16 Jan 2023

HFG Foundation Young African Scholars Program 2023

Application Deadline: 1st March 2023

Eligible Countries: African countries

Eligible Fields: Applicants’ projects are expected to highlight the issues of violence and aggression.

About the HFG Foundation Young African Scholars Program: Harry Guggenheim established this foundation to support research on violence, aggression, and dominance because he was convinced that solid, thoughtful, scholarly and scientific research, experimentation, and analysis would in the end accomplish more than the usual solutions impelled by urgency rather than understanding. We do not yet hold the solution to violence, but better analyses, more acute predictions, constructive criticisms, and new, effective ideas will come in time from investigations such as those supported by our grants.

The foundation places a priority on the study of urgent problems of violence and aggression in the modern world and also encourages related research projects in neuroscience, genetics, animal behavior, the social sciences, history, criminology, and the humanities which illuminate modern human problems. Grants have been made to study aspects of violence related to youth, family relationships, media effects, crime, biological factors, intergroup conflict related to religion, ethnicity, and nationalism, and political violence deployed in war and sub-state terrorism, as well as processes of peace and the control of aggression.

Type: Grants

Eligibility: Applicants must be aged 40 or younger, currently enrolled in a Ph.D. program at an African higher education institution, and living on the continent.

Number of Awardees: 10

Value of HFG Foundation Young African Scholars Program: The program includes:

  • a methods workshop
  • fieldwork research grants of $10,000 USD each,
  • editorial and publication assistance,
  • and sponsorship at an international conference to present research findings.

How to Apply: The March 1 application deadline occurs every other year, in accordance with the program application cycle. Applicants must create an account to access the application. The guidelines are also available through the second link below.

Online Application (Login required)

Application Guidelines (PDF)

Visit Programme Webpage for details

Government of Austria ITH Fully-funded Masters Scholarships 2023/2024

Application Deadline: 31st March, 2023

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: Scholarships are offered to i) ADC Priority countries (See list below) and ii) Other Developing countries

To be taken at (country): The Institute of Tourism and Hotel Management in Salzburg Klessheim, Austria.

About the Government of Austria ITH Fully-funded Masters Scholarships: The Austrian Development Cooperation through the Institute of Tourism and Hotel Management offers about 30 scholarships to applicants from priority countries as well as other developing countries. The Tourism School in Salzburg has an outstanding international reputation and a long tradition. They train future entrepreneurs and employees according to the needs of the international tourism and leisure industry.

Type: Postgraduate

Eligibility: To apply for the Government of Austria ITH Fully-funded Masters Scholarships at ITH, candidate must meet the following criteria:

  • Be between 18 – 35 years of age
  • Have a secondary school leaving certificate (high school diploma)
  • Have a minimum of one year‘s experience within the tourism and hospitality industry
  • Non-native English speakers must have an English qualification e.g. TOEFL, Cambridge 1st Certificate, IELTS or equivalent

Successful candidates should be ambitious and open-minded with good organisational and time management skills

Number of Awardees: up to 30

Value of Scholarships: Scholarship for Priority countries include:

  • tuition fee
  • accommodation
  • flight tickets (from home country to Salzburg and back)
  • health insurance
  • food from Monday – Sunday
  • excursions (except field trip to ITB Berlin)
  • € 205.- pocket money per month

Not included in this scholarship are:

  • transfer from the Airport to the hostel and back to the Airport when leaving
  • visa fee: the visa fees have to be paid by the applicants. The entry visa is approximately $ 110, – and the 8 months residence permit, which will be issued in Salzburg, costs approximately € 120.

Scholarship for Developing countries include:

  • tuition fee
  • health insurance
  • food from Monday – Friday
  • excursions (except field trip to ITB Berlin)
  • € 205.- pocket money per month

Not included in the Scholarship are:

  • accommodation: accommodation costs have to be covered by students who are awarded this scholarship. It is € 247, – per month. (€ 1976, – in total). The total accommodation fee of € 1.976, – has to be remitted in advance before admission letter can be issued.
  • flight ticket: Students who are on this scholarship have to cover their own travel expenses from their countries to Salzburg and back.
  • visa fee: the visa fees have to be paid by the applicants. The entry visa is approximately $ 110, – and the 8 months residence permit, which will be issued in Salzburg, costs approximately € 120.

