24 Jun 2025

Spain’s Socialist Party-Sumar government faces collapse amid corruption scandal, war drive, and rising class struggle

Alejandro López


Spain’s Socialist Party (PSOE) and Sumar coalition government, led by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, is engulfed in a deepening corruption scandal that threatens to bring down the administration.

The mounting crisis is raising the prospect of snap elections which, according to most polls, would likely hand power to the right-wing Popular Party (PP) and the far-right Vox.

Pedro Sánchez and Alberto Núñez Feijóo in December 2023 [Photo by Flickr / La Moncloa - Gobierno de España / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0]

At the centre of the allegations is Santos Cerdán, one of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s closest allies and, until last week, the Secretary of Organisation for the PSOE. Cerdán resigned after being linked to a widening corruption probe led by the Guardia Civil, which uncovered a network of kickbacks, influence peddling, and profiteering tied to public contracts.

The case is closely linked to the “Koldo case,” centred on former Transport Minister José Luis Ábalos and his long-time aide Koldo García. Investigators accuse them of funneling millions in illicit commissions through shell companies during the pandemic, including for overpriced face masks and infrastructure contracts.

Sánchez’s reassurances to his parliamentary allies that the scandal is limited to the “toxic triangle” of Cerdán, Ábalos, and García have failed to convince. Catalan nationalist ERC leader Gabriel Rufián warned of a “sense of end of cycle”. The Basque Nationalist Party refused to say whether the governing majority can hold. Its spokesperson Maribel Vaquero warned: “Each day brings new revelations. We will be prudent.” Even pseudo-left Sumar took its distance, with their minister Pablo Bustinduy declaring that the PSOE’s explanations were “clearly insufficient”.

Pablo Bustinduy [Photo by Marta Jara / CC BY-SA 3.0]

This is not merely a corruption case, but part of a broader process through which the ruling class is reconfiguring its political strategy. The scandal engulfing Sánchez’s government is being used not only to settle internal disputes within the political establishment, but to prepare the ground for a realignment aimed at imposing deeper austerity, intensified repression of the working class, and a full-scale turn to militarism.

In 2018, the PSOE came to power through a no-confidence vote backed by Podemos, using the PP’s Bárcenas corruption scandal, another kickback scheme involving construction firms, to oust Mariano Rajoy and stabilise the regime. The real objective was to reorient the state in the aftermath of the 2017 Catalan independence referendum, which had plunged Spanish capitalism into crisis. The PP’s brutal crackdown on October 1, leaving over 1,000 injured, and the jailing of Catalan leaders shattered the political equilibrium that had sustained the post-Franco order. The PSOE was brought in to defuse the Catalan crisis and restore political control.

Today, the same logic is playing out. The Spanish ruling class faces an existential crisis. It is being squeezed by mounting international pressures and intensifying class struggle at home.

The global trade war led by US President Donald Trump has placed Spain’s economy in a vulnerable position. According to the Chamber of Commerce, new US tariffs could affect €22 billion in bilateral trade, inflicting losses of up to €4.3 billion. Nearly 28,000 companies could be directly impacted, particularly in core sectors like infrastructure, machinery, metallurgy, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, agribusiness and textiles.

At the same time, NATO is intensifying its demands for unprecedented increases in military spending. In a letter sent last week, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called on all member states to raise defence spending to a staggering 5 percent of GDP.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte during his speech at Chatham House, June 9, 2025 [Photo by Nato/Flickr / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0]

For Spain, this would mean diverting an additional €80 billion annually, nearly half the country’s total pension budget, towards war preparations. Sánchez has already imposed sweeping pension cuts, regressive labour reforms, and passed the largest military budgets in Spain’s recent history. But for the ruling class and its imperialist backers, this is only the beginning, prompting Sánchez to oppose the mandatory target as “unreasonable but also counterproductive” and a threat to Spain’s economy.

