24 Jan 2023

While slashing pensions, Macron demands 40 percent hike in French military budget

Alex Lantier


As he pledges to cut €13 billion per year from pensions, French President Emmanuel Macron aims to raise military spending €118 billion over the next six years. On Friday, speaking at an airbase in Mont-de-Marsan, he announced a nearly 40 percent rise in military spending, to €413 billion in the period of 2024-2030.

France said Wednesday January 4, 2023 it will send French-made AMX-10 RC light tanks to Ukraine, the first tanks from a Western European country, following an afternoon phone call between French President Emmanuel Macron and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. [AP Photo/Jeremy Bessat/Armee de Terre]

As Macron and all the NATO powers spend billions of euros on waging war on Russia in Ukraine, this plan exposes the ruling elite’s undisguised contempt for public opinion and the social needs of the working class. Macron’s pension cuts are opposed by 80 percent of the French people. Yet he wants to transfer hundreds of billions of euros from retirees to the banks and the military, arguing that further, major escalations of the war are unavoidable.

Such announcements show that stopping the decimation of workers’ living standards by austerity and inflation requires building a movement against NATO imperialist wars.

With NATO teetering on the brink of launching an all-out global war on Russia, Macron demanded that France prepare for further, explosive military escalation and high intensity wars. “We must never be one war late. We must be ahead by one war,” Macron said, insisting that France must be ready for “more brutal and more numerous wars.”

He announced a comprehensive modernisation of the warheads, missile launch systems of France’s nuclear missiles, and an increase in the size of its ballistic-missile submarine fleet. Praising France’s nuclear deterrent program, Macron said: “Deterrence is one issue that makes France a different country in Europe. We are seeing again in Ukraine its vital importance. It deserves the considerable efforts that we devote to it.”

The budget expends enormous resources on the latest methods of spying and drone warfare. Macron announced a 60 percent rise in military intelligence and cyber warfare budgets, increasing France’s fleet of reconnaissance and killer drones, and building new air defense systems to scan for enemy drones, many of which can evade radar. The budget also allows for building a new aircraft carrier, replacing all Mirage jets with newer Rafale fighters and buying large quantities of the new Scorpion armored vehicle.

Macron called for a major increase in the French military-industrial complex’s ability to put out large quantities of heavy weapons for use in overseas wars. Demanding to “build up our stocks of munitions, logistics capacity and support,” he said: “We must be more alert, reinforce national emergency preparedness and have the necessary means for military intervention on little warning, even far from metropolitan France.”

Macron called for France to be able to promptly deploy 20,000 soldiers capable of heavy combined arms operations.

He concluded by boasting that his presidency would entrench the vastly expanded power of the military high command in French public life, regardless of public opinion. Citing the 2019-2023 and 2024-2030 military budgets, Macron said: “Overall, the last two military budget laws will have led to a doubling of our military spending. … These are considerable resources that are amplifying defense spending whose growth is without precedent since five decades.”

This doubling of French military spending—to levels unseen since the era of the bloody 1954-1962 colonial war in Algeria—is, he said, “a profound change that will now be irreversible.”

Macron did not spell this out, but the anti-democratic implications of this statement are self-evident: If workers’ social and political demands interfere with Macron’s “irreversible” decision to shower the high command with hundreds of billions of euros, they must be crushed.

His attempts to present his military build-up as a defensive measure to deter attacks on French soil is thoroughly dishonest. It is belied, first of all, by the fact that he is calling to escalate spending on offensive weapons that are to be deployed overseas, far from France’s borders. Moreover, with the France, like the United States, having declared that it may be the first to use nuclear weapons in a war, Macron’s call for a nuclear build-up does not so much deter as threaten other countries.

It is increasingly clear, moreover, that the conception that a country can reliably deter attacks on its forces and soil by developing nuclear weapons is false. Russia has one of the world’s largest nuclear arsenals, capable of destroying the entire world many times over. Yet NATO is arming Ukraine, on Russia’s borders, and helping Ukraine launch attacks on Russian-speaking regions such as Crimea, on which Russia maintains armed forces and that Moscow claims as part of Russia.

