29 Jan 2025

Turkish Erdoğan government crackdown on political opposition and journalists escalates

Barış Demir & Hasan Yıldırım


Pro-opposition Halk TV journalist Barış Pehlivan, anchor Seda Selek, presenter Seda Selek and the channel’s managing director Serhan Asker were detained on Tuesday in Turkey, while programme coordinator Kürşat Oğuz and editor-in-chief Suat Toktaş were detained on Wednesday over a programme broadcast by Halk.

Selek and Asker were released on judicial control conditions, while Pehlivan, Oğuz and Toktaş were requested to be arrested.

Journalist Barış Pehlivan participating in the panel "Freedom of the Press is for All of Us" organised by Manisa Municipality as part of the Working Journalists' Day on 10 January 2025. [Photo: X / @manisabsb]

The journalists are accused of influencing the judiciary by broadcasting their interview with an expert appointed for investigations related to the Republican People’s Party (CHP) and made public by Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu (CHP).

İmamoğlu is seen as the favourite candidate against President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in a possible presidential election. New investigations have recently been opened against İmamoğlu, who is currently facing the risk of being banned from politics due to an indefinite judgement.

Ten professional organisations, including the Association of Journalists, issued a statement condemning the detention of the journalists. “This month alone, 14 journalists have been arrested... Today, instead of standing up for freedom of the press and freedom of expression, the political establishment, the government and, unfortunately, the judiciary are acting as an instrument of threat and a mechanism of intimidation against journalists,” the statement said.

The latest crackdown on journalists comes as the Erdoğan government steps up operations against the CHP as well as the Kurdish nationalist Peoples’ Equality and Democracy Party (DEM Party), and left-wing parties such as the Socialist Party of the Oppressed (ESP) and the Socialist Labourers Party. On Wednesday, a trustee was appointed to the DEM Party-run Siirt municipality, while 34 members of the ESP, including its leader, were arrested last week. This brings to eight the number of DEM Party’s municipalities where unconstitutional trustees have been appointed since the March 2024 elections.

The increasing repression of the Erdoğan government is part of a worldwide tendency of the ruling classes to turn to authoritarian regimes under conditions of imperialist war and growing social inequality. Ankara faces growing opposition from the working class at home as it fights for a share in the war of plunder in the Middle East, deepened by the genocide in Gaza and regime change in Syria.

After winning every election since 2002, Erdoğan’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) came second to the CHP for the first time in the local elections in March last year and is still trailing in the polls. While the CHP did not campaign on workers’ social grievances, including the rising cost of living, or on Israel’s NATO-backed genocide in Gaza, it was an undeserving beneficiary of the growing anger against the government on these issues.

As government repression escalated after the local elections, CHP leader Özgür Özel initiated a process of “détente” and “normalization” with Erdoğan. The DEM party then became part of a new “peace process” with Erdoğan on the Kurdish question, amid a growing crackdown on elected mayors. The negotiations, in which Abdullah Öcalan, the imprisoned leader of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), plays an important role, aim, as in previous attempts, to ensure the reactionary alliance of the Turkish and Kurdish bourgeoisies in the reshaping of the Middle East under the leadership of US imperialism.

The latest wave of repression by the government shows the bankruptcy of all perspectives that attribute a progressive role to this or that faction of the bourgeoisie. Already last May, the Socialist Equality Group declared that the claims of the bourgeois opposition that “peace and democracy” would be developed on the basis of reconciliation with the Erdoğan government are a fraud, stating:

At the heart of this ruling class consensus, of which the trade union bureaucracy is a part, is the need to intensify the social offensive against the working class and to suppress social opposition from below. In conditions where, on the one hand, NATO-backed Israel is intensifying the genocide in Gaza and provoking a Middle East-wide war against Iran, and, on the other hand, NATO-backed Ukraine’s war with Russia is raising the danger of a nuclear conflict, war abroad is everywhere accompanied by class war and the elimination of democratic rights at home.

Perspectives based on an orientation towards and alliance with this or that political faction of the Turkish and Kurdish bourgeoisie and the upper middle class, which are deeply linked to NATO and imperialism, and which put forward false nationalist solutions under capitalism, are bankrupt.

The increasing pressure and investigations against CHP started at the end of October with the arrest of Istanbul Esenyurt Mayor Prof. Dr. Ahmet Özer, on charges of “being a member of PKK/KCK armed terrorist organisation”, and the appointment of a trustee in his place. Two weeks ago, Istanbul Beşiktaş Mayor Rıza Akpolat was arrested on corruption charges. At the same time, following Erdoğan’s order, some CHP municipality accounts have been levied on the pretext of paying social security premium debts.

