6 Mar 2025

Trump’s tariffs rock US and global economy

Nick Beams


US President Trump’s imposition of a 25 percent tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, which came into effect on Tuesday, has sent a shock wave through the global economy as the realisation grows that the entire framework of economic and trade relations set in place after World War II has disintegrated.

Workers harvest cabbage Wednesday, March 5, 2025, on a field less than ten miles from the border with Mexico, in Holtville, Calif. [AP Photo/Gregory Bull]

In addition to the tariffs imposed on Canada and Mexico, the US added another 10 percent to tariffs against China, on top of the 10 percent that had earlier been enacted.

China has retaliated with a 15 percent tariff on American agricultural products, including chicken, wheat, corn and cotton, as well as a 10 percent tariff on sorghum, fruits, vegetables and dairy products.

Beijing has added 10 US companies to the so-called “unreliable entity list,” meaning they are prohibited from exporting or importing in China or making new investments. It also made 15 US entities subject to an export control list.

Canada has responded with an immediate 25 percent tax on $21 billion worth of US imports, to be followed by a tariff on around $90 billion worth in three weeks’ time.

The tariff measures were initially unveiled by Trump shortly after his inauguration on the grounds that Canada was not doing enough to halt the flow of the drug fentanyl into the US. But this was only a pretext for the expansionist aims of the US, as Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau has now blurted out.

At a press conference on Tuesday, he said the issue of cross-border trafficking of fentanyl was “completely bogus, completely unjustified, completely false.” What Trump really wanted to do was to trigger “the total collapse of the Canadian economy because that would make it easier to annex us.” Earlier Trudeau had told a meeting of business leaders that Trump’s focus on critical minerals meant his annexation threat was a “real thing.”

It is a sure sign of the economic and geopolitical breakdown. What might have been said behind closed doors is now out in the open, as imperialist leaders publicly accuse each other of lying in order to cover up their real agenda.

The threat to the Canadian and Mexican economies is a very real one. More than 80 percent of the exports of both countries go to the US. According to an analysis reported by the Wall Street Journal, Canada could face a contraction of up to 5 percent of GDP and Mexico 3 percent.

Europe is also directly in the firing line, with Trump having threatened to impose tariffs of 25 percent after denouncing the European Union as an organisation set up to “screw” the US.

In his address to the joint session of Congress on Tuesday, Trump emphasised that the imposition of “reciprocal tariffs” would go ahead after the delivery of a report on April 2. The planned measures go far beyond tariffs and include retaliation for any measures, such as the European value-added tax and regulations on the tech giants, which the US considers inimical to the profits of its corporations.

After lobbying by major US auto companies, Trump has given them a one-month reprieve on the Mexico-Canada tariff, which his press secretary Karoline Leavitt said was aimed at ensuring they were not “at an economic disadvantage.” How a one-month carve-out would assist the auto firms in their planning operations that extend over years she did not say.

Even before the one-month delay, there were warnings that whatever the twists and turns in the future, the damage had already been done.

Matthew Holmes, executive vice-president of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, told the Journal: “Businesses just can’t switch their whole model to avoid tariffs and then go back again, depending on what politicians decide on any given day.”

The Trump trade war not only threatens every economy in the world but also the US itself. One indication is the fall in share values on Wall Street, which has wiped out all the gains made since the Trump election victory in November. So far, a total of around $3.4 trillion has been wiped off of market capitalisation.

Warnings about the impact of tariffs have been coming thick and fast. The farming sector is one of the first to be hit, as industry representatives denounce the tariff measures.

“Contrary to what the president thinks, this means nothing but pain,” Aaron Lehman, head of the Iowa Farmers Union, told the Financial Times.

Other comments to the FT were in the same vein. Caleb Ragland, president of the American Soybean Association, said farmers were “frustrated.” Tariffs were not something to be taken lightly and to “have fun” with, but hit businesses in the wallet. They have rocked a “core tenet on which our trading relations are built, and that is reliability.”