Whatever the outcome, the European Union’s rearmament drive and NATO’s global war campaign aimed at its three interconnected fronts—Russia in Eastern Europe, China in the Pacific and also the violent reshaping of the Middle East—demands deeper austerity, privatisations, and intensified domestic repression. Israel’s war with Iran could push oil prices 20 percent above baseline forecasts, triggering a new inflationary wave that would further erode workers’ living standards across Europe.

The ruling class has already shown its willingness to prioritise NATO’s demands over social spending, but fears whether the PSOE-Sumar coalition, the weakest in the post-Franco era, depending on the support of five parties in parliament, is strong enough to impose the next wave of cuts without sparking uncontrollable revolt.

The escalating social crisis, driven by spiraling rents, unaffordable mortgages and stagnant wages, has already ignited a nationwide wave of protests and strikes. In Cantabria, 22,000 metalworkers launched a strike that the unions rapidly shut down, fearing its convergence with a strike of 26,000 metalworkers in Cádiz that began weeks later. In Cartagena, 20,000 more metalworkers are entering a new round of bargaining, intersecting with growing unrest among workers in A Coruña and at the Navantia shipyards.

Pickets on the second day of the metal workers strike in Cantabria [Photo: Alerta Gorria Irratia/X]

The metal sector is just one front in a broader class offensive: 9,500 workers at the energy giant Iberdrola are on strike, EasyJet flight crews and doctors are mobilising across the country for better pay and conditions, teachers in Asturias are demanding wage increases, and workers at the supermarket chain Alcampo and at Caixabank are resisting mass job cuts.

For now, the PP, the only party in parliament with enough seats to table a no-confidence motion, has opted against doing so. Spokesman Borja Sémper argued that such a move would only offer a “breath of oxygen to Sanchismo” and “distract from the focus,” signaling that the PP at this point prefers a strategy of attrition. Rather than force a vote it cannot win because it lacks enough parliamentary support, the PP aims to organise media attacks and street mobilisations, pressuring Sánchez to call snap elections on his own. “It may be a slow agony,” Sémper admitted, “but it will be more painful.”

The PSOE could also initiate a vote of confidence. With a razor-thin parliamentary majority of 152 seats held by the PSOE and Sumar in the 350-seat parliament, Sánchez would risk everything on the assumption that five parties backing it in parliament would hold the line.

Within the PSOE, calls are growing for snap elections. This has been championed by former Prime Minister Felipe González, who ruled from 1982 to 1996, and Emiliano García-Page, the influential regional president of Castilla-La Mancha. González publicly backed Page’s call for early elections ahead of the scheduled municipal and regional polls in May 2027.

Felipe González (2014) [Photo by Junta Informa / CC BY-SA 2.0]

González played a central role in ousting Sánchez as PSOE general secretary in 2016, orchestrating an internal coup that enabled the party to abstain in a parliamentary vote and allow the PP to take power. This operation, carried out in the interests of the Spanish bourgeoisie after two inconclusive elections and nine months of political deadlock, trampled party rules and the popular will and was driven by a full-scale media campaign against Sánchez.

Now González has returned to the spotlight, using the corruption scandal to press for a government more aligned with NATO’s escalating demands. “Some people think the best defence policy is to spend nothing on defence or security… they want to declare peace to the world… and if they don’t believe us, well, fuck them. Let them attack us—we won’t defend ourselves. It’s ridiculous,” he said.

On Monday, Sánchez pledged support for anti-corruption measures demanded by his parliamentary backers to maintain power and avoid, in his words, “handing power to the right and far right.” He described his administration as a “historic achievement,” declaring, “We will not allow the possible corruption of a few to bring down the most progressive government in the EU.”

This rhetoric cannot conceal that the PSOE-Sumar government has implemented sweeping austerity, repressive labour reforms, and record military spending while supporting NATO’s war against Russia in Ukraine and its complicity with Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

The decisive issue facing the Spanish working class is that while it is beginning to move industrially, it remains politically voiceless. The strikes and protests breaking out across the country are led by the same treacherous union federations, CCOO and UGT, aligned with the government. These bureaucracies act as labour police, supressing anger, isolating struggles, and protecting the capitalist state.

