Ben McGrath
The Japanese government has announced that it will use the current
parliamentary session to push through a raft of legislation to codify
its “re-interpretation” of the country’s constitution to allow for
“collective self-defense.” Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is exploiting the
current hostage crisis, in which Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)
has killed one Japanese citizen and continues to hold another, in a bid
to overcome public opposition to remilitarisation.
The regular
150-day session of the Japanese parliament or Diet that began on Monday
is the first since the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) won
reelection in December. Among some 80 bills expected to be submitted are
10 to remove restrictions on the Self-Defense Forces (SDF), Japan’s
military. The LDP will begin negotiations with its coalition partner
Komeito in early February and plans to submit the bills for a vote
following April’s local elections.
Speaking to Japan’s NHK public
broadcaster on Sunday, Abe declared: “The legislation is aimed at
protecting the lives and well-being of the people by structuring a
seamless legal security structure. For example, if Japanese abroad come
under harm’s way, as in the recent case, the Self-Defense Forces
currently aren’t able to fully utilize their abilities.”
These new
laws are being drawn up not to protect Japanese citizens, but to
facilitate the Japanese military’s involvement in US wars of aggression,
in particular its war preparations against China as part the US “pivot
to Asia.” The legislation is in line with new defense guidelines that
Washington and Tokyo agreed to last October.
The legislation will
allow Abe to dispatch the SDF overseas without seeking the Diet’s
approval. Currently, each time the militarily is sent abroad, a new law
must be passed authorizing the mission, as was the case in Japan’s
military support for the US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
The
proposed laws will ensure that Japan is more closely integrated into US
war planning in Asia against China. The Pentagon regards its military
bases in Japan as crucial components of its “AirSea Battle” strategy,
which envisages a massive missile and air attack on Chinese mainland
bases, missile sites, command centers and communications. Japan is also
critical to another element of US military planning, for an economic
blockade of China.
Other laws are specifically directed against
China. These include allowing the prime minister to dispatch the SDF if
foreign ships or people enter the waters around Japanese islands or land
on the islands themselves. The disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands in the
East China Sea have been at the centre of sharp tensions with China
since the Japanese government provocatively nationalised them in 2012 by
purchasing three of the islands from their private owner.
A
particularly insidious bill will allow the government to restrict the
rights of Japanese citizens if Japan is attacked or threatened with an
attack. The legislation will give the government broad scope to crack
down on anti-war protests or opposition to remilitarization in Japan, on
the pretext, for example, of a supposed threat from North Korea.
The
Abe government is clearly considering measures that go beyond its
proposals for “collective self-defense.” Reuters reported that at Abe’s
request Japanese officials drafted a briefing paper last Friday to
consider a series of questions, including whether the planned legal
changes would allow Japan to launch a military attack on ISIS to secure
the release of the hostages. The paper’s conclusion that there was no
legal basis for such action could well be used by Abe to press for
further legislative changes.
However, the briefing paper did
conclude that the new legislation would permit Japan to give military
support to the US-led war in Iraq and Syria. “We are proceeding with
consideration of a legal framework to implement support activities
necessary to support other militaries in contributing to Japan’s peace
and safety and the peace and stability of the international community,”
it stated, without directly referring to ISIS.
The current hostage
crisis began on January 20 when ISIS released a video featuring two
Japanese men, Haruna Yukawa and Kenji Goto, and demanding $200 million
for their release. Yukawa was captured last August. Goto attempted to
intercede for Yukawa in October but was also captured. In the video,
ISIS gave a 72-hour deadline for Japan to pay the ransom or the two men
would be killed.
The deadline expired Friday afternoon but it was
not until late Saturday evening that a second video was released
featuring Goto holding a picture of Yukawa, who had been beheaded. ISIS
also changed its demand from a ransom to a prisoner exchange. The
organization is seeking the release of Sajida al-Rishawi, a woman
condemned to death in Jordan for her role in a 2005 terrorist attack at
hotels in the Jordanian capital, Amman. ISIS issued a new threat saying
Goto would be killed along with a Jordanian pilot on Wednesday if its
demands were not met.
In 2013, Abe seized on a hostage crisis in
Algeria, which resulted in the deaths of 10 Japanese citizens, to pass a
new law watering down restrictions on the Japanese military. The law
overturned a ban on Japan sending SDF vehicles, including armored
vehicles, into a conflict zone.
The widespread public opposition
to the government’s constitutional reinterpretation and the planned
legislation finds no expression in the political establishment. The
LDP’s coalition partner, Komeito, which is nominally pacifist, backed
Abe’s constitutional reinterpretation last year and is looking for
cosmetic changes to the new legislation. In relation to providing
logistical support for US wars, spokesman Natsuo Yamaguchi said on
Sunday: “As a basic rule, rear-line support should be to back the
response of the international community based on a UN Security Council
resolution.”
The opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has
yet to formulate a coherent stance on the government’s planned laws.
Newly-installed DPJ leader Katsuya Okada tentatively pointed out that
the legislation would mean Japan would be drawn into US wars. “If the
United States requests more direct involvement, can the Japanese
government refuse it by saying, ‘we only conduct humanitarian aid?’”
However, he did not oppose the legislation, or involvement in US-led
conflicts, outright.
No comments:
Post a Comment