Referring to Trump’s election claims that he would bring down prices and grow the economy—part of the snake oil claims that induced millions of people to vote for him out of anger and disgust with the Democrats—Michael Hanson, a spokesperson for the Retail Industry Leaders Association, said: “Tariffs on Canada and Mexico put those goals in serious jeopardy and risk destabilising the North American economy.”

The New York Times has reported that “anxious business groups” were holding meetings to determine their responses, with some even considering a legal challenge to the national security authority under which Trump has imposed the tariffs.

Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist at the banking and financial forum Nationwide, said that if the tariffs were maintained and retaliation followed, economic growth would be at least one percentage point lower in 2025 than it had been in 2024, coming in at just 1.5 percent.

The outlook for the American economy appears to be rapidly worsening. Last Friday, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s running estimate of GDP growth forecast a contraction of 1.5 percent in the first quarter. In an estimate published on Monday, that contraction had risen to 2.8 percent.

US businesses are reporting significant declines in new orders and employment. The ISM purchasing manufacturers index for February dropped to 50.3 from 50.9 the previous month. The level of 50 marks the boundary between expansion and contraction. Other indexes pointed to a steep decline in new orders, falling from 55.1 to 48.6.

The prospect of a significant downturn in the US economy is also reflected in the bond market. Yields (interest rates) on the 10-year government bond have been falling.

Normally they could be expected to rise in the expectation by investors that the Federal Reserve would not be cutting rates because of inflationary pressures caused by the tariff hikes, which, contrary to Trump’s lying claims that they are paid for by foreigners, hit consumers and businesses.

But market sentiment is shifting rapidly. At the beginning of the year, there was an expectation that there would only be one interest rate cut this year. But now there is an expectation of three cuts starting in June.

This is because investors fear that Trump’s tariff measures will push the economy towards a recession in which the Fed will feel the need to cut rates. One of the concerns of the Fed, though this is not mentioned openly, is that a recession could set off a sharp fall on Wall Street and lead to financial turmoil.

As Emmanuel Cau, an analyst at the Barclay’s bank, told the FT: “Investors have started to really fear Trump’s policies. If there is a growth problem in the US, that will be hard to ignore … People are nervous, with some even starting to fear a recession.”

Huge rise in council tax bills for millions in Britain as services slashed

Barry Mason


Speaking in March 2023 just prior to that year’s local elections, Sir Kier Starmer said of a future Labour government: “Not a penny more on your council tax, not a penny more than the bill you paid last year.” He declared it would represent a “tax cut for the 99 per cent of working people”. This was a lie.

UK workers face crippling council tax rises in April even as local services are slashed, along with thousands of council workers’ jobs. Fully 85 percent of councils (139) are raising council tax by the maximum amount allowed without holding a referendum of 4.99 percent.

View of city of Bradford, England, showing Bradford City Hall [Photo by Linda Spashett, Storye book / CC BY 3.0]

Others have been given permission by central government to impose even higher rises, taking the proportion of local authorities implementing rises of 4.99 percent or more to 90 percent.

Bradford is increasing council tax by 9.9 percent. According to the newspaper, the council had already issued nearly 30,200 liability orders for missing council tax payments.

The article noted, “The number of summonses sent by the council has steadily increased over the past few tax years, with 12,198 being sent in 2020/21, 33,094 in 2021/22, 34,796 in 2022/23, and 37,727 sent in 2023/24, the last full tax year.”

Windsor and Maidenhead and Newham in London are raising council tax by 9 percent; and Trafford in Greater Manchester, Birmingham and Somerset by 7.5 percent.

Workers’ budgets are already being squeezed by bills. Analysts are predicting a rise in the energy price cap (for electricity and gas) of between five and seven percent in April, with a further rise expected in July. The same month, water companies will increase their charges by an average 26 percent, around an extra £10 a month.

Research by the Resolution Foundation shows that the poorest fifth of households spend 4.8 percent of their income on council tax. This is three times the amount, 1.5 percent spent by the richest fifth. Economist Lalitha Try noted that these families are “spending almost as much on these bills as they pay in income tax. This terribly designed tax increasingly resembles the very thing it was meant to replace—the dreaded poll tax.”