In the 2023 elections, the WSWS warned that no support should be given to the PSOE and Sumar in the name of opposing the far right. We insisted that only an independent political movement of the working class could fight austerity, militarism, and dictatorship. That warning has been vindicated. The very parties hailed as a “progressive alternative” have spent two years clearing the path for the far right to return to power.

This pattern is not unique to Spain. In the US, the Democrats prepared the ground for Donald Trump’s return. In Germany, the Social Democrats, Greens and the Left Party paved the way for the most militarist and far-right government since the Second World War under Friedrich Merz. In Britain, Starmer’s Labour Party is indistinguishable from the Tories. The turn by the ruling class toward fascism and dictatorship flows from an economic system wracked by deepening inequality, social decay, and global war.

In court testimony, Bolsonaro and military chiefs acknowledge conspiracy to overthrow democracy in Brazil

Tomas Castanheira



Ex-president Jair Bolsonaro at high court hearing [Photo by Fellipe Sampaio/STF / CC BY 4.0]

Last week, on June 9 and 10, the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) questioned former President Jair Bolsonaro and those accused of comprising the “crucial nucleus” of the coup conspiracy that culminated in the January 8, 2023 insurrection in Brasilia. Of the eight defendants, six were military personnel, including former Army and Navy commanders and four-star generals.

The testimony, broadcast live nationwide, represents a landmark political event in Brazilian history. In a country that lived under a brutal military dictatorship for two decades, from 1964 to 1985, for the first time, generals appeared in the dock being questioned about their crimes against democracy.

The most significant fact that emerged from the testimony was the acknowledgment by Bolsonaro and the other defendants that the former president conspired with the armed forces command to prevent the inauguration of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of the Workers Party (PT), who was democratically elected in 2022.

The meetings between the former president and military commanders to discuss plans for a coup d’état after Bolsonaro’s electoral defeat had already been acknowledged by former Air Force commander Lt. Brig. Carlos de Almeida Baptista Júnior and Army commander Gen. Marco Antônio Freire Gomes, who testified as witnesses.

The former commanders stated that, at a meeting on December 7, 2022, former Defense Minister Gen. Paulo Sérgio Nogueira de Oliveira presented them with the document that became known as the “coup draft.” The document provided for the transfer of power to the military and the annulment of the elections.

When questioned by the rapporteur of the case, Minister Alexandre de Moraes, about the December 7 meeting, Bolsonaro stated that he could not “guarantee that this or that matter was discussed on that day.” He claimed, however, that the meetings with the military command “were largely due to the decision of the TSE [Superior Electoral Court], when we petitioned the TSE about possible vulnerabilities.”

Bolsonaro was referring to a petition by his right-wing Liberal Party (PL) for the annulment of the results in the second round of the presidential elections, based on unsubstantiated allegations of fraud. Once the petition was denied, “it was up to us to seek an alternative in the Constitution,” said the former president.

Bolsonaro further declared:

Perhaps it was at that meeting. We studied other possibilities within the Constitution. ... As Commander Paulo Sérgio himself said, we had to be very careful on the legal issue, because we couldn’t do anything outside of that. Obviously, we knew that. In a few meetings, we abandoned any possibility of constitutional action, we abandoned it and faced the end of our government.

Moraes questioned Bolsonaro: “Are you saying that the consideration ... of this issue of a state of siege, a state of defense, was due to the impossibility of an electoral appeal, is that right?” “Yes, sir,” he replied.

Next, Attorney General Paulo Gonet, questioned the ex-president:

Gonet: I would like to know if the defendant, Bolsonaro, understands that, because he does not accept a judicial decision, it is in accordance with the four lines of the Constitution to summon military commanders to discuss the matter.

Bolsonaro: It was an invitation. Why military commanders? I have the same training, we went to the same academy, we went to the same training schools; and the military, in good and bad times, are with you. I wasn’t in the mood to invite anyone to discuss any issue, it fell to them. ... And I confess that I absorbed a lot of what they said and quickly came to the conclusion that there was nothing more to be done, that this government [Lula] was going to fall on its own, as it is falling now.