CHP leader Özgür Özel announced on Tuesday his party’s roadmap against these developments. Özel’s statement was in preparation for early elections to be held in 2025. He announced the CHP’s presidential candidates would be İmamoğlu and Ankara Metropolitan Mayor Mansur Yavaş.

The repression of political opposition and journalists is increasing in the context of the deepening social offensive of the bourgeoisie against the working class. The government’s fiscal policy and attacks on wages and social rights have brought the social anger within the working class to the point of explosion.

Despite the rising cost of living, in July the government refused to raise the minimum wage, which determines the wages of the majority of the working class. In December, the minimum wage was raised by only 30 percent, below the official inflation rate. In December, Turkey’s official annual inflation rate was 44 percent, while ENAG, an independent research organisation, calculated annual inflation at 83 percent.

For the working class, the fall in real wages is accompanied by rising taxes. According to the November budget implementation report of the Ministry of Treasury and Finance, the tax collected from companies in the period January-November this year increased by 13.5 percent compared to the same period last year, while the tax collected from workers increased by 119.8 percent.

In these conditions of explosive class and political tensions, the government’s wave of politically motivated arrests has extended to the film industry. Actress manager Ayşe Barım, who was recently detained on charges of “monopolising the sector”, was arrested on Monday.

Barım is accused of “aiding and abetting an attempt to overthrow the government or prevent it from carrying out its duties” by organising artists and actors during the anti-government Gezi Park protests in 2013, which attracted millions of people across the country. The charges against Barım also include “influence campaigning”, which is on the government’s agenda to implement but does not yet exist in law.

The resurrection of the Gezi Park trial and the recent increase in police state repression is a sign that any democratic opposition to the government and mass protests will be criminalised and violently suppressed. This is above all a threat to the working class, which is seen as the main threat by the ruling class.

The leader of the fascist Nationalist Movement Party, Devlet Bahçeli, clearly expressed this threat in his speech on Tuesday with the following words: “We are aware that the calls to take to the streets, the provocations for resistance are invitations to either a coup or a rebellion... If you have the courage, take to the streets and we’ll see. If you have the curiosity to play with fire, try it and we’ll see how you fare.”

28 Jan 2025

Information Controls Fellowship Program

Application Deadline:

The application deadline is February 28, 2025.

Tell Me About The Information Controls Fellowship Program For Researchers:

The Information Controls Fellowship Program (ICFP) supports researchers investigating the restrictions governments impose on the free flow of information, cutting access to the open internet, and implementing censorship mechanisms that threaten basic human rights and democracy. The program also supports work focused on mitigating these threats. Fellows work full-time with a host organization of their choosing for a period of 3 to 12 months, conducting research, producing outputs, and collaborating on creative solutions to address internet censorship and surveillance.

Which Fields are Eligible?

The fellowship is open to a wide range of disciplines, including but not limited to:

  • Computer science
  • Engineering
  • Information security research
  • Software development
  • Social sciences
  • Law
  • Data visualization

Type:

Fellowship 

Who can Apply for the Information Controls Fellowship Program For Researchers?

The eligibility criteria include:

  • Applicants of all ages, irrespective of nationality, residency, creed, gender, or other factors, with the exception of individuals from countries with U.S. trade restrictions or export sanctions.
  • Individuals must demonstrate the ability to assist in overcoming information controls and a desire to grow their knowledge through a collaborative, cross-discipline approach.
  • A commitment to reaching audiences outside of the research community is required.

How are Applicants Selected?

  • The proposed project must be relevant to internet freedom and censorship, with an emphasis on addressing issues in the world’s most repressive environments.
  • Applicants should have a track record of expertise in the field, demonstrated ability to execute the proposed project, and an interest in engaging with a diverse, global community.
  • Preference is given to applicants from or with experience in repressive censorship environments, particularly in the Global South, or those focusing on underrepresented or targeted minority groups.

Required Documents:

  • CV or resume

Which Countries Are Eligible?

All countries 

Where will the Award be Taken?

Fellows will work full-time with their chosen host organization, which may be located anywhere globally. Remote work may also be considered.

How Many Awards?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of the Information Controls Fellowship Program For Researchers?

Additionally, the benefits include:

  • Monthly stipend of $7,000 USD
  • Travel stipend of $1,250 to $5,000 USD, depending on the fellowship length
  • Equipment stipend of $1,250 to $5,000 USD, depending on the fellowship length

How Long Will the Award Last?

