Integrated Circuit, Network, and Information Security Services, Others

4. High-end Equipment: Scientific Instruments and Sensors, Intelligent Manufacturing Equipment, Rail Transit Equipment, Intelligent Vehicle, Aerospace Equipment, Marine Engineering Equipment, Others

5. New Energy / New Materials / Energy Conservation & Environmental Protection: New Energy Products and Technology, Power battery, New Material, Carbon Neutrality, Energy Conservation, Environment Protection, Resource Recovery, and Comprehensive Utilization, Others

6. Cultural Creativity: Online Education, Cultural Entertainment (Movie, Game , Trendy Toys and etc.), New Retail, Industrial Design, Others

7. AgriTech/FoodTech: New AgriTech, FoodTech and Product Safety Traceability, New Logistics and Supply Chain, Others

Who is Eligible?

> You are a tech-based startup founder who wishes to do business in China through landing in Beijing.

> You have not registered any company in Beijing yet or with companies registered in Beijing after Jan 1st, 2023 (Jan 1st, 2023 included).

> If you have already registered any company in Beijing during last 10 years, please reach out to Carol Chen PKU separately without participating here.

How are Applicants Selected?

The HICOOL 2023 Global Entrepreneur Summit and Entrepreneurship Competition is mainly divided into four stages:

  • Online Assessment
  • Preliminary Round
  • Semifinal, and;
  • Final

The agenda of the Competition is arranged as follows:

> Registration Stage: Jan 2023

> Online Assessment: May 2023

> Preliminary Round: June to July 2023

> Semi-final Stage: August 2023

> Final Stage: August to September 2023

Stages for Startups

  • Bootstrapped
  • Pre-Seed
  • Seed
  • Angel
  • Pre-A
  • Series A
  • Series B

How many Awards?

140

What is Value of Award?

  • USD 10 Million Prize Pool
  • There are 140 prize winners in the competition, including 7 first prizes, 21 second prizes, 42 third prizes, and 70 winner prizes.
  • The awards are distributed in the proportion of 5:2 among overseas and domestic groups.
  • First Prize: 7 * CNY 2 million (≈USD 291,000) / startup
  • Second Prize: 21 * CNY 1 million (≈USD 146,000) / startup
  • Third Prize: 42 * CNY 500,000 (≈USD 73,000) / startup
  • Winner Prize: 70 * CNY 200,000 (≈USD 29,000) / startup

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

1. Permanent Residency Support:

Foreign winners, their spouses, and minor children can apply for residence permits valid for two to five years by winning first, second, and third prizes of the overseas group. With the recommendation, the winner can directly apply for a permanent residence permit for foreigners.

2. Brand Exposure in China:

Entry of scientific research articles (First, second and third prize winner of the overseas group). A small amount of scientific research and teaching materials imported by the winners can be exempted from import tax.

3. Children’s Education Support:

It will be given to the winner’s children in the municipal public schools first. Children of foreign winners can attend international classes in international schools or public schools.

4. Social Insurance Support:

For first, second, and third prize winners of the overseas group. The foreign unemployed spouses and children under the age of 16 of the winners can participate in the basic medical insurance for urban residents in Beijing.

How to Apply?

Apply below

Visit Application Webpage for Details

Oxford/Reuters Institute Journalism Fellowships 2023

Application Deadline: 6th February 2023 (23:59 UK time).

Eligible Countries: African/Developing Countries

To be taken at (country): University of Oxford

About the Award: The fully-funded Fellowships are aimed at practising journalists from all over the world, to enable them to research a topic of their choice, related to their work and the broader media industry, before returning to newsrooms. The Fellowships offer an opportunity to network with a global group of journalists, spend time away from the daily pressure of deadlines, and examine the key issues facing the industry, with input from leading experts and practitioners.

You do not need to specify which particular source of funding you are applying for – we will allocate the one most suitable for you based on your country of origin and research proposal.

  • Thomson Reuters Foundation Fellowships
  • Anglo American Journalist Fellowship
  • Google Digital News Journalist Fellowship
  • Mona Megalli Fellowship
  • Wincott Business Journalist Fellowship
  • David Levy Fellowship for International Dialogue

Type: Fellowship (Professional)

Eligibility:

  • To be considered for a Fellowship you must have a minimum of five years’ journalistic experience, or in rare cases demonstrate the equivalent level of expertise.
  • You will be able to write at a publishable level of English, allowing you to participate in the fellowship and produce papers when necessary. If English is not your first language, please present suitable evidence (this is an original certificate no more than two years old and issued by the relevant body) that you are at a suitable standard. More information on the university’s English language requirements is in the Programme Webpage Link below.

Number of Awards: 30

Value of Award: Most Journalist Fellowships are fully-funded and cover living costs and accommodation. There are some opportunities for self-funded candidates. Some Fellowships are open only to candidates who are employees of the sponsoring organisation.

Duration of Programme: Fellowships last one, two or three terms.

How to Apply: Applications for the 2023/2024 fellowship cohorts (starting in October 2023, January 2024 and April 2024) are now open. Find out how to apply. The application deadline is 6 February.

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

AfDB Africa Digital Financial Inclusion Facility 2023

Application Deadline:

31st March 2023

Tell Me About Award:

  • For Government ministries, Central Banks, regulatory authorities, bank and non-bank financial institutions, mobile money operators and payment switch companies.