The NATO war on Russia in Ukraine is the culmination of three decades of NATO wars since the 1991 Stalinist dissolution of the Soviet Union. NATO countries were the aggressors in these conflicts, attacking countries like Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Mali in wars that altogether claimed millions of lives. The Russian capitalist regime’s invasion of Ukraine last year was no doubt reactionary. However, it came after a 2014 NATO-backed coup in Kiev installed a far-right regime in Ukraine that attacked Russian-speaking areas of Ukraine on Russia’s borders.

In 2019, Macron publicly criticized US policy towards Russia in The Economist, calling NATO “brain-dead” for risking direct war with Russia and stating: “When the United States is very harsh with Russia, it is a form of governmental, political, and historical hysteria.”

After three years of rising class conflict and economic crisis since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, Macron has turned 180 degrees and embraced war with Russia, recently pledging to send Kiev French tanks to attack Russia.

Macron’s pension cuts illustrate how French imperialism’s policy of plunder overseas is inseparable from its drive to plunder the working class at home. The slashing of hundeds of billions of euros from pensions is intended not only to free up resources for French military operations overseas, but also to generate massive profits and tax cuts for major French corporations.

Social media reports have confirmed that provisions in Macron’s pension-cuting law explicitly state that the purpose of cutting pensions is to allow the state to clash corporate tax rates. The passage in question declares: “This curbing of spending will allow, without threatening the objective of controlling the budget deficit, to continue the strategy of cutting mandatory taxes launched in the previous term … It will be pursued notably with the suppression over two years of corporate taxes paid on value added, as specified by the 2023 finances law.”

23 Jan 2023

Spanish Government MAEC-AECID Masters Scholarships 2023/2024

Application Deadline: 10th February 2023

Type: Master

Eligibility: All the applicants of this program (SCHOLARSHIPS AFRICA-MED) must have knowledge of Spanish, meet all the requirements as stipulated in the specific conditions of section 3.1 of Annexure III and present all the documentation required as per section 3.4 of the mentioned Annexure.

Eligible Countries: Countries in  Latin America, Africa and Asia

To be Taken at (Country): Spain

Number of Awards: Not specified

Duration of Award: 9 months

How to Apply: Access to online procedure (requires authentication)

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Firefighters exposed to toxins at Grenfell Tower fire diagnosed with incurable cancers

Margot Miller


Twelve firefighters among the 1,300 who attended the June 2017 Grenfell Tower inferno in London have developed incurable cancers—possibly the result of exposure to deadly contaminants released by the blaze. Some are relatively young men in their forties.

Exhausted firefighters rest next to a wall as they take a break in battling the inferno that raged in Grenfell Tower, London, June 14, 2017. [AP Photo/Matt Dunham]

Mirror investigation reported that the majority are suffering from digestive cancers and leukaemia, and that their number could rise to 20 as a list of firefighters at the scene who now have cancer is being compiled. It is feared this is “only this tip of the iceberg” as cancer can take up to 25 years to develop.

Grenfell underwent “refurbishment” on the cheap in 2014, during which the exterior was covered with highly combustible cladding, permitting a small kitchen fire to spread with exceptional ferocity—72 people died.

The blaze burned for 60 hours, releasing a thick black smoke so dense it was impossible for those trying to escape to see even their hand in front of their face. It contained carcinogens released from the burning cladding.

Firefighters continued the rescue even as they ran out of oxygen, forced to breathe in the fumes.

Pictures taken at the time show them exhausted, clothed “in soot-covered personal protective equipment on the grass, drinking and eating,” which can lead to cancer of the digestive system.

Exhausted firefighters rest as they take a break in battling a massive fire that raged in Grenfell Tower, London, June 14, 2017. [AP Photo/Matt Dunham]

The Mirror noted, “A 2019 study by the University of Central Lancashire (UClan) found soil contamination from the disaster caused by the fire could lead to an increased risk of cancer and respiratory problems of those living in the area.

“Analysis of soil, debris and char samples of insulation boards used on the tower revealed heightened concentrations of cancer-causing chemicals and proven carcinogens, including benzene, within 200m of the tower.”