The fellowship lasts for 3, 6, 9, or 12 months, with the possibility of extensions depending on the project’s progress and funding availability.

How to Apply:

The application process is two-stage:

  1. Stage 1: Submit a concept note via the OTF’s online application system.
  2. Stage 2: Invited applicants submit a full proposal along with their proposed host organization.

Visit the official application webpage

The Government Of Latvia Scholarship

Application Deadline:

The application deadline is from 1 February to 1 April 1

Tell Me About The Government Of Latvia Scholarship For International Students:

The Latvian government offers state scholarships to citizens of over 30 eligible countries for pursuing higher in Latvian institutions. These scholarships aim to support Bachelor’s, Master’s, and PhD students in their academic endeavors. In addition to scholarships for full-degree programs, funding is also available for participation in summer schools organized by Latvian higher education institutions.

Which Fields are Eligible?

All fields

Type:

Scholarship 

Who can Apply For The Government Of Latvia Scholarship For International Students?

To be eligible, you must meet the following criteria:

  • Bachelor’s applicants must have successfully completed at least one academic year at a higher education institution (HEI).
  • Master’s and PhD applicants must be enrolled in a previous HEI.
  • Applicants must secure admission to a program at a Latvian HEI and receive confirmation for the chosen study program before applying.
  • Applicants already studying in Latvia must provide confirmation of their current or new study program.
  • Scholarships are available for up to two terms during a student’s study period.

How are Applicants Selected?

Applications are evaluated based on criteria set by the evaluation committee of VIAA. Only complete and correctly submitted applications are considered. Applicants will receive the scholarship decision by email in June, and it will also be accessible in their online profile.

Required Documents:

Applicants are also to submit the following:

  • Completed application form.
  • Confirmation letter from a Latvian higher education institution (HEI).
  • Curriculum Vitae (CV).
  • Motivation letter.
  • Study plan.
  • Recommendation letter(s).
  • Academic transcripts and diplomas.
  • Language proficiency certificate (if applicable).
  • Passport copy.

Which Countries Are Eligible?

The following countries are eligible:

  • Europe: Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium (Federation Wallonia-Brussels), Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine
  • Asia: Israel, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, South Korea, Tajikistan, The People’s Republic of China, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Turkey, Indonesia
  • North America: The United States of America, Mexico
  • South America: Peru
  • Africa: Egypt, Namibia, Senegal, Ethiopia, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Liberia
  • Oceania: Fiji

Where will the Award be Taken?

Higher Institutions in Latvia

How Many Awards?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of the Government Of Latvia Scholarship For International Students?

Additionally, the government of Latvia scholarship comes with the following benefits:

  • €500 per month for Bachelor’s students (and 2nd level professional higher education students in the 1st–3rd study year).
  • €600 per month for Master’s students (and 2nd level professional higher education students starting from the 4th study year).
  • €700 per month for PhD students.
  • Summer school participants benefit from scholarship funds transferred directly to the organizers, though travel, insurance, and visa expenses must be covered personally.

How Long Will the Award Last?

  • Up to 10 months for Bachelor’s and Master’s students.
  • Up to 11 months for PhD students.

How to Apply:

  1. Applicants must register in the electronic application system and create a profile with a unique login and password.
  2. Fill out the online application form based on the specified criteria.
  3. Attach all necessary application documents (translated into Latvian or English).
  4. Submit the application before the deadline (1 February to 1 April).
  5. Await the decision, which will be communicated via email and the online profile in June.

Visit the official application page.

Trade war could erupt between US and EU over Trump’s threat to seize Greenland

Jordan Shilton


Tensions remain high between the Trump administration and Denmark following the new US president’s repeated threats to seize control of Greenland. The geopolitical and economic significance of who enjoys control over the self-governing Danish territory makes the eruption of a trade war between Europe and the United States a real possibility.

Although Trump did not explicitly refer to Greenland in his inauguration speech on 20 January, Danish commentators took note of the fact that he declared, “The United States will once again consider itself a growing nation — one that increases our wealth, expands our territory, builds our cities, raises our expectations, and carries our flag into new and beautiful horizons.”

President Trump Meets with the Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Denmark, 2019. [Photo: US Government / Flickr]

In an exchange with reporters later at the White House, Trump stated, “Greenland is a wonderful place. We need it for international security. And I’m sure that Denmark will come along… Greenland is necessary not for us, it’s necessary for international security. You have Russian boats all over the place, you have China’s boats all over the place – warships – and they [Denmark] can’t maintain it.”