While acknowledging his conspiratorial deliberations with military commanders, Bolsonaro insisted that this could not be characterized as plotting a coup. “On my part and on the part of military commanders ... there was never any talk of a coup. A coup is an abominable thing,” Bolsonaro said.

The fundamental thesis of Bolsonaro’s defense—that the president’s conspiracy with the military against the Republic was legitimate and constitutional—is extraordinary. Its goal is to subvert the Constitution and subordinate the most basic democratic principles to an order based on the unrestricted power of the executive branch, i.e., an order that effectively represents the dictatorship of the president supported by the armed forces.

This authoritarian thesis was systematically promoted by Bolsonaro throughout his presidency. He persistently presented the military as a “moderating power” standing above all other branches of government, and at the same time as “my army.”

The arguments presented to the STF by Bolsonaro’s military accomplices in the same way sought to normalize practices that have historically characterized ruptures with democratic order.

Former Navy commander Adm. Almir Garnier Santos also acknowledged the meetings in which he is accused of having expressed support for a coup d’état and placed his troops at its disposal. In his defense, Garnier stated:

There were several issues [at the December 7 meeting], the main one being the president’s concern, which was also ours, about the countless people who were, shall we say, dissatisfied and taking a stand throughout Brazil, in front of Army barracks.

When asked by Minister Luiz Fux about the reasons for the military’s “concern,” Garnier replied:

Concern about the issue of dissatisfied people on the streets, that this could lead to rioting... that public security agencies could lose control, or imagine that this could happen. This would normally bring responsibility to the last bastion of this thing, which is the Armed Forces. ... [They] are always ready for their constitutional missions.

The testimony of the former Minister of Defense was likewise revealing. General Nogueira recounted: “After the meeting, I approached the president and warned him of the seriousness if he was thinking about a state of defense, of siege, the consequences of future action. That was the meeting on the 7th [of December].” Presenting the execution of a coup d’état as a “serious” measure, the former minister sought only to distance himself from responsibility for its practical execution.

Gen. Augusto Heleno, Bolsonaro’s Minister of Institutional Security (GSI), agreed to answer questions only from his defense team. When asked if he “coordinated any action by Abin (Brazil’s Intelligence Agency) to produce reports or documents with false information about the elections,” Heleno replied, “There was no mood for that,” and was interrupted by his own lawyer, who demanded, “Yes or no, General.”

The widespread acceptance of these fascist ideas within the Brazilian military command is exposed by the fact that they were promoted not only by the defendants in the case. General Freire Gomes, whom the official narrative has credited with “saving democracy,” also defended the “constitutionality” of the conspiratorial discussions between the commanders and the president.

In their testimony to the STF, Bolsonaro and the fascist military presented the political framework for a battle they intend to wage outside the confines of the courts.

A few days after his deposition, Bolsonaro called for a confrontation with the STF process. “Enough of this farce,” he wrote on Instagram last Friday. Presenting the case as a “plot to persecute political opponents and silence those who dare to oppose the left,” he demanded: “This political process disguised as criminal action must be stopped before it causes irreversible damage to the rule of law in our country.”

The former president’s eldest son, Flávio Bolsonaro, was even more belligerent in an interview with Folha de São Paulo, published last Saturday. Stating that “amnesty is the honorable way out for everyone,” he threatened that a conviction of his father would provoke a “popular” and “international reaction” that “are not under our control.”

Flávio outlined a scenario in which his father is convicted and supports a candidate in the 2026 presidential elections. “Not only will [Bolsonaro] want to support someone who backs amnesty or pardon, but who will carry it out.” Assuming that such a pardon for his father will be challenged in the Supreme Court, he added: “It’s a very bad scenario, because we’re talking about the possibility and use of force.”

As Flávio’s reference to “international resistance” indicates, the Brazilian fascists are waging their struggle not only within the national political arena.

Days before testifying to the STF, Bolsonaro was questioned by the Federal Police in the investigation opened against his second son, Eduardo Bolsonaro. He is accused of obstructing and threatening the ongoing proceedings against the former president through his activities in the United States.