Brian Flanagan, 47, a firefighter who attended the emergency, said, “What is out of the ordinary was the length of time we were there, and this is the problem. In a standard fire you would be there not more than four hours. When you get to that mark you get a relief crew. But I was at Grenfell for eight hours, twice as long as I should have been.” Many firefighters were on duty for 12 hours.

Research commissioned by the Fire Brigades’ Union from the UClan found firefighters are twice as likely to develop cancer if they remain in their personal protective equipment longer than four hours. They face a similar risk if they notice soot in their nose or throat.

Another firefighter, a father in his 50s, who, “risked his life as he and his colleagues led a trapped family to safety” spoke anonymously. Grenfell “left him suicidal and suffering from scarred lungs,” reported the Mirror.

“We were quite early on the scene and got held in this underground car park and we were breathing all the toxins for ages,” he said.

The newspaper reported that the firefighter has “failed several medicals since the blaze because of his lung function and now needs inhalers.”

He told the Mirror, “Before Grenfell my health was great. I passed all the medicals and had no problems at all… It literally was within a month or so I started to get this cough and for me that’s when it started to go downhill.”

Long-term occupational health hazards for firefighters are severe. Another study by UClan, “Scottish Firefighters Occupational Cancer and Disease Mortality Rates: 2000-2020”, found they had a mortality rate higher than the general population by a multiple of 1.6, based on data from the National Records of Scotland.

The study revealed the higher incidence of the following cancers among firefighters:

·      Prostate3.8 times higher than the general population

·      Leukaemia—17 times higher

·      Oesophageal—2.42 times higher

·      Cancers of unknown origin—6.37 times higher

The rate of heart attacks is five times higher than the general public, and three times higher for strokes.

Yet, as FBU national official Riccardo la Torre pointed out in response to the news of the Grenfell responders’ illness, “Firefighters are left in the dark due to the lack of regular health surveillance and proper monitoring of exposures in the UK.”

Inside Housing reported Friday on a memo from the company Celotex, sellers of the combustible insulation used in the Grenfell cladding, revealing that the company “had research which demonstrated that it produced acidic, toxic smoke when burned, 18 months before the blaze.” Studies were commissioned comparing toxicity of its material to others on the market.

A fire expert reviewing the memo told Inside Housing, that “All smoke is toxic… They [Celotex] seemed interested in a plastic that is toxic in fire than their competitors. They were not looking for a product that was of low toxicity. The difference is important.”

During phase one of the inquiry into the fire, the company declared, “Celotex (PIR) insulation is an organic material and… releases a variety of gases on combustion. This information was well known by construction professionals and was clearly stated in Celotex’s health and safety datasheet which was readily available to those responsible for the design and installation of the cladding system on Grenfell Tower.”

It has already been revealed that Celotex falsified the results of tests so their product would pass the minimum standard of limited combustibility—adding fire resistant boards to a fire test.

Another conglomerate, Arconic, manufactured the cladding’s outer rainscreen aluminium composite panels (ACM)—a layer of polyethylene sandwiched between two aluminium skins, which has been likened to solid petrol.

The suffering and illness of a significant number of the Grenfell firefighters makes even more filthy the moves by the authorities and Grenfell Inquiry to scapegoat them for the disaster. Both first and second phases concentrated disproportionately on the efforts of a cash-strapped London Fire Brigade (LFB) to respond to a catastrophe created by rampant criminality in corporate and political circles—part of a clear agenda to pin the blame for Grenfell almost exclusively on the LFB.

Many responded to the news of the suffering firefighters with outrage.

Some asked why they had not been given sufficient protection:

Loading Tweet ...
Tweet not loading? See it directly on Twitter

Others warned of the still to be discovered impacts on local residents:

Loading Tweet ...
Tweet not loading? See it directly on Twitter

Many demanded that those responsible be held accountable and prosecuted:

Loading Tweet ...
Tweet not loading? See it directly on Twitter
Loading Tweet ...
Tweet not loading? See it directly on Twitter
Loading Tweet ...
Tweet not loading? See it directly on Twitter

The official inquiry hearings ended last November. It was set up as a government cover-up with no powers of prosecution, barred from investigating causes of a “social, economic and political nature.”