Eligible Countries: 

ADC Priority countries include: Ethiopia, Uganda, Burkina Faso, Mozambique, Bhutan, Palestinian Territories, Georgia, Armenia

Other Developing countries include: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Benin, Burundi, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Dem. Rep., Eritrea, Gambia, The, Guinea, Guinea-Bisau, Haiti, Kenya, Korea, Dem Rep., Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Togo, Zimbabwe, Bolivia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Congo, Rep., Côte d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Egypt, Arab Rep., El Salvador, Ghana, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Kiribati, Kosovo, Lao PDR, Lesotho, Mauritania, Micronesia, Fed. Sts., Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Philippines, Samoa, São Tomé and Principe, Senegal, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Swaziland, Syrian Arab Republic, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vietnam, West Bank and Gaza, Yemen, Rep., Zambia, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Angola, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belize, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Fiji, Gabon, Grenada, Hungry, Iran, Islamic Rep., Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Libya, Macedonia, FYR, Malaysia, Maldives, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Mexico, Montenegro, Namibia, Palau, Panama, Peru, Romania, Serbia,  Seychelles, South Africa, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Thailand, Tonga, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu and Venezuela

How to Apply: Students may attend ITH by private means or through scholarships given by the Austrian Development Cooperation.

Procedure: 

  1. Get information about ITH from an Austrian consulate or embassy
  2. Download ITH application form by clicking hereAustrian embassies and consulates have this form as well.
  3. Application Process – all applications should be sent directly to the Institute via post.
    Submission deadline is the 31st of March 2023 (all applications have to be received by the ITH office the latest by 31st March 2023)
  4. You will receive a confirmation by email that you application has been received
  5. Confirmation – You will be informed about the result of your application in May 2023. If you were awarded a scholarship you will receive a letter of acceptance.

Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

Aga Khan Foundation Scholarship 2023/2024

Application Deadline: 17th March 2023. 

In certain countries, internal deadlines may be earlier.

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: The Foundation accepts applications from nationals of the following countries: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Canada*, Egypt, France*, India, Kenya, Kyrgyz Republic, Madagascar, Mozambique, Pakistan, Portugal*, Syria, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Uganda and the USA*. [*Note: in Canada, France, Portugal and the USA, applications are accepted from those who are originally from one of the above developing countries, are interested in development-related studies and who have no other means of financing their education.]

Accepted Subject Areas? Masters and PhD focused areas are Architecture, Health, Civil Society, Planning & Building, Culture, Rural Development, Economic Development, Humanitarian Assistance, Education, Music etc

About Aga Khan Foundation Scholarship: The Aga Khan Foundation provides a limited number of scholarships each year for postgraduate studies to outstanding students from select developing countries who have no other means of financing their studies, to develop effective scholars and leaders and to prepare them for employment, primarily within the AKDN. Scholarships are awarded on a 50% grant : 50% loan basis through a competitive application process once a year in June or July.

The Foundation gives priority to requests for Master’s level courses. Still, it is willing to consider applications for PhD programmes, only in the case of outstanding students who are highly recommended for doctoral studies by their professors and who need a PhD for the fulfillment of their career objectives (academic or research-oriented).

Type: Masters, PhD

Selection Criteria and Eligibility: The main criteria for selecting award winners are:

  1. excellent academic records,
  2. genuine financial need,
  3. admission to a reputable institution of higher learning and
  4. thoughtful and coherent educational and career plans.

Candidates are also evaluated on their extra-curricular interests and achievements, potential to achieve their goals and likelihood to succeed in a foreign academic environment. Applicants are expected to have some years of work experience in their field of interest.

Preference is given to students under 30 years of age.

Number of Scholarships: A limited number of scholarship will be available

Value of Aga Khan Foundation Scholarship: The Foundation assists students with tuition fees and living expenses only. The cost of travel is not included in AKF scholarships. Applicants are requested to make every effort to obtain funding from other sources as well, so that the amount requested from the Foundation can be reduced to a minimum. Preference is given to those who have secured some funding from alternative sources.

Loan Conditions: Half of the scholarship amount is considered as a loan, which must be reimbursed with an annual service charge of 5%. A guarantor is required to co-sign the loan agreement. The payback period is five years, starting six months after the study period funded by the Aga Khan Foundation.

How long will sponsorship last? For the duration of the degree programme

How to Apply for Aga Khan Foundation Scholarship:

  • Application forms can be obtained from the Aga Khan Foundation or Aga Khan Education Board/Service office in the applicant’s country of current residence
  • Completed applications should be returned to the agency from which the form was obtained, or to the address indicated on the front of the form. They should not be sent to Geneva.