In February of this year, Eduardo Bolsonaro resigned from his position as federal deputy and moved to Texas to coordinate directly with the openly fascist wing of the Republican Party. Since then, the Trump administration has promoted a series of measures to “put pressure” on the Brazilian judicial system. More recently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the US government is “strongly considering” sanctions against Alexandre de Moraes.

Jair Bolsonaro himself has stated on several recent occasions that “Brazil cannot get out of this situation on its own” and that US intervention “is very welcome.” Spreading the lie that the PT government is “handing Brazil over to China” and providing “material that Russia ... China does not have” for the “construction of atomic bombs,” Bolsonaro declared: “I have already passed this on to Trump’s team. ... They are concerned ... that Brazil will consolidate itself as a new Venezuela.”

There is little doubt that if Bolsonaro and the military were to stage a coup in Brazil today, it would be backed by Washington.

Besides the direct coordination of Trump with the Brazilian fascists, there exists a profound correlation between the decomposition of democracy in Brazil and in the United States.

Bolsonaro’s conspiracy was openly based on the example of the coup orchestrated by Trump on January 6, 2021. From the first day of his second term, Trump has been promoting the continuation of this conspiracy to establish a presidential dictatorship in the US.

International Labour Organization reports declining share of global income for workers and slowing job creation

Jean Shaoul


The United Nations International Labour Organization (ILO) has warned that the economic and labour outlook for 2025 is “increasingly fragile”, with economic growth slowing, trade volatility intensifying and geopolitical tensions increasing. The prospects for workers in terms of jobs, the rate of exploitation, income and conditions, are all deteriorating.

The ILO’s flagship report, World Employment and Social Outlook: May 2025 Update, points to the uncertainty generated by the Trump administration’s sweeping “reciprocal tariffs”. The World Trade Organization (WTO) expects this will significantly reduce international trade and increase the risk of a synchronised global slowdown.

World Employment and Social Outlook: May 2025 Update (screenshot of report) [Photo: ilo.org]

The changes in tariffs will disrupt supply chains and increase inflation, particularly in China, Vietnam, Sri Lanka and Cambodia. While Africa generally faces fewer tariffs in the advanced capitalist countries due to preferential trade agreements, its countries face high inflation and soaring indebtedness—with the poorest facing bankruptcy—as well as regional instability, conflicts and wars.

Slower economic growth is likely to cut the number of new jobs worldwide to 53 million instead of the previously estimated 60 million. In those countries where data is available, mostly high-income countries, job vacancies are below their long-term trend as business confidence declines.

An ILO report published earlier this year estimated that the overall number of jobs “missing” stood at around 402.4 million in 2024. The jobs gap includes about 186 million who are officially unemployed, 137 million who are part of a potential workforce, mainly “discouraged” workers, and 79 million who would like to work but are unable to do so because of care obligations.

The ILO suggests that workers whose jobs depend on consumer demand in the United States face unemployment due to higher tariffs and trade uncertainty. US tariffs and their repercussions—including how the tariffs impact on US demand for imports, trade diversion and employment shifts into other sectors—are also likely to lead to poorer quality jobs. Trade-related jobs tend to have better conditions and pay than non-trade-related jobs, often based in the informal economy where workers are employed on a casual or day-by-day basis.

In the 71 countries with the relevant data, an estimated 84 million workers in 2023 had jobs directly or indirectly linked through supply chains to demand from the US. Of these, 56 million are in Asia and the Pacific, equal to around 4.3 percent of all jobs in these countries. The worst affected are Canada and Mexico, where 17.1 percent jobs are dependent on exports to the US.

This follows a 10-year period, 2014-2024, that saw global GDP increase by 33 percent despite the recession caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, with the strongest growth in Asia and the Pacific. Yet there were only “moderate employment gains”. Global employment grew by just 13.2 percent over the same period. There was little indication that this translated into better jobs, higher incomes or meaningful improvements in living standards, while the rate of exploitation increased.