Even as it prepares its final report, more crimes are being revealed. Over five years after the fire not a single person in corporate and political circles responsible for turning the building into an inferno has been arrested or prosecuted. Hundreds of thousands of people continue to reside in unsafe high-rise buildings covered in dangerous cladding.

New Zealand Labour Party installs new right-wing PM

Tom Peters


Over the weekend, following the sudden resignation of Jacinda Ardern as New Zealand’s prime minister, the ruling Labour Party caucus endorsed senior minister Chris Hipkins as her replacement. Hipkins was chosen unopposed to head the party and government in the lead-up to the October 14 election.

Chris Hipkins speaking outside parliament in Wellington on January 21, a day before he was appointed New Zealand prime minister. [AP Photo/Nick Perry]

Ardern announced her departure last Thursday, declaring that she was worn out from leading the country during multiple crises and wanted to spend time with her family.

The reality is that despite being glorified in the world’s media as a “liberal icon” and feminist hero, Ardern and her right-wing government have become increasingly unpopular. All of Ardern’s rhetoric about “kindness” and her promises to alleviate poverty and homelessness have been exposed as a fraud.

The Labour government exploited the pandemic to carry out an historic transfer of tens of billions of dollars to big business and the banks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Soaring inflation is now driving hundreds of thousands of people into poverty, while more than 3,000 people have died in the past year as a result of the adoption of the homicidal “let it rip” policy demanded by big business.

In every country, the ruling class is now seeking to impose the full burden of the global economic crisis, triggered by the pandemic and made worse by the US-NATO war against Russia in Ukraine, onto the backs of working people.

Ardern’s departure, as the WSWS noted, follows demands for an even more brutal assault on workers’ living standards. The Reserve Bank is seeking to engineer a recession and higher unemployment to drive down wages. Ardern has signaled that she does not feel up to the task of imposing this agenda and confronting the resistance that will inevitably emerge.

Ardern appears to have chosen Hipkins as her replacement. While most of the party was unaware of her impending resignation, she told him prior to Christmas that she was considering stepping down.

Hipkins is widely described as “Mr Fixit,” Ardern’s “attack dog,” and as someone who will shift the government further to the right. His record includes enforcing austerity against striking teachers as education minister, dismantling public health measures as COVID-19 response minister, and imposing so-called “tough on crime” measures as police minister.

In his first media conference, Hipkins distanced himself from Ardern’s slogan that she would make “transformational” changes, saying: “I’m not really interested in those kinds of catchphrases.”

While stating that “many people in New Zealand, many families are struggling… worried about paying their grocery bills and paying their mortgages,” Hipkins sought to dampen expectations of any significant steps to address the cost of living crisis. “New Zealanders,” he said, “understand we cannot do everything and we certainly can’t do everything all at once. They see the global economic pressures that New Zealand is up against.”

Even as more than 50 people are dying and hundreds are being hospitalised each week due to COVID-19, Hipkins talked about the pandemic entirely in the past tense. He declared: “COVID-19 and the global pandemic created a health crisis, and now it’s created an economic one, and that’s where my government’s focus will be.”

After Ardern announced the scrapping of New Zealand’s COVID elimination policy in late 2021, Hipkins oversaw the dismantling of public health measures, allowing the coronavirus to infect millions of people. On Twitter, he soon earned the nickname #LetitRipkins.

As education minister, he undertook the reopening of schools for in-person learning, which played a central role in unleashing COVID across the country. He defended the deliberate infection of children, telling Newsroom on May 18, 2022 that “a proportion of children will get COVID, that’s just the reality of living in a community where COVID is circulating.” He said people concerned about this were “catastrophising.”

Before the pandemic, Hipkins had already established a reputation for ruthlessness, imposing the government’s effective pay freeze and austerity across the education sector in the face of nationwide strikes by teachers in 2018 and 2019. This was done with the assistance of the education unions, which also prevented any organised resistance to the unsafe reopening of schools.

Hipkins’ ministry has also overseen a funding freeze at universities as international student numbers dropped during the pandemic, resulting in hundreds of job losses. About 7,000 university staff held a nationwide strike last October demanding a real wage increase. The ongoing process of merging the country’s 16 polytechnics (training institutes) into a single national entity, Te Pūkenga, is expected to involve more staff cuts.