Visit Scholarship Webpage for Details

Government of Mauritius Africa Scholarships 2023/2024

Application Deadlines:

Deadline for electronic submission-19th May 2023

Deadline for submission of hard copy-26th May 2023

Eligible Countries: Countries in the African Union

To be taken at (country): Mauritius

Type: Undergraduate, Masters, PhD

Eligibility: 

  • Applicants for Mauritius Africa Scholarships should be above 18 years of age and should not have reached their 26th birthday at the closing date of application;
  • For Master’s programmes, applicants should not have reached 35 years and,
  • for PhD programmes, applicants should not have reached 45 years by the closing date of application
  • Applicants must have applied for full-time on-campus studies at any public Tertiary Education Institution in Mauritius for academic year starting in 2023;
  • The scholarship will be for a maximum of four (4) years or the minimum course duration whichever is lesser.
  • Qualification entry requirements
    • Mauritius Africa Scholarships’ candidates should have successfully completed end of secondary school to be eligible and should satisfy the minimum grade requirements as indicated below: : (i) 24 points at GCE A – Level which will be computed on the basis of the following grades obtained in three Principal subjects: A+=10, A=9, B=8, C=7, D=6 & E=5; OR (ii) at least an overall average of 70% or an overall average of, 14/20; OR (iii) criteria equivalent to (i) or (ii) above.
    • In case the language of instruction is not English in the qualifying examination, the candidate will have to provide a valid TOEFL or IELTS test results with a minimum score not less than 550 or 5.5 respectively, or an appropriate proof of English Language proficiency.
  • Candidates who are already holders of an undergraduate degree will NOT be eligible under this scholarship scheme.
  • Self-financing candidates already studying in Mauritius in will NOT be eligible under this Scholarship scheme.

Number of Awardees: Not specified

Value of Mauritius Africa Scholarships: The Scholarship will support successful candidates in meeting tuition fees and contribute to their living expenses during their studies in Mauritius. Furthermore, the airfare, by the most economical route, from the country of origin at the beginning of studies and back to the country of origin at the end of the studies will be covered. This will be valid for travel from the country of origin at the beginning of the studies and back to the country of origin upon successful completion of studies.

Duration of Scholarship: 

  • Undergraduate Diploma Three (3) years
  • Undergraduate Degree Four (4) years
  • Master’s Two (2) years
  • PhD Three (3) years

How to Apply for Mauritius Africa Scholarships: 

Applications, together with supporting documents as required should be forwarded to the Ministry of Education, Tertiary Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Mauritius at the address mentioned below, for a final selection.

The Senior Chief Executive,
Ministry of Education, Tertiary Education, Science and Technology
(Attn: Tertiary Education and Scientific Research Division)
Level 2, MITD House, Pont Fer, Phoenix 73544.
Republic of Mauritius (Email: studymauritius@govmu.org)

It is important to go through all Application Requirements for application instructions before applying.

Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

Romania Government Scholarships 2023/2024

Application Deadline: 1st March 2023

This is the date whereby Foreign diplomatic missions accredited to Bucharest must send the application files with a Verbal Note to Ministry of Foreign Affairs – Public, Cultural and Scientific Diplomacy Directorate.

However, the candidate should enquire at the diplomatic mission where he intends to submit the application file about the enrolment calendar. Each diplomatic mission establishes the deadline for submitting the application files.

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: Any non-EU country

To be taken at (country): Romanian Universities

Eligible Field of Study: priority will be given to the candidates applying for: political and administrative sciences, education studies, Romanian culture and civilization, journalism, technical studies, oil and gas, agricultural studies, veterinary medicine, architecture, music, arts.

About Romanian Government Scholarships: The scholarships are granted for three levels of study:

  1.  for the first cycle (licenta): This scheme is dedicated to graduates of high schools or of equivalent pre-university systems, as well as to candidates who require the equivalent of partial studies and the continuation of their studies in Romania. The complete cycle of university studies lasts for 3 to 6 years, according to the specific requirements of the chosen faculty, and ends with a final examination (licenta);
  2.  for the 2nd cycle (master): This scheme is dedicated to graduates of university/post-graduate studies; it lasts for 1,5 to 2 years and ends with a dissertation;
  3.  for the 3rd cycle (doctorate) the scheme is dedicated to the graduates of university/postgraduate studies (i.e. master); it lasts for 3-4 years, in keeping with the specific requirements of the chosen faculty, and ends with a doctor’s thesis.

Type: Undergraduate, Masters and Doctoral degrees

Eligibility: Citizens of non-EU countries (irrespective of their residence) are eligible to apply. Priority is given to citizens from non-EU states with which Romania does not have cultural and education cooperation agreements.