The African Development Bank launched ADFI in 2019 in partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), the French Development Agency (AFD), the Ministry of Finance, Government of Luxembourg, joined by the Ministry of Economy and Finance, France and the Women’s Enterprise Finance Initiative in 2020 and 2022 respectively.

Call for Proposals

In line with its 2023 work program, ADFI is launching a Call for Proposals(link is external) to select viable and scalable digital financial solution (DFS) initiatives aimed at fostering access, quality, and usage of financial services as drivers of sustainable financial inclusion, especially among the most vulnerable, including women, youth and small businesses.

The Facility is an innovative financing vehicle designed to catalyse digital financial inclusion across Africa.

Areas Of Interventions

The Call for Proposals is aligned with ADFI’s pillars of intervention and has the following two components:

  • Lot 1 targeting the following countries: Algeria, Angola, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Egypt, Guinea, Morocco, Nigeria and Tanzania
  • Lot 2 targeting regional initiatives

Categories

Pillar 1: Digital Financial Infrastructure

  • Country level – Technical assistance on interoperability of payment systems, agent networks and merchant acceptance networks; digital registries and alternative credit scoring, increased mobile network coverage, affordable data and digital devices.
  •  Regional level – Technical assistance on interoperability of payment systems, interoperable payment distribution networks, and e-commerce platforms.

Pillar 2: Digital Financial Policy & Regulation

  • Country level – Sandboxing/Fintech innovations of policies or testing new digital products and business models; Interoperability regulatory frameworks; and consumer protection, e.g., data privacy, recourse mechanisms, cybersecurity.
  • Regional level – DFS policies and regulations for cross-border remittances; consumer protection, e.g., data privacy, recourse mechanisms, cybersecurity; Sandbox policies and testing of new products and business models and e-KYC.

Pillar 3: Digital Financial Products & innovation

  • Country level – Digitization of government payments and social transfers; and digitization of agriculture value chains and MSMEs.
  • Regional level – DFS products that have the potential for scale in more than one country, address the needs of the base of the pyramid and touch key sectors such as MSME and agriculture.

Who is Eligible?

Country level – Government ministries, Central Banks, regulatory authorities, bank and non-bank financial institutions, mobile money operators and payment switch companies.

Regional level – Regional economic communities, regional coordination bodies, regional private sector institutions, international agencies with operations in Africa, inter-governmental organizations, and private sector organizations such as bank and non-bank digital financial service providers with regional coverage.

How are Applicants Selected?

> Project viability

  • Applicant’s expertise and track record in relation to the proposed project
  • Ability to scale
  • Potential impact of the project

What is Value of Award?

  1. Maximum size of grant funding under Lot 1 (country level): USD 1 million
  2. Maximum for blended finance of grant and loan under Lot 1: USD 1.5 million
  3. Maximum size of grant under Lot 2 (regional level): USD 1.5 million
  4. Minimum size of loan under Lot 1 and Lot 2: USD 1 million

Project Duration

> Country-level projects: two to three years

> Regional-level projects: three to four years

How to Apply?

Applications should be submitted to the following email address: ADFI_CallforProposals2023@AFDB.ORG (link sends e-mail)  by 31/03/2023 12.00 midnight Abidjan time. The email subject should read: Call for Proposals-ADFI 2023

AFDB encourages interested and eligible organizations to apply using the ADFI Call for Proposals 2023: Application Template. Applications may be submitted in French or English.

Apply below

Visit Application Webpage for Details

Pro Helvetia Residencies 2024

Application Deadline:

1st March 2023

Tell Me About Pro Helvetia Residencies:

Cultural practitioners from Switzerland may apply for residencies in Southern, East, West or Central Africa, while cultural practitioners from Southern, East, West and Central Africa can apply for residencies in Switzerland. Below you will find more information about the countries in question.  

We have strong existing partner networks in DRC, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Zambia and Madagascar that can host visiting Swiss arts professionals, and developing networks in East, West and Central Africa. In countries outside of these existing networks, applicants would need to give some consideration in their proposals to potential host partners and local arrangements for their residency.

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Short course

Who can apply for Pro Helvetia Residencies?

The residencies programme is open to artists and cultural practitioners working in the fields of visual arts, design and interactive media, music, literature and performing arts, as well as arts practitioners with a transdisciplinary focus.

How are Applicants Selected?

  • Convincing track record: professional activity with a national / transregional reach 
  • Context-related motivation 
  • Sufficient knowledge of English
  • Concrete exchange project with a lasting impact 

Which Countries are Eligible?

Southern Africa, Central Africa, East Africa, Switzerland, West Africa

Where will Award be Taken?

Southern Africa, Central Africa, East Africa, Switzerland, West Africa

How Many will be Given?

Pro Helvetia supports three residencies per person at most. 

What is the Benefit of Pro Helvetia Residencies?

Residencies serve to gain inspiration, to establish networks and to work on projects. Pro Helvetia offers accommodation, travel costs, a daily allowance, professional supervision, a workplace (on request) and a contribution to production/material costs (on request). 

How to Apply for Pro Helvetia Residencies:

Application must be submitted in English, via the online portal myprohelvetia.

Visit Award Webpage for Details