None of this stopped Council of Trade Unions president Richard Wagstaff from congratulating Hipkins on becoming prime minister and declaring that the CTU had “worked closely with Hipkins, and we have been impressed by his commitment to addressing inequity.” The Labour government had “shown it has the wellbeing of working New Zealanders at its heart,” Wagstaff said.

The unions are playing a key role in imposing sellout pay agreements and preventing any organised fight for higher wages. Today, the CTU released a survey of 1,870 union members, showing that 44 percent had received no pay rise in the last 12 months. Three quarters said their incomes were not keeping up with inflation, which soared by 7.2 percent while food prices went up 11.3 percent in the last year.

Hipkins has also been involved in strengthening the repressive powers of the state to deal with the fallout of the social crisis. In June last year, Ardern made Hipkins minister of police following an hysterical “law and order” campaign by the media and opposition parties, which denounced his predecessor Poto Williams for failing to deal with an alleged “youth crime wave” and gang violence. Hipkins introduced new legislation that will give additional powers to police to search properties if they are believed to be occupied or owned by gang members.

There is no sign that a Hipkins-led government will make any significant change in foreign policy. In his press conference yesterday Hipkins declared that “our relationship with China is incredibly important, economically” and a visit to China would be “high on the priority list.”

The Labour government has deepened NZ’s military alliance with the United States, including by sending hundreds of troops to the UK to help train and supply the Ukrainian military in the expanding US-NATO war against Russia. At the same time, Wellington has been reluctant to fully and openly join the far-advanced preparations for war against China, which is New Zealand’s main trading partner. Hipkins’ comments will be viewed with concern in US and Australian ruling circles, which want a much firmer commitment from Wellington to the drive towards another imperialist world war.

Hipkins’ first action over the weekend was to appoint Carmel Sepuloni as the new deputy prime minister. Immediately, the race-obsessed media hailed Sepuloni, who has Tongan and Samoan heritage, as New Zealand’s first Pacific Islander in such a senior position.

For the past five years as social development minister Sepuloni’s main task has been to justify maintaining poverty-level welfare payments. She has also overseen the children’s ministry, Oranga Tamariki, which has triggered protests for removing babies from young mothers.

The Labour Party’s supporters, while still reeling from Ardern’s resignation, are desperately seeking to promote illusions in Hipkins to save the party from a crushing election defeat.

Green Party co-leader James Shaw, who is the minister for climate change in the Labour-led government, praised Hipkins’ record, telling reporters: “He’s taken on some of the toughest jobs in government and done a really good job of them, so I think he’ll be excellent.”

The liberal Daily Blog praised him as “ferociously bright, principled and clever.” The publication ludicrously painted the politician’s career as “a celebration of NZ egalitarian meritocracy.”

On Interest.co.nz, pro-Labour pundit Chris Trotter cautiously hoped that Hipkins would “correct his party’s currently suicidal political course” by backing away from “contentious” policies based on racial identity politics, such as Labour’s move to give co-governance of water infrastructure to Māori tribes. A reversal on this front is unlikely given the powerful business interests behind the tribes, which successive Labour and National governments have sought to cultivate.

New Zealand Herald politics commentator Bryce Edwards wrote that Hipkins would shift the government “to the right economically” while falsely claiming that such an agenda would resonate with the “average voter” and so-called “middle New Zealand”—the very people who are already suffering from the Ardern government’s right-wing policies.

In fact, while the political establishment lurches to the right, growing numbers of workers and young people are hostile to all the parliamentary parties and the capitalist system they uphold. Underlying Ardern’s departure and the increasing political instability, an historic class polarisation is underway in New Zealand, as is the case internationally, setting the stage for explosive class battles.

Pandemic deaths in China hit 700,000 since end of Zero-COVID policy, according to modeling estimates

Benjamin Mateus


New modeling estimates of COVID deaths in China since December 1, 2022, by Airfinity place the figure at over 700,000 fatalities since the Stalinist regime ended its Zero-COVID policy on December 1 in response to pressure from giant corporations and imperialist governments, particularly the United States.