Number of Scholarships: 85 scholarships for undergraduate and postgraduate studies in Romania

Value of Romanian Government Scholarships:

  • Free-of-charge tuition
  • Free-of-charge accommodation (depending on availability, accommodation will be offered free-of-charge in students hostels, in keeping with the higher education regulations and within the limits of the sums available for this purpose),
  • Financial support – a monthly amount representing :
    •  the equivalent in Romanian currency of 65 EURO per month, for undergraduate students (1st cycle),
    • the equivalent in Romanian currency of 75 EURO per month, for post-graduate students (master degrees and specialization) 2nd cycle.
    • the equivalent in Romanian currency of 85 EURO per month, for postgraduate students (doctor’s degree) 3rd cycle.

These scholarships do not cover food, international and local transport. The candidates must be prepared to support personally any other additional expenses.

Duration of Scholarship: For the period of study, subject to academic performance.

How to Apply for Romanian Government Scholarships: To get all the necessary information about the scholarships (conditions, necessary documents, enrolment calendar) and to submit their application files, the candidates should apply directly to:

  • the Romanian diplomatic missions accredited to the candidate’s country of origin or of residence or to
  • the diplomatic mission of the candidate’s state of origin accredited to Bucharest

Visit scholarship webpage for Details

Important Notes: Language of Study: To promote the Romanian language and culture, the Ministry of National Education has decided that the beneficiaries of the scholarships should study only in the Romanian language. The candidates who do not know Romanian are offered one supplementary preparatory year to study the language. Students who declare they know the Romanian language will have to pass a language test organized by competent higher education institutions.

100,000 protest Israel’s far-right government plans to politically control judiciary

Jean Shaoul


One hundred thousand Israelis braved the rain to rally in Tel Aviv’s Habima Square to protest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plans to change the country’s legal system and weaken the Supreme Court. With thousands more rallying in Jerusalem, Haifa and the northern town of Rosh Pina, the demonstrations were by far the largest anti-government protests in recent years.

Israelis protest against the government's plans to overhaul the country's legal system, in Tel Aviv, Israel, January 14, 2023. [AP Photo/Oded Balilty]

While many protesters carried Israeli flags, others held homemade placards warning against “Fascism,” a “Coup d’état,” “Criminal Government, “The End of Democracy,” attacks on democratic and social rights, and corruption and voiced their opposition to Netanyahu’s return to power. One poster read, “We will die before giving up on democracy.”

Others carried Palestinian flags, in defiance of the new Minister of National Security and Jewish Power leader Itamar Ben-Gvir’s call for the police to crackdown on people carrying Palestinian flags in public spaces. His order came after a few protesters waved Palestinian flags in last Saturday’s anti-government demonstration in Tel Aviv, prompting furious criticism from Netanyahu and his far-right allies.

Saturday’s demonstrations were far larger than last week’s protest, testifying to the increasing concerns and anger on the part of Israelis, Jewish and Palestinian, over the political programme of Netanyahu’s far-right coalition government that includes his Likud, three fascistic and racist parties—Religious Zionism, Jewish Power and Noam—and two right-wing religious parties, Shas and United Torah Judaism.

Their agenda is Jewish supremacy and apartheid rule, the annexation of large swathes of the West Bank, the expansion of illegal settlements, Jewish prayer at al-Aqsa Mosque and the rollback of a swathe of anti-discriminatory measures. This can only be accomplished by sweeping changes to Israel’s legal system and stepping up the police and military crackdown on all political dissent, be it from the Palestinians in the territories occupied illegally since the 1967 Arab Israeli war, or workers, Jewish and Palestinian, in Israel.

Under the new government’s signature legislation announced by Justice Minister Yariv Levin, the High Court’s ability to strike down laws or sections of a law will be severely limited and a simple majority in Israel’s single chamber parliament will be able to override any such rulings. The High Court would be stripped of its power to use “reasonableness” as a criterion for determining whether or not government decisions are lawful. The government would take control over the appointment of judges, while ministers would be free to appoint their own legal advisors whose advice will not be legally binding.

A second phase of the legislation is being drafted and is expected to split the role of the Attorney General in two—one for the government’s legal adviser and the other for the state prosecutor. This would allow Netanyahu to replace Attorney General Baharav-Miara with a prosecutor of his choosing, who would either revise or revoke the corruption charges against him. Currently in court facing charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust in three separate cases, bound up with his efforts to control the media, Netanyahu claims to be the victim of a witch-hunt by a hostile media, police and left-wing prosecutors. He poured fuel on the fire by offering two cabinet post to Aryeh Deri, leader of the Shas religious party, who served a jail sentence in 1999 for taking bribes and was convicted last year for tax fraud. Deri’s appointment is now being challenged in the High Court using the criterion of the “reasonableness” of appointing a twice convicted criminal.