The ultra-regressive poll tax was introduced by the Thatcher Conservative government between 1989-90, first in Scotland, then England and Wales—with each taxpayer taxed the same fixed sum. It was abolished and withdrawn over 1991-3 in the face of mass opposition and unrest.

Fully 15 year after the beginning of the Labour-Tory “age of austerity” many councils have lost so much central government funding that they are, nonetheless either bankrupt or on the verge of it. Workers are paying to barely keep the lights on.

Unison, the main public sector union, issued a report last September titled, “Councils on the Brink: The Local Government Funding Gap 2025/26”.

Based on freedom of information requests and searches of local authority financial strategy papers, it showed councils across England, Scotland and Wales would have a £4.3 billion collective shortfall for 2025/26. The report estimated this would rise to £6.9 billion in 2025/26.

It noted: “Between 2010 and 2023, at least 1,243 council-run youth centres were closed and 1,168 council-run children’s centres were shut. There has also been a significant decline in the number of council-run libraries (1,376 fewer) and public toilets (a drop of 1,629) over the same period.”

Another report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies issued just before the 2024 general election found that between 2010/11 and 2024/25 core funding for councils fell by nine percent, while demand for services has risen.

A Local Government Association (LGA) survey released last October showed one in four local authorities in England would likely apply for emergency government bailouts in the financial years 2025/26 and 2026/27 to avoid having to declare bankruptcy. Last week, the National Audit projected that the situation was so dire that without intervention by next March an accumulated deficit for councils in England—expected to have reached £4.6 billion—could leave 43 percent of local authorities at risk of declaring effective bankruptcy.

Introduced in 2021, the use of Exceptional Financial Support (EFS) measures allowing a local authority to borrow capital or sell assets to raise revenue has grown, with a record 30 granted by the government this year, including seven councils in London. Collectively, these councils alone will borrow around £1.5 billion to plug budget gaps, only pushing the crisis a year or two down the line.

Labour-run Birmingham council, which oversees Britain’s second largest city, is one of the councils given permission to raise its council tax by more than 4.99 percent.

In September 2023 it issued a section 114 notice effectively declaring itself bankrupt. Central government sent in a record number of six commissioners for a potential five-year placement taking control over the council’s budget. Among the council’s liabilities is an outstanding equal pay claim bill for female staff costing around £760 million.

In February last year the council was given Exceptional Financial Support of £1.25 billion by the outgoing Sunak Tory government.

After losing around £1 billion in central government support since 2010, and imposing hundreds of millions of pounds in austerity cuts, the response of the Labour council was to escalate cuts. For the second year in a row Birmingham will impose cuts of around £148 million. This includes a £43 million cut in adult services, £39 million in children’s services, and £28 million for city operations including refuse collection.

Having already axed 11,000 of its workforce since 2011, a further 300 jobs are to go this year.

Other job losses announced by Labour councils are in North Tyneside (200), Derby City Council (more than 100) and Wakefield City Council (200). Liberal Democrat-run Somerset Council is to shed 555 jobs.

Under Labour, the central government support grant for local government for 2025/26 will rise by 6.8 percent, not touching the sides.

Responding to the figure the LGA noted, “Extra money for councils next year… still falls short of what is desperately needed to cover them all. This financial year therefore remains extremely challenging for councils of all types who now face having to increase council tax bills to bring in desperately needed funding next year yet could still be forced to make further cuts to services.”

The Scottish National Party (SNP) government in Edinburg is to carry out a similar council tax rise offensive, having ditched its previous anti-austerity posture. Over the last 20 years—with the SNP in power in Scotland for most of that time—council tax rates in Scotland have either been frozen or capped. The freeze ends in April with five local authorities, responsible for around two million people (approximately 40 percent of Scotland’s population) to hike rates.

The Starmer government came to office stating that it would impose “iron” fiscal discipline, while claiming it would end austerity. Its immediate withdrawal of winter fuel allowances from almost 2 million of the poorest pensioners and refusal to remove the two-child limit on child benefits exposed this lie.

But these attacks and the bill rises from April are just a small down-payment. Starmer is committed to large increases in military spending, meaning the savaging of what remains of the post-war welfare state and an offensive against the working class on a scale not seen since the 1930s.