US imperialism has long viewed Greenland as critical for geopolitical and security reasons. It has enjoyed a military presence there for over 80 years, and its Thule air base (now rebranded the Pituffik Space Base) was a key operational centre for its ballistic missiles and served as a store for nuclear weapons during the Cold War. Its position between North America and Russia in the Arctic means that Greenland’s military significance is growing under conditions of a rapidly escalating third world war pursued by US imperialism to retain its global hegemony.

Greenland’s importance is also bound up with the abundance of natural resources it possesses that are critical for building modern weaponry to wage war and dominating key economic sectors, and its proximity to Arctic sea lanes that are rapidly opening up for freight transportation due to climate change.

Earlier in January, Trump warned that he could not rule out using economic and military force to back up his claims for Greenland and the Panama Canal. Trump then held a 45-minute telephone call with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen on 15 January, during which he reportedly threatened to impose severe tariffs on Danish exports to the US. America is Denmark’s largest export market, having overtaken Germany in recent years. During the first eleven months of 2024, it accounted for over 17 percent of all Danish exports, which are predominantly medical supplies, vaccines, and maritime transportation, mainly through shipping giant Mærsk.

US journalist and author Ann Applebaum, who was in Copenhagen the day after Trump’s call with Frederiksen, wrote in The Atlantic, “In private discussions, the adjective that was most frequently used to describe the Trump phone call was rough. The verb most frequently used was threaten.” A Financial Times report Friday described the call, based on information from five EU sources, as having plunged Denmark into “crisis mode.”

Frederiksen and much of the Danish political establishment have done their best to downplay the tensions, stressing their desire for continued close collaboration with Washington. Frederiksen’s government, a coalition of her Social Democrats with the right-wing Liberal (Venstre) and Moderate parties, has reaffirmed its determination to increase defence spending and expand Denmark’s military presence in the Arctic.

Foreign Minister and Moderate leader Lars Løkke Rasmussen held a 20-minute phone call with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday focusing on Ukraine, Denmark’s role in NATO, and the Middle East. He stressed that the discussion, which reportedly avoided raising Greenland at Washington’s request, took place in a “good and constructive tone.” Rasmussen added that Denmark is prepared to contribute more to NATO, but ruled out for the time being meeting Trump’s demand of spending 5 percent of GDP on defence.

In December, just hours after Trump declared that controlling Greenland was an “absolute necessity” for the US, Danish Defence Minister Troels Lund Poulsen revealed a major expansion of defence spending for military operations in Greenland. The package, estimated to be worth between 12 and 15 billion kroner (about €1.7 to €2.1 billion), includes purchasing two long-range drones and two military inspection ships, and upgrading an airport on the island’s west coast so it can accommodate US-built F-35 fighter jets.

Improbably describing the timing of the decision as “an irony of fate,” Poulsen added, “We have not invested enough in the Arctic for many years, now we are planning a stronger presence.”

Poulsen declared in a Facebook post last week that he expects the Arctic spending package will be the first of many, and that the 200 billion kroner in additional military spending planned on top of Denmark’s regular military budget between 2024 and 2033 should be increased potentially by as much as 300 billion kroner. “It’s not a question of if we can find the money. The money will be found,” he declared.

While Copenhagen wants to consolidate its Arctic presence by expanding military operations in Greenland, Trump and his far-right allies are consciously exploiting the long-standing push for Greenland’s independence from Denmark. A Danish colony from the early 18th to the mid 20th century, Greenland secured limited home rule only in 1979. Powers were expanded in a 2009 self-government agreement with Copenhagen that spelt out the path for full independence.

Opposition to Danish rule grew steadily during the second half of the 20th century, and has been fueled by revelations of colonial-era and post-colonial abuses, including the sterilisation of Greenlandic girls, the forced resettlement of local populations, and attempts at cultural assimilation. However, full independence has been viewed as a long-term goal even by most of its advocates, principally because Greenland relies on an annual block grant from Copenhagen of about 5 billion kroner (€700 million) to pay for its public services and social welfare programmes.

Some now hope they can replace this source of finance by cutting deals with US mining and oil firms to exploit the island’s natural resources. The Trump-aligned Fox News last week gave airtime to Greenland’s Prime Minister, Mute Egede, to explain his commitment to Greenlandic independence. Egede’s government, led by the pro-independence Inuit Ataqatigiit party, is scheduled to call parliamentary elections by April 2025 at the latest. Although the 2009 self-government agreement with Denmark includes the provision that Greenland can call an independence referendum, which in the event of a “yes” vote would be submitted for approval to the Danish parliament, Egede has yet to present a timeframe for calling such a vote.