Although the real scale of death and misery may never truly be known, this analysis nonetheless provides a horrific glimpse into the crisis befalling the Chinese working class.

Patients are checked as they arrive at an emergency hall of a hospital in Beijing, Thursday, January 19, 2023. [AP Photo/Andy Wong]

The figures on infections, deaths and the course of the outbreak by the British-based analytics firm Airfinity were recently revised and updated to take account of epidemiologic data from the more remote inland provinces. Airfinity is now forecasting one longer, more severe COVID wave as Chinese New Year travel will continue to fuel the outbreak that has spread across the country at unimaginable rates.

The group wrote on January 16, “Today’s new forecast considers reports that some provinces including Henan, Gansu, Qinghai, and Yunnan have already seen infections peak. Our analytics indicators suggest that the virus has spread more quickly to rural areas, partly driven by people traveling for the Chinese New Year celebrations. This increased growth rate has changed our forecast from predicting two successive waves to one larger and more severe wave.”

As China’s ministry of transport has noted, more than two billion passenger trips are likely to take place during the 40-day holiday season. Already on Saturday, the eve of the Chinese New Year, the Chinese media reported that more than 26 million passenger trips took place.

A majority of the travelers are thought to be migrant workers on their way home to visit families, many for the first time in the three years since the Wuhan lockdowns took effect and Zero COVID was implemented as the country’s official response to the coronavirus. There are real and justified fears that such travel will only entrench the virus deeper into Chinese society.

According to Airfinity’s calculations, COVID-19 infections could peak at 4.8 million per day, with more than 62 million infections estimated to occur in the latter half of January. Assuming a fatality rate similar to other countries, deaths would peak at 36,000 per day on January 26, with the New Year festivities well underway. The firm estimates that cumulative COVID-19 deaths as of January 20 stand at 708,000.

These figures imply that the health systems across China over the next several weeks can expect to face a more protracted and horrific wave. Dr. Matt Linley, Airfinity’s Analytics Director, said, “Our forecast estimates a significant burden on China’s healthcare system for the next fortnight and it is likely that many treatable patients could die due to overcrowded hospitals and lack of care.”

These estimates were corroborated by China’s chief epidemiologist at their Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Dr. Wu Zunyou, who said over the weekend that the current wave of infections “has already infected about 80 percent of the people,” or around 1.1 billion people.

However, these numbers haven’t fazed Chinese health authorities and their Stalinist bosses, who continue to downplay the current crisis that has swept across the country with unprecedented speed. Vice Premier Sun Chunlan said late last week, before the start of festivities, that the virus was at a “relatively low” level and that the number of critical patients in hospitals were in decline.

Major urban centers like Shanghai and Beijing continue to see patients being piled into crowded hospital rooms, hallways and lobbies waiting for treatment, while more people are pouring through the doors who had waited to see how their illness would proceed.

Circumstantial evidence of the ongoing catastrophe is palpable in the comments offered to the media. One woman speaking with an NBC News correspondent said, “Thirty-five people passed away the day before yesterday, right here. Since my mom was here, I’ve come here to see her every day. On the day my father moved into the hospital, almost all patients in the emergency department died.”

Many family members of the deceased have also been critical of the local governments and health systems for failing to acknowledge that the virus caused their deaths. The Financial Times noted that the “lower-than-expected figures” are due to “keeping COVID-19 off the death certificates.” Instead, the deaths are being attributed to pneumonia or heart disease or as unknown, if the deceased were brought in after having succumbed at home.

The clinical director at Raffles, a premier private hospital that caters to the wealthiest Chinese and high-ranking officials and whose pharmacies are stocked with Paxlovid, told the Economist that “local hospitals, especially ICUs, are full and we still seeing patients arriving with complications making it difficult to find ICU beds currently in Beijing. There are less patients but still a lot of serious cases and patients with complications are still arriving to the hospitals.”

The continuing crisis in Beijing, which has by far the most advanced health care resources available to it when compared to other regions of the country, means the consequences for rural and smaller metropolitan areas are nothing short of dire. For instance, Paxlovid, the anti-viral medication manufactured by Pfizer for prevention of severe disease, is known to be selling on the black market. It would cost an average Chinese worker two months of salary to procure these lifesaving treatments.