In the two weeks since the most right-wing government in Israel’s history, with its majority of just four in the 120-seat Knesset was sworn in:

* 13 Palestinians, including three children, have been killed by Israeli soldiers. It follows a record year of violence by security forces and settlers under the previous “government of change” headed by Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid when at least 167 were killed in the West Bank, the highest death toll since 2005.

* Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, leader of the Religious Zionist party and advocate of annexing the entire West Bank, who is now in charge of settlement construction, seized $40 million funds held by Israel that belong to the Palestinian Authority.

* National Security Minister and Jewish Power leader Itamar Ben-Gvir staged a provocative visit to the al-Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem’s Old City as part of his campaign to enable Jews to pray at the site.

* Ben-Gvir ordered police to use water cannon against anti-government demonstrators and arrest protesters blocking roads, saying that last week’s Saturday evening demonstration in Tel Aviv caused “serious harm to democracy.”

* Jewish Power legislator Zvika Fogel accused opposition leader and former prime minister Yair Lapid and former Defence Minister Benny Gantz of “treason against the homeland” for supporting the demonstration.

On Thursday, the president of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Esther Hayut, said the proposals were designed to “deal a mortal blow to the independence of the judiciary and silence it.” Levin, speaking on television, accused her of having joined activists in their call “to set the streets alight.”

Israel’s former attorney generals and almost all the former state prosecutors published a letter warning that without significant changes the plans could lead to an unprecedented constitutional crisis, with a confrontation between the judiciary and the government.

On Thursday, hundreds of lawyers, former judges and legal professionals staged a one-hour strike outside major courts.

Speaking at this week’s rally in Tel Aviv were former defense minister Benny Gantz, Labor Party chairwoman Merav Michaeli, leaders of the Arab Ra'am party Mansour Abbas and of Hadash-Ta'al Ayman Odeh, and politicians from Yesh Atid and the other opposition parties. Formerly touted as a “government of change”, they instead adopted the policies of the former Netanyahu-led coalition government, paving the way for his return to power.

Netanyahu said he had no intention of backtracking on his plans, insisting that November’s election gave him a mandate to “comprehensively reform the judicial system. More than that, they demanded it.”

President Isaac Herzog has sought to mediate between the government and its opposition critics, holding “intense conversations” with Levin, Netanyahu and Hayut in a bid to reach a compromise.

As the World Socialist Web Site wrote in its New Year’s perspective pointing to developments in the US and Europe, “The breakdown of democracy and the growing political influence of far-right and fascistic movements is a global phenomenon.”

Netanyahu’s plans are a direct assault on Israel’s very limited checks on the government’s power. Israel has no constitution or second legislative chamber. They flow inexorably from the acute crisis of the Zionist state, one of the most socially unequal countries among the OECD group of rich nations, and the Zionist project of establishing a Jewish state through the violent dispossession of the indigenous Arab population.

Chinese National Health Commission discloses 60,000 deaths since abandoning Zero COVID

Benjamin Mateus


On Saturday, China’s leading public health institution, the National Health Commission (NHC), revealed that between December 8, 2022, when Chinese authorities announced the complete scrapping of all remaining aspects of its prior Zero COVID public health program, and January 12, a total of 59,938 COVID-19-related deaths took place.

President Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) were under intense international scrutiny to reveal the true extent of their public health crisis after lifting essentially all mitigation measures to contain the coronavirus and allowing a tsunami of hundreds of millions of infections to rip through the country.

As late as January 12, health authorities had confirmed that a mere 37 people had died from the virus, a figure known to be completely erroneous and outrageous given the three years of experience with the pandemic.

Several modeling estimates made by various research institutes estimated that the first wave of COVID infections in China could cause upwards of 2 million deaths. Even economists at Barclays had predicted that the Omicron wave would have a fatality rate of 0.4 percent among the unvaccinated, while the fully vaccinated may see a rate of 0.02 percent.

A study published in Nature Medicine estimated that in the last week of December approximately 76 percent of Beijing’s 22 million people had been infected and by the end of January that figure would rise to 92 percent.

The figure provided by the NHC is clearly intended to suppress any real assessment of the crisis sweeping over China. Many photos and videos taken at crematoriums show these facilities operating at capacity, indicating a significant shift in the number of people seeking to give their deceased family members a respectable burial. Last week, the Washington Post released a report using satellite imagery to show that several crematoriums in densely populated centers were seeing record numbers of visitors.

World Health Organization (WHO) COVID-19 Technical Lead, Dr. Maria van Kerkhove, spoke on China’s outbreak at a media briefing last Wednesday, noting, “There are some very important gaps that we are working with China to fill. First and foremost is to have a really deeper understanding of the transmission dynamics of COVID across the country.”