The last thing on the minds of the political establishments on both sides of the Atlantic is the fate of Greenland’s tiny population of about 57,000. While Trump expresses most aggressively American imperialism’s demand for territorial expansion as it seeks to offset its precipitous economic decline through the use of military force around the world, the European imperialists are responding by ruthlessly enforcing their own class interests in the deepening capitalist crisis.

Governments in Germany and France, and the European Union, can hardly pose as upholders of democratic rights and the “rule of law” after they have backed Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza to the hilt, and provided tens of billions of dollars of military and financial assistance to the dictatorial Zelensky regime in Ukraine as it sends hundreds of thousands of young men to their deaths and imprisons opponents of the US-NATO war on Russia.

What outrages Berlin, Paris, and Copenhagen about Trump’s menacing threats is that America’s seizure of Greenland could cut the European imperialists out of exploiting the rich natural resources and emerging trade routes of the Arctic.

Senior EU officials have indicated that if Trump imposes tariffs on Denmark, Brussels could invoke the Anti-Coercion Instrument, a trade rule adopted initially against China that would allow the EU to respond as a bloc to hostile trade measures adopted by a third country against an EU member state. The ACI “gives the EU a wide range of possible countermeasures when a country refuses to remove the coercion,” including “the imposition of tariffs, restrictions on trade in services and trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights, and restrictions on access to foreign direct investment and public procurement.”

However, the EU’s response would be hampered by sharp divisions within Europe itself, with the least likely scenario being that all member states would be prepared to adopt a hardline stance towards Trump. The US President enjoys strong support among the continent’s far-right governments of Hungary and Italy, among others.

Greenland could also emerge as a military flashpoint as the major European powers seek to defend their interests in the Arctic in the face of Trump’s aggressive push to seize the island for the US. In an interview with Germany’s Welt am Sonntag, Austrian General Robert Brieger, who heads the EU’s Military Committee, suggested that EU soldiers could be deployed alongside Americans in Greenland in the future. Greenland is not an EU member, having left the bloc in 1985, but it retains the status of an associated overseas country or territory. The deployment of EU soldiers would therefore be no less provocative than Trump’s sending of American troops.

DeepSeek shock wave hits Wall Street

Nick Beams


US tech companies, Wall Street and the political and military establishment have been delivered a major blow with the announcement by a small Chinese startup company, DeepSeek, that it is able to develop an advanced AI system without the most advanced chips produced in the US and at much less cost.

The logo for the app DeepSeek [AP Photo/Jon Elswick]

On January 20, DeepSeek introduced R1, a model for solving complex problems. It explained that it had developed a so-called large language model (LLM) which could learn and improve itself without human supervision using lower-level technology and at lower cost. The model was open source, meaning that the process by which it was developed can be followed.

According to the Wall Street Journal: “Specialists said DeepSeek’s technology still trails that of OpenAI and Google. But it is a close rival using fewer and less-advanced chips, and in some cases skipping steps that US developers consider essential.”

Marc Andreessen, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist who has been advising Trump, said on X on Friday: “DeepSeek R1 is one of the most amazing and impressive breakthroughs I’ve ever seen.”

He called its development “AI’s Sputnik moment,” likening it to the Soviet Union’s launch of the first satellite to circle the earth in 1957, an event which shocked the US.

A week after its model was released and assessed, a shock wave hit Wall Street in trading on Monday.

Shares in Nvidia, the leading US manufacturer of advanced AI chips, which has been at the centre of Wall Street’s high-tech boom, plunged by almost 17 percent. The company lost around $600 billion in market value, more than double the previous record it held for a single-day fall and the biggest for any company in history.

Broadcom, another AI-based stock dropped by 17 percent. The S&P 500 closed 1.5 percent lower and the tech-heavy NASDAQ dropped 3 percent.

Other companies, not directly involved in AI but connected to its development, were also hit. Siemens Energy, which supplies electrical hardware for AI infrastructure, dropped 20 percent and Schneider Electrical which supplies power products used in data centres fell 9.5 percent.

The DeepSeek breakthrough, if it is sustained and some are calling it into question, threatens to upend the major investment plans of the leading US AI firms. Nvidia has said that it expects what the Financial Times (FT) calls the “data centre building frenzy” to continue to at least the end of the decade.

