Thomas Gaist
Former Central Intelligence Agency officer Jeffrey Sterling was
found guilty of violating the 1917 Espionage Act Monday for providing
information to the New York Times regarding covert operations
conducted by the CIA against Iran. Sterling was convicted of nine
felonies including illegally possessing and transferring secret
government information. He could receive up to 100 years in prison after
sentencing in late April.
Sterling allegedly spoke to Risen about the CIA efforts, codenamed Operation Merlin, as part of research for Risen’s 2006 book State of War.
Operation Merlin sought to sabotage Iran’s nuclear program by selling
the Iranian government flawed nuclear reactor blueprints through a
foreign intermediary.
Risen resisted years-long efforts by the
Justice Department to force him to testify against Sterling, stating
that he would accept a prison term before doing so. The Obama
administration dropped its efforts to coerce Risen once prosecutors
became convinced they could convict Sterling without Risen taking the
stand.
CIA officers who did testify in the case were concealed
behind a dark screen. The federal prosecution team never introduced
evidence that Sterling even spoke directly to Risen about the Iran
operations. The only correspondence between the two presented to the
court related to a separate issue.
Sterling informed the Senate
Intelligence Committee in 2003-04 about CIA operations against Iran, and
the leak could have originated from Senate staffers, Sterling’s defense
attorney argued, pointing to the prosecution’s lack of direct evidence.
The
case represents yet another victory for the Obama administration’s
assault on investigative journalism, including the secret wiretapping of
the Associated Press to identify “leakers” and the prosecution of
Chelsea (Bradley) Manning for providing information to WikiLeaks. The
administration has prosecuted more cases under the Espionage Act than
all previous presidential administrations combined.
The Obama
administration’s surveillance and prosecution of journalists has
produced a “chilling effect,” with sources in the government and
corporate bureaucracies suddenly going silent, according to leading
journalists. As Risen noted in an interview with the Times last August, President Obama is “the greatest enemy to press freedom in a generation.”
The Obama administration is “going to bring these cases continuously to
demonstrate that type of conduct by a government employee or a
government contractor is going to be prosecuted,” a prominent New York
lawyer told the Washington Post, referring to Sterling’s conviction.
Attorney
General Eric Holder responded by declaring that Sterling’s conviction
was the “just and appropriate outcome” of the trial. Sterling’s
communications with Risen “placed lives at risk” and represented “an
egregious breach of the public trust,” Holder said.
In essence,
Sterling has been convicted for allegedly leaking information about
illegal CIA covert operations, that is, for helping expose a criminal
conspiracy orchestrated at the highest levels of government.
Holder,
on the other hand, has committed grave crimes against the US
Constitution. While serving on behalf of President Obama, Holder has
overseen the destruction of central elements of the US Constitution,
including the right to due process and protection from arbitrary
searches and seizures. The attorney general will be known above all for
his arguments in favor of the right of the president to assassinate US
citizens without any legal procedure.
No comments:
Post a Comment