5 Mar 2025

Nigerian Women Association of Georgia (NWAG) 2025 Scholarships

Application Deadline:

The application deadline is April 30th, 2025.

Tell Me About The NWAG Scholarships For Nigerian Female Undergraduates:

The Nigerian Women Association of Georgia (NWAG) is offering 111 one-time scholarships to female undergraduate students in Nigeria. Each awardee will receive $300 in scholarship funds. Additionally, the first runner-up in each state will receive $150, while the second runner-up will be awarded $100. The scholarship will be given in Naira equivalent and is aimed at supporting the education of young Nigerian women.

Which Fields are Eligible?

All fields 

Type:

Undergraduate scholarship 

Who can Apply for the NWAG Scholarships For Nigerian Female Undergraduates?

Also, the eligibility criteria include:

  • Open to female undergraduate students in Nigeria.
  • Applicants must not be in their final year of study.
  • Applicants must provide proof of state of origin.

How are Applicants Selected?

Applicants will be assessed based on:

  • The completeness and accuracy of their submitted documents.
  • The quality of their essay on:
    “Analyze how technology can be leveraged to address gender-based violence (GBV) in Nigeria, including facilitating reporting, access to services, and creating safe spaces for survivors. Evaluate current interventions and propose innovative solutions for ensuring timely and effective assistance for GBV survivors.”
  • The level of financial need and academic merit.

Required Documents

Applicants must submit:

  • Proof of State of Origin – A letter from the university or a local government office.
  • Two letters of recommendation from any of the following:
    • Pastor or Imam
    • Village Head
    • Local Government Chairperson
    • University Lecturer or Head of Department
  • One additional letter of recommendation from the Dean of Faculty or School Head.
  • Departmental proof of enrollment (e.g., letter or document).
  • Photocopy of current student identification card.
  • A recent passport-sized photograph.
  • A short explanation (not exceeding half a page) on why they need the scholarship.
  • A two-page, double-spaced, typewritten essay on the given topic.

Which Countries Are Eligible?

Nigeria 

Where will the Award be Taken?

Nigeria 

How Many Awards?

111

What is the Benefit of the NWAG Scholarships For Nigerian Female Undergraduates?

Additionally, the benefits include: 

  • $300 for each selected winner.
  • $150 for the first runner-up in each state.
  • $100 for the second runner-up in each state.
  • Funds will be awarded in Naira equivalent.

How Long Will the Award Last?

One-time award

How to Apply:

  • Visit www.nwag.org to download the application form.
  • Prepare and gather all required documents listed above.
  • Submit your completed application via email, ensuring that the email subject line includes your state and full name.
  • Ensure your application form is typed-written (handwritten submissions are not accepted).
  • Do not send money to anyone, the application is free of charge.

Visit the official webpage to begin.

Poverty among Australian retirees has doubled in the past decade

Max Boddy


A growing number of Australian retirees are facing financial hardship after decades in the workforce. According to the Australia Institute, 22.6 percent of retirees now live in poverty—a figure that has nearly doubled over the past decade.

Former-state owned inner-Sydney Millers Point public housing overshadowed by luxury units and office blocks.

This is a product of decades of cuts to social programs, including the slashing of funding to aged care facilities, the evisceration of public housing, attacks on pensions and declining real wages. A significant factor is also the skyrocketing cost of housing.

A recent report from the Grattan Institute found that poverty among retirees is most severe for the 12 percent—around 200,000 households—who rent. Of those, 67 percent are living below the poverty line. 

While renters are especially vulnerable, financial security is by no means guaranteed for the 78 percent of Australians over 65 who own their homes. Some 25 percent of retired homeowners with a mortgage, as well as 11 percent of those who own their homes outright, also live in poverty, according to the report.

More than 90 percent of older Australians receive the full or partial pension, and for many it is not just a supplement to their superannuation or savings, but their only source of regular income. Yet, it falls woefully short of covering basic living costs. Including subsidies for utility bills, a single pensioner receives a maximum of just $1,144.40 per fortnight, while couples receive $1,725.20 combined.