On Saturday, before the NHC’s release of figures on COVID-19 fatalities, WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus spoke with NHC head Ma Xiaowei on the country’s current COVID-19 prevention and control measures.

The figures presented Saturday only substantiate that the CCP is playing a statistical sleight of hand with the numbers to appease the WHO and international media, but they are doing so in accordance with every other country that has dismantled COVID-19 testing and tracking metrics and have allowed the pandemic to rip under their public health radars.

An article in the CCP-aligned Global Times said, “China has insisted on classifying deaths of patients with a positive nucleic acid test as COVID-19-related deaths, which is in line with WHO and international standards.” This was intended as a rebuke against the hypocrisy evident in numerous recent critiques by the Western media and governments against China’s actions on COVID-19, while they carried out similar measures in forcing their populations to accept mass infection and death.

In order to suppress official figures, Chinese health authorities have maintained a strict definition of COVID-19 fatality that must include respiratory failure caused by the virus. This misses a significant number of people that have died at home or from other causes not directly attributable to respiratory failure but a by-product of their infection.

Jiao Yahui, an NHC official, told the Global Times that 90.1 percent of the nearly 60,000 fatalities were above the age of 65, 56.5 percent over 80, and a significant majority had underlying health conditions when they died. However, Jiao added that only 5,503 were due to respiratory failure caused by SARS-CoV-2, and the other 54,435 died with COVID and not from COVID, in line with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) definition. In other words, confirmed COVID-19 deaths in China have only risen twofold.

In their article on the NHC data update, the New York Times noted, “The lack of transparency prompted several countries, including Japan and South Korea, to impose travel curbs on Chinese visitors after China reopened its borders last Sunday. Experts also warned that playing down the severity of the outbreak could lead people within the country to take fewer precautions.”

The hint of moralizing in these statements from the bourgeois press is hypocritical and cynical, as Japan is currently facing the highest mortality rate from COVID-19 it has ever experienced. In the US, the weekly death rate has jumped to almost 4,000, or an average of around 550 per day, a byproduct of the national spread of the highly infectious and immune-resistant XBB.1.5 variant.

In response to the growing number of daily new COVID-19 deaths in the US, Washington Post contributing columnist Leana Wen, one of the most notorious pandemic minimizers, wrote an opinion piece falsely claiming that the US is overcounting COVID-19 deaths and hospitalizations. She states, “According to the [CDC], the United States is experiencing around 400 COVID deaths every day. At that rate, there would be nearly 150,000 deaths a year. But are these Americans dying from COVID or with COVID?”

Since Omicron has dominated the pandemic, excess deaths have remained stubbornly high not only in the US but across Europe, Australia and other regions that have been tracking and documenting their mortality data. These are partly due directly to COVID-19 and complications experienced from COVID-19 infections that can impose a significant toll on the body’s various organ systems. In addition, the pandemic’s toll on every social aspect of life has been catastrophic, and the US has led many high-income countries in declines in life expectancy amid a free fall in its health care and public health infrastructure.

The concept of dying “from” versus “with” COVID was a right-wing talking point manufactured first by Donald Trump, which was embraced by the entire political and media establishment early during the Omicron wave, alongside the oft-stated but false notion that the strain was mild. Indeed, more than 277,000 Americans officially died from Omicron in 2022. The peak in deaths in January–February 2022 was second only to the first winter wave from December 2020 to January 2021, when the vaccines were first being distributed.

A widely-shared thread posted by Gregory Travis over the weekend places the political issues behind this ploy into perspective. It must be noted that the same data manipulation now on display in China was first pioneered in the US.

Next Sunday, January 22, will be the official beginning of the Lunar New Year, with officials forecasting that more than 2 billion trips will take place across the country over 40 days, the largest annual human migration in the world. Chinese officials have been more forthcoming about the concerns of bringing COVID-19 to rural regions, where vaccine uptake has been much lower and health care systems are much less able to cope with a deluge of patients.

A post on the Chinese social media platform WeChat from a small town in central Henan province noted, “In the face of a virus like Omicron, all people should be equal, but the fact is that as far as the virus is concerned, urban and rural areas are not equal. Not only are resources and opportunities unequal but there is also a wide gap in the understanding of how to handle public health.”

Biden and the secrets of the national security state

Patrick Martin



The Capitol is seen in Washington, Nov. 11, 2022. [AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File]

There are many unanswered questions that follow on the news that classified documents have been found in unsecured locations in Washington D.C. and Wilmington, Delaware, where they were taken by aides to then-Vice President Biden at the end of his eight years in office.