Many in rural China have access only to rudimentary health care and, if required, the severely afflicted require transport to townships where more up-to-date health systems are available. In other words, anyone infected is essentially left on their own to see if the course of their illness will take a fatal turn. People have to cope with their symptoms and hope for the best.

As the Economist noted, even in these rural areas, where symptomatic cases remain high and health systems are under strain, local residents have said that many have experienced COVID-19 recently from the massive surge in cases in December that washed across the country after the lifting of all mitigation measures.

David Rennie, the Economist’s bureau chief in Beijing, who recently visited a remote village in the central rural region of China in Henan province, wrote, “They talked about how everyone basically got sick in late December. The sheer speed of that wave, which I think was much faster than maybe we were expecting has clearly had a really brutal impact, although, we may never know exactly how many deaths … I spoke to a funeral worker who said he was three times busier than usual and at the crematorium … is handling 100 cremations a day and went up to 150 to 160 at the peak of the sicknesses. Before the pandemic, they were doing 30 or 40 cremations a day.”

He then added that doing the math means seeing hundreds or thousands of excess deaths for just the one county and then multiplying it by 66 times to account for the entire Henan Province. “You get some very big numbers very soon,” he observed.

Ben Cowling, chair professor of epidemiology in the School of Public Health in Hong Kong, said, “For the next two or three weeks, we know the virus is going to find its way to every last corner of the country. That means in rural areas they’re going to have lots of infections, most likely within a short space of time, and the impact may be greater because of that lack of resources.”

The rapidity with which the Chinese Communist Party has embraced the “herd immunity” policy and essentially forced the population to accept mass infection has been nothing short of a criminal policy of social murder. It is as though the Stalinist regime is seeking to catch up with the Western powers in infections and deaths, after having kept the virus out for the last three years and protected the lives of millions of people.

The demands placed by finance capital on China’s leadership were bound to supersede any nationally based public health policy aimed at maintaining Zero COVID.

In that regard, China’s Vice Premier Liu He’s appearance before the world’s billionaires at Davos to tell the world that China was open for business was a revealing indictment of the bureaucracy’s orientation. Without flinching, he told the elite audience, “Life has been restored to normal in China.”

Long wait times in emergency rooms lead to deaths and poor health outcomes across North America

Liz Cabrera


Hospitals throughout Canada and the United States have experienced an alarming surge of respiratory viruses in infants, children and adults, predominantly respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza and COVID-19. Hospitals in both countries have been operating at or above capacity for several months with no end in sight due to the homicidal “forever COVID” policy which has been overseen by the Trudeau Liberal government in Canada and the Biden administration in the United States. 

In this Thursday, August 19, 2021, photo, EMTs bring another patient to the Emergency Department in the Critical Care Unit at Asante Three Rivers Medical Center in Grants Pass, Oregon [AP Photo/Mike Zacchino/KDRV via AP, Pool]

The rapid spread of the XBB.1.5 Omicron subvariant across Canada and the United States is overwhelming an already stretched health care system. The risk of death and other serious health care outcomes from long wait times in emergency rooms (ERs) will increase due to lack of beds and staff and increased boarding time (the total time required to treat patients in the ER). Hospital staff are exhausted and suffering from moral injury and are leaving in droves, which will only exacerbate the shortage of health care workers. 

According to a report by the Canadian CBC News, ER deaths are at a six-year high in the province of Nova Scotia; 558 people died in ERs in 2022, up from 505 in 2021 and 393 in 2020. 

The most recent death was that of a 37-year-old woman who had sought medical treatment for excruciating abdominal pain at Cumberland Regional Health Care Centre in Amherst, Nova Scotia. The patient, Allison Holthoff, waited six hours in a wheelchair or lying on the floor in the waiting room before being brought into an exam room. Her husband, Gunter Holthoff, told CBC News that at one point he told medical staff that his spouse was not doing well, and she felt like she was dying, but there was no response or action. After more time passed the nurses prepared Allison for an X-ray, but she subsequently went into cardiac arrest before the test could be performed. She was resuscitated three times but later died in the intensive care unit. 