In addition, aged pensioners can get rent assistance, capped at $211.20 per fortnight for singles and $199 per fortnight for couples. Therefore a retired couple, each receiving the full pension and the maximum rent assistance payment, receives a total of $1,924.20 per fortnight.

If their rent is $960 or more per fortnight ($480 a week), or their mortgage repayments more than $760 per fortnight ($380 a week), they fall below the poverty line. The Melbourne Institute calculates that non-working couples who have less than $966.10 per fortnight ($483.05 a week) for all expenses other than housing are below the poverty line.

In an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), 74-year-old retiree Jackie Collins described how her financial security vanished after decades working in the social service sector. Retiring with just $45,000 in superannuation, she was first forced into a caravan park before securing a social housing unit. While the rent is affordable, the home is dilapidated and plagued with mold. “I thought, ‘I had so much promise in my life, and this is where I ended up,’” she said.

Lyn, who lives in Melbourne, told the ABC she was always brought up to not be a burden: “I’m now bordering on being evicted. That’s what upsets me.” After a divorce, she was left with no superannuation. At first, she was able to pay rent in the unit she has been living in for 12 years, by working in the highly exploitative courier sub-contracting industry, using her own vehicle to deliver parcels and pathology samples.

However, injuries she sustained in a workplace accident years earlier eventually caught up with her. By 2023 she was barely able to get in and out of her car and needed a double knee replacement, leaving her unable to work. After her landlord increased the rent by $50 per week last year, she has fallen behind and is now two months in arrears.

Renting in retirement is becoming unaffordable, if not impossible. Since 2019, rents have soared by 46.8 percent—the equivalent, on average, of an extra $205 per week, or $10,660 per year. According to data from CoreLogic, the median national rent in 2019 was $438 per week. By the end of 2024, it had surged to $643 per week.

The Grattan Institute found that the average pensioner can afford to spend just $300 per week on rent—far below market rates. This means that just 4 percent of one-bedroom homes in Sydney, 13 percent in Brisbane and 14 percent in Melbourne are affordable for a single retiree. 

According to the latest available data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), in 2021, at least 9,000 Australians over 65 were homeless. However, data reported in the annual Homelessness Monitor show a more than 30 percent increase in the number of older Australians accessing specialist homelessness services between 2017–18 and 2023–24. 

Beyond the pension, stark wealth inequality exists among retirees. A report from the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) last year identified Australia’s superannuation system—in which employers contribute a percentage of workers’ earnings into a retirement fund—as a key driver of this inequality.

Professor Carla Treloar, author of the report, highlighted the extent of the disparity: “At the top end of our households [by wealth], they have on average about half-a-million dollars in superannuation wealth. The bottom 20 percent households, by wealth, have on average about $66,000 in superannuation assets.” 

For those in the bottom bracket, the aged pension is often their only income. Many are reluctant to spend what little superannuation they have saved, fearing they may need it for unexpected medical bills, home repairs, or vehicle costs—expenses that could push them further into financial hardship.

The number of retirees with a mortgage is also rising, as those 55- to 64-year-olds owning their home outright has nearly halved over the past 20 years. This trend is primarily driven by skyrocketing housing costs, with the median house price in Sydney—Australia’s most populous city—now reaching $1.48 million, while units average $846,000. Compounding the crisis is the ongoing cost-of-living squeeze and a continued decline in real wages, which have been falling since 2016.

The crisis facing retired renters is a phenomenon that has been building over the past 30 years. Since the introduction by the Labor government of Prime Minister Paul Keating in 1992 of compulsory superannuation, there has been a decline in the proportion of Australians receiving the full aged care pension. In effect, as superannuation comes from workers’ wages, they are forced to pay for their own retirement.

There has been a bipartisan effort to reduce the pension payment. This includes the means testing of retirees to determine their eligibility and in 2009 the raising of the pension age by the Rudd Labor government from 65 to 67, which came into effect in 2023. 

This is coupled with the broader housing crisis in Australia, which has seen massive tax breaks to property developers and speculators, ramping up the cost of houses and rent to unaffordable levels.