But they are not the questions over which Biden’s Republican opponents are howling and the corporate media is obsessing.

The important issues, which the media avoids raising, include the following: What is in these documents? Why are there so many secrets? And who is the US government keeping the secrets from?

Many of the documents that receive the highest classification—Top Secret, or Sensitive Compartmented Information—relate to the foreign policy of the United States. In other words, they concern the abominable crimes being carried out by US imperialism all over the world.

Let us suggest some possible subjects these documents might cover:

  • The role of the US-allied Saudi government in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, carried out by the Al Qaeda organization founded by the Saudi millionaire Osama bin Laden. Most of the 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals, and several were receiving financial support from the Saudi regime at the time of 9/11.

  • The US role in the 2014 regime-change operation in Ukraine that overthrew an elected government and installed a far-right, anti-Russian regime, riddled with neo-Nazis, and set the stage for the outbreak of war with Russia in Ukraine eight years later.

  • What the United States is doing in relation to Taiwan, in an effort to provoke a Chinese invasion, based on the example of Russia and Ukraine, which would become the pretext for an all-out US-led war against the Beijing regime.

  • US plans for regime-change through economic strangulation, internal subversion and outright war in Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, North Korea and other countries targeted by American imperialism.

  • Conversely, US plans to intervene to prop up reactionary authoritarian governments like the Saudi monarchy and other Persian Gulf autocracies, the bloodstained Egyptian military dictatorship, the Hindu chauvinist government of Narendra Modi in India and similar governments in Latin America and Africa.

  • In pursuit of any or all of these goals, plans for CIA assassinations and other covert operations in virtually every country in the world.

President Joe Biden epitomizes the fusion of the state and the individual, to the extent that he hardly knows where one ends and the other begins. He was a senator for 36 years, elected to his first term at the age of only 29. He spent much of that time on the Foreign Relations Committee, either as chairman or ranking minority member, giving him access to many such secret plans. He was then vice president for eight years, with a portfolio that included Latin America and Ukraine.

It is likely that when his eight years in the Obama administration came to an end, he had so many thousands of pages of classified documents in his possession that it was easy for aides to miss a few. A handful of press reports suggest that some of them concern Ukraine and Iran, two of the most sensitive areas of US subversion.

Nor are Top Secret papers limited to foreign policy. It is noteworthy that last month the National Archives released a tranche of documents relating to the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, with significant redactions and with many documents withheld at the request of the intelligence agencies.

In other words, 60 years after the Kennedy assassination, the CIA still refuses to come clean about its ties with the supposed assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, a former Marine who moved to the USSR at the height of the Cold War, married a Russian woman, then returned to the United States and joined the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, a group purportedly opposed to the US blockade that was manipulated by the US intelligence agencies.

As far as the political impact of the revelations is concerned, the Democratic Party is hoist with its own petard. While Trump was in office, it focused its attacks on him on foreign policy, suggesting that he was an agent or stooge of the Putin regime in Russia. After Trump left office, it focused its opposition to Trump on his possession of Top Secret papers at Mar-a-Lago, and Biden himself banged the “damage to national security” drum in an interview with 60 Minutes.

The president’s Republican critics have used the revelations not just to undermine Biden politically, but to foment anti-Chinese sentiment. They hint darkly that Chinese spies could have had access to the unsecured documents and demand detailed visitors’ lists for the Penn Biden Center in Washington, Biden’s home in Wilmington and even his garage.

The hypocrisy here is obvious, since these same warriors for transparency opposed the release of visitors’ logs to the Trump White House, after Trump broke with the longstanding practice of public disclosure.

There is cynicism, hypocrisy and reaction aplenty on both sides, as is characteristic of disputes within the US ruling elite.

But if there is a crime in these stories, it is not the endangering of secrets; it is the existence of them. The real victim of the crime is the American people—and the populations of the world targeted by US imperialism—not Biden, Trump or the massive military-intelligence apparatus.

Biden is the leader of a supposedly democratic government that is buried in secrets, many of which are known to other governments in the world, but are not made known to the American people. As far as the US ruling class is concerned, the American people must be kept in the dark about how US wars are prepared and what the trillion dollars in annual US military-intelligence spending is really buying. They fear that if the American people knew what crimes were being carried out, they would rise up in anger and outrage.

That is why a courageous exposer of secrets like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is being held in a British dungeon on a US extradition warrant: his “crime” was to make public evidence of US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, records of torture at Guantanamo Bay, diplomatic cables documenting conspiracies to subvert and bully governments around the world, and CIA techniques for hacking and surveillance.