The day before Allison Holthoff’s death, 67-year-old Charlene Snow died after returning home following a seven-hour wait in the ER at the Cape Breton Regional Hospital. Snow had been ill for several days with intense jaw pain and flu-like symptoms before seeking treatment, but left without being seen. Snow suffered a cardiac arrest and died an hour after leaving the hospital, according to Global News.

According to the Annual Accountability Report, in 2021-2022 there were 536,666 total visits to emergency departments (EDs) across Nova Scotia and during this same time period 43,142 patients (8.0 percent) who visited EDs left without being seen (LWBS) by staff at an ED. The EDs with the greatest number of patients LWBS are South Shore Regional (15.0 percent) and Cape Breton Regional (14.8 percent), the hospital where Charlene Snow sought medical care. 

The head of emergency medicine for Halifax, Nova Scotia, Dr. Kirk Magee, recently told Global News that emergency care was “in a state of crisis” amid a shortage of nurses, physicians and hospital beds, and an increased volume of patients with complex needs. The shortage of primarily nursing staff has forced closure of ERs across Canada, causing more pressure on an already collapsing health system. 

In addition to the nursing shortage, there is a shortage of primary care physicians which has increased the use of ERs for chronic medical issues. According to Nova Scotia Health, as of January 1, 2023, 129,321 Nova Scotians are on the family practice registry, that is 13 percent of the population are looking for a family practice physician. 

Similar situations are unfolding in ERs across the United States. Shortages in staff and beds and increased boarding are plaguing emergency departments around the country and contributing to long wait times. 

On October 14, 2022, 12-year-old Meiah Tafoya was brought to Presbyterian Hospital in Albuquerque, New Mexico for a fracture she sustained from a fall at school. Meiah waited 10 hours before she was told by staff that she could not be adequately treated at Presbyterian Hospital and would need to be transferred to another hospital. She was transferred to University of New Mexico Hospital where she underwent four surgeries which included the amputation of her injured leg. 

In another tragic incident, 23-year-old William “Billy” Miller died in the ER after being transported to Yale New Haven Hospital in Connecticut after ingesting a white, powdery substance he believed was laced with fentanyl. The patient was given naloxone, a medication that reverses opioid overdose, by firefighters and then transferred to New Haven ER where he was designated a Level 2 patient, meaning staff were required to reassess him every hour. According to a press report, hospital staff did not check on him for seven hours and he was later found to be in full cardiac arrest.

Decades of research have long demonstrated that overcrowding in E’s can lead to worse outcomes for patients receiving emergency treatment, and this overcrowding impacts patients in other areas of the hospital as well.  

In an article published last month in the journal Health Services Research, researchers from Penn State and the University of California, San Francisco examined five million discharge records from hospitals across California between October 2015 and the end of 2017. They found that patients throughout a hospital were 5.4 percent more likely to die of any cause on days when that hospital’s emergency department was the most crowded.

The researchers note that since the causes of death have not yet been explored, it is too early to say whether people are dying because of emergency room crowding. Still, the results show that more people at the hospitals die when the emergency rooms fill up. 

Moreover, since the data was collected in California, where legislation regulates the minimum staffing levels for nurses, the impact of ED overcrowding in other states is likely even greater. This data was also collected prior to the pandemic. One can assume that the overwhelmed emergency departments during the pandemic, and now with the confluence of multiple respiratory viruses, have only resulted in even higher rates of inpatient deaths at hospitals.

The overlapping surge of multiple viruses circulating in the population could have been prevented. There were numerous warnings by experts months before but nothing was done to prepare. 

The unfolding tragedy is a consequence of the “herd immunity” and “forever COVID” policy now pursued by both the Biden administration and the Trudeau Liberal government which over the past year have systematically dismantled all anti-COVID protection measures based on science.

The capitalist policy of prioritizing corporate profit over every other social need has produced horrific results for which the recent ED deaths and poor outcomes are only one aspect. All public health measures during the pandemic have been subordinated to the profit interests of corporations, resulting in the unnecessary loss of millions of lives.