The current Albanese Labor government, since narrowly scraping into office in the 2022 federal election, has further deepened this crisis, instigating a program of austerity and cuts to social spending. As a result, poverty has deepened across Australia, with 3.3 million people now living below the poverty line and 2 million experiencing food insecurity.

Labor’s policies have further enriched the property development sector—the very industry driving the crisis. Part of its 2022 election policy platform was the $10 billion Housing Australia Future Fund (HAFF), which supposedly aims to build 30,000 so-called “affordable” homes by 2029.

If this target were met, it would barely make a dent in the social housing shortfall, which already exceeds 600,000 dwellings and continues to grow rapidly. Since the HAFF was legislated in September 2023, fewer than 400 new homes have been built under the scheme and only around 13,000 more are even in the planning stages.

4 Mar 2025

Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) Scholarships 2025/2026

Application Deadline: 5th April 2025

About the Award: The Islamic Development Bank funds and implements its scholarship programmes as part of its overall efforts to develop the human resources of its member countries and those of the Muslim communities in non-member countries.

  1. Undergraduate
  2. Master’s
  3. PhD and Post-Doctoral Research Programme
  4. IsDB-ISFD for Technical Vocational Education & Training (TVET) for 21 Least Developed Member Countries (LDMCs):  Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Benin, Burkina Faso, Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, The Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somali, Sudan, Togo, Uganda and Yemen
  5. IsDB-ISFD Bachelor studies for 21 LDMCs as mentioned in No. 4 above
  6. IsDB-The World Academy of Science (TWAS) Joint Programme for Capacity Building and Technology Transfer

Objectives: The Programmes are important parts of the developmental initiatives led by the Bank since 1983 to foster technology and knowledge sharing among its member countries and Muslim communities in non-member countries. They are designed to attract talented male and female students and in order to build the right competencies required with a special focus on sustainability sciences to empower communities and to assist them in achieving their national and global development plans including the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  The motto is to develop the students/researchers as Good Citizens & Competent Professionals (GCCPs).

Concept:

The IsDB Scholarship Programme is more than just a scholarship programme in the traditional sense of a straight financial assistance to the outstanding and qualified students. It is also a tool for the improvement of the socio-economic conditions of the Member Countries and Muslim communities.It is basically a scholarship programme and a development programme at the same time, since the scholarship is given as an interest-free-loan (Qard Hasan) to the students and as a grant to their communities /countries to which they belong.

The students are required to fulfil the obligations detailed, under each programme, after graduation and gainful employment. Besides, the students are also required to take part in the development of their communities/countries, through their respective professions. The repaid fund will be used to provide scholarships to other students from the same community/country to complement the IsDB Programme and to ensure its continuity in the long run, while the community development services rendered by the students and graduates will contribute to the overall development of the community/country.

Type: Undergraduate, Masters, PhD, Postdoc

Eligibility:

Undergraduate

The Programme is open for academically meritorious students with strong desire to engage in social services and community development after graduation. Candidates MUST ensure that they meet all the criteria of the programme listed hereunder, failing which the Application will not be considered:

  • Must be a citizen of any of the IsDB member countries or Muslim communities in non-member countries.
  • Candidate from non-member countries must be a Muslim.
  • Must have obtained a high school diploma or registered in one of the top 10 public/government universities in his/her own country.
  • Must have minimum of 70% in his/her high school final GPA.
  • Must choose a field of study listed among the approved disciplines of the programme.
  • Must provide evidence of language proficiency in university medium of instruction as relevant. The language proficiency must be supported by a document or certificate, e.g., for English, by a recognized language certificate such as TOEFL, IELTS or passed required level test conducted such as by British Council or equivalent system in French or other language).
  • Must provide certified English or French translation of all documents in case if they are initially in other languages.
  • Must not be in receipt of any other scholarship at the time of application and during study.
  • Must be medically fit and willing to undergo medical tests after selection.