The American corporate media has turned the Biden documents affair into a further justification for suppressing secrets and keeping the American people ignorant of what is being done in their name.

The Berlin Senate and the German government end compulsory mask wearing on public transport

Tamino Dreisam


In the midst of the Senate election campaign in Berlin, the Senate leadership—comprised of the SPD, the Green Party and the Left Party—together with the federal government has decided to end the compulsory wearing of masks on local and long-distance public transport. The Berlin Senate has also agreed to relax the law regarding the isolation of COVID-19 victims.

The Berlin Senate made the public transport decision last week, setting February 2 as the date for the new policy to take effect. The mask requirement will therefore end in the middle of winter, a time when particularly large numbers of people use public transport in Berlin and are often crammed together in overcrowded trains.

A packed BVG bus in Berlin, Germany. [Photo: WSWS]

The Berlin Senate thus became the first city administration not headed by a conservative party, i.e., the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) or Christian Social Union (CSU), to lift the mask requirement for local transport. The decision underscores once again that the nominally “left-wing” Berlin Senate parties follow the same ruthless “profit before lives” pandemic policies as Germany’s traditional right-wing parties.

In addition, the Berlin Senate has decided to relax the isolation requirement for infected persons. From 16 January, a negative coronavirus test is no longer required to end quarantine as long as the patient has no symptoms 48 hours before.

This policy can only be described as criminal. The relaxations are being implemented even though the pandemic remains rampant, and around 175 victims are dying nationwide from the virus every day. The number of COVID-caused deaths totaled 937 last week, and an average of 10,000 people have to be hospitalised every week.

The number of infections is exploding particularly in Berlin, although this is not reflected in official statistics. This is being made clear by the extent of coronavirus detected in the city’s sewage. Although these values cannot be used to determine the exact incidence of the virus, they do provide important information about the basic course of the infection.

During the pandemic, the values recorded from wastewater monitoring have largely corresponded to those stemming from PCR tests. In the meantime, PCR testing has been drastically cut back, although at the end of October last year the concentration of coronaviruses measured in wastewater “shot through the roof,” according to the molecular biologist Emanuel Wyler.

Within the space of one to two months, the values measured in wastewater tripled, and even the Berlin health administration was forced to acknowledge that this was worrisome figure but then concluded that “we can only speculate about its level and causes.”

This spread of the virus is also evident in Berlin clinics. In the week before Christmas, Charité University Hospital was forced to operate on an emergency basis, faced with the so-called 'tripledemia' of RSV, influenza and the coronavirus. Last Wednesday, the Berlin Medical Association criticised “untenable conditions” in the city’s hospital for forensic psychiatry. The conditions for patients were “in part inhumane and the working conditions for staff intolerable,” declared the president of the Berlin Medical Association, Peter Bobbert.

The Berlin Senate's decision anticipated what is now being imposed in all other federal states. On January 9, federal Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (SPD) announced the nationwide end of compulsory masks in local and long-distance public transport, beginning February 2. To justify the move, the minister resorted to blatant lies, claiming that the situation showed the pandemic had stabilised, sewage monitoring values were constant or falling, the number of hospitalisations was decreasing, and new variants were not on the horizon.

Personally, he added cynically, he advocated “voluntarily wearing masks indoors,” but “it was now necessary to place more emphasis on personal responsibility and voluntary behaviour.” What this means is clear: the ditching of all remaining protective measures.

The states of Thuringia and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania have also announced they intend to abolish the regulation for the isolation of infected persons. In Thuringia, the date of February 3 has already been set, while the state government of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania plans to lift the isolation obligation about four weeks after ending the rule regarding the wearing of masks.

So far, the states Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria, Hesse, Rhineland-Palatinate and Schleswig-Holstein have already lifted the isolation requirement for infected persons. And the regulation requiring masks will apply in only just under half of the country’s states.

The latest relaxations also expose the role of the Left Party. Of the four federal states in which the Left Party is in government, only Bremen currently maintains the mandatory mask requirement in local transport. But even there, the SPD-Left Party-Green state government has announced that it will end the mask requirement at the end of March.

The state governments of Thuringia, led by the Left Party, and the SPD-Left Party governed state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania are planning to abolish the isolation requirement. To the extent that the Left Party’s coronavirus policy differs from other parties, it is because it is the most aggressive party on this issue.

The state of Thuringia is the best example. The administration led by the Left Party prime minister Bodo Ramelow was the first state government to openly propagate the Swedish policy of “herd immunity,” i.e., the deliberate contamination of the population. As a result, Thuringia was for a long time the state in Germany that registered the most deaths. Currently, it occupies second place for corona deaths measured by the number of inhabitants.