Luca Paolini, chief strategist at Picet Asset Management, told the FT the DeepSeek development showed “how vulnerable the AI trade still is, like every trade that is consensus and based on the assumption of an unassailable lead.”

The AI boom on the stock market began after the release of ChatGPT at the end of 2022. From the start of 2023 the NASDAQ index has risen by 92 percent, an increase in market capitalisation of $14 trillion which has shoveled tens, if not hundreds, of billions into the portfolios of tech company founders and chef executives. In Monday’s trading the index lost market capitalisation of $1 trillion. The arrival of DeepSeek has raised major concerns.

As an article on Bloomberg noted: “Suddenly, a rally predicated on US AI dominance turned into a question of whether the hundreds of billions in AI investments would ever lead to profits large enough to justify the rich valuations afforded to Megacap stocks. The group makes up 30 percent of the S&P 500 by weighting, more than at any time in history.”

Comments from a number of analysts and executives cited by Bloomberg, pointed to the development of a sea change in AI and the market boom it has promoted.

Max Gokhman, senior vice president at Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions, said: “Today’s moves show just how precarious this market set up is. When valuations stretch to the sky it’s easier for small trembles to make the entire market rumble.”

Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at the wealth management firm Union Bancaire Privee, said: “DeepSeek shows that it is possible to develop powerful AI models that cost less. It can potentially derail the investment case for the entire AI supply chain, which is driven by high spending from a small handful of hyperscalers.”

Paul Nolte, a senior market strategist at a wealth management firm, said he did not know whether this was a “Sputnik Moment” for stocks but it was a wake-up call that the US was “not the only game in town.”

“That requires a lot of investors to look at the AI companies in a different way: To put these very high valuations in stocks thinking they have cornered the market is a huge mistake and that is being re-rated.”

The DeepSeek development, has major political implications. Trump has declared that the US is the global leader in AI and its development and monopolisation is central to his Make America Great Again project aimed at ensuring American dominance over the global economy, and above all the suppression of China.

The attack on the technological development of China, which began in the first Trump administration and was considerably intensified under Biden, has centred on imposing export bans on high-end computer chips on the grounds of “national security.”

But even before the DeepSeek announcement there have been clear indications that not only has this policy been failing but it may have even pushed forward Chinese high-tech development.

Last year the Chinese phone and telecommunications company, Huawei, which was nearly put out of business by bans imposed under the first Trump administration, released a phone which more than adequately rivalled those of its competitors. It involved the development of a new chip which had been considered very difficult.

China is already the global leader in photovoltaics, crucial for solar panels, and is fast becoming the world leader in electric vehicles if it is not already.

Now the question will arise in the US political and military establishment as to whether this might occur in AI.

As Mitul Kotecha, head of emerging markets macro and foreign exchange strategy at Barclays told the FT: “It seems as if there is a bit of reality dawning that China has not been sitting idle, even as these tariffs and investment restrictions on tech companies have been put in place.”

Notwithstanding the impact of the tech bans, and they have been significant, Chinese companies have been able to draw on the capacities and ingenuity of the tens of thousands of graduates who come out of colleges and universities every year.

There is, as yet, no public response from the Pentagon or other sections of the military and intelligence establishment to the DeepSeek development. But no doubt it will be subject to careful study because AI is regarded as an existential issue for the maintenance of US dominance. And the conclusion will be drawn that if the measures imposed so far have not been effective, then others must be developed, including outright military methods.

ICE escalates raids across the US after Trump demands 1,500 immigrant arrests per day

Kevin Reed



US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers use a chain to restrain a detained person, Monday, January 27, 2025, in Silver Spring, Maryland [AP Photo/Alex Brandon]

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers dramatically increased daily arrests of immigrants in cities across the US beginning on Sunday under orders from the Trump White House.

In a meeting on Saturday, Trump administration officials demanded quotas for ICE arrests be raised from a few hundred to between 1,200 and 1,500 people per day. A report in the Washington Post said the increase was demanded “because the president has been disappointed with the results of his mass deportation campaign so far, according to four people with knowledge of the briefings.”

The Post report also said, “The quotas were outlined Saturday in a call with senior ICE officials, who were told that each of the agency’s field offices should make 75 arrests per day and managers would be held accountable for missing those targets.”

Prior to the new quotas, the daily number of immigrants being arrested by the Biden administration was 311 people on average.

ICE reported 956 people had been arrested on Sunday by multiple federal police agencies in cities, including Chicago, Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Diego, Denver, Miami, Atlanta and major cities in northern Texas.