Masters:

The Programme is open for academically meritorious students and mid-career professionals from member countries and Muslim Communities in non-member countries. Candidates MUST ensure that they meet all the criteria of the programme listed hereunder, failing which the Application will not be considered:

  • Must be a citizen of any of the IsDB member countries or Muslim communities in non-member countries.
  • Candidate from non-member countries must be a Muslim.
  • Must have minimum of 70% in his/her Bachelor studies’ GPA.
  • Must choose a field of study listed among the approved disciplines of the programme.
  • Must provide certified English or French translation of all documents in case if they are initially in other languages.
  • Must provide evidence of language proficiency in university medium of instruction as relevant. The language proficiency must be supported by a document or certificate, e.g., for English, by a recognized language certificate such as TOEFL, IELTS or passed required level test conducted such as by British Council or equivalent system in French or other languages).
  • Must not be in receipt of any other scholarship at the time of application and during study.
    • Must be medically fit and willing to undergo medical tests after selection.

PhD and Post-Doctoral Research Programme:

The Programme is designed to help promising and outstanding scholars from member countries and Muslim communities in non-member countries who meet the following criteria:

1. PhD study

  • Have Master’s degree in one of the fields of study of the programme.
  • Have minimum (“Very Good”) academic standing;
  • Preferably have work and/or research experience.
  • Have a research proposal in one of the fields of study of the programme stating its scientific and development relevance to the community / country.
  • Be medically fit and be willing to undergo medical tests after selection.

2. Post-doctoral research

  • Have PhD degree in one of approved fields of the programme.
  • Have minimum (“Very Good”) academic standing.
  • Have not less than two (2) years of experience in the field of research.
  • Must have a record of publications/research in the same field.
  • Have a research proposal in one of the fields of study of the programme stating its scientific and development relevance to the community / country.
  • Be medically fit and be willing to undergo medical tests after selection

Eligible Countries: Muslim communities

Number of Awards: Numerous

Value of Award:

Undergraduate & Masters:

The programme covers the following items:

  • Monthly stipend commensurate with the cost of living of the country of study.
  • Tuition fees, if any, subject to IsDB’s approval.
  • Cost of medical treatment at university/government hospital.
  • Economy class return air tickets (once at the time of joining and on completion of study) and installation and equipment allowance for the students selected to study abroad at partnered universities/countries.

PhD study

The programme covers the following items:

  • Monthly stipend commensurate with the cost of living of the country of study;
  • Tuition fees, if any, subject to IsDB’s approval;
  • Cost of medical treatment at university/government hospital.
  • Economy class return air tickets (once at the time of joining and on completion of study) and installation and equipment allowance for the students selected to study abroad at partnered universities/countries.
  • Thesis preparation allowance
  • Scientific papers’ preparation allowance

Post-doctoral research

The programme covers the following items:

  • Monthly stipend commensurate with the cost of living of the country of study;
  • Cost of medical treatment at university/government hospital.
  • Economy class return air tickets (once at the time of joining and on completion of study) and installation and equipment allowance for the students selected to study abroad at partnered universities/countries.
  • Scientific papers’ preparation allowance

How to Apply: Apply below

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Thailand: Opposition parties file no-confidence motion against prime minister

Robert Campion


Thailand’s opposition parties in the National Assembly filed a censure motion against Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra of the Pheu Thai Party (PT) last Thursday. At the end of March, a debate will be held that could potentially oust Paetongtarn or even lead to the dissolution of the lower house of parliament. At present, the prime minister is expected to survive the no-confidence motion.

Thailand‘s Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, centre, arrives at Government House for cabinet meeting in Bangkok, February 4, 2025. [AP Photo/Sakchai Lalit]

While 10 ministers in the government’s cabinet were originally targeted, the opposition, led by the so-called “progressive” People’s Party (PP) instead chose to focus solely on Paetongtarn, who took office last August. The People’s Party was previously known as the Move Forward Party (MFP) before the latter was dissolved by the Constitutional Court in August as well.

Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut, who leads the opposition bloc in parliament and is also head of the People’s Party, stated, “We cannot trust the current government to govern the country because the prime minister lacks the qualifications, knowledge, and the will to resolve the people’s problems. She has shown no responsibility as prime minister.”

The debate is scheduled to begin March 24 and could last five days, though Pheu Thai is attempting to limit it to only two days. Other issues to be addressed include alleged failures in public administration and corrupt practices with large business conglomerates.