Output grew at a much higher rate: 17.9 percent. Productivity growth was highest in Asia at 55 percent, while the number of jobs increased by just 10 percent. In other words, the increased output was the result of an intensification of work.

Furthermore, informal jobs—with the associated insecurity, ill-treatment and rotten pay, not to say near-destitution, the term implies—increased at a faster rate than formal employment. More than 2 billion workers worldwide were in informal employment in 2024, or nearly 60 percent of all workers on the planet. In sub-Saharan Africa—where the number of working-age people will overtake that in the developed world in 2026, and around 85 percent of workers are casual day workers—informal employment rose by almost 30 percent over the last decade.

Mother of two Amsale Hailemariam, a domestic worker who lost work because of the coronavirus, washes her family's clothes outside her small tent in the capital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on Friday, June 26, 2020. (AP Photo/Mulugeta Ayene)

Even more telling is what has happened to labour’s share of income. While global GDP has risen over the decade, albeit unevenly due to the pandemic, the distribution of income between labour and capital has seen a significant shift. Capital income refers to the returns received by the owners of assets such as land, plant and equipment, buildings and intellectual copyright. Together, labour income and capital income make up the bulk of global GDP. With capital income going to the rich, labour’s share of GDP is widely used as an indicator of economic inequality.

The ILO does not report the share going to capital but said that labour’s share of global GDP fell from 53 percent in 2014 to 52.4 percent in 2024, implying a corresponding increase in the share going to the rich. In 2022, global labour income’s share had already fallen, after a temporary rise during the pandemic when profits fell, below its pre-pandemic level. This downward trend in the share of income going to labour compared to that going to capital has been ongoing since the 1980s.

A 2024 study by Loukas Karabarbounis, Professor of Economics, University of Minnesota, and Research Consultant to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, cited by the ILO, noted that in 2022 labour’s share of income in the US was at its lowest level since the Great Depression. Labour’s share fell 6 percentage points between 1929 and 2022. The decline since World War II is even larger, at around 7 percentage points. He noted similar downward trends in many of the world’s major economies.

An earlier report by the ILO showed that global wages fell in real terms in 2022 for the first time since comparable records began, rebutting any notion that wage demands were stoking inflation. Its 2022 annual report on pay showed that global monthly average wages in the first half of 2022 were 0.9 percent lower in real terms than a year earlier, marking the first outright fall in worldwide living standards in the 15 years for which the ILO has published data, with the fall steepest in the advanced capitalist countries where inflation picked up earlier and wages fell by 2.2 percent.

The ILO said that the erosion of real wages was exacerbating the losses incurred by many workers during the pandemic and the longer-term stagnation in living standards in a few countries—including the UK, one of four G20 economies where wages were lower in real terms than they were at the time of the global financial crisis in 2008.

The trend marks a sharp acceleration of a long-running decline. The ILO said labour’s share of global GDP had fallen 1.6 percentage points since it first began publishing data in 2004, representing a loss of $2.4 trillion after adjusting for inflation, and that 40 percent of the drop had taken place since 2019. The worst affected were workers in Africa, the Americas and the Arab states.

The much-vaunted economic growth that was supposed to lead to greater prosperity and incomes for all is a cover for increasing the wealth of a small proportion of the world’s population, the owners of capital, not those who labour to create wealth. Far from improving the position of workers, economic growth led to a deterioration, with far worse to come.

The implementation of artificial intelligence is likely to affect around one quarter of the global workforce, particularly those in medium-skill occupations such as clerical support workers, service and sales workers, craft and retail trades workers and plant and machine operators and assemblers.

All the ILO report could offer as an answer was to encourage governments to ensure that “the gains of economic progress are fairly shared” by working to strengthen “labour market institutions that uphold fundamental principles and rights at work, promote social dialogue, and reinforce collective bargaining.” The latter refers to the trade union bureaucracy, whose real role is to police the class struggle on the corporations’ behalf.

Nevertheless, the ILO’s findings illustrate why, when the world’s handful of multibillionaires deprive billions of people of their rights, including the right to a decent standard of living, they must turn ever more forcefully to repression and dictatorship.