While the president and his fascist border czar Tom Homan are claiming that the raids are “enhanced targeted operations” aimed at “keeping potentially dangerous criminal aliens out of our communities,” it is clear the arrests are being carried out indiscriminately and the up to five-fold increase will intensify this fact.

In an example of the blatantly racist tactics being utilized by immigration authorities—which exposes the fundamentally undemocratic character of the entire operation—Navajo Nation Council Speaker Crystalyne Curley reported that at least 15 Indigenous people in Arizona and New Mexico have reported being stopped and asked to produce proof of citizenship. Some of these US citizens in tribal communities have also been detained.

A press release issued by the Office of Navajo President Buu Nygren on Friday said, “My office has received multiple reports from Navajo citizens that they have had negative, and sometimes traumatizing, experiences with federal agents targeting undocumented immigrants in the Southwest.”

Other reports have shown that the raids are above all aimed at intimidating and terrorizing immigrant families and communities as part of the Trump administration’s campaign to scapegoat immigrants for the crisis of American and world capitalism.

In the Chicago area, ABC Eyewitness News said a woman reported that her father, who had been in the US for 30 years, was arrested at his home in Waukegan. Yelitza Marquina explained that the seizure of her father happened under apparently false pretenses. “They (family members) opened the door because they thought maybe one of us was in trouble or something happened to us. Never did they think it was ICE.”

In another example of the despicable role of media personalities in the ICE offensive, “Dr. Phil” McGraw has been permitted to “embed” with ICE officers during raids in Chicago. The purpose of the ride-along by the former psychologist, who rose to television fame alongside Oprah Winfrey, is to bolster the Trump administration’s claims that only “known criminals and terrorists” are being targeted by ICE.

In Miami, CBS News interviewed an unidentified man who said ICE had taken his wife during a raid in the neighborhood of Brownsville. The man said his wife of 11 years was from Venezuela and had a court date scheduled to complete a three-year process of getting her US citizenship. He said, “everything was good” until ICE showed up. “They just came, and they snatched her,” he said.

In Los Angeles, Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) officials mobilized their forces to assist the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in carrying out the crackdown in the fire ravaged city. Matthew Allen, special agent in charge of the DEA’s LA field division, posted photos on social media showing DEA agents, who were masked, armed and dressed in paramilitary fatigues, deployed in a residential area.

In Texas, ICE representatives confirmed to the Texas Newsroom that raids were underway across the northern cities of Dallas, Irving, Arlington, Fort Worth, Garland and Collin County. The statement said that 84 people had been arrested in North Texas and the state of Oklahoma, and they were taken to ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations field office in Dallas for processing.

Targeted operations were also carried out in Austin and the Rio Grande Valley. In Austin, ICE was supported by DEA agents from Houston. However, details on the number of arrests or where they were carried out have not been reported.

On Sunday afternoon, protesters gathered at the Texas State Capitol in response to the raids in Austin. One protester told KXAN, “They are the epitome of the American Dream. They’ve come here and worked hard. They have a right to be here just like anyone else who has fled a country that doesn’t provide the needs of the citizens.”

A demonstration against the ICE raids was also held in Omaha, Nebraska, near 24th and L streets in the south of the city, as reported by KETV 7 ABC.

It is not clear what kind of process those who have been arrested will face. It is being widely reported that anyone who is merely undocumented—a civil, not criminal, infraction—and picked up in the raids will be deported, along with those authorities claim who have committed crimes in the US.

Also, US military aircraft are being used to fly groups of immigrants back to their home countries. CNN reported from Guatemala City on Monday about two flights by US military planes that had landed with migrants who had been deported.

Numerous Democrats have been interviewed on CNN about the vicious attacks on immigrant workers and their families. Not one has disputed the assertions of the fascist Trump and his cabinet officials that the US has been invaded by “drug dealers, criminals and rapists.”

Far from it, the Democrats argue that Trump has a “moral obligation” to protect those who are innocent, while also consistently supporting the pretext that “criminals” must be arrested and deported. This amounts to an endorsement of an unprecedented assault on the basic rights of the most vulnerable sections of the working class.

27 Jan 2025

Australian governments exposed for human rights violations on youth detention

Eric Ludlow


Global NGO Human Rights Watch (HRW) has in its World Report 2025 slammed Australian state and territory governments for human rights violations including the treatment of children in the criminal justice system.

Governments in Australia have adopted a “tough on crime” stance to counter a supposed youth “crime wave.” 

Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk’s Labor government on August 24, 2023, amended the Youth Justice Act to legitimise locking up children in adult cells. [Photo: Australian Human Rights Commission]

In reality, youth crime is on the decrease and the policies of governments to incarcerate young people—particularly those from impoverished backgrounds—is part of a wholesale assault on the democratic rights of working-class people.

The age of criminal responsibility is just 10 in New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Western Australia (WA) and the Northern Territory (NT). In August, the Victorian Labor government abandoned plans to raise the age of criminal responsibility to 14. Instead, it has raised it to just 12.

The only jurisdiction in the country with a criminal age of responsibility of 14 years is the Australian Capital Territory. That is the minimum recommended by the UN. Children younger than the age of criminal responsibility cannot be charged or prosecuted.

According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, more than 700 children between 10 and 17 years old were in detention in 2022–2023. That number has likely ballooned further. About 60 percent of the children imprisoned across the country are indigenous.

Among the detained youth are many who are kept in adult jails. 

The WA government has detained children in Unit 18—a wing of the maximum-security Casuarina Prison. In September 2023, a 17-year-old Aboriginal boy, Cleveland Dodd, committed suicide after being incarcerated at Unit 18 and the Banksia Hill youth detention centre. He was regularly subjected to solitary confinement.

The situation in the NT is the most shocking.

There, the prison population has skyrocketed to more than 2,600 this month following the imposition of the lower age of criminal responsibility. The prison population has nearly doubled since 2012 when it was 1,413. The number of people in NT prisons is more than 1 percent of the territory’s population which is about 255,000.

Around 89 percent of the prison population in NT is indigenous. This is despite the territory’s indigenous people only making up 26 percent of the total population. This is the outcome of the centuries-long oppression of Aboriginal people under Australian capitalism. Many live in poverty with little to no access to healthcare, education and social welfare. They are the most oppressed section of the working class.

If the Northern Territory were a separate country, it would have the second highest incarceration rate in the world—behind only El Salvador—according to the World Population Review. 

This extraordinary situation is the responsibility of both Labor and conservative governments. Labor held office from 2016 until last August, as the incarceration rate consistently increased, before suffering a major election defeat, substantially resulting from popular anger over the massive cost-of-living and social crisis.

The next highest imprisonment rate in Australia is WA which has 0.2 percent of its population behind bars.

Across the NT’s prisons and work camps, there are 2,177 beds. This means that there is an overflow of hundreds of prisoners currently being held in police watch houses. Australian Human Rights Commissioner Lorraine Finlay also found that rising prisoner overcrowding and overheating—problems across the country—are acute in the NT.

The government has begun work to add up to 1,000 new beds to NT prisons by 2028. This includes reopening the Don Dale youth detention centre as the Berrimah adult jail to house 200 adult prisoners by March. Done Dale was exposed in 2014 as a site where children were tortured and inhumanely treated, shocking workers and youth across the country.

Earlier this month, NT chief minister Lia Finocchiaro claimed that more arrests meant “safer streets.”

Legal advocates have slammed the “tough on crime” policies of NT and other governments.

“Law and order posturing about punishment, power and control has never worked before and it won’t work now,” National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Services chair Karly Warner said in September.

A report in September 2022 by the Justice Reform Initiative found that nearly three-quarters of people in the NT’s prisons have been in prison before.

In other words, incarceration is in no way an effective means of rehabilitating young people and workers. The response of governments to the social crisis confronting the working class is to punish workers and youth rather than investing in education, housing and welfare services to prevent the resort to crime.

Immense resources are being used to bolster the police and prison system in the Northern Territory.

According to Productivity Commission data, the NT government spent more than $270 million on prisons and community corrections facilities in 2022–23. Across Australia, the figure is about $7 billion.

In its 2024–25 budget, the NT government pledged a further $325 million between 2023 and 2027 and a further $120 million every year from 2027 to review the territory’s police force and recruit an additional 200 officers. It also includes a further $15 million per year between 2023 and 2026, and then $10 million every year from 2026, to meet “correctional services demand.” An additional $30 million will also be put into establishing youth detention camps between 2024 and 2026.

All of this comes amid a broader crackdown in Australia and internationally against the social rights of ordinary workers and young people who are increasingly angry about mounting social crisis, the rising cost of living and explosion of imperialist militarism abroad. 

As the social opposition mounts, governments are moving to criminalise opposition to the policies of war and austerity.

Over the course of the ongoing Gaza genocide, protesters against the war crimes committed by Israel and supported by the imperialist powers including Australia have been arrested.