None of the parties in parliament is attempting to improve conditions for workers or protect the democratic rights of the population. All of them in their own way defend the capitalist system and are hostile to the working class, including the PP, which did not lift even a finger to fight the dissolution of its predecessor, the MFP.

The censure debate instead reflects divisions within the Thai ruling class. Serious concerns about the economy exist, which has been struggling, a product of the crisis of world capitalism. According to the Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC) the economy grew 2.5 percent in 2024, the slowest in South East Asia. The economy is only expected to grow between 2.4 and 2.9 percent this year.

Last year, agriculture and manufacturing contracted 1 percent and 0.5 percent respectively. Thai workers are also struggling with the highest levels of household debt in the region, roughly 89 percent of GDP.

These concerns have only intensified since Trump came to power. Thailand is highly vulnerable to Trump’s trade tariffs. It has the fifth largest trade surplus with the US, which has grown 343 percent since 2017. No doubt sections of the Thai ruling class feel Paetongtarn is incapable of maneuvering amid dramatically changing world politics and economy and will also be unable to contain social unrest as living conditions further decline for the working class.

Natthaphong also accused Paetongtarn of allowing her father, Thaksin Shinawatra, of leading her and being involved in the government administration. Thaksin was prime minister from 2001 to 2006 until he was driven from office in a military coup. His administration had cut across the interests of the military, the monarchy, and other conservative sections of the bourgeoisie. He is also the founder of Pheu Thai and its de facto leader, though he holds no official position in the party or government.

Thaksin spent 15 years in exile before Pheu Thai reached a backroom deal with the military to form a government in August 2023, which allowed Thaksin to return. An eight-year prison term for corruption was reduced to one year by Thailand’s king, of which Thaksin only served six months in the comfort of a hospital room. He remains a target of the military and its allies and currently faces charges of lèse-majesté.

Censure debates are not uncommon in Thai politics. Pheu Thai called four similar censure debates along with the MFP between 2020 and 2022 against the military regime. All of these were unsuccessful, but they served the opposition’s purpose of promoting illusions that democratic issues could be resolved within the parliamentary system.

However, the People’s Party is now openly aligning itself with the opposition Palang Pracharath Party (PPRP), which supports the censure motion. The PPRP was the party of the military junta under General Prayut Chan-o-cha, who seized power in the 2014 coup and remained in power until 2023. Before the 2023 general election, he split from the PPRP to join the United Thai Nation Party (UTN).

The PPRP was removed from the ruling coalition after it cooperated with the antidemocratic efforts last year to successfully remove the first Pheu Thai prime minister Srettha Thavisin on trumped-up ethics charges. Significantly, the PP, the successor to the MFP, now finds itself in the league with the PPRP which played a central role in blocking the formation of an MFP-led government following the latter’s victory in the 2023 general election.

The PP’s posturing as “progressive” has nothing to do with defending the democratic and social rights of youth and workers. Rather it is aimed at suppressing unrest by directing hostility and anger over attacks on democratic rights and social conditions into the dead-end of parliamentary politics.

Based on current seats, the opposition does not have the numbers to pass the censure motion. Pheu Thai’s coalition, comprised of nine parties including the right-wing Bhumjaithai Party (BJT, 71 seats) and United Thai Nation Party (36 seats), holds 322 seats out of 500.

Paetongtarn stated following a closed-door meeting of coalition party leaders last Tuesday, “We’ve discussed the censure debate in detail because we want this coalition to maintain its unity and stability. We will all help each other [in the debate] across all ministries.”

However, the BJT is a right-wing party, which previously backed Prayut’s military government. It has emerged as the standard bearer for the right-wing sections of the ruling class grouped around the military and monarchy. It also played a key role in preventing the MFP from coming to power in 2023.

The BJT recently walked out of two sittings of parliament regarding PT-led discussions to amend the 2017 junta-imposed constitution. The walkouts on February 13 and 14 meant a lack of quorum, ending any discussion on the issue. It is therefore not out of the question that the BJT could leads a split of right-wing parties to remove Paetongtarn.